victims
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Brad Edwards
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Wendy Olsen
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Criminal |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
juror
|
Shared experience |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Other victims
|
Recruitment |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Interaction |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Interaction |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Perpetrator victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional prosecutor affected parties |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Boise
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Glassman
|
Professional counsel for |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Bail hearing | A bail hearing is mentioned where victims have the opportunity to testify. | court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked and enticed victims to recruit other girls | Florida | View |
| N/A | Trip | Victims traveling to meet the defendant and Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A potential trial in the United States for Ms. Maxwell, which is argued to be in the best interes... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sex trafficking scheme | Two states | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims' lawsuit against Dershowitz | Legal proceedings (mentione... | View |
| N/A | Crime | A years-long scheme to sexually abuse underage girls, involving recruitment, payment, and exploit... | New York and Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | Crime | Commercial sex acts with victims who were paid for 'massage' appointments, as charged in Count Five. | Florida | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A bail hearing is mentioned where victims have been given the opportunity to testify. | court | View |
| N/A | Grand jury proceedings | Grand jury testimony was offered in connection with charges proposed against Epstein and Maxwell.... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | Maxwell's trial, during which certain aspects and subject matters of the grand jury transcripts b... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Civil litigation | Some victims made their factual accounts public in the course of civil litigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal process | A potential claims resolution program involving Jeffrey Epstein's Estate. | U.S. Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | Meeting | The CEOS Trial Attorney had meetings with some of the victims after the NPA was signed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Criminal conspiracy/scheme | A criminal scheme discussed in court where Sarah Kellen worked as an assistant for Maxwell and Ep... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Abuse scheme operation | Defendant and Epstein normalized bodily contact and commonly instigated instances of sexual abuse... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) not disclosed to victims | N/A | View |
| 2025-12-01 | N/A | FBI agents hand-delivered letters to victims while conducting interviews. | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Federal judge ruled the plea deal violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | U.S. District Court | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Murders of two known figures | Dubai | View |
| 2025-11-01 | N/A | FBI interviews potential witnesses and victims. | Florida, New York, New Mexico | View |
| 2025-08-06 | N/A | Government moved to unseal grand jury materials without providing notice to victims. | Court | View |
| 2025-08-05 | Legal deadline | Due date for submissions from victims and defendant Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Submission of five letters | Court Docket | View |
| 2025-08-05 | Deadline | Deadline set by the Court for the defendants and victims to set out their positions on the unseal... | United States District Cour... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001695.jpg
This is page 6 of a court filing (Document 36) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 30, 2020. The document outlines protocols for handling 'Confidential Information' during discovery, specifically regarding the protection of PII for victims and witnesses, while noting that victims who have publicly identified themselves on the record are exempt from this confidentiality. It also establishes the procedure for Defense Counsel to challenge confidentiality designations made by the Government.
DOJ-OGR-00001694.jpg
This document is Page 5 of a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines strict protocols prohibiting the Defense team and potential witnesses from publicly disclosing the identities of victims or witnesses found in discovery materials, mandating that such references in court filings be made under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00001684.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the second page of a declaration by Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller. It outlines a disagreement between the U.S. Government and the defense regarding proposed restrictions on the public identification of victims and witnesses in the case. The document specifies the conflicting paragraphs in the proposed orders from both sides and references an accompanying letter for the Government's full reasoning.
DOJ-OGR-00001676.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, defines what constitutes "Confidential Information" provided by the Government during discovery. It specifies that materials containing personal information of victims and witnesses are to be marked confidential, but also establishes a procedure for Defense Counsel to challenge this designation if they disagree, potentially leading to a motion to de-designate the materials.
DOJ-OGR-00001675.jpg
This document is page 5 of a court order (Document 33-1) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on July 28, 2020. The order restricts the defense team and other authorized persons from publicly disclosing or filing the identities of victims and witnesses found in discovery materials. Such information must be filed under seal unless specific written authorization is granted by the Government or the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001653.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated July 27, 2020. It outlines protocols for handling 'Confidential Information' during the discovery process, specifically defining what constitutes confidential material and how personal identification of victims and witnesses must be protected. It also notes that victims or witnesses who have publicly identified themselves are not subject to these specific confidentiality restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00001156.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 18, 2020, is a court motion arguing that victims' accounts against an unnamed defendant are strongly corroborated by both witnesses and documentary evidence. The filing asserts that this evidence will prove the victims interacted with both the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein, particularly when some victims were minors. It also addresses a complaint from the defense's 'Renewed Bail Motion' regarding the sufficiency of the evidence produced.
DOJ-OGR-00001155.jpg
This legal document discusses the corroboration of victims' accounts against a defendant involved in Epstein's criminal scheme to sexually abuse minors. It addresses the defense's arguments regarding the sufficiency of evidence and witness testimony, asserting that multiple victims will provide consistent testimony about the defendant's role in grooming and enticing minor girls. The document also notes that the defendant has abandoned certain legal challenges related to bail after receiving discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00001041.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing the government's argument for detaining a defendant pending trial. The government's representative, Ms. Moe, asserts the defendant is an extreme flight risk, citing her possession of three passports, large sums of money, and international connections. The court clarifies that the government's argument is based solely on flight risk and not on any danger the defendant poses to the community.
DOJ-OGR-00000988.jpg
This page is from a government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated July 2, 2020, arguing for the defendant's detention pending trial. The government argues that despite COVID-19 concerns, the defendant should remain at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) like other inmates, citing her significant assets, foreign ties, and history of evading detection as flight risks. The document also introduces an argument based on the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), noting that victims and their counsel have been contacted and seek her detention.
DOJ-OGR-00000773.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing in the case regarding Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490), dated August 5, 2025. It argues for strict adherence to grand jury secrecy rules (Rule 6(e)) to protect the privacy of victims, many of whom were minors at the time of abuse. The filing outlines specific requested relief, including requiring the government to confer with victims' counsel, conducting judicial in camera reviews of materials, and allowing victims' counsel to review proposed redactions prior to any public release to prevent re-identification.
DOJ-OGR-00000752.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing (Document 66) in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. It argues factors regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials, noting that Epstein is deceased and Maxwell is incarcerated. It states that victim testimony at Maxwell's trial was consistent with law enforcement testimony given to the grand jury and that the government is unaware of any impermissible leaks of the transcripts.
DOJ-OGR-00000739.jpg
This court document, filed on July 22, 2025, orders the Government to file a memorandum of law and submit Epstein grand jury transcripts under seal by July 29, 2025. The Court also sets a deadline of August 5, 2025, for a submission from Epstein's representative and notes that it has not yet received input from victims regarding the potential unsealing of materials.
DOJ-OGR-00000723.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated 2019-09-03, detailing a witness's testimony about a traumatic encounter with Mr. Epstein. The speaker recounts how an 'audition' turned into a 'casting call for prostitution' and mentions Mr. Epstein's connections to powerful individuals like Bill Clinton. The court also expresses gratitude to all participants, victims, and attorneys for their contributions to the hearing and proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00000710.jpg
This document is page 72 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, following Jeffrey Epstein's death. An attorney representing victims addresses the court, acknowledging the likely motion to dismiss the criminal case but passionately arguing that the record should remain open. The speaker emphasizes the systemic betrayal of the victims and requests that those not present be allowed to submit victim impact statements so their voices are officially recorded.
DOJ-OGR-00000650.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, in which a representative for the government addresses the court regarding the victims in the case. The speaker confirms that efforts were made to notify all known victims of the proceeding, in compliance with the Crimes Victims' Rights Act, and notes that both the U.S. Attorney's office and the FBI have been in contact with them. The government also commits to continuing to provide services to the victims even if the indictment is dismissed.
DOJ-OGR-00000649.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A representative for the government is addressing the court, stating that despite the dismissal of the indictment, related investigations and the possibility of civil asset forfeiture will continue. The speaker also confirms that defense counsel is complying with a protective order to return discovery materials and reaffirms the government's commitment to the victims of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000646.jpg
This document is page 8 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019. It discusses the legal concept of 'abatement' following the death of a defendant, citing the Second Circuit case *U.S. v. Wright*. The text explains that upon a defendant's death during a pending appeal, the conviction, indictment, restitution, and forfeiture orders are typically vacated.
DOJ-OGR-00000630.jpg
A court order issued by Judge Richard M. Berman on August 21, 2019, scheduling a hearing for August 27, 2019, regarding the dismissal (*nolle prosequi*) of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death. The order explicitly states that victims and their counsel will be given the opportunity to be heard at this proceeding, citing the public's informational interest in the process.
DOJ-OGR-00000576.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from a case in the Southern District. A speaker, likely a prosecutor, argues against granting bail to a defendant, claiming he is a flight risk due to a lengthy, covert government investigation and his recent indictment. The judge ('THE COURT') questions the speaker about a recent submission that mentioned victims or their counsel oppose the defendant's release and asks if any of them wish to be heard.
DOJ-OGR-00000522.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. A prosecutor is arguing to a judge that the defendant should be detained, citing evidence of witness tampering through payments to associates, and highlighting that the defendant is an 'extraordinary flight risk' due to his immense wealth (over $500 million), six homes, two private islands, and a residence in France.
DOJ-OGR-00000473.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues against granting pretrial release (bail) to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. It cites legal statutes and precedents to establish a presumption against release due to the nature of the charges (sex trafficking of a minor) and the existence of a grand jury indictment. The document also references a letter from the Government which claims Mr. Epstein poses a danger to the community and is likely to intimidate witnesses and obstruct justice if released.
DOJ-OGR-00000412.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 16, 2019, in which a government prosecutor argues for the pretrial detention of a defendant charged with sex trafficking. The prosecutor emphasizes the seriousness of the alleged crimes, which involve years of sexual abuse of dozens of minors in multiple locations. The argument is supported by claims of strong evidence, including credible and corroborated information from victims, witnesses, and a recent search of the defendant's Manhattan mansion.
DOJ-OGR-00000411.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing dated July 16, 2019, details allegations from an indictment against a defendant for sexual abuse of underage girls. The crimes allegedly occurred at his residences in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida, and involved facilitation by employees and associates. The document argues that the defendant, being 'extraordinarily wealthy' with multiple international residences and two private jets, is a significant flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00000349.jpg
This document is a page from a legal memorandum filed by the government arguing for the detention of Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines his extreme wealth, lack of family ties, and extensive assets (including private jets, 15 vehicles, and a private island) as evidence that he poses a significant flight risk. It specifically details his property values in NY and FL and notes over 20 international flights taken between 2018 and 2019.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Damages pursuant to 18 USC 2255. | View |
| N/A | Received | [Redacted Female ... | victims | $0.00 | Financial incentives offered for not speaking w... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Agreement to a means for victims to obtain mone... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Monetary damages for victims mentioned as a req... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to 'settlement payments made ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Agreement to pay attorney fees for victims and ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Mention of 'significant monetary settlements to... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/A... | victims | $0.00 | Victims were paid 'hundreds of dollars' after a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein, Maxwell,... | victims | $0.00 | Cash payments made in connection with each sexu... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Reference to potential monetary damages victims... | View |
| N/A | Paid | victims | Scammers | $250,000.00 | Example amount cited by Epstein regarding how t... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Paid millions of dollars in civil compensation ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Cash settlements in civil suits requiring non-d... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $200.00 | Typical payment per visit for massage sessions ... | View |
| N/A | Received | The Defendant | victims | $0.00 | Promised to help pay for school as part of groo... | View |
| N/A | Received | Restitution Mecha... | victims | $150,000.00 | Mentioned by Sloman as a restitution amount tha... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein/Maxwell | victims | $0.00 | Giving them money and gifts (general mention) | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Cash settlements in civil suits. | View |
| N/A | Received | Compensation Fund | victims | $0.00 | Reference to a compensation fund or incentive f... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | NPA requirement to provide monetary damages/unc... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein/Maxwell (... | victims | $0.00 | Juror mentions victims 'returning repeatedly fo... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Confidential financial settlements reached afte... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Restitution made to victims as part of the nego... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Potential damages paid to victims who elect to ... | View |
Position on proposed disclosure
Letters from victims to the Court setting out their positions on a proposed disclosure, which are due by August 5, 2025.
Victim submissions
The order mentions letters submitted by or on behalf of victims, which were due on August 5, 2025.
Notification process
Informed victims about an opt-in process for receiving future notifications.
Legal Representation/Impact Statements
Victims contacting the attorney recently.
Case Notification
Notifications made to victims regarding the case; phone number and website established.
Notification
Victims accuse prosecutors of deceiving them with 'false notification letters'.
Victim Notification
Notification regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement and Epstein's sentencing terms.
Notice of Agreement / 2255 Rights
Notice provided to victims regarding the agreement clause preserving their rights to proceed under 18 U.S.C. 2255.
Agreement Notice
Notice regarding the condition of the agreement preserving federal remedy for victims.
Resolution of federal investigation
Letters concerning resolution of federal investigation
Status of investigation
Stated case was 'currently under investigation'
Information about the Epstein case/NPA
OPR evaluated representations Villafaña made to victims regarding the case.
Investigation/NPA
Villafaña interviewed victims; OPR investigating if she misled them about the existence of the NPA.
Information about the Epstein case/NPA
OPR evaluated representations Villafaña made to victims regarding the case.
N/A
Villafaña interviewed victims and made misleading representations; failed to inform them specifically of the signed NPA.
Investigation/NPA
Villafaña interviewed victims; OPR investigating if she misled them about the existence of the NPA.
N/A
Villafaña interviewed victims and made misleading representations; failed to inform them specifically of the signed NPA.
Notification of rights/remedy
USAO furnished victims with appropriate notification after Epstein entered guilty pleas.
Status of investigation
Stated case was 'currently under investigation'
Status of Investigation
Misleading letters stating the case was 'under investigation' after NPA was signed.
Revised Victim Notification
A table of contents entry indicates that between August and September 2008, the USAO sent a revised victim notification letter after a court order.
Resolution of federal investigation
Informed victims that state pleas had resolved the federal investigation.
Notification of upcoming events and rights
Sloman informed Lefkowitz of his intent to send a letter to victims after COB on Thursday, November 29, to meet statutory obligations.
Resolution of federal case and eligibility for monetary d...
A written notice prepared by Villafaña to inform victims of the federal case resolution, their eligibility for monetary damages, and inviting them to appear at the state plea hearing.
Status of investigation
Stated case was 'currently under investigation'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity