| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecution outlines its case against an unnamed defendant, alleging their involvement with Jeffrey Epstein in the abuse of underage victims. The statement details the evidence to be presented, including testimony from victims' relatives, Epstein's pilots and staff, and law enforcement who searched Epstein's Palm Beach and New York residences, to establish the defendant's role and efforts to create a 'culture of silence'.
This document is a page from a prosecutor's (Ms. Pomerantz) opening statement in a criminal trial, filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor alleges that the defendant conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to recruit and facilitate the sexual abuse of multiple underage girls. Specific examples cited include the abuse of a girl named 'Jane' in New York and Florida, and the grooming and abuse of a 16-year-old girl at Epstein's ranch in New Mexico.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a legal argument between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach), the defense (Mr. Everdell), and the Judge regarding jury instructions for a Mann Act conspiracy count. The specific issue involves whether sexual conduct was illegal under New Mexico law versus New York law, and the age of consent regarding a specific witness.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between Mr. Rohrbach and the presiding judge. The conversation centers on the legal definition of 'illegal sexual activity' within an indictment, specifically whether events in New Mexico and the intent for activity in New York satisfy the requirements of the Mann Act for conspiracy charges against 'minor Victim 2'. The judge expresses concern about potential jury confusion over the complex legal points being argued.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between the government (represented by Mr. Rohrbach) and the judge. The discussion centers on whether the potential illegality of sexual conduct in New Mexico can be used as evidence for an enticement charge under New York law. The judge expresses skepticism about the government's approach, pointing out that the charges were not filed under New Mexico law and cautioning against confusing the jury.
This document is page 33 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that the jury must be carefully instructed regarding testimony about 'Accuser 2' and 'Accuser 3' to avoid convicting Maxwell based on 'New Mexico activity' rather than New York law violations. The Court (Judge) acknowledges the need for clarification regarding the 'enticement' charge versus the sexual activity itself.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that the government's proposed jury instructions are confusing and contrasts them with the defense's position. The argument centers on jurisdiction and the age of consent, specifically regarding 'Accuser 2' and acts committed in New Mexico that were allegedly legal under New Mexico law at the time, versus how they are treated under New York conspiracy law.
This document is a victim's testimony from a legal case, detailing the profound and lasting trauma inflicted by Epstein and Maxwell. The speaker describes being terrified and threatened with death, and how her attempts to escape by moving were futile as they always found her. This involvement led to a decade of severe mental and physical health issues, including over two dozen hospitalizations, and left her unable to hold a job or care for herself.
This legal document is a first-person account from a former salesperson at Henri Bendel and student at FIT. The narrator describes their first encounter with Ghislaine Maxwell, which began as a seemingly positive customer interaction but was used to lure the narrator to a hotel to meet Jeffrey Epstein. That night, the narrator was sexually assaulted by both Maxwell and Epstein, an event described as the first of many such assaults that caused the narrator's life and studies to 'crack'.
This document is page 73 of a court transcript from the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 22, 2022. It features the conclusion of a victim impact statement by Ms. Ransome, who condemns Maxwell's lack of remorse and asserts her own survival. Following this, the Court introduces Ms. Stein, who begins her statement by recounting her move to New York in 1991 to attend FIT and her subsequent employment at Henri Bendel, where she encountered Maxwell.
This document is a victim's testimony from a legal case, detailing horrific sexual abuse perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwell over seven to eight months. The victim describes being manipulated and abused daily at Epstein's New York mansion and private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, culminating in an escape attempt. The testimony highlights the methods of control and psychological torment used by Epstein and Maxwell to ensnare their victims.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022. It captures a portion of a victim impact statement hearing, where the court acknowledges written submissions from Ms. Bryant, Ms. Maria Farmer, and Ms. Helm before hearing live testimony from Ms. Ransome. Ms. Ransome begins her testimony by describing the lasting trauma from a "hideous trap set by Epstein, Maxwell and other co-conspirators" and recounts how she was approached by an "Epstein-Maxwell recruiter" named Natalya after moving to New York at age 22.
This document appears to be the final page of a ProPublica article written by Jesse Eisinger discussing former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara. The text critiques Bharara's record, comparing him to Robert Morgenthau, noting that his office ceded certain financial crisis investigations to the main Justice Department, and suggesting that voters scrutinize the 'list of possible targets he never pursued.' The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
On March 13, 2017, Kathy Ruemmler sent an email with 'High' importance to Jeffrey Epstein (via jeevacation@gmail.com) containing the full text of a ProPublica article titled 'When It Comes to Wall Street, Preet Bharara Is No Hero.' The article discusses the recent firing of U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara by Donald Trump, criticizing Bharara's record on Wall Street crime while drawing historical parallels to Robert Morgenthau's refusal to resign under Nixon and his prosecution of Roy Cohn (Donald Trump's former mentor).
This document is page 330 of a selected bibliography from a book, likely produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019818). The page lists various articles published between 2010 and 2015, primarily focusing on Edward Snowden, the NSA leaks, WikiLeaks, and cybersecurity. While the document bears a file name starting with 'Epst' (possibly referring to Epstein in a larger production batch), the text itself is entirely focused on the Snowden saga and intelligence leaks.
This document is page 329 from a book (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the ISBN in the footer), containing a 'Selected Bibliography' of books related to espionage, the CIA, the KGB, and Edward Snowden. It bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence during a congressional investigation. The 'Epstein' mentioned in the text is author Edward Jay Epstein, not the financier Jeffrey Epstein.
This document appears to be page 322 from the notes section of a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the footer). It contains endnotes for Chapter 18, citing various news articles and interviews regarding intelligence agencies (NSA, CIA), Russian espionage, and Edward Snowden. The document has a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger document production for a congressional committee. Despite the filename containing 'Epst', the content relates to the author Edward Jay Epstein, not Jeffrey Epstein.
This document appears to be a page of endnotes (page 319) from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, bearing a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp. The text details sources and citations regarding Edward Snowden's flight from the US, the revocation of his passport by the State Department in June 2013, and various interviews conducted by the author with intelligence officials and journalists. The document references whistleblowers, the FBI, the NSA, and Russian President Vladimir Putin's involvement in the Snowden affair. While the prompt requests 'Epstein-related' data, this specific page concerns Edward Snowden; the 'Epstein' connection is likely the author of the book, Edward Jay Epstein, rather than Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page of endnotes (p. 318) from a book authored by Edward Jay Epstein, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets'. The notes provide citations for Chapter 14, 'The Crime Scene Investigation,' detailing sources related to Edward Snowden, the NSA, James Clapper, and comparisons to Lee Harvey Oswald. The page is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019806', indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
This document is page 312 of a book (indicated by the file name and layout), appearing in a House Oversight Committee file. It consists of endnotes (numbers 59-70) citing various articles, interviews, and books related to the Edward Snowden NSA leaks, focusing heavily on journalists Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras. The notes reference publications from 2010 to 2016, including The Guardian, Wired, and NPR.
This document is a page of endnotes (page 307) from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, produced to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019795). The notes relate to a prologue about Edward Snowden in Hong Kong (2014), citing interviews the author conducted with figures like General Keith Alexander and Keith Bradsher, as well as various books and articles. While part of a House Oversight production potentially related to investigations involving the author (who had connections to Jeffrey Epstein), the content specifically details sources regarding the NSA and Snowden.
This document is a proof page (Epilogue, page 303) from a book, stamped by the House Oversight Committee. The file name 'Epst_9780451494566' indicates this is likely from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, rather than a document about Jeffrey Epstein. The text analyzes the public distrust in government following Edward Snowden's NSA leaks, specifically discussing Senator Dianne Feinstein's defense of intelligence programs regarding a 2009 New York subway plot.
This document appears to be page 295 from a book (likely by Edward Jay Epstein given the footer filename and ISBN) included in House Oversight records. It details Edward Snowden's revelations regarding NSA and GCHQ surveillance programs, specifically XKeyscore and PRISM, and includes reactions from officials like Dianne Feinstein and Mike Rogers. The text explains how XKeyscore creates digital fingerprints for suspects and recounts Snowden's advice on evading surveillance by avoiding UK routing and U.S. internet companies.
The document is a page (Chapter 26, 'The Handler') from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the footer). It details the author's unsuccessful attempts in Moscow to secure an interview with Edward Snowden or his lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, via his fixer Zamir. The text mentions the difficulty other journalists have faced in accessing Kucherena and references the author's past investigation into the 2006 polonium poisoning.
This document is page 254 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (not Jeffrey Epstein), produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019742). The text details the author's 2015 trip to Moscow to investigate Edward Snowden's 2013 arrival at Sheremetyevo Airport. It challenges Snowden's narrative that he was stuck in the transit zone, citing Russian sources claiming a 'special operation' was conducted by intelligence services to receive him immediately upon landing from Hong Kong.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity