| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
38
Very Strong
|
49 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
20
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Co counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Corresponded |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
John Browning
|
Process server recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Ingram
|
Professional media contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kathy Ruemmler
|
Co counsel professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marc Fernich
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Co counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Mike Blake
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted AUSA]
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (DOJ)
|
Professional opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-07 | N/A | Attempted Attorney Visit | MCC | View |
| 2019-07-07 | N/A | Verification of Martin Weinberg's attorney status and authorization to visit Jeffrey Epstein. | MCC New York | View |
| 2019-05-29 | N/A | Roy Black forwarded his 'no comment' email to Jeffrey Epstein and his legal team (Martin Weinberg... | N/A | View |
| 2019-03-14 | N/A | Circulation of negative press regarding Epstein's prosecution team among his legal defense team. | View | |
| 2016-10-09 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein shares a news article regarding a lawsuit against Donald Trump with his legal con... | N/A | View |
| 2016-10-08 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein shares a news article link with his legal team regarding a federal judge ordering... | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-28 | N/A | Reuters reporter David Ingram contacts Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit alleging rape by Epste... | View | |
| 2016-04-28 | N/A | Reuters inquiry regarding Katie Johnson lawsuit. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2016-04-28 | N/A | David Ingram of Reuters contacts Epstein's legal team regarding an impending story about a lawsui... | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-28 | N/A | Reuters planning to publish a story regarding the lawsuit. | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-28 | N/A | Reuters inquiry regarding a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein initiates an email chain among his le... | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-27 | N/A | A Fox News reporter sent a media inquiry to Martin Weinberg seeking an on-the-record interview wi... | N/A | View |
| 2015-04-23 | N/A | Email correspondence between Jeffrey E. and his attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a matter prote... | N/A | View |
| 2015-04-23 | N/A | Attorney Martin Weinberg sent an email concerning an 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE' matter to Jeffre... | N/A | View |
| 2011-03-08 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sends an email to Martin Weinberg forwarding a Vanity Fair article about himself ... | N/A | View |
| 2008-03-12 | N/A | Meeting attended by Starr, Lefkowitz, Weinberg (Epstein defense team), and Oosterbaan, Mandelker,... | Unspecified | View |
| 2008-03-12 | Meeting | A meeting between Epstein's defense team and DOJ officials to discuss the case. It was described ... | The Department (DOJ) | View |
| 2007-12-14 | N/A | Meeting in Miami between Acosta, USAO representatives, and Epstein's defense team (Starr, Dershow... | Miami | View |
This email chain from April 28, 2016, tracks a Reuters press inquiry regarding a lawsuit (Katie Johnson v Trump) alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The inquiry was sent by reporter David Ingram to Martin Weinberg, who forwarded it to Epstein. Epstein then forwarded the chain to Tom Barrack with the comment 'nuts but i thought you guys should know,' attaching the complaint PDF.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, originating with a Reuters reporter, David Ingram, contacting attorney Martin Weinberg for comment regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleged that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email was forwarded by Weinberg to Epstein, and subsequently by Epstein to Lesley Groff, who responded with concern ('so sorry...'). Portions of the email chain between Weinberg and Epstein are redacted under privilege.
This document is an email chain forwarding a Miami Herald article titled "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case." The article reports that the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta following the recusal of Miami federal prosecutors. It also references a video of Attorney General nominee William Barr pledging to review the handling of the Epstein case.
This document is a 'Counsel List' page from a legal filing in the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein' (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It details the contact information (addresses, phone numbers, emails) for attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein, including Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, and Joseph Ackerman, as well as Marc Nurik representing Scott Rothstein. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document contains an email chain from March 7, 2011, in which attorney Jay Lefkowitz forwards a list of interview questions from journalist Alexandra Wolfe to Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email jeevacation@gmail.com) and his legal team. Wolfe's questions probe Epstein's current status, including his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton, his business valuation ($15 billion), his time in prison, and his reaction to his conviction. Lefkowitz prefaces the exchange by warning the journalist that previous press coverage has been 'defamatory' and requesting factual questions.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by a Reuters reporter asking attorney Martin Weinberg about a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. The email is forwarded by Weinberg to Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger. The content of the attorneys' discussions is redacted under attorney-client privilege.
This document is an email from Darren Indyke to 'jeevacation' (likely Epstein) and attorney Martin Weinberg, dated May 10, 2019. The body of the email is redacted for privilege, but it forwards a Miami Herald article from February 2019 regarding Jeffrey Sloman defending former prosecutor Alexander Acosta's handling of the Epstein plea deal. The document highlights the ongoing scrutiny of the non-prosecution agreement.
An email sent by Darren Indyke on May 10, 2019, to Martin Weinberg and the address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The subject line indicates the email concerns a 'Privileged and Confidential' timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case published by the Miami Herald. The body of the email is heavily redacted, though the file attachments list names relevant to the case, including Virginia Roberts, Brad Edwards, and Barry Krischer.
This document is a 'Counsel List' page from a legal filing in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG), likely from 2009 based on the case number. It lists contact information for attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein (Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, Joseph Ackerman, and the firm Farmer, Jaffe, et al.) and an attorney representing Scott Rothstein (Marc S. Nurik). The document includes email addresses, physical addresses in Florida and Massachusetts, and phone/fax numbers.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters correspondent David Ingram seeking comment from Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwarded this inquiry to Epstein, who subsequently forwarded it to Darren Indyke. The email includes an attachment titled 'katie johnson v trump complaint.pdf', and a significant portion of the correspondence between Weinberg and Epstein is redacted as privileged.
An email sent by Jeffrey Epstein (Jeffrey E.) on October 9, 2016, to attorneys Kathy Ruemmler, Darren Indyke, and Martin Weinberg. The sole content of the email is a link to a LawNewz article titled 'Federal Judge Orders Hearing in Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit Case'. The document contains a standard legal confidentiality disclaimer identifying the content as the property of 'JEE'.
This document is an email dated March 2, 2019, from Darren Indyke to Martin Weinberg (cc: jeevacation@gmail.com) containing a link to a Palm Beach Post article. The article, written by Jane Musgrave, reports that Jeffrey Epstein paid $5.5 million to three women to settle underage-sex lawsuits. The document includes captions referencing attorneys Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, and mentions Epstein's 2008 guilty plea.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram contacting attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California federal court. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwards this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwards it to his legal team (Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger). Portions of the attorney communications are redacted as privileged.
This document is an email chain dated April 28, 2016, originating from a Reuters journalist, David Ingram, seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email chain shows the inquiry being forwarded from Weinberg to Epstein (at jeevacation@gmail.com), and subsequently discussed by attorneys Jack Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Roy Black, though the specific legal advice is redacted as privileged.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit (Katie Johnson v. Trump) alleging rape by Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in 1994. Weinberg forwarded this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwarded it to his legal defense team, including Alan Dershowitz and Roy Black. The document includes a 'Privileged - Redacted' stamp, indicating sensitive attorney-client communication was removed.
An email chain from March 19, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com) forwards a message from attorney Martin Weinberg to Kathy Ruemmler. The subject line references 'Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein.' The body of the attorney's email is heavily redacted, and the document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This is a heavily redacted email dated April 23, 2015, sent to Jeffrey Epstein (using the address jeevacation@gmail.com) and Kathy Ruemmler. The email was sent by attorney Martin G. Weinberg regarding a matter subject to attorney-client privilege. The entire body of the message has been withheld.
This document contains the footer and header of an email chain involving the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., dated April 23, 2015. It displays the firm's Boston address and a standard legal privilege disclaimer. The recipient of the email from Martin Weinberg has been redacted.
An email chain from April 23, 2015, between attorney Martin Weinberg and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'). The subject of the correspondence is 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE'. The actual content of the messages has been entirely redacted with 'Privileged - Redacted' stamps. The document includes standard legal disclaimers and Weinberg's Boston office address.
This document is an email chain dated April 23, 2015, between attorney Martin Weinberg, Jeffrey Epstein, and Kathy Ruemmler (with 'dkiesq' CC'd). The subject matter is explicitly marked 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE'. The actual content of the messages has been completely redacted under privilege claims, leaving only the header information, legal disclaimers, and contact information for Martin Weinberg's Boston law office.
This document is a chain of forwarded emails initiated by Michael Reiter (Palm Beach Police) in 2008 and eventually forwarded by Jeffrey Epstein to his legal team in 2010. The content includes an editorial from the Palm Beach Post titled "He was over 50. And they were girls," which criticizes the leniency of charges against Epstein regarding minors. The email chain tracks the dissemination of this article among Epstein's defense attorneys, including Alan Dershowitz, Robert Critton, and Martin Weinberg.
This document is an email chain originating from a 2008 email by Michael Reiter to a contact named Margie, discussing leaks regarding the Epstein plea deal and criticizing the Palm Beach Daily News for their editorial silence. The email contains the text of a critical 2008 Palm Beach Post editorial regarding Epstein's sentence and mansion. In 2010, Jeffrey Epstein forwarded this historic email chain to his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Martin Weinberg, and Robert Critton Jr.
This document is an email chain initiated by Jeffrey Epstein in 2010, forwarding a 2008 email from Michael Reiter (Palm Beach Police) to a journalist named Margie. Reiter discusses leaking information about Epstein's plea deal to her and expresses frustration that her paper (Palm Beach Daily News) remained silent editorially. The email includes the full text of a critical Palm Beach Post editorial from July 2008, highlighting the 'different system of justice for the wealthy' and detailing Epstein's legal team.
This document is an email chain dated March 14, 2019, circulated among Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (including Darren Indyke, Martin Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, and Jack Goldberger). The email shares a Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown detailing how the lead prosecutor in the Epstein case, A. Marie Villafaña, had been previously rebuked by a judge for concealing victim information in a prior sex crime case, and how Alexander Acosta defended her. The document includes a specific section marked as 'Privileged - Redacted'.
An email chain from March 14, 2019, in which Darren Indyke forwards a Miami Herald article to 'J' (jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to a legal team including Martin Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, and Jack Goldberger. The article, by Julie K. Brown, details how Alexander Acosta (then U.S. Attorney) was notified that A. Marie Villafaña, the lead prosecutor in the Epstein case, had been previously rebuked by a judge for concealing victim information in a separate 2007 case. The document highlights the legal team's monitoring of press coverage regarding the handling of Epstein's plea deal.
Discussing agenda for tomorrow; mentions concerns about MCC conditions and why client died.
Requesting a call upon wrapping up for the night.
Confirmation: 'Yes, will do Thanks'
Reply: 'Marty, That time works for us, thanks. Could you please circulate a dial-in?'
Suggesting Weinberg send the follow-up letter immediately to be incorporated into the response.
Attaching '8.1.19_Supplemental_Discovery_Letter_Epstein_(1).pdf' and asking if he needs to contact specific AUSAs personally.
Requesting a call regarding notifying other relevant districts and DOJ of preservation request.
Stating they are traveling and response might be delayed until next week.
Mentioning a follow-up letter focusing on an AUSA in SD Fla regarding document preservation.
Thanks [Redacted]
Proposing 2pm call and mentioning discussion of 'protective order'.
Asking AUSA to call Mike Miller at Steptoe and conference them.
Stating availability shortly after 3 so Mike Miller can join.
Confirming 3pm works.
Stating availability at or after 1.
Inquiry about discussing case management issues, Protective Order, and Discovery rollout.
Request to discuss further after the hearing.
Discussion regarding recusal of SDFL, preservation of communications, and the use of a taint team for privilege review of seized devices.
Asking if the original document will be available to see tomorrow.
Clarification on SDFL recusal date (CVRA Dkt 205-2); discussion of taint review protocol for phones/electronics.
Confirming SDFL recusal in March 2019; discussing ND Ga involvement; requesting list of attorneys for privilege screening.
Raising issues of privilege review for seized devices; asking about communications between SDNY and ND Ga/Main Justice.
Mentioning list of attorneys to send to 'taint prosecutor'.
Update on unsealing indictment expected at 9:15 AM Monday; discussion of potential bail consent vs detention.
Confirming he expects to be with Reid Weingarten.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity