STI
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
US State Department
|
Unknown |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Max Tegmark
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Benjamin Harnwell
|
Founder president |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Hillary Clinton
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Raphael Mechoulam
|
Professional employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BARBARA J. BURNS
|
Professional organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard Koo
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Performer host |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the author
|
Guest attendee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Guest attendee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Arthur Brooks
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
University of Mississippi
|
Contractual |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard Perle
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
NLV-II
|
Portfolio company |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Zachary Bechard
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Leon T. Hadar
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Researcher subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted
|
Cooperating witness |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Professional affiliation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | U.S. Justice Department to discuss consumer protection at social media meeting | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Certification of Victim Status | USA | View |
| 2020-12-02 | Report | The associate warden reported to the Criminal Justice Advisory Board that MDC does not mandate CO... | MDC | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Discovery/Search of Epstein's New York apartment where photos were taken and schoolgirl outfits w... | New York Apartment | View |
| 2014-06-01 | N/A | Amendments strengthening enforcement of foreign agents law. | Russia | View |
| 2014-03-01 | N/A | Firing of Andrey Zubov for an article criticizing the Crimea seizure. | Moscow | View |
| 2014-01-01 | N/A | Lawfare Institute analysis of Snowden documents. | N/A | View |
| 2010-08-01 | N/A | Update to the USA Today/Cato Institute analysis. | USA | View |
| 2010-03-01 | N/A | Publication of USA Today/Cato Institute analysis and OMB/OPM response regarding federal wages. | USA | View |
| 2009-11-30 | Request for assignment | Barbara J. Burns requested an investigator for the 'State vs. JEFFREY E EPSTEIN' case to serve a ... | N/A | View |
| 2004-07-01 | N/A | International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on the Barrier | International Court of Justice | View |
| 1984-08-31 | Hearing | A hearing by the subcommittee on Criminal Justice regarding the 1984 Federal Rape Law Reform. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00015246.tif
This document is a list of academic institutions, legal associations, and other organizations, along with events, grouped by year from 1974 to 1980. It appears to be a chronological record of affiliations, seminars, and conferences, potentially related to a professional's career or an institution's activities. The document also includes page numbering and a document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00015246'.
DOJ-OGR-00015215.tif
This document is a page from a curriculum vitae or professional biography, detailing academic and professional achievements. It lists various memberships in psychological and scientific societies, editorial roles, and recognition received, such as the Elizabeth Loftus Award and mentions in 'Who's Who' publications. The document highlights a career spanning several decades with a focus on psychology and related fields.
DOJ-OGR-00033229.tif
This document details Jeffrey's philanthropic activities, highlighting his significant contributions to educational and civic organizations. He supported scholars at risk globally, sponsored awards for women economists, and funded Rwandan students' education in the US. Jeffrey also donated to various wellness and civic organizations in New York City and the Virgin Islands, including the Robin Hood Foundation and Antilles School.
DOJ-OGR-00001139.jpg
This legal document outlines two major impediments to Ms. Maxwell's defense preparation. Firstly, it details persistent technical failures with discovery materials provided by the government, including broken and malfunctioning hard drives, which have left her without access to readable evidence for over four months. Secondly, it describes the added burdens of a 14-day COVID-19 quarantine and heightened exposure risk at the MDC due to contact with untested staff, further limiting her ability to review case materials and prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00000918.jpg
This document serves as a legal argument dated April 1, 2021, detailing the harsh prison conditions faced by Ghislaine Maxwell, including sleep deprivation via flashlight checks, inedible food, and undrinkable water. The defense argues that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is subjecting her to this unconstitutional treatment solely due to the public relations fallout surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein. It further notes that the charges against her stem from allegations made by anonymous accusers regarding events from 1994 to 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00000897.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from Jan 26 to Feb 4, 2021. It details significant pre-trial activity, including the filing of twelve pre-trial motions by the defense, disputes over laptop access at the MDC Brooklyn involving the Bureau of Prisons, and specific motions to suppress evidence and dismiss charges (counts 1-6). The document highlights the involvement of various AUSAs, defense attorneys, and Judge Alison J. Nathan in managing redactions and discovery disputes.
DOJ-OGR-00000859.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering entries from January 26, 2021, to February 4, 2021. It details various legal filings, including government letters regarding laptop access at MDC Brooklyn, a denial of a BOP request to vacate an order, and multiple defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss specific counts of the indictment. The document highlights the active legal maneuvering regarding redactions, detention conditions, and pre-trial dismissal attempts.
DOJ-OGR-00000450.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The author asserts that Epstein consistently notified New Mexico official Detective Deborah Anaya of his presence at his residence there. The filing also counters a point made by the judge, arguing against the idea that sex offender recidivism rates increase after 15 years by citing studies suggesting the risk of relapse substantially drops over time for offense-free individuals.
DOJ-OGR-00000436.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The author refutes the judge's suggestion that sex offender recidivism rates increase after 15 years, citing two studies that conclude the opposite. The document also mentions a New Mexico detective, Deborah Anaya, and speculation by a third-party counsel, Mr. Boies, regarding alleged payments in late 2018.
DOJ-OGR-00015761.jpg
This document is a shopping or inventory list dated February 14, 2005. It is divided into two sections, 'Miscellaneous' and 'Household products', listing various food items and a comprehensive range of brand-name cleaning and household supplies. The page is numbered 32 and includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) document identifier.
DOJ-OGR-00015675.jpg
This document, dated September 7, 2002, is a list titled "PB New Shampoo and Massage products". It enumerates various shampoo and massage products from a wide range of cosmetic and personal care brands. The document is marked as "GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 420" and includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) control number, indicating it was collected as evidence in a legal proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00015416.jpg
This document is page 3 of 5 of a FedEx invoice (Number 7-153-78512) dated December 12, 2002. It provides a summary of charges for one shipment, totaling $64.41 specifically for 'Duties, Tax, Customs, Other Fees'. The document is marked 'CONFIDENTIAL' and bears DOJ and SDNY Bates stamps.
DOJ-OGR-00015307.jpg
This document is a 'Find Report' from Shoppers Travel, Inc. generated on April 27, 2016. It lists financial transactions (invoices) from May 19, 1999, to July 30, 1999. The ledger tracks travel-related expenses for Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and numerous associates including Emma Tayler, Julian Bicknell, and Martyn Rix. The document shows a running balance that reaches over $1.4 million by July 1999.
DOJ-OGR-00002073.jpg
This document is a page from a legal declaration by a forensic accountant. The declarant outlines their experience working for law enforcement and on the World Trade Center Integrity Compliance Program. They state they were hired by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to independently review a financial report on Ghislaine Maxwell, which was prepared by Macalvins Accountants and covers the years 2015-2020.
DOJ-OGR-00002015.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) outlines the defense's grievances regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's inability to access readable discovery materials due to technical failures with hard drives provided by the government. It also details harsh prison conditions at the MDC, specifically noting that Maxwell was placed in quarantine after exposure to a COVID-positive staffer and subjected to invasive searches that increased her health risks.
DOJ-OGR-00022351.jpg
This document is page 66 of a contact book (likely Jeffrey Epstein's 'Little Black Book'), identified by the DOJ Bates number DOJ-OGR-00022351. It contains an alphabetical list of contacts ranging from 'Beverly Wilshire' to 'Four Seasons Restaurant'. The list primarily consists of high-end hotels, restaurants, and services (mostly in New York), along with specific individuals such as chef Henry Meer and Gibby Cohen. All specific contact details (phone numbers/addresses) have been redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00021751.jpg
This legal document from July 27, 2023, argues that Ms. Maxwell has legal standing to enforce a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) as a third-party beneficiary. It cites precedent from the Second and Seventh Circuits to support the claim that the immunity granted in the NPA should prevent the United States from prosecuting her in the Southern District of New York. The document asserts that the District Court has already correctly found in Maxwell's favor on this point.
DOJ-OGR-00021454.jpg
This document is page 252 of a larger legal filing (Exhibit SA-278), originating from the DOJ (DOJ-OGR-00021454) and filed in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It outlines Department of Justice policies regarding 'Consultation With a Government Attorney,' specifically detailing the rights of victims to confer with prosecutors about major case decisions like plea agreements and dismissals, while explicitly stating that this does not create an attorney-client relationship. It lists factors responsible officials must consider when deciding whether to notify victims of plea negotiations, such as public safety and the number of victims.
DOJ-OGR-00021359.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report concludes that the frequency of meetings between USAO officials (Acosta, Menchel, Lourie, Sloman, Villafaña) and Epstein's defense team (Starr, Lefkowitz) was not evidence of improper favoritism, given the high-profile nature of the case and the resources of the defendant. It details specific meetings in late 2007 and early 2008, noting that despite defense efforts to involve higher-level DOJ officials (Fisher, Filip), the USAO maintained its position on the federal investigation and the NPA. The report ultimately finds no evidence that these meetings resulted in substantial improper benefits to the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00021256.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal drafting process of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement. It highlights how Menchel modified Villafaña's draft to specify a two-year state imprisonment term and initially included a federal Rule 11(c) plea option, which was subsequently removed, allegedly by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta ('Alex'). The text includes footnotes referencing emails from September 6, 2007, discussing Acosta's refusal to entertain the Rule 11(c) plea.
DOJ-OGR-00031369.jpg
This document contains three MySpace blog posts from late 2005 by the user 'sublimehottie'. The author describes attending a 'Toys For Tots' charity bike rally in December and, in an earlier November post, expresses deep depression and sadness about an upcoming move on January 5th. The move necessitates leaving their roommate and best friend, Will, which is the primary source of their distress.
DOJ-OGR-00031356.jpg
This document is a printout of two MySpace blog posts from November 2005. In the first post, the author angrily recounts quitting their job at Victoria's Secret after being falsely accused of causing losses and vows to find success. In the second post, the author expresses deep sadness and depression about an upcoming trip on January 5th that will require them to move out and leave their best friend and roommate, Will.
DOJ-OGR-00031325.jpg
This document is a screenshot of a Myspace blog page from late 2005 belonging to an 18-year-old female user. A post from December 10 describes her excitement attending a 'Toys for Tots' charity motorcycle rally. An earlier post from November 15 reveals her depression and anxiety about an upcoming move on January 5th, which will separate her from her best friend, Will.
DOJ-OGR-00019836.jpg
This legal document, dated April 1, 2021, argues that Ms. Maxwell is being subjected to unconstitutional and inappropriate treatment by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The author claims this treatment, which includes sleep deprivation, inedible food, and unnecessary suicide watch, is a direct result of the death of Epstein and is preventing Ms. Maxwell from adequately preparing for her trial. The charges against her are noted to be from 1994-1997 and involve three anonymous accusers.
DOJ-OGR-00013294.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) in the case USA v. Maxwell. The Court and attorneys discuss the admissibility of Mar-a-Lago personnel records (Exhibits 823 and 824) intended to prove that Virginia Roberts was the daughter and dependent of an employee, Mr. Roberts. The debate centers on whether the employee-filled forms constitute hearsay or admissible business records verified by the employer.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity