MARSH LAW FIRM PLLC
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sarah Ransome
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth Stein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
EFTA00037149.pdf
A legal document from Marsh Law Firm PLLC outlining a Joint Representation and Prosecution Agreement. The document discusses the consolidation of claims for multiple clients who are survivors of sexual abuse and exploitation, advising the client on the advantages and disadvantages of joint representation. It appears to be part of a larger discovery file, marked with Bates stamp EFTA00037149.
EFTA00037139.pdf
This document is a legal retention letter dated March 24, 2024, from Jennifer Freeman of Marsh Law Firm PLLC to a redacted recipient. The letter confirms the firm's willingness to represent the client in potential claims and requests the signature of a Legal Services Agreement and a Joint Representation and Prosecution Agreement via Adobe Acrobat Sign. The document appears to be a screenshot taken from a mobile device.
EFTA00037137.pdf
This document is a screenshot of a digital signature page (page 8/9) for a legal agreement involving Marsh Law Firm PLLC, dated March 24, 2024. It displays a signature by Founding Partner James R. Marsh and a pending signature field for a client. The document includes a Bates stamp 'EFTA00037137' and appears to be a retainer or service agreement viewed on a mobile device via Adobe Sign.
EFTA00037124.pdf
This document is a screenshot of an email exchange from January 12, 2024, involving attorney James R. Marsh of Marsh Law Firm PLLC. An unidentified individual complains about being denied legal representation and freedom of speech, invoking 'article 51' and criticizing their treatment. Marsh responds by suggesting the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) as a resource.
EFTA00037109.pdf
This document is a legal objection to a proposed $290 million class action settlement in the case of Jane Doe 1 v. Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase. Filed by the Marsh Law Firm on behalf of an anonymous Epstein survivor, the objection argues that the settlement amount is inadequate, the allocation plan is arbitrary, and the requested attorney fees (30%) are excessive. The filing also alleges potential conflicts of interest regarding Class Counsel's prior relationships with Epstein associates and requests that the Objector be allowed to appear virtually at the fairness hearing.
EFTA00037090.pdf
This document is a mobile screenshot of an email thread containing a digital receipt for a wire transfer dated January 18, 2024. Attorney James R. Marsh of Marsh Law Firm PLLC sent a 'Test Wire' of $1.36 to a redacted recipient to prove payment ('POP'), asserting he 'was not tying' (lying) about sending it. The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00037090.
EFTA00037088.pdf
A letter from Marsh Law Firm to a client in the Netherlands regarding a settlement from the Epstein JPM Fund dated January 19, 2024. The document details a gross settlement of $1,000,000, legal fees of $75,000, and a net disbursement of $925,000 to the victim. It also provides a disclaimer regarding tax liabilities and suggests consulting tax attorney Asher Harris.
EFTA00015328.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between the Marsh Law Firm and government officials (likely DOJ/FBI). The law firm is requesting assistance to bring a client into the U.S. who claims to have been a victim of a sex trafficking ring involving Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence details significant evidence, including a victim who was allegedly in Epstein's mansion at age five around 1997, providing specific architectural details of the property (9 East 71st St) and mentioning a 'scary man's face' over the door. The emails also discuss internal government jurisdiction over the case due to the Epstein connection.
DOJ-OGR-00010528.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 14, 2022, from MARSH law firm pllc to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The firm, representing sex trafficking victims Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, formally requests that the two women be allowed to speak at the upcoming sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28, 2022. The request is supported by a citation from the Crime Victims' Rights Act, asserting their right to be heard.
DOJ-OGR-00010692.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum filed on June 25, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorneys from Marsh Law Firm PLLC, on behalf of crime victims Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, are petitioning the court to allow their clients to deliver oral victim impact statements at the upcoming sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28, 2022. The memorandum argues that the court should consider the full scope of harm caused by Maxwell's crimes, beyond the specific counts for which she was convicted.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-19 | Paid | MARSH LAW FIRM PLLC | [Redacted Client] | $1.36 | Test wire transfer confirmed received | View |
| 2024-01-19 | Received | [Redacted Client] | MARSH LAW FIRM PLLC | $75,000.00 | Fees and Costs Billed | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity