New York

Location
Mentions
6508
Relationships
2
Events
0
Documents
2987
Also known as:
New York-New York Hotel & Casino New York-New York Atlanta, Chicago, New York, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, Phoenix, San Francisco, Tulsa New York New York New York City New York, NY 620 Eighth Ave., New York, NY 10018 New York City, NY 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10022 345 Park Avenue, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10154 345 Park Avenue, NYC 20-2606, New York, NY 10154-0004 320 EAST 82 ST | NEW YORK | NY State of New York West Village, New York Coney Island, New York SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK New York Stock Exchange (subject of artwork) New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange, New York Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), New York New York, N.Y. Armonk, New York New York, New York One Hogan Place, New York, New York 10013 New York County, New York 85 Broad Street, New York, NY 10004 240 Central Park South, New York, NY 10019 511 6th Ave, New York NY 10011 New York City (N.Y.C.) 1 Central Park West #32F, New York, NY 10023 950 5th Avenue, New York, New York 10021 1260 Ave. of the Americas, New York 125 West 18th St., New York Pier 59, at Chelsea Piers, New York 475 10th Ave., New York 11 West 42nd Street, New York New York University New York Office 18 West 10th St, New York, NY 900 Park Ave, New York, NY 40 East 62nd St, New York 10021 New York (NY) 655 Park Avenue, New York NY 10021 142 W 57th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10019 Metropolitan Pavilion, 125 West 18th St., New York 336 East 69th Street, New York, NY 10021 21 East 70th St., New York 10021 208 E. 90th Street, New York, NY 10128 9 East 68th St., New York, New York 10022 130 West 56th Street, New York, New York 10019 1 Beekman Place, New York, NY 10022 Upper East Side, New York Town Hall, New York 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor, New York, NY 10022 New York mansion 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10022 40 Wall (New York) New York State 60 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10012 142 Greene St. #5, New York, NY 10012 10 Lincoln Center Plaza, New York Grand Hyatt New York, Park Ave. at Grand Central Terminal, New York 365 Fifth Ave., New York Yonkers, New York 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Ossining, New York New York (N.Y.) New York (implied by area code 212 and NYT affiliation) Eastern District of New York Fifth Avenue (New York) New York office New York Stock Exchange (subject of photo) 153 E 53 St. 18th Fl., New York, New York 10022 110 E 59 St, Floor 28, New York, New York 10022 110 East End Ave., New York, NY 10021 332 E. 84th St, #1G, New York, NY 10028 570 Park Avenue # 2B, New York, NY 10021 N.Y.C (New York City) NY (New York) 60 Greene Street, New York 333 West 23rd St., New York (SVA Theatre) 655 West 34th St., New York (Javits Center) New York Public Library 462 7th Ave 2nd Fl, New York, NY 10018 Southern District of New York 1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036 450 Park Avenue, New York Joyce Theater, 175 Eighth Ave., New York The Pierre Hotel, 2 East 61st St., New York Gotham Hall, 1356 Broadway, New York 85 Broad Street, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10004 246 Spring St., New York 324 E. 57th, New York, 10022 New York Museum of Modern Art 767 5th Avenue 46th fl., New York, NY 10153 813 Park Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10021 42 E. 58th Street, New York Liberty, New York 575 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022 315 East 14th Street, New York 172 Norfolk St., New York 950 3rd Ave, New York, NY 1 East 66th St, New York, NY 10021 8 Spruce Street (New York) New York (Broadcast studio location) 810 Seventh Ave., Suite 620, New York, NY 10019 New York Presbyterian Hospital Foley Square, New York (Implied) New York property New York Southern (UNYS) Latham, New York New York Field Office NYM (New York) New York (implied by NYPD/FBI NY context) New York (implied by N. (NY) and NYPD) Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), New York (implied) New York, NY 10022-6843 New York Office (NYO) MCC (Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York) 40 Foley, New York New York, NY (implied by office names) 9 East 67th Street, New York New York (implied by 'NY' in case number) New York (implied by Field Office) MCC New York (implied by BOP and context of Epstein case) FBI New York Office New York Presbyterian/Cornell Medical Center 299 Park Avenue, New York NY 10171-0002 New York (Epstein Residence) New York (Grand Jury location) New York Co. SDNY Office (1 St. Andrew’s Plaza, New York, NY) New York, NY 10001 9 E 71st St, New York, NY MCC (New York) 500 Pearl St, New York, NY 500 Pearl St., New York, NY 66 John Street, New York, NY One Penn Plaza, Suite 4715, New York, NY 10119 301 E. 66th Street, New York, NY 875 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10002 919 Third Ave, New York, NY 10022 New York, NY 10278 MCC New York (Implied) 55 Hudson Yards, New York, NY New York (implied by 'your fair city' and NYPD context) New York, NY (1 St. Andrew's Plaza) New York, NY 10003 New York Headquarters 10 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10020 Shore Haven (New York) 521 5th Avenue, New York, NY 10175 467 10th Ave, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 230 FIFTH, 230 Fifth Ave., New York OCME, 421 E. 26th St, New York, NY

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person CAROLYN
Origin
1
1
View
person Maria
Resident
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008733.jpg

This document is page 27 (numbered 26 internally) of jury instructions filed on December 19, 2021, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It outlines the three legal elements required to prove 'Count Four: Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity.' The instruction specifies that this count relates solely to a victim identified as 'Jane' during the time period of 1994 to 1997.

Court document (jury instructions)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008731.jpg

This legal document, filed on December 19, 2021, outlines the jury instructions for Count Two against Ms. Maxwell, which alleges a violation of New York Criminal Law. The count specifies that between 1994 and 1997, Ms. Maxwell enticed a minor named Jane across state lines for sexual activity, constituting Sexual Abuse in the Third Degree under New York Penal Law § 130.55. The document defines "sexual contact" and clarifies that under New York law, a person under seventeen is legally incapable of consent, but the prosecution must prove Ms. Maxwell knew of Jane's age.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008730.jpg

This legal document, part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, provides jury instructions for Count Two against Ms. Maxwell, specifically focusing on the third element: "Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity." It defines what constitutes acting "intentionally" and clarifies that the government must prove that a "significant or motivating purpose" for encouraging an individual named Jane to travel across state lines was for illegal sexual activity, not that it was the sole purpose.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008727.jpg

This document is page 21 of a court filing (Document 565) from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 19, 2021. It details Jury Instruction No. 14 regarding 'Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity,' outlining the three legal elements the Government must prove. It specifies that this count relates specifically to a victim identified as 'Jane' during the period of 1994 to 1997.

Court filing - jury instructions
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008704.jpg

This document is a draft verdict sheet from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the first three counts regarding conspiracy and enticement of minors for illegal sexual activity, providing spaces for the jury to mark 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty'.

Legal document (draft verdict sheet)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00008670.jpg

This document is a page from jury instructions (Instruction No. 36) filed on December 18, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the 'Third Element' of conspiracy, requiring an 'overt act,' and lists specific alleged acts including group sexual encounters involving Maxwell, Epstein, and a minor named Jane (1994-1997), an unsolicited massage given by Maxwell to Annie in New Mexico (1996), and travel invitations to a minor named Carolyn (2001-2002).

Court filing - jury instructions (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002702.jpg

This document is a page from a legal motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on February 4, 2021. The defense argues that the government has failed to provide a 'bill of particulars' specifying the dates and details of alleged interactions with 'Accuser-1' (Minor Victim 1), including travel from Florida to New York for sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein. Citing the legal precedent *Bortnovsky*, the defense claims Maxwell cannot adequately prepare for trial because the allegations span a four-year period without specific dates, despite the government claiming to possess corroborating flight and business records.

Legal filing (motion for bill of particulars)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017582.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness named 'Jane' testifies about ceasing contact with Jeffrey Epstein at the end of 2002. She explains she stopped seeing him because she got engaged, which led to Epstein leaving 'increasingly agitated' voicemails demanding she call him back and reminding her that he was paying for her mother's apartment in New York.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017580.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named "Jane". She testifies that during her senior year of high school, she continued to engage in unwanted "sexualized massages" with Jeffrey Epstein and also spent time with Ghislaine Maxwell. The witness states she moved away from New York in October 1999 after graduating.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017554.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), featuring the direct examination of a witness identified as 'Jane'. Jane testifies about sexual abuse she endured at ages 14, 15, and 16 in the massage room of a New York house (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein's), confirming that Maxwell was present during those years. The testimony includes a detailed description of the massage room, noting it was off the master bathroom, very dark with red lighting, and contained a giant black massage table.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017552.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Jane, filed on August 10, 2022. Jane describes her experience inside a house in New York, focusing on the artwork which she found creepy, dark, and intimidating, including paintings of naked women and orgies. She testifies that the atmosphere of the house made her feel unsafe and constantly watched.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017487.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The witness clarifies that Ghislaine's New York residence was at 116 East 65th Street and confirms that from 1991 through the 2000s, Ghislaine maintained a residence separate from Jeffrey Epstein's. The witness also states they would pick up luggage for both Ghislaine and Jeffrey Epstein, but from their respective residences.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017485.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski in the case US v. Maxwell (implied by case number). The testimony confirms that Visoski provided similar services for both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically handling luggage and installing audio/video equipment at their respective New York residences. The witness confirms Epstein resided at 9 East 71st Street and notes that Maxwell had several different New York residences between 1991 and 2005.

Court transcript (cross examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017484.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski (likely Larry Visoski). The testimony establishes that Visoski began working for the subject (Epstein) in 1991 and utilized his mechanics background to install high-end audio/video equipment at all of the subject's properties, including New York, Palm Beach, Zorro Ranch, and 'the island.' The witness confirms the subject lived on 69th Street in New York in 1991.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017483.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Mr. Visoski. He is being questioned about his visits to Jeffrey Epstein's two New York residences between 1991 and 2005. Visoski confirms that his main reasons for visiting were to handle Epstein's luggage related to flights and to pursue his hobby of installing home theater systems.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017471.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The witness confirms staying in a New York building with Dave Rogers and seeing other 'Epstein employees' there, specifically identifying Sarah Kellen in a '66th Street building'. The questioning concludes on this topic before shifting to a ranch in New Mexico.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017470.jpg

This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski, who worked for Epstein, describes their lodging arrangements, stating they stayed at their own home near Palm Beach but were provided with a corporate apartment at 301 East 66th Street in New York, a building owned by Epstein. Visoski confirms that their partner and copilot, Dave Rogers, also stayed at the same New York location.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014517.jpg

This document is page 117 of a court transcript (Summation by Ms. Menninger) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney argues against the credibility of a witness named Annie, highlighting inconsistencies between her testimony and statements made to the government in 2006 and 2020 regarding a trip to New Mexico and the nature of massages. The defense asserts that Epstein, not Maxwell, communicated with Annie's mother and that Maxwell was unaware of Epstein's hidden agenda.

Court transcript (summation)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014516.jpg

This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely an attorney. Menninger argues that her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, had no involvement in a trip to New York taken by a person named Annie, stating the trip's purpose was for Annie to see her sister. To support this, Menninger asserts that Maxwell is never mentioned in Annie's diaries from that time and suggests that Annie's memories of events are unreliable and colored by hindsight.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014515.jpg

This document is a legal summation describing the testimony of Ms. Menninger regarding two encounters with Epstein in New York. The first was a meeting with her sister in his office to discuss college applications, and the second was at a movie theater where he held her hand, an act she later reported to the Victims Compensation Fund as sexual abuse. The testimony also asserts that Ghislaine Maxwell was not present or involved in these events.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014514.jpg

This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely for the defense. The speaker attempts to discredit two individuals: an unnamed woman by questioning her claims of secret flights and a $5 million payment from the government, and Annie Farmer by highlighting a court instruction that her alleged encounter with Epstein and Maxwell was not illegal as charged, and by noting that she was introduced to Epstein by her sister, Maria, who worked for him.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014512.jpg

This document is a transcript from a legal summation by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022, arguing that a witness named Jane has an unreliable and 'contaminated' memory. The speaker presents evidence, including testimony from other witnesses (Annie, Larry Visoski) and a flight log, to contradict Jane's account of events involving Epstein's Santa Fe property. The summation alleges that Jane deliberately altered her timeline to make herself seem younger and that her memory was influenced by news reports and conversations with family.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014504.jpg

This document is a transcript page from a defense summation by Ms. Menninger in a criminal trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney argues that a witness's testimony is unreliable due to significant memory lapses and inconsistencies, specifically highlighting contradictory accounts given to the FBI versus in court regarding the location and circumstances of the first instance of sexual abuse involving Epstein.

Court transcript (summation)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014501.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger filed 08/10/22) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney attacks the credibility of a witness named 'Jane' by highlighting inconsistencies in her testimony regarding dates, her age during specific trips (New York, New Mexico, Europe), and her communications with her mother regarding abuse versus other lawsuits. The text specifically mentions Jane receiving 'wads of cash' from Jeffrey Epstein and cites a 1997 flight log entry.

Court transcript (summation/closing argument)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00011714.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim. She describes Jeffrey Epstein's use of private jets as 'commuter jets' for a wide variety of guests, including friends, professionals, and girlfriends. Sternheim also outlines the relationship between Epstein and Ghislaine, stating that their personal 'companionship' ended, but Ghislaine continued to work for him as an employee.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity