DOJ-OGR-00001341.jpg
360 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (conclusion page)
File Size:
360 KB
Summary
This is the conclusion page (page 24) of a legal filing dated April 12, 2021, submitted by the Southern District of New York (Assistant US Attorneys Pomerantz, Comey, and Moe). The document argues that Judge Nathan acted correctly in denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for temporary release and concludes that the motion should remain denied.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the motion; prosecutors argue her motion for temporary release should be denied.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Presiding judge who previously denied Maxwell's motion; described as acting within her discretion.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | Assistant United States Attorney |
Signatory for the Government/Prosecution.
|
| Maurene Comey | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed on signature block for the Government.
|
| Alison Moe | Assistant United States Attorney |
Listed on signature block for the Government.
|
| Stephens | Case Citation Subject |
Referenced in case law citation (United States v. Stephens).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York |
Office of the Assistant United States Attorneys filing the document.
|
|
| United States Attorneys Office |
Employer of the signatories.
|
Timeline (2 events)
April 12, 2021
Filing of government's opposition/conclusion regarding Maxwell's motion.
New York, New York
Prior to April 12, 2021
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the document was dated and filed.
|
Relationships (2)
Pomerantz signing the document arguing Maxwell's motion be denied.
Mention of Judge Nathan denying Maxwell's previous motion.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (654 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 40-1, 04/12/2021, 3075763, Page24 of 25
positioned to note with respect to the principal case cited below. (See Ex. D at 90-
91 (distinguishing United States v. Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d 63, 67 (S.D.N.Y.
2020))).
91 (distinguishing United States v. Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d 63, 67 (S.D.N.Y.
2020))).
42. In sum, Judge Nathan acted well within her substantial discretion
by denying Maxwell’s motion for temporary release.
by denying Maxwell’s motion for temporary release.
CONCLUSION
43. For the foregoing reasons, Maxwell’s motion should be denied.
Dated: New York, New York
April 12, 2021
April 12, 2021
/s/ Lara Pomerantz
Maurene Comey / Alison Moe / Lara
Pomerantz
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Telephone: (212) 637-2343
Maurene Comey / Alison Moe / Lara
Pomerantz
Assistant United States Attorneys
Southern District of New York
Telephone: (212) 637-2343
24
DOJ-OGR-00001341
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document