defense attorney
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Loftus
|
Witness counsel |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ivan Robles
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant State Attorney
|
Conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
client (defendant)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon Morgan
|
Employment collegial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
NY Daily News Reporter
|
Source journalist |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Witness examiner |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown Supervisory Staff Attorney
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant US Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed inmate
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-23 | N/A | Defense attorney visited Epstein. | MCC | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Phone conversation between AUSA and Defense Counsel. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Court hearing regarding bail/detention (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | Attorney visit for inmate in SHU. | Metropolitan Correctional C... | View |
| 2019-07-09 | N/A | Scheduled call between SDNY and Defense Counsel | Phone Call | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001073.jpg
A page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, featuring arguments by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney. The attorney argues that the government's citations of 'dangerousness cases' are irrelevant to Maxwell's situation and emphasizes the impossibility of preparing for trial while Maxwell is detained during the COVID-19 crisis, citing lack of in-person access to the client due to BOP restrictions. The Judge attempts to interject at the bottom of the page.
DOJ-OGR-00001072.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021. A defense attorney is arguing for the release of their client (inferred to be Ghislaine Maxwell) on the grounds that reviewing voluminous electronic discovery for 'conduct that's alleged to be 25 years old' is impossible while the client is in custody during the pandemic. The attorney notes the client is in 'administrative seg.' (segregation) because authorities are 'afraid of what happened with Mr. Epstein' (referencing his death in custody).
DOJ-OGR-00001064.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021, concerning a bail application. The defense attorney argues against a deep investigation into the detained client's finances, specifically addressing a 2016 real estate transaction of $15 million (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's townhouse sale). The defense disputes the government's claim that the client retains $14 million in liquid assets, citing liabilities and litigation expenses, while referencing legal precedents (Khashoggi, Dreier) regarding bail amounts.
DOJ-OGR-00001059.jpg
A transcript page from a court proceeding (dated April 1, 2021) where a defense attorney argues that the government is misrepresenting the circumstances of their client's arrest to influence the judge and media. The attorney details that the client (likely Ghislaine Maxwell based on the description) was in pajamas with one security guard, the doors were unlocked, and she moved to another room as a safety protocol rather than attempting to flee when FBI agents raided the property.
DOJ-OGR-00000542.jpg
Transcript from a July 24, 2019 court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) where Epstein's defense argues for his release. The defense claims Epstein 'disciplined himself' and cites a 14-year gap in allegations (referencing 2002 and 2005) as proof he is no longer a danger. The Judge ('The Court') challenges this position, quoting the defense's previous letter which stated any danger had 'abated' or 'evaporated.'
DOJ-OGR-00018601.jpg
This legal document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing an argument about witness tampering. An attorney informs the judge that a witness who already testified contacted a future witness, Brian, to discuss their testimony, potentially violating a sequestration order. The attorney requests that Brian be barred from testifying, while another attorney, Ms. Moe, begins a counterargument by citing legal rules regarding witness exclusion.
DOJ-OGR-00013023.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) and defense (Ms. Menninger) are discussing a potential violation regarding witness communication. Specifically, a witness named 'Jane' called an individual named 'Brian' after her testimony to warn him that the defense attorney was an 'expletive' and mentioned being shown an 'Interlochen application' during cross-examination.
Target Letter
Notifies a defendant of the general nature of the government's criminal investigation.
Cross-examination
Discussion regarding Exhibit 801-R, an invoice from 2002.
Direct Examination
Discussion regarding the reliability of memory involving trauma and the correlation between confidence and accuracy in memory retrieval.
Sentencing/Conditions Argument
Oral argument regarding the inhumane conditions at MCC and requesting consideration for time served.
Dispute over arrest details
Defense argues the government misrepresented the client's behavior during arrest as fleeing rather than following security protocol.
Information from MCC inmate
Attorney called with information regarding Epstein/MCC.
Re: [Redacted] - Epstein
Agreeing to set a time for Tuesday morning.
Re: [Redacted] - Epstein
Offering to schedule a call on Tuesday, possibly before the attorney meets with the client.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity