New Jersey
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00010750.pdf
This document is a series of emails from whistleblower Chris Dilorio to redacted recipients (likely SEC/DOJ officials) between April and May 2019. Dilorio alleges a vast conspiracy involving Apollo Global Management (Leon Black, Josh Harris), Jared Kushner, and Jeffrey Epstein, claiming that Apollo provided loans to Kushner in exchange for regulatory relief from the SEC. He also details allegations of money laundering involving shell companies like ESWW and DryShips, connects these entities to Russian interests, and reports receiving threatening phone calls in retaliation for his complaints.
DOJ-OGR-00000211.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing, likely a brief or memo, discussing the limited scope of various agreements made by different United States Attorney's Offices and divisions of the Department of Justice. It references several legal cases, including United States v. Lafarge S.A., United States v. Goldfield, United States v. Ellison (likely Caroline Ellison), and United States v. Coccagna, providing case numbers, ECF filings, and dates, and notes the non-binding nature of these agreements on other federal, state, local, or foreign authorities.
DOJ-OGR-00000049.tif
This document, likely a legal petition or brief, discusses the reasons for granting a petition filed by 'Maxwell' after an en banc rehearing was denied. It focuses on a circuit split regarding the binding nature of plea agreements made by a U.S. Attorney's office in one district on other U.S. Attorney's offices. The document cites Santobello v. New York as a precedent suggesting that such promises should be binding across different prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00033232.tif
This document details various accommodations and financial assistance provided by Jeffrey (Epstein) to his employees and their family members. Examples include tuition payments for children, medical support, and flexible work arrangements, illustrating his alleged generosity and support for his staff's well-being and educational pursuits.
DOJ-OGR-00018094.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Alessi, filed on August 10, 2022. Alessi testifies about his employment with Mr. Epstein, stating he worked for him until December 2002 and recalls seeing Ms. Maxwell taking pictures with a camera at Epstein's Palm Beach residence. He also clarifies that he moved from New Jersey to Florida in October 1984 and stopped working for Epstein due to illness.
DOJ-OGR-00017973.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of Mr. Alessi) filed on August 10, 2022. Mr. Alessi testifies about his work history, stating he moved to Florida in early 1994, worked as a maintenance man for a wealthy family in Palm Beach, was briefly self-employed, and then began working for Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00021085.jpg
This document is page 38 of a legal brief (Case 22-1426, dated Feb 28, 2023) filed in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. It contains legal arguments attempting to distance the current case from the precedent set in *U.S. v. Annabi*, arguing that *Annabi* is an outlier regarding whether a plea agreement in one district binds another. The text consists primarily of extensive footnotes citing various Second Circuit decisions (*Prisco*, *Ashraf*, *Salameh*, etc.) that limited plea agreements to specific US Attorney's Offices, supporting the government's position against the Appellant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell).
DOJ-OGR-00020596.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 28, 2022, from an appellate counsel at the law firm Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, P.C. to the Clerk of Court. The lawyer, newly assigned to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, requests an extension to file the Appellant's Brief, moving the deadline from October 14, 2022, to January 30, 2023. The justification for the request includes the voluminous nature of the case record (over 3,800 pages of transcripts and 738 docket entries) and the fact that the lawyer has been unable to meet with Maxwell following her recent transfer to a prison in Tallahassee, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00016040.jpg
A 1993 memorandum from Tim Ambrose at the Interlochen Center for the Arts to Jeffrey Epstein regarding the construction of a 'Scholarship Lodge.' The memo details the selection of an architect (Karen Sargent), estimated costs between $125,000 and $150,000, and a proposed location next to the Frohlich lodge. It serves as a preliminary informational update prior to a potential formal proposal.
DOJ-OGR-00030486.jpg
This legal letter, dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek, analyzes the significant risk that their client could be subjected to sex offender registration laws (Megan's Law). The analysis focuses on Florida law but also considers risks in other jurisdictions like the Virgin Islands and New Jersey, highlighting a national trend of expanding such statutes and citing recent court decisions and news articles as evidence. The letter warns that even a plea to aggravated assault carries a grave risk of future registration requirements and associated burdens for the client.
DOJ-OGR-00030451.jpg
This is a letter dated February 22, 2007, from the law firm Atterbury Goldberger Weiss, representing Jeffrey Epstein, to Lanna Belohlavek of the Office of the State Attorney. The letter follows up on a previous meeting and lists eleven specific items of evidence, such as interview transcripts, call logs, and voicemails involving individuals like Haley Robson, Melissa Eaton, and Johanna Sjoberg, that the law firm has determined are missing from the discovery materials provided to them. This document highlights a formal request for missing evidence in the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00021842.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing that critiques the reasoning of a prior court decision, 'Annabi'. The author argues that 'Annabi' departed from the established legal doctrine that a plea agreement with a specific U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) only binds that office, not the entire U.S. government, unless explicitly stated otherwise. The text cites numerous other cases in its footnotes to support this traditional, more limited interpretation of such agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00021684.jpg
Page 24 (PDF page 37) of a legal brief in Case 22-1426 (United States v. Maxwell appeal). The text argues against Maxwell's claim that Eleventh Circuit law should apply to the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), asserting that the court should follow its own precedents (Annabi) and that the governing law is that of the forum state. It cites multiple cases to support the application of local circuit law over the law where a plea agreement was originally negotiated.
DOJ-OGR-00021229.jpg
This document outlines internal DOJ deliberations from May 2007 regarding the strategy for charging Jeffrey Epstein. Prosecutor Lourie advocated for a pre-indictment plea to maintain control over the case and avoid judicial scrutiny of dismissed counts, noting that sentencing guidelines suggested a 20-year range. Meanwhile, prosecutor Villafaña urged immediate action when Epstein traveled to New Jersey, but was blocked by Menchel and U.S. Attorney Acosta, who wanted more time to review the case.
DOJ-OGR-00021205.jpg
This document outlines the professional histories and specific roles of several key figures from the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) who were involved in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It details the career paths of Jeffrey H. Sloman, Matthew I. Menchel, and Andrew C. Lourie within the USAO, describing their supervisory responsibilities, participation in meetings with defense counsel, and involvement in negotiating the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The text also notes the career transitions of former U.S. Attorney Acosta, including his recusal from the Epstein matter and subsequent roles as Secretary of Labor and university dean.
DOJ-OGR-00019085.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Rodgers) detailing flight movements involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in August. It establishes that Maxwell was not on a flight from Aspen to Traverse City on the 18th, but rejoined Epstein on a flight from Traverse City to Teterboro on the 20th, accompanied by Dawn DeVitto.
DOJ-OGR-00017122.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding, likely a summation, dated August 10, 2022. The speaker, 'I', questions the credibility of 'Jane' regarding alleged sexual abuse, lawsuits, and travel dates, noting inconsistencies in her accounts and her mother's absence from testifying. The document also mentions Jane receiving 'wads of cash' from Jeffrey Epstein and details several of Jane's trips, including one from New Jersey to New Mexico in May '97 and to Europe in January '98.
DOJ-OGR-00016845.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness (Mrs. Dubin) by Mr. Pagliuca regarding a flight taken on November 21, 1995, from Teterboro, NJ to Palm Beach with Glen Dubin, their child, and a nanny. The defense attorney, Ms. Moe, objects to lines of questioning, and the witness states she does not recall the specific Thanksgiving trip mentioned.
DOJ-OGR-00009271.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a juror named Conrad. The questioning, led primarily by attorney Mr. Shechtman, focuses on why she failed to disclose information during jury selection (voir dire), such as her husband's criminal record and her own suspended legal career. Conrad defends her 'omissions,' while the attorney probes whether she lied to get on the jury for the $40/day stipend, out of curiosity, or for 'intellectual stimulation'.
DOJ-OGR-00009254.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas (dated Feb 15, 2012), specifically a direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The testimony focuses on Conrad's alleged perjury and misconduct during jury selection (voir dire), specifically regarding lies about her residence in Bronxville and her husband's background (claiming he owned bus companies when he was actually a 'retired criminal' released from a NJ penitentiary in 2004). While included in a DOJ release batch (DOJ-OGR-00009254), the content pertains to the Daugerdas tax shelter case and juror misconduct, not directly to Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00009237.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, featuring Ms. Trzaskoma's testimony during redirect and recross-examination. The questioning primarily concerns information about juror Catherine Conrad, specifically when Ms. Trzaskoma became aware of Conrad's background as a suspended lawyer with a criminal record and civil lawsuit, and whether this information was properly disclosed during the trial. The Court also inquires about a juror replacement event on May 16th during deliberations, and Ms. Trzaskoma denies any intent to mislead the court.
DOJ-OGR-00009133.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, argues against setting aside a jury verdict. It establishes that the standard for doing so is an "exacting hurdle," citing Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), which severely restricts jurors from testifying about their deliberations. The document contrasts this federal standard with New Jersey state law and clarifies that only specific, improper outside influences, not a juror's personal experiences, can be grounds for such an inquiry.
DOJ-OGR-00009055.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was denied a fair trial because a juror, identified as Juror 50, failed to disclose his own claimed victim status during jury selection. This omission prevented the defense from exercising a peremptory challenge, and the juror later revealed his bias to the media by stating his memory was 'like a video' and that he would advocate for the alleged victims' credibility. The argument cites numerous New Jersey court precedents where judgments were invalidated for similar juror inaccuracies.
DOJ-OGR-00009007.jpg
This document is page vi of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 613), filed on February 24, 2022. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal cases with their citations and the page numbers where they are referenced in the main document. The cases cited span from 1936 to 2018 and involve various parties in different U.S. federal and state courts.
DOJ-OGR-00031617.jpg
A T-Mobile facsimile cover sheet dated August 2, 2005, sent by Andy Dios to Detective Michelle Pagan. The subject indicates it is a response to a subpoena (case/reference number 2005-048776). The document includes administrative footers indicating a 2017 public records request release.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity