Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Martin Weinberg

Person
Mentions
248
Relationships
34
Events
43
Documents
115
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
34 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Client
38 Very Strong
49
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
20 Very Strong
19
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person jeffrey E.
Client
7
1
View
person REID WEINGARTEN
Co counsel
7
3
View
person Darren Indyke
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Alan Dershowitz
Acquaintance
7
1
View
person Darren Indyke
Business associate
7
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Corresponded
6
1
View
person jeffrey E.
Legal representative
6
1
View
person Epstein
Client
6
2
View
person John Browning
Process server recipient
5
1
View
person Alison Moe
Opposing counsel
5
1
View
person Mr. Epstein
Client
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Correspondent
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Business associate
5
1
View
person the defendant
Client
5
1
View
person David Ingram
Professional media contact
5
1
View
person Kathy Ruemmler
Co counsel professional
5
1
View
person Marc Fernich
Co counsel
3
3
View
person Michael Miller
Co counsel
2
2
View
person Mike Blake
Business associate
2
2
View
person [Redacted AUSA]
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
person [Redacted] (DOJ)
Professional opposing counsel
1
1
View
person REID WEINGARTEN
Business associate
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2021-11-10 N/A Status Conference Courtroom 110, 40 Centre St... View
2020-07-14 N/A Initial Appearance Court View
2019-09-03 N/A Court Hearing (Case Called) Courtroom (Southern District) View
2019-08-15 N/A Scheduled call/meeting regarding potential civil forfeiture issues. Teleconference (dial-in req... View
2019-08-10 N/A Legal Notification Request N/A View
2019-07-25 N/A Protective Order consented to by Defense Counsel. New York, New York View
2019-07-25 Legal filing A court order in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB was filed. The order was signed by Judge Richard M. Berma... United States District Cour... View
2019-07-24 N/A Conference Call between Defense Team and SDNY Phone View
2019-07-23 N/A Proposed conference call to discuss case management issues. Teleconference View
2019-07-18 N/A Bond Hearing Judge Richard M. Berman's C... View
2019-07-18 N/A Bail/Detention Hearing SDNY Court View
2019-07-18 Court hearing Bond Hearing for Jeffrey Epstein was held. The court denied bail. A written order was to follow. ... Court View
2019-07-17 N/A Exchange of discovery materials (Passport Photographs) in U.S. v. Epstein case. New York View
2019-07-15 N/A Court appearance/hearing Court View
2019-07-08 N/A Presentation of Jeffrey Epstein at U.S. District Court 500 Pearl Street View
2019-07-08 Court proceeding Initial Appearance as to Jeffrey Epstein held before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman. N/A View
2019-07-08 Court proceeding Arraignment as to Jeffrey Epstein held before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman. Plea entered by J... N/A View
2019-07-08 Court proceeding Status Conference as to Jeffrey Epstein held before Judge Richard M. Berman. N/A View
2019-07-08 Court presentment Presentment of defendant Jeffrey Epstein in court. S.D.N.Y. View
2019-07-08 N/A Arraignment - Plea Entered: Not Guilty Court (Before Magistrate Ju... View
2019-07-08 N/A Scheduled presentation/arraignment of Jeffrey Epstein. U.S. District Court, 500 Pe... View
2019-07-08 N/A Status Conference in USA v. Epstein before Judge Richard M. Berman U.S. District Court, Southe... View
2019-07-08 N/A Arraignment and Conference SDNY Court View
2019-07-07 N/A Verification of attorney Martin Weinberg and authorization for him to visit Jeffrey Epstein. Metropolitan Correctional C... View
2019-07-07 N/A Attempted attorney visit denied MCC View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031612.jpg

This email chain from April 28, 2016, tracks a Reuters press inquiry regarding a lawsuit (Katie Johnson v Trump) alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The inquiry was sent by reporter David Ingram to Martin Weinberg, who forwarded it to Epstein. Epstein then forwarded the chain to Tom Barrack with the comment 'nuts but i thought you guys should know,' attaching the complaint PDF.

Email chain
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031462.jpg

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, originating with a Reuters reporter, David Ingram, contacting attorney Martin Weinberg for comment regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleged that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email was forwarded by Weinberg to Epstein, and subsequently by Epstein to Lesley Groff, who responded with concern ('so sorry...'). Portions of the email chain between Weinberg and Epstein are redacted under privilege.

Email chain
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031428.jpg

This document is an email chain forwarding a Miami Herald article titled "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case." The article reports that the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta following the recusal of Miami federal prosecutors. It also references a video of Attorney General nominee William Barr pledging to review the handling of the Epstein case.

Email correspondence / news article
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012104.jpg

This document is a 'Counsel List' page from a legal filing in the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein' (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It details the contact information (addresses, phone numbers, emails) for attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein, including Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, and Joseph Ackerman, as well as Marc Nurik representing Scott Rothstein. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.

Legal document (counsel list / service list)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020822.jpg

This document contains an email chain from March 7, 2011, in which attorney Jay Lefkowitz forwards a list of interview questions from journalist Alexandra Wolfe to Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email jeevacation@gmail.com) and his legal team. Wolfe's questions probe Epstein's current status, including his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton, his business valuation ($15 billion), his time in prison, and his reaction to his conviction. Lefkowitz prefaces the exchange by warning the journalist that previous press coverage has been 'defamatory' and requesting factual questions.

Email chain
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028970.jpg

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by a Reuters reporter asking attorney Martin Weinberg about a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. The email is forwarded by Weinberg to Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger. The content of the attorneys' discussions is redacted under attorney-client privilege.

Email chain
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126.jpg

This document is an email from Darren Indyke to 'jeevacation' (likely Epstein) and attorney Martin Weinberg, dated May 10, 2019. The body of the email is redacted for privilege, but it forwards a Miami Herald article from February 2019 regarding Jeffrey Sloman defending former prosecutor Alexander Acosta's handling of the Epstein plea deal. The document highlights the ongoing scrutiny of the non-prosecution agreement.

Email
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023001.jpg

An email sent by Darren Indyke on May 10, 2019, to Martin Weinberg and the address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The subject line indicates the email concerns a 'Privileged and Confidential' timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case published by the Miami Herald. The body of the email is heavily redacted, though the file attachments list names relevant to the case, including Virginia Roberts, Brad Edwards, and Barry Krischer.

Email
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015553.jpg

This document is a 'Counsel List' page from a legal filing in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG), likely from 2009 based on the case number. It lists contact information for attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein (Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, Joseph Ackerman, and the firm Farmer, Jaffe, et al.) and an attorney representing Scott Rothstein (Marc S. Nurik). The document includes email addresses, physical addresses in Florida and Massachusetts, and phone/fax numbers.

Legal document (counsel list / notice of filing supplement)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032066.jpg

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters correspondent David Ingram seeking comment from Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwarded this inquiry to Epstein, who subsequently forwarded it to Darren Indyke. The email includes an attachment titled 'katie johnson v trump complaint.pdf', and a significant portion of the correspondence between Weinberg and Epstein is redacted as privileged.

Email thread
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032064.jpg

An email sent by Jeffrey Epstein (Jeffrey E.) on October 9, 2016, to attorneys Kathy Ruemmler, Darren Indyke, and Martin Weinberg. The sole content of the email is a link to a LawNewz article titled 'Federal Judge Orders Hearing in Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit Case'. The document contains a standard legal confidentiality disclaimer identifying the content as the property of 'JEE'.

Email
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029859.jpg

This document is an email dated March 2, 2019, from Darren Indyke to Martin Weinberg (cc: jeevacation@gmail.com) containing a link to a Palm Beach Post article. The article, written by Jane Musgrave, reports that Jeffrey Epstein paid $5.5 million to three women to settle underage-sex lawsuits. The document includes captions referencing attorneys Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, and mentions Epstein's 2008 guilty plea.

Email
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029835.jpg

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram contacting attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California federal court. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwards this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwards it to his legal team (Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger). Portions of the attorney communications are redacted as privileged.

Email thread
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029831.jpg

This document is an email chain dated April 28, 2016, originating from a Reuters journalist, David Ingram, seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email chain shows the inquiry being forwarded from Weinberg to Epstein (at jeevacation@gmail.com), and subsequently discussed by attorneys Jack Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Roy Black, though the specific legal advice is redacted as privileged.

Email thread
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029255.jpg

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit (Katie Johnson v. Trump) alleging rape by Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in 1994. Weinberg forwarded this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwarded it to his legal defense team, including Alan Dershowitz and Roy Black. The document includes a 'Privileged - Redacted' stamp, indicating sensitive attorney-client communication was removed.

Email chain
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029231.jpg

An email chain from March 19, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com) forwards a message from attorney Martin Weinberg to Kathy Ruemmler. The subject line references 'Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein.' The body of the attorney's email is heavily redacted, and the document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.

Email / forwarded email chain
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025884.jpg

This is a heavily redacted email dated April 23, 2015, sent to Jeffrey Epstein (using the address jeevacation@gmail.com) and Kathy Ruemmler. The email was sent by attorney Martin G. Weinberg regarding a matter subject to attorney-client privilege. The entire body of the message has been withheld.

Email
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025883.jpg

This document contains the footer and header of an email chain involving the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., dated April 23, 2015. It displays the firm's Boston address and a standard legal privilege disclaimer. The recipient of the email from Martin Weinberg has been redacted.

Email fragment / legal disclaimer
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025882.jpg

An email chain from April 23, 2015, between attorney Martin Weinberg and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'). The subject of the correspondence is 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE'. The actual content of the messages has been entirely redacted with 'Privileged - Redacted' stamps. The document includes standard legal disclaimers and Weinberg's Boston office address.

Email chain
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025879.jpg

This document is an email chain dated April 23, 2015, between attorney Martin Weinberg, Jeffrey Epstein, and Kathy Ruemmler (with 'dkiesq' CC'd). The subject matter is explicitly marked 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE'. The actual content of the messages has been completely redacted under privilege claims, leaving only the header information, legal disclaimers, and contact information for Martin Weinberg's Boston law office.

Email chain
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021794.jpg

This document is a chain of forwarded emails initiated by Michael Reiter (Palm Beach Police) in 2008 and eventually forwarded by Jeffrey Epstein to his legal team in 2010. The content includes an editorial from the Palm Beach Post titled "He was over 50. And they were girls," which criticizes the leniency of charges against Epstein regarding minors. The email chain tracks the dissemination of this article among Epstein's defense attorneys, including Alan Dershowitz, Robert Critton, and Martin Weinberg.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021790.jpg

This document is an email chain originating from a 2008 email by Michael Reiter to a contact named Margie, discussing leaks regarding the Epstein plea deal and criticizing the Palm Beach Daily News for their editorial silence. The email contains the text of a critical 2008 Palm Beach Post editorial regarding Epstein's sentence and mansion. In 2010, Jeffrey Epstein forwarded this historic email chain to his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Martin Weinberg, and Robert Critton Jr.

Email chain
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021761.jpg

This document is an email chain initiated by Jeffrey Epstein in 2010, forwarding a 2008 email from Michael Reiter (Palm Beach Police) to a journalist named Margie. Reiter discusses leaking information about Epstein's plea deal to her and expresses frustration that her paper (Palm Beach Daily News) remained silent editorially. The email includes the full text of a critical Palm Beach Post editorial from July 2008, highlighting the 'different system of justice for the wealthy' and detailing Epstein's legal team.

Email chain
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021750.jpg

This document is an email chain dated March 14, 2019, circulated among Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (including Darren Indyke, Martin Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, and Jack Goldberger). The email shares a Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown detailing how the lead prosecutor in the Epstein case, A. Marie Villafaña, had been previously rebuked by a judge for concealing victim information in a prior sex crime case, and how Alexander Acosta defended her. The document includes a specific section marked as 'Privileged - Redacted'.

Email chain
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021729.jpg

An email chain from March 14, 2019, in which Darren Indyke forwards a Miami Herald article to 'J' (jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to a legal team including Martin Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, and Jack Goldberger. The article, by Julie K. Brown, details how Alexander Acosta (then U.S. Attorney) was notified that A. Marie Villafaña, the lead prosecutor in the Epstein case, had been previously rebuked by a judge for concealing victim information in a separate 2007 case. The document highlights the legal team's monitoring of press coverage regarding the handling of Epstein's plea deal.

Email thread / news article forward
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
49
As Recipient
29
Total
78

RE: Epstein

From: [Redacted] (AUSA)
To: Martin Weinberg

Requesting a call upon wrapping up for the night.

Email
2019-08-26
Communication Source

Re: Epstein

From: Martin Weinberg
To: [Redacted] (AUSA)

Discussing agenda for tomorrow; mentions concerns about MCC conditions and why client died.

Email
2019-08-26
Communication Source

Re: US v Epstein

From: Alex (implied from con...
To: Martin Weinberg

Reply: 'Marty, That time works for us, thanks. Could you please circulate a dial-in?'

Email
2019-08-14
Communication Source

Re: US v Epstein

From: Martin Weinberg
To: Alex (implied)

Confirmation: 'Yes, will do Thanks'

Email
2019-08-14
Communication Source

Re: US v Epstein - Preservation Requests

From: [REDACTED]
To: Martin Weinberg

Stating they are traveling and response might be delayed until next week.

Email
2019-08-01
Communication Source

Re: US v Epstein - Preservation Requests

From: Martin Weinberg
To: [REDACTED]

Mentioning a follow-up letter focusing on an AUSA in SD Fla regarding document preservation.

Email
2019-08-01
Communication Source

US v Epstein - Preservation Requests

From: Martin Weinberg
To: [REDACTED]

Requesting a call regarding notifying other relevant districts and DOJ of preservation request.

Email
2019-08-01
Communication Source

Re: US v Epstein - Preservation Requests

From: Martin Weinberg
To: [REDACTED]

Attaching '8.1.19_Supplemental_Discovery_Letter_Epstein_(1).pdf' and asking if he needs to contact specific AUSAs personally.

Email
2019-08-01
Communication Source

Re: US v Epstein - Preservation Requests

From: [REDACTED]
To: Martin Weinberg

Suggesting Weinberg send the follow-up letter immediately to be incorporated into the response.

Email
2019-08-01
Communication Source

Re: 19 Cr. 490 (RMB) - Discovery Production

From: Martin Weinberg
To: [REDACTED]

Thanks [Redacted]

Email
2019-07-31
Communication Source

RE: Call today

From: Assistant United State...
To: Martin Weinberg

Confirming 3pm works.

Email
2019-07-24
Communication Source

RE: Call today

From: Assistant United State...
To: Martin Weinberg

Proposing 2pm call and mentioning discussion of 'protective order'.

Email
2019-07-24
Communication Source

Re: Call today

From: Martin Weinberg
To: Assistant United State...

Stating availability at or after 1.

Email
2019-07-24
Communication Source

RE: Call today

From: Martin Weinberg
To: Assistant United State...

Asking AUSA to call Mike Miller at Steptoe and conference them.

Email
2019-07-24
Communication Source

RE: Call today

From: Martin Weinberg
To: Assistant United State...

Stating availability shortly after 3 so Mike Miller can join.

Email
2019-07-24
Communication Source

US v Epstein

From: Martin Weinberg
To: jeevacation@gmail.com;...

Inquiry about discussing case management issues, Protective Order, and Discovery rollout.

Email
2019-07-19
Communication Source

Re: Epstein - Legal Issues and Requests

From: Martin Weinberg
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Request to discuss further after the hearing.

Email
2019-07-18
Communication Source

Re: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB)

From: Martin Weinberg
To: [REDACTED]

Asking if the original document will be available to see tomorrow.

Email
2019-07-17
Communication Source

Re: Epstein - Legal Issues and Requests

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Martin Weinberg

Discussion regarding recusal of SDFL, preservation of communications, and the use of a taint team for privilege review of seized devices.

Email
2019-07-17
Communication Source

RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items

From: Martin Weinberg
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Raising issues of privilege review for seized devices; asking about communications between SDNY and ND Ga/Main Justice.

Email
2019-07-16
Communication Source

Epstein - Legal Issues and Requests

From: Martin Weinberg
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Clarification on SDFL recusal date (CVRA Dkt 205-2); discussion of taint review protocol for phones/electronics.

Email
2019-07-16
Communication Source

RE: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Martin Weinberg

Confirming SDFL recusal in March 2019; discussing ND Ga involvement; requesting list of attorneys for privilege screening.

Email
2019-07-16
Communication Source

Re: Epstein Arrest Seizure Items

From: Martin Weinberg
To: Assistant U.S. Attorne...

Mentioning list of attorneys to send to 'taint prosecutor'.

Email
2019-07-15
Communication Source

Re: U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein

From: Martin Weinberg
To: [REDACTED]

Confirming he expects to be with Reid Weingarten.

Email
2019-07-07
Communication Source

RE: U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein

From: [Redacted Prosecutor]
To: Martin Weinberg

Apology for missed contact with MCC counsel; plan to touch base tomorrow.

Email
2019-07-07
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search