| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This document is a page from the rebuttal argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by case number). Comey argues that the testimony of four key witnesses (Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie) is sufficient for a guilty verdict and refutes defense attorney Ms. Menninger's claims regarding age limits at the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Comey also details witness testimony corroborating that the victim 'Annie' was 16, not 17, during a trip to Santa Fe.
This document is page 151 of a court transcript containing the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that Maxwell was not involved with the accuser 'Kate' in New York and that regarding 'Carolyn' and the Palm Beach property, mere presence or management duties do not constitute conspiracy or sex trafficking. The defense emphasizes the lack of physical evidence (message pads, phone records) linking Maxwell to orchestrating massages and notes that Sarah Kellen was present at the property.
This document is a transcript of a closing argument by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues for Maxwell's acquittal on 'Count Six', which relates to an accuser named Carolyn, by attacking Carolyn's credibility and claiming she never traveled to New York as alleged. The attorney also distances Maxwell from any involvement in the travel of another individual, Annie Farmer, to undermine the government's broader conspiracy theory involving Maxwell and Epstein.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. During a direct examination by attorney Ms. Comey, a witness named Mr. Visoski identifies Government Exhibits 932 and 704 as fair and accurate photos of Mr. Epstein's brownstone residence at 9 East 71st Street in New York. With no objection from opposing counsel Mr. Everdell, the court admits the exhibits into evidence.
This document is a transcript of testimony from a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski identifies Juan Alessi and Janusz as house managers for Mr. Epstein in Palm Beach between 1994 and 2004. The witness also states they frequently visited Epstein's Manhattan residence at 9 East 71st Street to handle luggage before flights.
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski provides a detailed walkthrough of Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach property, describing the layout of the main house, including a Florida room, kitchen, and living room. The witness also identifies a separate pool cabana containing Mr. Epstein's gym and personal office, and states there were a total of three structures on the property.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Visoski. Visoski testifies about their employment with "Mr. Epstein," listing numerous residences they visited, including properties in Manhattan, Palm Beach, New Mexico, Paris, and two islands in St. Thomas. The witness recalls their first visit to the Palm Beach residence was in 1991 and states they visited that location frequently to handle luggage.
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski describes being notified of Mr. Epstein's flights by Epstein himself, Ghislaine Maxwell, or other assistants. The witness also recounts first meeting Ghislaine Maxwell in late 1991, describing her as a 30-year-old assistant to Mr. Epstein with a British accent.
This document is a court transcript of an opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim regarding a witness named 'Kate'. The text characterizes Kate as an ambitious former actress and model who maintained a decade-long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, including sending him emails and photos while he was incarcerated. The defense argues Kate was above the age of consent in all relevant jurisdictions (UK, NY, FL) and implies her testimony may be unreliable due to admitted drug use.
This document is a court transcript of an opening statement by an attorney, Ms. Sternheim. She attempts to discredit a witness named Annie by highlighting inconsistencies in her behavior, such as not believing she was a victim until later and keeping boots allegedly bought by Epstein for 25 years. Sternheim also points to a $1.5 million settlement Annie received as a potential motive for her testimony, and argues the events in New Mexico are not relevant to the indictment.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, containing part of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim. The statement describes a young woman named Annie who, at age 16, met Jeffrey Epstein in New York and later traveled to Santa Fe, where she met Ghislaine for the only time. The speaker asserts that nothing criminal occurred during the Santa Fe trip and that Annie was above the age of consent in New Mexico.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) containing the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim. The text details the background of a witness referred to as 'Jane,' describing her artistic upbringing, attendance at the Epstein-sponsored Interlochen program, and visits to Epstein's Palm Beach home where 'nothing amiss happened.' It notes that Jane accepted flights paid for by Epstein but initially refused involvement in the criminal case prior to his 2019 arrest, only changing her mind after his death.
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated October 29, 2021, which discusses the legal standards for the admissibility of expert testimony. It cites several legal precedents, including United States v. Felder and Kumho Tire, to argue that an expert's testimony can be based on personal experience and that it is generally the jury's role, not the court's, to resolve conflicting expert opinions. The document concludes by asserting that the rejection of expert testimony should be an exception.
This document is page 13 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details specific allegations of Maxwell facilitating the sexual abuse of three unnamed minors (Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4) for Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2002. The alleged incidents occurred in various locations, including New Mexico, London, and Florida, and form the basis for Count Two of the indictment, 'Enticement of a Minor to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts'.
This legal document, page 9 of a court filing dated March 24, 2021, details a court's analysis of a dispute between the defendant, Schulte, and the Government over the proper 'relevant community' for jury selection. The court sides with the Government, ruling that the appropriate jury pool is the White Plains master wheel, which draws from all counties in the Southern District, rather than just those that supply jurors to Manhattan where the trial is to be held. This decision is based on legal precedent and the statutory composition of the judicial district.
This document provides a biographical and legal summary of Jeffrey Epstein, detailing his early dismissal from teaching and Bear Stearns, and his subsequent financial rise involving the alleged misappropriation of over $46 million from a redacted client/mentor. It outlines his criminal history, including his 2008 conviction in Florida and the 2019 federal sex trafficking charges that led to his detention without bail shortly before his death.
This document is a memorandum dated September 17, 2019, from Hugh J. Hurwitz (Assistant Director, Reentry Services Division, BOP) to J. Ray Ormond (Regional Director, Northeast Region). It formally discusses the 'Psychological Reconstruction' report following Jeffrey Epstein's suicide on August 10, 2019, at MCC New York. The memo instructs the recipient to review the attached report and provide a written response within 60 days outlining corrective actions and implementation plans to improve the national suicide prevention program.
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing entitled 'Table of Authorities' from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 18, 2020. It lists numerous legal precedents cited in the filing, primarily 'United States v. [Defendant]' cases. Notably, the list includes two citations for 'United States v. Epstein' (one from 2001 in E.D. Pa. and one from 2019 in S.D.N.Y.) and one for 'United States v. Madoff'.
This document is page 38 of a legal filing (filed Jan 21, 2021) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text highlights the difficulties of preparing a defense due to COVID-19 lockdowns at the MDC, citing a spike in cases in early December. The conclusion asserts Maxwell's commitment to fighting the charges, staying in New York, and protecting her sureties, urging the court to grant bail on strict conditions.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she intentionally moved to New Hampshire to be within driving distance of New York prosecutors and that her defense counsel was in regular communication with the government for months. The filing aims to counter the government's portrayal of her as a fugitive who was hiding and changing locations.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski (likely a pilot or aviation manager). The testimony confirms that Ghislaine Maxwell and Lesley Groff (Epstein's secretary) were responsible for contacting the witness to schedule flights on Epstein's plane. The witness specifically recalls calling Groff at the New York main office number: 212-750-9895.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. In the transcript, a speaker identified as Ms. Comey stipulates that several government exhibits (11 through 16) are true and correct certified copies of birth certificates. These certificates were reported to various government agencies in New York, Rhode Island, Missouri, Sacramento County (California), and Massachusetts.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a pilot named Visoski. Visoski details the protocols for creating passenger manifests for flights piloted for Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2004, explaining that the captain was responsible for recording flight times and passenger names immediately after landing. He testifies that he did not keep copies of these records but physically delivered them to a main office in New York approximately every 30 days.
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 386-1) is a formal request from the United States Attorney's Office (Audrey Strauss, signed by Assistants including Maurene Comey and Alison Moe) to the defense. The Government reiterates a request originally made on August 5, 2020, for reciprocal discovery regarding evidence the defendant intends to use at trial and prior statements of defense witnesses (referring to the defendant as 'she'). The document cites Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 16(b) and 26.2.
This legal document discusses the government's alleged motives in a case, arguing that the defense's claims lack a legitimate theory. It references Epstein's death and the timing of charges, as well as the Second Circuit's explanation regarding government misconduct claims.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity