| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers confirms sending flight manifests, which were separate from the logbook, to Epstein's New York office on a monthly basis. The witness explicitly denies ever sending these manifests to Ghislaine.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the procedures for scheduling flights for Mr. Epstein during the 1990s. Rodgers confirms that while he occasionally spoke with Mr. Epstein or Ghislaine directly, the primary point of contact for scheduling was typically Epstein's secretary in New York.
This is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca questions witness Ms. Hesse about her knowledge of women visiting Jeffrey Epstein for massages when Ghislaine Maxwell was not present, which Hesse confirms based on messages she took. The testimony also establishes that Hesse knew Maxwell had a home in New York but was unaware of a residence in Miami.
This document is a page from the court testimony of a witness named Shawn in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Shawn testifies about being with an individual named Carolyn in West Palm Beach when Carolyn received a package from New York containing lingerie and a movie. Shawn also confirms visiting Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house with Carolyn, Virginia, Tony, and two other unidentified individuals.
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Carolyn) filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies between the witness's current memory and a statement she gave to the FBI in 2007 regarding who called her about 'Incubus tickets' (Sarah or Epstein). The questioning also establishes that Sarah called the witness to convey that Epstein wanted to take photographs of her.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on a 2007 interview Carolyn had with the FBI, establishing that she discussed individuals like Sarah, Epstein, and Virginia Roberts, but never mentioned Ghislaine Maxwell. Carolyn testifies that Maxwell was not mentioned because she was not the subject of the FBI's inquiry at that time.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that she gave her address to someone named Maxwell so that Jeffrey Epstein could send her gifts, which included lingerie from Victoria's Secret, a massage book, and concert tickets. She also confirms that other females, including a person named Virginia, were present in the room when she was massaging Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She testifies that Ms. Maxwell paid her $300 in cash after she engaged in a "sexualized massage" with Jeffrey Epstein. Carolyn also states she received lingerie as a gift from Epstein, delivered via a FedEx package with a return address from Manhattan, New York, to her home in West Palm Beach.
This document is a court transcript page from a direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that a person named Maxwell invited her to an island, but she declined, stating she was only 14. Despite knowing her age, Maxwell allegedly continued to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn with Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that she grew up in New York, moved to Florida in 1999, dropped out of school in the seventh grade, and has struggled with addiction to pain pills and cocaine.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning attorney establishes that the witness does not know the physical location of a desktop computer at the time certain exhibits were created, suggesting it could have been in Florida, New York, or elsewhere. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, makes two objections during this line of questioning, both of which are overruled by the court.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of FBI Special Agent Maguire by Ms. Moe. Maguire identifies Government Exhibit 54 as a hard drive found in a plastic bin within an office, originally part of Exhibit 935R. He explains that the hard drive bears a barcode from the FBI's New York Computer Analysis Response Team (CART), verifying it was processed as digital evidence.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a legal argument over the admissibility of photo exhibits dated from 2019. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues the photos demonstrate Jeffrey Epstein's sexual preference for schoolgirls, while the defense (Mr. Everdell) and the Judge question the relevance given the time gap and location discrepancies (New York vs. Palm Beach) relative to the charged conspiracy. The text mentions testimony from a witness named 'Kate' regarding schoolgirl outfits.
Excerpt from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Rohrbach seeks clarification from the Judge regarding testimony about a search of the New York residence. The discussion confirms that while the government will not introduce physical exhibits of nude photos or photos of Epstein with celebrities, the witness is permitted to testify about observing these items and 'nude artwork' in the house.
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Kate in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The witness admits to initiating contact with Jeffrey Epstein in 2011, asking to stay with him in New York, and maintaining contact with him via email over the years. Conversely, the witness confirms she had no email correspondence with Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, who admits to initiating email contact with Jeffrey Epstein to arrange a meeting and asking to stay at his residence in New York. Ms. Pomerantz objects to several lines of questioning during the proceedings.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the consistency of her statements regarding alleged incidents in New York and New Mexico, and specifically probes the details she provided to a victims compensation fund about a foot massage involving Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms submitting a narrative claim and affirms the general details of the incidents while not recalling the exact words used.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The questioning focuses on a form submitted to the victims' compensation program where the witness identified locations of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Specific locations discussed include a movie theater in New York, New York City generally, and New Mexico.
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The testimony focuses on an incident in a New Mexico movie theater where Jeffrey Epstein held the witness's hand. The defense establishes that while Ghislaine Maxwell was sitting on the other side of Epstein, the witness does not know if Maxwell saw the contact, and Maxwell did not comment on it afterward.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger. They are arguing over the relevance of an August 2019 email in which the witness, A. Farmer, recounts her memory of a 2007 meeting with the FBI. Ms. Menninger argues it tests the witness's memory regarding events in 1996, but the judge ultimately sustains an objection, ruling the evidence is 'two steps removed' and irrelevant.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on Farmer's past trips to Mexico and New York, their feelings about New York, a 'movie theater incident,' and a journal entry in which Farmer recorded their impressions of Epstein as being 'down to earth and easy to talk to'.
This document is an excerpt from a legal cross-examination dated August 10, 2022, involving Ms. Menninger questioning A. Farmer. The testimony focuses on entries made by Farmer after returning from New York, specifically confirming details about attending 'Phantom of the Opera', visiting Mr. Epstein's home, meeting Maria's boyfriend, and going cross-country skiing during a trip. Ms. Pomerantz also addresses 'Your Honor' during the proceeding.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, specifically regarding the admission of a journal entry (Exhibit AF1, Bates AFarmer10472) written by Farmer before a trip to New York. The government, represented by Ms. Pomerantz, agrees that no redactions are necessary for this specific page.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about the consistency of her journaling habits during high school, specifically referencing journals from trips to Thailand and New York. The attorney also challenges the witness regarding a statement made to the government in September 2019 about maintaining a journal throughout high school.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about a trip to New York during her junior year (age 16) and whether she used a journal to refresh her memory during a September 2019 meeting with the government. Farmer contests the interpretation of a summary document presented by the defense regarding exactly how she determined her age at the time.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity