| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Joscha Bach
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Google
|
Critic subject of criticism |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joscha Bach
|
Debate intellectual opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Meeting participant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawrence Krauss
|
Academic recruitment |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-29 | N/A | Planned meeting or event with 'Noam' (inferred from 'Saturday' mention on Friday 06/28/19). | Unknown | View |
| 2019-06-29 | N/A | Meeting/Interaction involving 'Noam' | Unknown | View |
| 2017-01-07 | N/A | Noam going to Tucson | Tucson, AZ | View |
| 2016-07-10 | N/A | An intellectual discussion or meeting took place where Joscha Bach felt he 'embarrassed' himself ... | Unknown | View |
| 2016-07-09 | N/A | A discussion or meeting occurred where Joscha Bach felt he was an 'embarrassment'. The conversati... | Unknown | View |
| 2016-07-09 | N/A | Meeting or discussion involving Joscha Bach, Jeffrey Epstein, and Noam Chomsky. | Unknown | View |
| 2016-07-09 | N/A | Joscha Bach participated in a discussion where he felt he was an 'embarrassment' and made a point... | Unknown | View |
An email thread from January 2017 between Valeria Chomsky (wife of Noam Chomsky) and Jeffrey Epstein. Valeria sends belated birthday wishes to Epstein, noting his birthday aligns with the inauguration, and discusses travel logistics between Cambridge and Arizona. Epstein mentions he was in Cambridge ('there') the previous day, missing them, while Valeria expresses hope that she and Noam will see him soon.
An email chain from December 2016 between Jeffrey Epstein (Jeffrey E.) and ASU physicist Lawrence Krauss. Epstein informs Krauss that 'noam' (likely Noam Chomsky) is visiting Tucson; Krauss invites Epstein to accompany 'noam' to a potential AI meeting in Phoenix and reveals confidential plans to recruit 'noam' to ASU. The thread also includes a debate on climate change, with Epstein sharing a skeptic's video and Krauss dismissing the source's scientific validity.
This document is page 41 of a 42-page legal text, specifically from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), containing footnotes 226 through 238. The text references various legal studies, statutes, and articles concerning prosecutorial discretion, domestic violence laws, political influence on sentencing, and the independence of prosecutors in the US and abroad (Australia, Ireland, Canada). The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
Digital message log from June 29-30, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted associate. The conversation discusses 'Noam' (likely Noam Chomsky given the mention of age 90) being in pain and needing to be scheduled for filming. Epstein also details his travel itinerary: landing in New York on Sunday, flying to his island on Tuesday afternoon, and then traveling to Paris.
This document contains a log of digital messages from late June 2019 between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses logistics involving deploying personnel to Tucson, Arizona, and confirms a meeting or preparation for 'Noam' on the upcoming Saturday. The document originates from a House Oversight collection.
An email exchange between Jakob Köllhofer (Director of DAI Heidelberg) and Professor Lawrence Krauss regarding Krauss's potential participation in an event on October 19. Krauss requests coverage for a 4500 Euro ticket, but Köllhofer counters with a final offer of a '5k' lump sum, citing budget constraints due to the expensive booking of a prominent Nobel laureate.
This document is a page from a correspondence (likely an email found in the House Oversight production) discussing the intersection of neuroscience, artificial intelligence, and linguistics. It references Google's DeepMind acquisition, specific machine learning milestones from 2015, and Noam Chomsky's linguistic theories, while also forwarding a controversial hypothesis linking race, motor development, and IQ. The document includes Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025964.
This document is a page from an email written by 'Joscha' (likely cognitive scientist Joscha Bach) discussing the state of Artificial Intelligence and machine learning. The text covers topics such as universal cortical learning, Google's image recognition errors, DeepMind's reinforcement learning in Atari games, and criticisms of Noam Chomsky's linguistic theories. The author also references their own presentation at a NIPS workshop regarding 'request-confirmation networks' and makes a controversial claim correlating race, motor development, and IQ.
An email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein following a meeting that included Noam Chomsky. Bach apologizes for his performance during the meeting and elaborates on his theories regarding cognitive science, specifically discussing genetic developmental switches, comparisons between human and ape brain development, and controversial racial comparisons regarding cognitive versus motor development.
This document appears to be a page from a correspondence (likely between Jeffrey Epstein and a scientific contact) discussing evolutionary psychology and artificial intelligence. The text compares human and gorilla cognitive development, theorizes about the origins of language, and discusses advancements in machine learning by Google and DeepMind. It includes a controversial statement linking race, motor development, and IQ, and references 'Noam' (likely Chomsky).
This document compares the prolonged developmental period in humans to that of gorillas, suggesting the extended learning phase allows for greater cognitive abstraction. It discusses the role of motivation and reward systems in learning, drawing parallels to machine learning advancements like Google's image recognition and DeepMind's Atari-playing AI. The text concludes by noting the limitations of current AI models and referencing Noam Chomsky's criticism of machine translation.
This document is an email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein dated July 10, 2016. Bach apologizes for an 'embarrassment' during a recent intellectual discussion with Noam Chomsky, shares his theories on linguistics and child development, and provides a separate, critical analysis of Joi Ito's public communication methods. The email contains controversial statements regarding racial differences in child development and indicates a collegial relationship between Bach and Epstein.
This document is an essay comparing human and animal learning with contemporary machine learning, referencing Google, DeepMind, and AI research from circa 2015. The author discusses theories on intelligence, including a controversial hypothesis linking race, motor development, and IQ. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026410' suggests it is an exhibit from a congressional investigation, but the text contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals, locations, or events.
This document is an email from AI researcher Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein, dated July 10, 2016. Bach discusses a recent academic debate he had with 'Noam' (likely Chomsky), analyzes the communication style of 'Joi' (likely Ito), and presents his controversial theories on child development and cognition. The email, marked as evidence from a House Oversight investigation, highlights the intellectual and social circle Epstein cultivated.
This document is an email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein, dated July 10, 2016, with a brief follow-up message. Bach apologizes for an 'embarrassment' during a recent discussion with Noam Chomsky and proceeds to detail his theories on cognitive development, including controversial claims about racial differences. The follow-up note reflects on the purpose of communication, citing 'Joi' (likely Joi Ito).
This document is an email from an individual named Joscha to an unnamed recipient, discussing advanced topics in artificial intelligence and machine learning, referencing Google, DeepMind, and Noam Chomsky. A legal disclaimer at the bottom indicates the communication is the property of 'JEE' (likely Jeffrey E. Epstein) and provides a contact email, 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026397' suggests the document is from a collection related to a U.S. House of Representatives investigation.
This document is an essay presenting a theory on human cognitive development, suggesting it is based on simple 'developmental switches' rather than complex innate circuits. The author makes controversial comparisons between developmental speeds and IQ across different races and draws parallels to machine learning, citing a 2015 incident where Google's AI misidentified Black people. Despite the 'Epstein-related' prompt, the document's content does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or any known associates; its only potential connection is a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' document label.
This document is an email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein, dated shortly after July 10, 2016. Bach thanks Epstein for his support and provides commentary on fascism, Jeffrey's 'political incorrectness', and a 'Forbidden Research conference.' He also offers a detailed critique of Joi Ito's communication style, alleging that Ito has others write his work for him.
Chomsky shares a draft/thoughts on the Iran deal, criticizing US and Israeli policy and media coverage.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity