| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues against a defendant's motion to dismiss enticement charges. Rohrbach contends that the defendant, along with an associate named Epstein, manipulated a person named Jane by building a multi-year relationship and playing on her 'hopes and desires' to entice her to travel to New York. This conduct, Rohrbach argues, squarely meets the legal definition of enticement, and therefore the charges should stand.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It contains defense arguments asserting that Ghislaine Maxwell did not 'entice' a victim known as 'Jane' to travel for illegal purposes, arguing that return trips to Palm Beach do not constitute enticement to commit crimes in New York. The defense emphasizes testimony stating that Jeffrey Epstein's office typically handled travel arrangements, with Maxwell only occasionally assisting.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. An unnamed speaker makes a legal argument to a judge, defining the terms "persuade, induce, entice" as words of causation by citing the legal precedent U.S. v. Broxmeyer and definitions from the Random House Dictionary. The argument is framed in the context of testimony from a witness named Jane regarding Ms. Maxwell's alleged involvement in her travel to New York.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, featuring defense attorney Mr. Everdell moving for a judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(a) on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. Everdell argues that the government's evidence is insufficient to prove the charges in the S2 indictment, specifically focusing on Counts One and Two (enticement and conspiracy). He contends that the prosecution has failed to prove that Maxwell persuaded the witness 'Jane' to travel to New York for illegal sex acts.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a witness's testimony about their interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness states that Epstein, identified as "Maria's boss," called them at least six times, beginning in December 1995, to offer to fly a young woman named Annie to New York to visit Maria for Christmas. Epstein also offered to help guide Annie's college selection and introduce her to helpful people, and the witness confirms they gave Annie permission for the trip.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Swain, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony covers Ms. Swain's relationship with a young woman named Annie, including discussions about college, and also touches on an individual named Maria who lived in New York in 1995. The witness confirms having spoken with Jeffrey Epstein on the phone, and the transcript records a sustained hearsay objection by another attorney, Ms. Menninger.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mulligan. Mulligan testifies about a conversation with his then-girlfriend, Annie, regarding a trip she took to New York to visit her sister, Maria. Mulligan recounts that Annie told him she, Maria, and Jeffrey Epstein went to a show where Epstein sat between the sisters and inappropriately touched Annie's leg. Annie reportedly felt unable to speak up because Epstein provided significant career opportunities for her sister, Maria.
This document is a page from a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Mulligan, filed on August 10, 2022. Mulligan testifies about his past romantic relationship with a woman named Annie, which ended in 2003, and their current friendship. He also describes Annie's family situation in high school, stating she lived with her sister, Ashley, and their single mother, who he believed was struggling financially.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on Farmer's application to a victims compensation fund, specifically regarding whether incidents of 'hand-holding' and 'caressing' in movie theaters in New York and New Mexico were categorized as sexual abuse. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects to the line of questioning, but is overruled by the Court.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness identified as A. Farmer. The questioning centers on a document from a victims' compensation program in which Farmer identified New York City and New Mexico as locations of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The discussion clarifies the specific entries made by the witness on the form.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on an incident in a New Mexico movie theater where Epstein held Farmer's hand. Farmer confirms the event, states it was 'more blatant' than a similar incident in New York, and clarifies that while Ghislaine Maxwell was present, Farmer does not know if Maxwell saw the hand-holding and that Maxwell said nothing about it.
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness A. Farmer) filed on August 10, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The witness confirms speaking to Jeffrey Epstein on the phone regarding a trip to Thailand and admits speaking to him between her trips to New York and New Mexico. The defense attorney also questions the witness about discussions with her sister and asks if she ever spoke to Ghislaine Maxwell on the phone.
This document is page 108 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) regarding a journal entry she wrote in January 1996. The questioning focuses on how hindsight affects her perception of events that occurred in New Mexico and New York, specifically referencing a 'movie theater incident' involving an unnamed male ('him').
This document is a page of a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on a trip Farmer took to New York, confirming their attendance at various events like a Blue Man Group show and a New Year's Eve party. The questioner highlights that the witness did not mention Ghislaine Maxwell in their journal from that trip, using the journal as a basis for memory recall.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on the witness's prior trips to Mexico and New York, her positive feelings about New York, and a journal entry she wrote after a 'movie theater incident' in which she described someone named Epstein as 'down to earth and easy to talk to'.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a journal entry written by Farmer regarding a trip to New York, where she visited bars and saw bands. The attorney highlights her emotional state upon returning, noting she felt depressed to be home and that the trip changed her outlook on life, comparing this feeling to a previous trip to Mexico.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on a journal entry the witness wrote after a trip to New York, confirming she visited Jeffrey Epstein's home, attended 'Phantom of the Opera' (which she described as the best night of the trip), went cross-country skiing, and met a woman named Maria's boyfriend.
This document is page 98 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding her past hopes that Epstein (referenced as 'Maria's boss') would pay for her college or help her gain admission. The testimony confirms she wrote these hopes down before traveling to New York but did not mention Ghislaine Maxwell in those specific notes.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The court admits a single page document, Bates labeled AFarmer10472, as exhibit AF1 without objection from the government. Attorney Ms. Menninger then begins questioning the witness about a handwritten journal entry made before a trip to New York.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer (Maria), by an attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding an undated entry about an upcoming trip to New York. The witness confirms her excitement about seeing her sister and meeting a person named Epstein, who had purchased a ticket for her.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the witness's habit of keeping journals during high school, exploring the consistency of this practice and referencing specific journals from trips to Thailand and New York. The questioner also brings up a statement the witness made to the government in September 2019 regarding their journaling.
This document is page 91 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a statement Farmer made to the government in September 2019. The questioning focuses on whether Farmer used a journal to refresh her memory about her age (specifically being 16) during a specific trip to New York in her junior year.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a meeting she had with the FBI and prosecutors in September 2019, specifically probing how she used a personal journal to refresh her memory about past events like a 'movie theater incident' and trips to New Mexico and New York before speaking with them.
This is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Menninger cross-examines witness A. Farmer about a journal entry, establishing that the witness returned from a week-long trip to New York on January 7th, 1996. The questioning references 'Government Exhibit 603', which is the witness's journal.
This document is a page of court testimony from a cross-examination of witness A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on whether Ghislaine Maxwell was part of or mentioned in a conversation the witness had at Mr. Epstein's home in New York, with the witness stating they don't remember. The witness also confirms having filed a civil lawsuit against Maxwell and a claim with the Victims Compensation Fund.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity