District Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Assignment of civil case caption 9:08-CV-80736. | District Court | View |
| 2006-10-06 | N/A | Grand Jury subpoena issued by US District Court, Southern District of Florida | Southern District of Florida | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017598.jpg
This document appears to be a narrative statement or correspondence submitted to the House Oversight Committee by Grace Nadine McGuire. It details allegations of a conspiracy involving IBM executives (Palmisano, Skoog), her former employers (the Gunthers), and her own mother to sabotage her pregnancy in 2007 and destroy her credibility through legal battles in 2011. The text quotes extensively from two specific lawsuits: 'McGuire v. John and Avery Gunther' (DC Superior Court) and 'McGuire v. IBM' (US District Court of Virginia).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017191.jpg
This document is page 104 of a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) recounting a Supreme Court oral argument regarding the film 'I Am Curious (Yellow).' The author details a contentious exchange with Chief Justice Warren Burger regarding a 'bear-baiting' analogy, harshly criticizing Burger's intelligence and judicial performance. The text also references the subsequent 'Miller v. California' decision in June 1973.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018039.jpg
This document serves as the cover page for Exhibit 16, associated with a legal filing on April 16, 2019, for Case 1:19-cv-03377. It contains a Bates stamp indicating it is part of a production for the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018030.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for 'Exhibit 13' filed on April 16, 2019, as part of Case 1:19-cv-03377. It bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018030, indicating it was part of a production to or from the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018018.jpg
This document is the final page (Page 4 of 4) of a court filing exhibit (Case 1:19-cv-03377). It is a printout of an Axios web article titled 'Alan Dershowitz says he's still advising Jeffrey Epstein.' The page is largely blank, containing only the header, the article title/tag ('SEXUAL ASSAULT'), the footer URL, page numbers, and a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018018'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017987.jpg
This document appears to be the final page (Page 3 of 3) of a court filing (Case 1:19-cv-03377) dated April 16, 2019. The text is a fragment of a sentence discussing 'suppressed emails' and a 'book manuscript' in the context of determining truthfulness. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017984.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:19-cv-03377) dated April 16, 2019, containing a printout of a response letter written by Alan Dershowitz to the publication Raw Story. In the text, Dershowitz categorically denies meeting or having sex with Virginia Roberts, claims she fabricated the story for money, and challenges her to repeat the claims outside of court immunity so he can sue for defamation. An editor's note clarifies Raw Story's stance, stating they reported accusations leveled by others.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010574.jpg
This page from a legal document details statements by Alfredo Rodriguez, a household employee of Jeffrey Epstein, regarding underage girls visiting Epstein's mansion for "massages." It describes a journal Rodriguez took from Epstein's computer, dubbed "The Holy Grail," which listed names of alleged abuse victims and acquaintances, and mentions Rodriguez's subsequent criminal charge for attempting to sell this evidence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011931.jpg
This document appears to be an investigative article (likely from The Daily Beast) submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. It details the legal troubles of Epstein employee Rodriguez, Epstein's financial influence over the Palm Beach Police Department via donations, and his alleged sex trafficking operation involving Jean Luc Brunel and the MC2 modeling agency. It highlights a specific $1 million wire transfer from Epstein to Brunel in 2004 and describes a racketeering pattern involving Maxwell, Marcinkova, and others.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011911.jpg
This document is a civil summons form from the 11th Judicial Circuit Court in Miami-Dade County, Florida, written in Haitian Creole. It informs a defendant that a lawsuit has been filed against them and mandates a written response within 20 days to avoid a default judgment. The form includes court location addresses, instructions for legal assistance, and an ADA notice providing contact information for disability accommodations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011910.jpg
This document is a French-language civil action summons form for the 11th Judicial Circuit Court in Miami-Dade, Florida. It instructs the defendant to respond to a lawsuit within 20 days to avoid default judgment and lists various courthouse locations in the county. It also includes an ADA notice providing contact information for disability accommodations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015531.jpg
This document is the cover page for the initial Complaint filed in the lawsuit Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:15-cv-07433) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It was filed on September 21, 2015. The document lists Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP as legal counsel and bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015368.jpg
A narrative page, stamped by House Oversight, recounting the final years of comedian Lenny Bruce. The narrator, identified as 'Paul' (likely Paul Krassner given the context), describes Lenny's legal battles in 1965, his correspondence regarding the NY State government, his death in 1966, and his funeral. The author mentions working on a novel about a similar satirist.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015023.jpg
This document appears to be part of a larger correspondence or 'whistleblower' narrative submitted to House Oversight. It details allegations by Nadine McGuire regarding a conspiracy involving IBM, the NSF, and her own family (the Gunthers and her mother), claiming they colluded to sabotage her pregnancy in 2007 and destroy her credibility. The text mixes legal citations from 2011 lawsuits with geopolitical commentary linking 9/11, DHS, and the election of Emmanuel Macron (dating the writing to post-2017).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015010.jpg
This document appears to be a narrative or submission by Nadine McGuire summarizing two legal battles involving IBM and the Gunther family. McGuire alleges that the Gunthers accepted payment from IBM to destroy her credibility and file a restraining order against her, while simultaneously alleging in a separate federal suit that IBM executives and her own mother (Pauline Scala McGuire) were responsible for an assault that caused the death of her unborn child in 2007. The page contains excerpts from complaints filed in DC Superior Court and the US District Court of Virginia in May 2011.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013476.jpg
This document is a legal motion filed on June 28, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys in the civil case 'Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein' (Case No. 08-CIV-80893). Epstein is requesting a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson or a second mediation attempt before July 1, 2010, citing upcoming trial deadlines on July 19, 2010. The document notes that a previous mediation on April 5, 2010, with mediator Rodney Romano failed to produce an agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013390.jpg
This page from a legal filing argues that Edwards is entitled to summary judgment against Jeffrey Epstein. The argument relies on adverse inferences drawn from Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment and his documented history of harassing and intimidating witnesses (who are also referred to as victims and potential accomplices). The document cites Florida case law to support the admissibility of witness tampering evidence as proof of consciousness of guilt.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013387.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013387) arguing for the dismissal of Epstein's claims against a party named Edwards. It lists specific unanswered discovery questions regarding physical contact with individuals identified as L.M., Jane Doe, and E.W., and cites Florida case law to argue that Epstein's refusal to answer these questions violates discovery rules and deprives Edwards of a fair defense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029426.jpg
This document is the final page (3 of 3) of a letter filed as an exhibit in a civil court case on May 25, 2017. It contains the closing signature of James Robertson, Senior Managing Editor of the National Enquirer. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029415.jpg
This document is the third and final page of a legal exhibit filed on May 25, 2017 (Case 1:17-cv-03956-PGG). It contains the closing signature block of a letter from James Robertson, Senior Managing Editor of the National Enquirer. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029405.jpg
This document is the first page of a legal complaint filed on May 25, 2017, in the Southern District of New York by Radar Online LLC against the FBI. The lawsuit seeks to compel the FBI to release records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regarding the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein for sex trafficking. The document establishes the parties involved and the court's jurisdiction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014072.jpg
This document is a page from a 2014 legal academic article discussing the application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It details the timeline of abuse from 2001-2007 involving over 30 minors and analyzes when victim rights would attach during the investigation phases by the Palm Beach Police and the FBI in 2006. The text argues that state investigations do not trigger federal CVRA protections and notes the transition from state to federal interest when the Palm Beach Police requested FBI assistance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity