| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
38
Very Strong
|
49 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
20
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Co counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Corresponded |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
John Browning
|
Process server recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Ingram
|
Professional media contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kathy Ruemmler
|
Co counsel professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marc Fernich
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Co counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Mike Blake
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted AUSA]
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (DOJ)
|
Professional opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-10 | N/A | Status Conference | Courtroom 110, 40 Centre St... | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Initial Appearance | Court | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case Called) | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Scheduled call/meeting regarding potential civil forfeiture issues. | Teleconference (dial-in req... | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Legal Notification Request | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-25 | N/A | Protective Order consented to by Defense Counsel. | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-07-25 | Legal filing | A court order in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB was filed. The order was signed by Judge Richard M. Berma... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Conference Call between Defense Team and SDNY | Phone | View |
| 2019-07-23 | N/A | Proposed conference call to discuss case management issues. | Teleconference | View |
| 2019-07-18 | N/A | Bond Hearing | Judge Richard M. Berman's C... | View |
| 2019-07-18 | N/A | Bail/Detention Hearing | SDNY Court | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Court hearing | Bond Hearing for Jeffrey Epstein was held. The court denied bail. A written order was to follow. ... | Court | View |
| 2019-07-17 | N/A | Exchange of discovery materials (Passport Photographs) in U.S. v. Epstein case. | New York | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | Court appearance/hearing | Court | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Presentation of Jeffrey Epstein at U.S. District Court | 500 Pearl Street | View |
| 2019-07-08 | Court proceeding | Initial Appearance as to Jeffrey Epstein held before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-08 | Court proceeding | Arraignment as to Jeffrey Epstein held before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman. Plea entered by J... | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-08 | Court proceeding | Status Conference as to Jeffrey Epstein held before Judge Richard M. Berman. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-08 | Court presentment | Presentment of defendant Jeffrey Epstein in court. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Arraignment - Plea Entered: Not Guilty | Court (Before Magistrate Ju... | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Scheduled presentation/arraignment of Jeffrey Epstein. | U.S. District Court, 500 Pe... | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Status Conference in USA v. Epstein before Judge Richard M. Berman | U.S. District Court, Southe... | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Arraignment and Conference | SDNY Court | View |
| 2019-07-07 | N/A | Verification of attorney Martin Weinberg and authorization for him to visit Jeffrey Epstein. | Metropolitan Correctional C... | View |
| 2019-07-07 | N/A | Attempted attorney visit denied | MCC | View |
This document is an email chain ending on March 8, 2011, in which Jeffrey Epstein forwards a list of interview questions from journalist Alexandra Wolfe to Mike Sitrick. The questions, originally sent to attorney Jay Lefkowitz, probe Epstein's post-prison life, the status of his $15 billion business, his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, and his charitable work with Bill Clinton.
An email chain from March 2011 in which Jeffrey Epstein forwards a list of interview questions from Alexandra Wolfe (via Peggy Siegal) to his legal team, Martin Weinberg and Darren Indyke. The document is marked privileged. The questions probe sensitive topics including Epstein's relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton, his work during imprisonment, his reaction to his conviction, and the status of his finances (referencing $15 billion).
An email dated April 23, 2019, from 'J' (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com) to attorneys Alan Dershowitz and Martin Weinberg. The email forwards a generic announcement from The Sidney Hillman Foundation congratulating the 2019 Hillman Prize recipients. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021113.
An email chain from May 29, 2019, in which attorney Roy Black forwards a response he sent to an undisclosed recipient (likely a journalist) to Jeffrey Epstein, Darren Indyke, and others. The underlying email states that Black has 'no comment on the trump story' and is finalizing a legal pleading regarding a plaintiff's remedies. The document reveals Epstein's personal email address as jeevacation@gmail.com.
This document is an email chain from May 29, 2019, in which attorney Roy Black forwards a response he sent to an unnamed recipient (likely a journalist) to his legal team and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). In the forwarded message, Black declines to comment on a 'trump story' stating they are finalizing a pleading regarding a plaintiff's position on remedies. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033361.
This document is page 2 of a legal affidavit, likely filed by representatives of the New York Post in December 2018. It details the newspaper's efforts to unseal legal briefs related to an appeal by Jeffrey Epstein, chronicling communications between Post reporter Susan Edelman and the Manhattan DA's office, as well as the affiant's communications with Epstein's lawyers, Jay Lefkowitz and Martin Weinberg. The DA's office indicated they would not oppose a petition for a redacted brief.
This document is an Affidavit of Service filed in the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, for the case of The People of the State of New York v. Jeffrey E. Epstein. John Browning attests that on January 14, 2018, he served legal documents via Federal Express to Martin Weinberg, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, David Aronberg, and Dexter Lee.
This document from April 27, 2016, is an email from attorney Martin Weinberg to his client, Jeffrey Epstein, forwarding a media inquiry. An investigative reporter from Fox News, referred by Alan Dershowitz, requested to arrange an on-the-record interview with Epstein regarding his ties to both the Clintons and Donald Trump.
This document is an email from May 29, 2019, where Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Roy Black, forwards a message to Epstein and his legal team. The original message was a 'no comment' response to an inquiry about a 'trump story,' with Black explaining that he would not comment until a legal pleading concerning a plaintiff's remedies was filed. The email identifies members of Epstein's legal circle, including Martin Weinberg, Jackie Perczek, and Darren Indyke, and reveals Epstein's email address as jeevacation@gmail.com.
This document is an email sent by Jeffrey Epstein to Martin Weinberg on March 8, 2011, marked as 'Privileged - Redacted'. Epstein forwards a Vanity Fair article published the same day by Vicky Ward, which details the relationship between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, refers to Maxwell as an alleged 'procurer', and revisits Epstein's financial history, past criminal charges, and associations with prominent figures like Prince Andrew and Les Wexner.
This document is an email dated January 30, 2015, from Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Martin Weinberg, to Epstein and Darren Indyke. Weinberg is forwarding a media enquiry from David Pegg, a journalist at The Guardian, regarding an upcoming article that may mention Epstein. Pegg notes that previous attempts to contact Epstein directly have failed and sets a response deadline of February 2, 2015.
This document is an email chain from February 2010 in which Jeffrey Epstein forwards an old 2008 email and a critical Palm Beach Post editorial about his plea deal to members of his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Martin Weinberg, and Robert Critton Jr. The repeated subject line indicates Epstein was having trouble with the emails being marked as 'undeliverable'.
This document is an email chain from 2010 where Jeffrey Epstein forwards a collection of news articles about himself to his legal team, including Robert D. Critton Jr., Jessica Cadwell, Alan M. Dershowitz, and Martin Weinberg. The forwarded chain originates from a 2008 email from Michael Reiter to a 'Joyce', which contained a 2006 Palm Beach Post editorial detailing allegations that Epstein, then over 50, solicited and paid for sex with underage girls.
This document is an email dated April 23, 2015, from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler, with the subject line "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE". The entire body of the email is redacted, indicating the communication is legally privileged. The email includes a standard confidentiality notice from Weinberg's law office and appears to be from a collection labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
This document is a heavily redacted email from 'jeffrey E.' (jeevacation@gmail.com) to attorney Martin Weinberg on April 23, 2015. The email is a reply to a previous message from Weinberg, and the subject line, 'Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE', indicates the communication is legally protected, with the content of both messages being completely withheld.
Discussing agenda for tomorrow; mentions concerns about MCC conditions and why client died.
Requesting a call upon wrapping up for the night.
Reply: 'Marty, That time works for us, thanks. Could you please circulate a dial-in?'
Confirmation: 'Yes, will do Thanks'
Mentioning a follow-up letter focusing on an AUSA in SD Fla regarding document preservation.
Stating they are traveling and response might be delayed until next week.
Requesting a call regarding notifying other relevant districts and DOJ of preservation request.
Attaching '8.1.19_Supplemental_Discovery_Letter_Epstein_(1).pdf' and asking if he needs to contact specific AUSAs personally.
Suggesting Weinberg send the follow-up letter immediately to be incorporated into the response.
Thanks [Redacted]
Stating availability shortly after 3 so Mike Miller can join.
Proposing 2pm call and mentioning discussion of 'protective order'.
Stating availability at or after 1.
Confirming 3pm works.
Asking AUSA to call Mike Miller at Steptoe and conference them.
Inquiry about discussing case management issues, Protective Order, and Discovery rollout.
Request to discuss further after the hearing.
Discussion regarding recusal of SDFL, preservation of communications, and the use of a taint team for privilege review of seized devices.
Asking if the original document will be available to see tomorrow.
Raising issues of privilege review for seized devices; asking about communications between SDNY and ND Ga/Main Justice.
Confirming SDFL recusal in March 2019; discussing ND Ga involvement; requesting list of attorneys for privilege screening.
Clarification on SDFL recusal date (CVRA Dkt 205-2); discussion of taint review protocol for phones/electronics.
Mentioning list of attorneys to send to 'taint prosecutor'.
Confirming attempt to call; stating he and Reid will call in the morning.
Apology for missed contact with MCC counsel; plan to touch base tomorrow.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity