| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ricci~Leopold, P.A.
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
C.L.
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
C.L.
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Plaintiff (C.M.A.)
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
B.B.
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
C. L. Judge
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
plaintiff
|
Counsel for plaintiff |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
plaintiff
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-06-29 | N/A | Signing of Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2010-06-14 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Withdrawing Subpoena | US District Court, Southern... | View |
| 2010-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2010-05-11 | N/A | Start of trial for Plaintiff's lead counsel in a separate case (Case No.: 50 2009 CA 028195 XXXX ... | Palm Beach Civil Circuit Court | View |
| 2010-03-31 | N/A | Filing of Civil Cover Sheet for Case 9:10-cv-80447-KAM | Southern District of Florid... | View |
| 2009-06-26 | N/A | Certificate of Service furnished | Palm Beach Gardens, FL | View |
| 2009-06-25 | N/A | Court Hearing on Motion to Unseal Records & Motion to Intervene | Courtroom (Palm Beach County) | View |
| 2009-06-15 | N/A | Motion to Intervene filed with the Clerk. | Palm Beach County Circuit C... | View |
| 2009-06-11 | N/A | Certificate of Service mailed to opposing counsel. | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2008-09-18 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-08-21 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiff's Motion to Preserve Evidence. | US District Court Southern ... | View |
| 2008-08-18 | N/A | Plaintiff filed Motion to Remand case to state court. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-06-18 | Cancellation of hearings | Hearings scheduled for June 18, 2008, regarding Defendant Epstein's Motion for Enlargement of Tim... | THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15... | View |
| 2008-06-18 | Document service | A true and correct copy of the Notice of Cancellation of Hearings was served by U.S. Mail to all ... | N/A | View |
This document is a Reply filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in November 2009 requesting a permanent order for the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), which was undergoing restructuring. The filing highlights that the Department of Justice had seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including about 13 boxes related to Epstein cases, amidst concerns of 'serious ethical and potentially criminal issues' at the firm. The document also argues against delaying the deposition of RRA's Chief Restructuring Officer, Herbert Stettin, citing upcoming trial deadlines.
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by third-party witness Igor Zinoviev, requesting a protective order to prevent his deposition in the case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Zinoviev, who worked as a driver and bodyguard for Epstein since November 2005, argues he has no relevant information for the civil cases as his employment began after the alleged events and he never discussed the criminal or civil cases with Epstein.
This document is a 'Notice of Compliance' filed on July 28, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It pertains to multiple civil cases filed by 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs against Epstein. The filing states that while the court ordered the parties to agree on a preservation of evidence order, they were unable to reach a full agreement, leading Epstein to submit his own proposed order. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and defendants, including Sarah Kellen.
Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice for Case No. 10-CV-80447 (C.L. vs. Jeffrey Epstein) in the Southern District of Florida. The case was dismissed following a stipulation by the parties, with the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce settlement terms. The order was signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on June 24, 2010.
This document is a 'Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice' filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 24, 2010. It formally ends the lawsuit between Plaintiff 'C.L.' and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein following a settlement agreement. The document is signed by attorneys Robert D. Critton, Jr. (representing Epstein) and Spencer T. Kuvin (representing C.L.).
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of C.L. vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-CV-80447). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case following a stipulation by the parties, denied all pending motions as moot, and retained jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement. The order was entered on the docket on June 24, 2010.
This document is an Emergency Motion filed on June 14, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team to quash a subpoena and prevent the deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez, scheduled for the following day. Epstein's lawyers argue that the subpoena issued by C.L.'s counsel (Spencer Kuvin) is premature under Rule 26(d) and that the cross-notice by Jane Doe's counsel (Brad Edwards) is invalid because discovery in the Jane Doe case had already concluded on May 31, 2010. The document includes the motion, a subpoena exhibit, and a cross-notice exhibit.
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff C.L. opposing Jeffrey Epstein's motion to dismiss Count III of her complaint. The core legal argument concerns whether the Adam Walsh Act (2006) can be applied retroactively to Epstein's conduct; the Plaintiff argues it provides a civil, non-punitive remedy and thus does not violate the Ex Post Facto clause. The document also graphically describes Epstein's 'systematic' child exploitation enterprise, involving at least three assistants who recruited, groomed, and paid minor girls, which Epstein sought to strike from the record.
This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 11, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida (Case 10-80447) by Plaintiff C.L. requesting a 10-day extension to respond to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss. The extension was requested because Plaintiff's counsel, Spencer T. Kuvin, had a conflicting trial starting the same day in Palm Beach Civil Circuit Court. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing Epstein's legal team (Critton, Pike, Goldberger) and a proposed order for Judge Kenneth A. Marra to sign.
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action issued on March 31, 2010, by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It notifies Jeffrey Epstein that he is being sued by a plaintiff identified as 'C.L.' and instructs him to serve an answer to the complaint within 21 days to the plaintiff's attorney, Spencer T. Kuvin.
This document is a civil summons issued on March 31, 2010, by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Plaintiff C.L. v. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (Case 9:10-cv-80447-KAM). It commands Epstein to respond to the lawsuit within 21 days and lists Spencer T. Kuvin as the plaintiff's attorney. The second page contains a blank Proof of Service form.
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on March 31, 2010, initiating a federal lawsuit by plaintiff 'C.L.' against Jeffrey Epstein. The cause of action is cited as sexual assault of a minor under 18 U.S.C §2255 and §2422. The document lists Epstein's legal team, including Jack Goldberger, Bruce Reinhart, and Robert Critton, and references numerous related federal cases.
This document is a page from a legal filing, listing contact information for various attorneys and their respective clients in several related court cases. It details counsel for plaintiffs, including C.M.A., and counsel for defendants Sarah Kellen and Jeffrey Epstein, along with their law firms and contact details.
This document is a legal notice from Ricci~Leopold, P.A., dated June 18, 2008, informing all counsel that hearings scheduled for that day have been cancelled. The hearings pertained to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Enlargement of Time and Defendant Haley Robson's Motion to Quash Service of Process in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, filed in Palm Beach County, Florida.
Notice that Plaintiff C.L. is withdrawing the subpoena for Maritza Milagros Vasquez and canceling her deposition scheduled for June 15, 2010.
Notice withdrawing subpoena for deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez and cancelling deposition scheduled for June 15, 2010.
Service of motion requesting extension of time to respond to defendant's motion.
Notice mailed regarding deposition of Jean Luc Bruhel
Service of the response via U.S. Mail.
Service of the response via U.S. Mail.
Counsel conferred in a good faith effort to resolve issues; defense counsel stated clients do not oppose the motion.
Undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for the Defendants in a good faith effort to resolve the issues... Defendants' counsel advised that Defendants oppose this motion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity