New York

Location
Mentions
6508
Relationships
2
Events
0
Documents
2987
Also known as:
New York-New York Hotel & Casino New York-New York Atlanta, Chicago, New York, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, Phoenix, San Francisco, Tulsa New York New York New York City New York, NY 620 Eighth Ave., New York, NY 10018 New York City, NY 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10022 345 Park Avenue, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10154 345 Park Avenue, NYC 20-2606, New York, NY 10154-0004 320 EAST 82 ST | NEW YORK | NY State of New York West Village, New York Coney Island, New York SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK New York Stock Exchange (subject of artwork) New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange, New York Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), New York New York, N.Y. Armonk, New York New York, New York One Hogan Place, New York, New York 10013 New York County, New York 85 Broad Street, New York, NY 10004 240 Central Park South, New York, NY 10019 511 6th Ave, New York NY 10011 New York City (N.Y.C.) 1 Central Park West #32F, New York, NY 10023 950 5th Avenue, New York, New York 10021 1260 Ave. of the Americas, New York 125 West 18th St., New York Pier 59, at Chelsea Piers, New York 475 10th Ave., New York 11 West 42nd Street, New York New York University New York Office 18 West 10th St, New York, NY 900 Park Ave, New York, NY 40 East 62nd St, New York 10021 New York (NY) 655 Park Avenue, New York NY 10021 142 W 57th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10019 Metropolitan Pavilion, 125 West 18th St., New York 336 East 69th Street, New York, NY 10021 21 East 70th St., New York 10021 208 E. 90th Street, New York, NY 10128 9 East 68th St., New York, New York 10022 130 West 56th Street, New York, New York 10019 1 Beekman Place, New York, NY 10022 Upper East Side, New York Town Hall, New York 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor, New York, NY 10022 New York mansion 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10022 40 Wall (New York) New York State 60 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10012 142 Greene St. #5, New York, NY 10012 10 Lincoln Center Plaza, New York Grand Hyatt New York, Park Ave. at Grand Central Terminal, New York 365 Fifth Ave., New York Yonkers, New York 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Ossining, New York New York (N.Y.) New York (implied by area code 212 and NYT affiliation) Eastern District of New York Fifth Avenue (New York) New York office New York Stock Exchange (subject of photo) 153 E 53 St. 18th Fl., New York, New York 10022 110 E 59 St, Floor 28, New York, New York 10022 110 East End Ave., New York, NY 10021 332 E. 84th St, #1G, New York, NY 10028 570 Park Avenue # 2B, New York, NY 10021 N.Y.C (New York City) NY (New York) 60 Greene Street, New York 333 West 23rd St., New York (SVA Theatre) 655 West 34th St., New York (Javits Center) New York Public Library 462 7th Ave 2nd Fl, New York, NY 10018 Southern District of New York 1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036 450 Park Avenue, New York Joyce Theater, 175 Eighth Ave., New York The Pierre Hotel, 2 East 61st St., New York Gotham Hall, 1356 Broadway, New York 85 Broad Street, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10004 246 Spring St., New York 324 E. 57th, New York, 10022 New York Museum of Modern Art 767 5th Avenue 46th fl., New York, NY 10153 813 Park Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10021 42 E. 58th Street, New York Liberty, New York 575 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 315 East 14th Street, New York 172 Norfolk St., New York 950 3rd Ave, New York, NY 1 East 66th St, New York, NY 10021 8 Spruce Street (New York) New York (Broadcast studio location) 810 Seventh Ave., Suite 620, New York, NY 10019 New York Presbyterian Hospital Foley Square, New York (Implied) New York property New York Southern (UNYS) Latham, New York New York Field Office NYM (New York) New York (implied by NYPD/FBI NY context) New York (implied by N. (NY) and NYPD) Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), New York (implied) New York, NY 10022-6843 New York Office (NYO) MCC (Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York) 40 Foley, New York New York, NY (implied by office names) 9 East 67th Street, New York New York (implied by 'NY' in case number) New York (implied by Field Office) MCC New York (implied by BOP and context of Epstein case) FBI New York Office New York Presbyterian/Cornell Medical Center 299 Park Avenue, New York NY 10171-0002 New York (Epstein Residence) New York (Grand Jury location) New York Co. SDNY Office (1 St. Andrew’s Plaza, New York, NY) New York, NY 10001 9 E 71st St, New York, NY MCC (New York) 500 Pearl St, New York, NY 500 Pearl St., New York, NY 66 John Street, New York, NY One Penn Plaza, Suite 4715, New York, NY 10119 301 E. 66th Street, New York, NY 875 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10002 919 Third Ave, New York, NY 10022 New York, NY 10278 MCC New York (Implied) 55 Hudson Yards, New York, NY New York (implied by 'your fair city' and NYPD context) New York, NY (1 St. Andrew's Plaza) New York, NY 10003 New York Headquarters 10 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10020 Shore Haven (New York) 521 5th Avenue, New York, NY 10175 467 10th Ave, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 230 FIFTH, 230 Fifth Ave., New York OCME, 421 E. 26th St, New York, NY

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person CAROLYN
Origin
1
1
View
person Maria
Resident
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00013515.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony establishes Rodgers' employment history starting in 1991 and tracks the employer's (contextually Jeffrey Epstein) movements between New York residences, specifically a property on 69th Street and the move to the 9 East 71st Street townhouse in 1996.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013514.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony establishes that when Epstein first bought a specific property (implied to be the New Mexico ranch), the main house was not built, and Epstein stayed in a trailer while the witness stayed in a bunkhouse at 'Ranch Central.' The questioning then pivots to discuss where Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell lived in New York starting in 1990.

Court transcript (cross examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013467.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers confirms sending flight manifests, which were separate from the flight logbook and also held by Larry Visoski, to Epstein's New York office on a monthly basis. The witness explicitly denies sending these same manifests to Ghislaine.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013453.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers testifies about the process of scheduling flights during the 1990s, stating that while they occasionally spoke directly with Mr. Epstein or Ghislaine, the primary point of contact was typically Epstein's secretary in New York.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013373.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Hesse, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Ms. Hesse testifies that she knew women came to a residence to give massages, even when Maxwell was absent, and that she took messages for them. She also confirms knowing about Maxwell's home in New York but denies any knowledge of a residence in Miami.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013326.jpg

This document is a page from the court testimony of a witness named Shawn (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony describes an incident where an individual named Carolyn received a package via FedEx in West Palm Beach containing lingerie and a movie, sent from New York. The witness also confirms visiting Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house with Carolyn, Virginia, Tony, and two other unidentified individuals.

Court transcript / testimony
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010757.jpg

This legal document, filed on June 29, 2022, argues for the immediate unsealing of a defendant's motion for a new trial and related documents, such as juror questionnaires. The argument is based on the First Amendment right of public access to court proceedings, which is asserted to be particularly strong when allegations of juror misconduct are involved. The document contends that the public interest in transparency is significant, especially in a high-profile case, and that no sufficient justification for sealing the documents has been provided.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010721.jpg

This legal document is a victim's statement detailing her experience with Epstein and Maxwell. The narrator recounts being offered a job, which she declined, leading to anger from Maxwell. Later, Maxwell re-established contact, manipulated the narrator into a trip to Florida that cost her her job, and then began a three-year period of trafficking, rape, and assault in New York and Florida.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010718.jpg

This document is a page from a victim impact statement filed in June 2022 for the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The survivor describes the trauma of attending the trial in New York, expresses frustration that high-profile "enablers" (politicians and wealthy friends) have not been exposed, and characterizes Maxwell as the "manager" of a massive trafficking conspiracy who lacks human decency.

Legal filing / victim impact statement
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010706.jpg

This document is page 15 of a legal filing (Document 675) from June 2022 arguing for the importance of allowing victims to speak at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. It quotes Victim Impact Statements from two survivors, 'Sarah' (from England) and 'Elizabeth' (from Philadelphia), who describe the therapeutic value of the trial and the validation of their trauma after decades of silence. The document asserts that public victim statements serve the broader interest of building confidence in the justice system regarding the Maxwell conspiracy.

Court filing (legal brief/memorandum)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010701.jpg

This document is page 10 of a legal filing from June 25, 2022, related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the court has broad discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3661 to hear from individuals during sentencing, even if they do not strictly meet the definition of a 'victim' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It cites various legal precedents to support the admission of statements from 'affected individuals,' specifically mentioning 'Sarah' at the very end of the page.

Legal filing (court document)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010700.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that federal courts have extremely broad and largely unlimited authority to consider information about a defendant during sentencing. It cites legal precedents and the federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 3661, which states 'no limitation' shall be placed on such information. The document specifically mentions that crucial information about an individual named Maxwell's 'background, character, and conduct' was possessed by two other individuals, Sarah and Elizabeth.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010693.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that two of Ghislaine Maxwell's victims, Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, should be permitted to give oral victim impact statements at her upcoming sentencing. It provides factual background on the sex trafficking conspiracy Maxwell and her coconspirator, Jeffrey Epstein, ran for over a decade. The document details how they targeted young women, like Ransome and Stein, who came to New York for the fashion industry, by preying on their vulnerabilities and promising career advancement in exchange for sexual favors.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010677.jpg

This document is a victim impact statement from Sarah Ransome, filed for the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. Ransome recounts being recruited at age 22 in New York by Natalya Malyshev and subsequently being sexually abused for months by Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and others in New York and on Epstein's private island. She describes Maxwell as a master manipulator and the central organizer of the abuse network, calling her the 'Five Star General' of Epstein's operation.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010664.jpg

This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, counsel for Annie Farmer, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 22, 2022. It provides Annie Farmer's victim impact statement regarding the crimes committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, and requests permission for Ms. Farmer to make an oral statement at Maxwell's sentencing. The statement details the profound and ongoing psychological and emotional impact of the abuse on Annie Farmer.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010569.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a defendant's actions satisfy the requirements for a 'covered sex crime' under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The prosecution asserts that the defendant engaged in a pattern of prohibited sexual conduct, including transporting victims (Jane) and non-consensual touching (Jane and Carolyn), justifying a sentencing enhancement. The document refutes the defendant's claim that the guideline is inapplicable, citing case law and the original congressional intent to ensure lengthy incarceration for such offenders.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010511.jpg

This document is a character reference letter from Harriett Jagger, filed as part of a legal case. Jagger describes her 45-year friendship with a person named Ghislaine, portraying her as a warm, loyal, and devoted individual who craved a family life. Jagger contrasts her personal knowledge of Ghislaine with the negative portrayal she reads in the media, asserting that it is not a true representation of her friend.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010498.jpg

This document is page 2 of a character reference letter filed in court on June 15, 2022, written by a sibling of Ghislaine Maxwell. The author defends Maxwell's character, citing her qualifications as a helicopter and submersible pilot and EMT to refute labels like 'socialite.' The letter highlights her family dedication, specifically caring for their mother in France, and her philanthropic work founding The TerraMar Project in 2012 for ocean conservation.

Court filing (character reference letter)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010492.jpg

This document is a character reference letter from James “Jamie” Martin Hollomon to a judge, filed on June 15, 2022, as part of a legal case. Hollomon advocates for a lenient sentence for an unnamed female defendant, attesting to her good character and arguing that she has learned her lesson and will dedicate her life to social causes. The letter references the defendant's past negative experience with someone named Epstein as a catalyst for her desire to do good in the world.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010469.jpg

This document page, filed on June 15, 2022, details the strict confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. It describes her total isolation from other inmates, 24-hour surveillance by high-level BOP staff (including while showering), and sleep deprivation tactics such as constant lighting and flashlight checks every 15 minutes. A footnote highlights the 'enormous expenditure' of this individualized detention for a non-violent inmate.

Legal filing (court document - case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010467.jpg

This document is page 21 of a sentencing memorandum filed by the defense for Ghislaine Maxwell on June 15, 2022. The defense argues for a 'non-guidelines sentence' (downward variance), contending that Maxwell should not be treated as harshly as Jeffrey Epstein (who they argue was more culpable) or Harvey Weinstein (who received 23 years for forcible rape). The text highlights that the Probation Department recommended 240 months, while the Guidelines range was 292-365 months, which the defense claims is unjust given her age (60), the age of the offenses (18-28 years prior), and her lack of criminal history.

Legal filing (sentencing memorandum)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010463.jpg

This document is page 17 of a sentencing memorandum filed in June 2022. It presents character statements (Exhibits F and G) from Catherine Vaughan-Edwards and Harriet Jagger, who describe Ghislaine Maxwell as a supportive friend and express sympathy for her desire for family life. The document transitions (Exhibit H) into a legal argument citing Supreme Court precedent regarding advisory sentencing guidelines.

Court filing (sentencing memorandum)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010458.jpg

This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details the biographical background of Ghislaine Maxwell, focusing on her family's financial troubles in the 1970s and her father Robert Maxwell's controlling nature. It outlines her education at Marlborough College and Oxford, her early work history in Spain and France, and her relocation to New York in 1991 to launch 'The European' magazine shortly before her father's death.

Court filing (sentencing memorandum/background history)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010448.jpg

This is page 1 (marked as page 2 of the filing) of a sentencing memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests a sentence significantly below the guideline range of 292-365 months and below the Probation Department's recommended 240 months. The text argues that Maxwell is being unfairly treated as a proxy for the deceased Jeffrey Epstein, whom the defense characterizes as the true mastermind and principal abuser.

Legal filing (sentencing memorandum)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010414.jpg

This document is a letter from the United States Attorney to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter concerns the government's motion for the exclusion of time for Counts Seven and Eight under the Speedy Trial Act until June 28, 2022, the scheduled date of sentencing.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity