New Jersey
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00010425.jpg
This legal document, part of a court case, argues against the application of the 2004 Sentencing Guidelines for a defendant whose criminal conduct is alleged to have ended 'in or about 2004'. The filing contends that applying the later, harsher guidelines would be an ex post facto violation, as the jury never made a specific factual finding that the conduct continued past the 2004 Guidelines' effective date. It further argues that having the court, rather than the jury, determine the offense end date would violate the defendant's (Ms. Maxwell's) Sixth Amendment rights.
DOJ-OGR-00010338.jpg
This legal document is a court's analysis of a defendant's motion for a new trial. The defendant argues that Juror 50's failure to disclose a history of sexual abuse denied her the ability to use a peremptory challenge. The court distinguishes the applicable federal law (the McDonough standard) from the New Jersey state law cited by the defendant and begins its analysis of the first prong of the McDonough test, noting that Juror 50 did provide inaccurate answers on a questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00010144.jpg
This document is a page from a professional resume or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, filed as part of a court case. It details his public lectures, participation in PBS series on ethics and the Constitution, and extensive legal and public service activities. Key activities include holding leadership and member roles in various American Bar Association commissions and being retained by the New Jersey Supreme Court to analyze lawyer disciplinary systems.
DOJ-OGR-00009950.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the cross-examination of a juror, Ms. Conrad. Attorney Mr. Shechtman questions her about why she made several omissions during jury selection, including failing to disclose her husband's criminal history. The questioning explores her motivations, such as a $40/day juror stipend, unemployment, and an intellectual curiosity for the courtroom, and challenges her distinction between an "omission" and a "lie".
DOJ-OGR-00009940.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the questioning of a juror named Conrad. The questioning reveals that Conrad was aware of her husband's extensive criminal history but deliberately concealed it during jury selection (voir dire) to secure a place on the jury. The transcript explores her motivations and her understanding of her civic duty in light of her actions.
DOJ-OGR-00009916.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of USA v. Paul M. Daugerdas. The witness, Ms. Trzaskoma, is being questioned regarding her knowledge of misconduct by Juror No. 1 (Catherine Conrad), specifically regarding a Westlaw report identifying Conrad as a suspended lawyer. Trzaskoma testifies that she believed the report was a case of mistaken identity and denies trying to 'sandbag' the court by withholding information about Conrad's criminal history and suspended license during the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009912.jpg
This document is an index of exhibits (13 through 23) from a 'Trzaskoma Declaration' filed in a legal case. The exhibits consist of various legal and criminal records, including court dispositions, police records, and filings related to individuals named Catherine Conrad, Catherine Rosa, and Frank Rosa. Several exhibits pertain to the civil case 'Conrad v. Manessis' in Bronx County, New York, with filings dated between 2003 and 2009.
DOJ-OGR-00009746.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was denied a fair trial due to material omissions by a juror, identified as Juror 50. The juror failed to disclose his own claimed victim status during jury selection, which prevented the defense from exercising a peremptory challenge and would have been grounds for dismissal for cause. The argument is bolstered by citing the juror's later statements to the media, where he claimed his memory "was like a video" and that he would advocate for the alleged victims' credibility, revealing a bias that tainted the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009611.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the sufficiency of evidence to uphold a defendant's conviction on multiple counts. It details the defendant's role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation, specifically by making travel arrangements for a victim named Jane and recruiting another victim, Virginia. The document cites trial testimony and legal precedents to assert that a rational jury could and did find the defendant guilty.
DOJ-OGR-00009465.jpg
This document is a page from a professional resume or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, detailing his public lectures and service activities. It lists his participation in PBS series, numerous lectures on legal ethics, and significant roles within the American Bar Association and as a consultant for the New Jersey Supreme Court. The activities span from 1989 to at least 2009, highlighting a long career in legal ethics and public service.
DOJ-OGR-00003207.jpg
This document, page 31 of a DOJ report (likely the OGR report), details the professional biographies and specific roles of USAO officials Jeffrey Sloman, Matthew Menchel, and Andrew Lourie in the Epstein investigation and the negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights Sloman's negotiation of an NPA addendum, Menchel's communication of the two-year plea deal, and Lourie's role in the NPA negotiations before his departure. The text also notes Alexander Acosta's resignation as Labor Secretary in 2019 due to criticism regarding the Epstein case.
DOJ-OGR-00004878.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 2, 2021. The text appears to be an excerpt from a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion (*Commonwealth v. Taylor*) discussing the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, citing various U.S. Supreme Court precedents to argue that the privilege applies broadly in both criminal and civil/administrative proceedings. The document emphasizes that the right accompanies a person regardless of the legal proceeding type.
DOJ-OGR-00020063.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing entitled 'Table of Authorities' from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 18, 2020. It lists numerous legal precedents cited in the filing, primarily 'United States v. [Defendant]' cases. Notably, the list includes two citations for 'United States v. Epstein' (one from 2001 in E.D. Pa. and one from 2019 in S.D.N.Y.) and one for 'United States v. Madoff'.
DOJ-OGR-00033220.jpg
This is a handwritten note from "Jack" (likely attorney Jack A. Goldberger) to "Barry" on the law firm's letterhead. Jack provides the phone number for an individual named Acosta and asks Barry to find out what Acosta says, because Jay Lefkowitz needs to call Acosta to finalize an unspecified matter. The note also mentions an enclosed document described as "fun reading on your Defendnt".
DOJ-OGR-00014501.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger filed 08/10/22) in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorney attacks the credibility of a witness named 'Jane' by highlighting inconsistencies in her testimony regarding dates, her age during specific trips (New York, New Mexico, Europe), and her communications with her mother regarding abuse versus other lawsuits. The text specifically mentions Jane receiving 'wads of cash' from Jeffrey Epstein and cites a 1997 flight log entry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019445.jpg
This document is a page from the Winter 2008 issue of 'onearth' magazine. The main article discusses the 'Biotron,' a research facility at the University of Western Ontario designed to study ecosystem responses to climate change. The page also includes two sidebar stories: one about Buddhists releasing invasive species into a New Jersey river, and another about the Bush administration censoring CDC testimony regarding the health risks of climate change.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031700.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an article or blog post written by Rabbi Steven Pruzansky analyzing the results of the 2012 US Presidential election. The text argues that Mitt Romney lost not due to campaign errors or Hurricane Sandy, but because 'conservative virtues' no longer inspire the electorate and because it is 'impossible to compete against free stuff.' The document bears a House Oversight footer, indicating it was collected as evidence, likely as part of an email attachment or correspondence file in the Epstein investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026008.jpg
An email thread from August 20, 2016, between Deepak Chopra and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E./jeevacation@gmail.com). Chopra discusses his new book 'Super Genes,' a documentary being made by a company connected to his son, and his intention to stop criticizing scientists based on advice from 'Leonard' and Epstein. Chopra outlines his travel schedule involving a fundraiser in NJ, a trip to Boston to meet 'Barnaby,' and future meetings in September, expressing a desire to follow Epstein's guidance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016536.jpg
This document page features an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the evolution of sexual assault laws, contrasting historical common law restrictions with modern reforms like rape shield laws. It also contains footnotes detailing state prosecutorial structures and citing legal precedents regarding prosecutorial discretion and equal protection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016527.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a law review article (103 Minn. L. Rev.) discussing the oversight of declination decisions in state justice systems compared to the federal system. It highlights the lack of administrative and judicial review for state prosecutors' charging decisions and details the limited exceptions and historical context through extensive footnotes citing case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026629.jpg
This document is a presentation slide containing four graphical charts analyzing polling or sentiment data for Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton across four states: Washington, Ohio, New Jersey, and Michigan. The charts track changes in percentages between the 1st/2nd presidential debates and the 3rd debate of the 2016 election cycle. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026596.jpg
This document is a page of footnotes (numbers 57-72) from a legal or tax analysis document produced for the House Oversight Committee. It cites various tax regulations (Reg 1.752, Reg 1.881), treatises on partnership taxation from 2009, and specific rulings regarding Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and Disregarded Entities (DREs). The content focuses on the technical tax treatment of pass-through entities across various US states.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026568.jpg
This document appears to be a printout of a promotional article or blog post from Jeffrey Epstein's personal website (jeffreyepstein.org), marked as a House Oversight evidence document. It praises the Bard High School Early College (BHSEC) model, detailing its academic success, structure, and history, including support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and praise from President Obama. The text concludes with a quote from Jeffrey Epstein emphasizing the competitiveness of the school and his foundation's support for public education.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026567.jpg
This document is a printed email chain dated July 10, 2012. Lesley Groff forwards an email to Jeffrey Epstein from Charles Stevenson, who thanks Epstein for his 'gifts to Bard College.' The email includes the text of a PR Newswire press release titled 'Exceptional Public Schools Cited By Obama, Get Critical Backing From Investor, Jeffrey Epstein,' detailing funding provided by Epstein's foundation to Bard High School Early College schools.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026565.jpg
A promotional document or press release highlighting 'substantial backing' provided by Jeffrey Epstein and the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation to the Bard High School Early College schools (BHSEC) in NY and NJ. The text details the academic success and unique structure of BHSEC, noting that President Obama praised the school model in a 2009 speech and that the New York Observer ranked it highly in 2012. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity