| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Joshua Adam Schulte
|
Alleged criminal association |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jacob Appelbaum
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Russian Secret Services
|
Collaborators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Publisher collaborator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Poitras
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Julian Assange
|
Leadership association |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Schulte
|
Alleged leaker recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edward Snowden
|
Collaborated with supported by |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Sony documents, allegedly stolen by North Korea and posted on Wikileaks, revealed a payment of 'O... | N/A | View |
| 2015-06-01 | N/A | WikiLeaks releases document revealing NSA targeting of French presidents. | Online | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Wikileaks offered bounties for Pacific Trade Agreement documents. | Internet | View |
| 2013-06-23 | N/A | Operation Snowden conducted by Secret Services in Moscow with WikiLeaks | Moscow | View |
| 2013-06-23 | N/A | An article in Izvestia reports that 'Secret Services in Moscow with Wikileaks conducted Operation... | Moscow | View |
| 2013-06-23 | N/A | An article in Izvestia describes "Operation Snowden," which it claims was conducted by Secret Ser... | Moscow | View |
| 2013-06-01 | N/A | Russian 'Secret Services in Moscow with Wikileaks conducted Operation Snowden,' as reported by Iz... | Moscow | View |
| 2012-12-16 | N/A | Launch of the Freedom of the Press Foundation to support WikiLeaks, as reported by the Huffington... | N/A | View |
| 2012-01-01 | N/A | American credit card companies block money transfers to WikiLeaks. | USA | View |
| 2011-04-01 | N/A | Publication of WikiLeaks cables | Washington DC | View |
This document appears to be a page (page 51) from a book titled 'Hacktivist' or similar, which was included as evidence in a House Oversight investigation (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019539). The file name 'Epst' suggests it is part of the Epstein document production. The text details the history of the Tor network, its use by Ross Ulbricht for the Silk Road, and its utilization by Chelsea Manning to leak documents to Julian Assange's WikiLeaks.
This document appears to be page 47 of a book manuscript (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the filename ISBN) produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation. The text analyzes the psychological motivations of leakers, referencing Edward Shils' work on the 'torment of secrecy,' and details Edward Snowden's mindset and access levels at the NSA in 2012. It describes Snowden's SCI clearance and his rhetorical questioning of colleagues regarding the potential impact of leaking secret data.
This document is page 32 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein), stamped as a House Oversight exhibit. It details Edward Snowden's employment with Dell in 2009, his work on the NSA backup system EPICSHELTER, and his discovery of security flaws regarding system administrator access. The text also references his lack of academic credits from UMUC and compares the role of 'rogue system administrators' to the ideology of Julian Assange.
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from Alan Dershowitz's legal team (Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP) complaining that the plaintiff (Giuffre) leaked selective, confidential information to the Washington Post to damage Dershowitz. The letter attempts to discredit a specific redacted witness (Ms. [Redacted]) by citing her 2016 emails which contained outlandish conspiracy theories involving the CIA, 'the Russians,' and 'Special Agents Forces Men.' The document details the witness's claims of possessing compromising sexual evidence against high-profile figures including Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Richard Branson, and Donald Trump.
This document is an excerpt from a writing by investigative journalist Edward Jay Epstein (not Jeffrey Epstein) regarding Edward Snowden. It details Snowden's interactions with Russian authorities and his lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, specifically confirming that Snowden brought secret NSA documents to Moscow that had not been previously released to journalists in Hong Kong. The text cites a House Intelligence Committee report alleging ongoing contact between Snowden and Russian intelligence services.
This document is a page from a House Oversight report detailing the timeline and circumstances of Edward Snowden's flight from Hong Kong to Russia in 2013. It refutes Snowden's claim that he was trapped in Russia by the US, presenting evidence that his passport was revoked before he left Hong Kong and that the Russian government (specifically Putin and Aeroflot) facilitated his travel. It also implicates WikiLeaks in funding and assisting his escape and cites Russian officials claiming Snowden shared intelligence with Russian security services.
This document is an email chain from October 2016 between Stephen Hanson and Jeffrey E. (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com). Hanson forwards a New York Times breaking news alert regarding the release of the Donald Trump 'Access Hollywood' tape with the comment 'Ouch'. In response, Jeffrey E. replies with a link to a specific email in the WikiLeaks Podesta email dump.
This document consists of pages 222-223 from the book 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson, contained within House Oversight Committee files. It details the media fallout regarding Prince Andrew's association with Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Roberts, including Sarah Ferguson's public defense of the Prince and her separate scandal involving selling access to him. The text also mentions allegations of Epstein's financial influence in the Virgin Islands and anecdotal accounts of Prince Andrew's rude behavior toward staff.
This document, marked as House Oversight evidence, appears to be an excerpt from an article analyzing the use of sexual blackmail and incentives ('honey traps') in Iranian politics and statecraft. It details scandals involving Iranian officials Reza Zarei and Mohammad Ali Abtahi, and discusses how the Iranian regime uses 'temporary marriages' to influence Iraqi politicians. It also mentions a 2012 incident involving Iranian agents in Thailand. The text cuts off at the end of the page.
This document is a draft page, dated April 2, 2012, from the preface of Alan Dershowitz's autobiography 'Taking the Stand.' It outlines his career highlights, listing high-profile clients such as OJ Simpson, Mike Tyson, and Claus Von Bulow, as well as his involvement in major historical legal events like the Clinton impeachment and the Pentagon Papers case. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document is a Table of Contents for a book manuscript, dated April 2, 2012, with a House Oversight stamp. The text outlines an autobiography covering the author's life from Brooklyn to Yale, clerkships with Judge Bazelon and Justice Goldberg, and a legal career focused on the First Amendment, addressing topics such as the Pentagon Papers, Wikileaks, and pornography cases like 'Deep Throat' and 'I Am Curious Yellow'. Based on the specific clerkships and career trajectory described, the manuscript appears to be by Alan Dershowitz.
This document appears to be a page from a legal manuscript or book draft (page 127), possibly written by Alan Dershowitz (based on the claim of being a 1964 law clerk). The text argues against the prosecution of Wikileaks, framing it as 'selective prosecution' and comparing it to historical misuse of power like the Alien and Sedition Acts. It includes a detailed footnote discussing First Amendment 'strict scrutiny' regarding violent video game legislation.
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated 4.2.12) discussing the ethics of leaking classified information. The author (likely Alan Dershowitz, based on the mention of representing Soviet dissidents in the 70s) compares traditional journalists like Seymour Hersh (spelled Hirsh) and Bob Woodward unfavorably against Julian Assange. The text argues that traditional reporters engage in a 'quid pro quo' with sources to spin narratives, whereas Assange/WikiLeaks publishes indiscriminately for the sake of transparency.
This document appears to be a page from a legal memoir or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) discussing the legal representation of Julian Assange. The text details the author's initial communications and a face-to-face meeting with Assange to discuss potential extradition to the United States. It focuses heavily on defending Assange's status as a journalist by comparing his methods and the 'dropbox' technology of Wikileaks to established journalists like Seymour Hersh and Bob Woodward.
This document appears to be a page from a book draft or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the Bates stamp context and footer citation) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the First Amendment, contrasting the historical Pentagon Papers case with the modern challenges posed by Julian Assange and Wikileaks. The text argues that while traditional media acts as a check and balance with accountability, modern 'hackers' and anonymous leaks pose a greater threat to national security without those constraints.
This document, labeled as Chapter 7, discusses the complex conflict between national security and free expression, contrasting it with issues of obscenity censorship. It categorizes different types of secrets—ranging from "necessary secrets" like troop movements to those kept for political convenience—and analyzes the difficult decisions regarding if and when to publish sensitive information in a democracy.
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated April 2, 2012) of a book, likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the specific legal history and cases mentioned (Harry Reems, bestiality defense, etc.). The text discusses the evolution of the First Amendment, contrasting it with Charlton Heston's views on the Second Amendment, and lists the controversial types of speech the author has defended. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein case in which Dershowitz was involved.
This document page, stamped by House Oversight, outlines the geopolitical rivalry between Saudi Arabia (Sunni) and Iran (Shia). It details their proxy conflicts in Lebanon, the formation of opposing alliances involving Israel and the West, and diplomatic severances in Morocco documented by WikiLeaks. It also mentions their competition for religious influence in Indonesia.
This document page appears to be an article or report discussing a 2011 Newsweek-Daily Beast poll of 1,000 Egyptians. The text highlights widespread skepticism in the region regarding U.S. narratives about the 9/11 attacks and the death of Osama bin Laden, attributing this distrust to decades of misinformation from regional leaders. It is marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a page (p. 22) from a book or narrative article included in a House Oversight Committee production (likely related to the Clinton Foundation or State Department investigations). It details Hillary Clinton's diplomatic challenges during the Arab Spring and the war in Libya, specifically focusing on the fallout from the WikiLeaks release of State Department cables. It mentions the embarrassment caused by Bradley Manning's leaks and the reactions of various world leaders, including Silvio Berlusconi and Vladimir Putin. Note: There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
This document page, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, analyzes the stability of the Assad regime in Syria during the early stages of the uprising (circa 2011). It discusses the internal power dynamic between Bashar al-Assad and his hardline brother Maher, outlines external threats from neighboring countries and exiles, and references WikiLeaks revelations regarding US State Department funding of Syrian opposition groups.
This document appears to be page 215 of a House Oversight Committee report regarding Edward Snowden's flight from Hong Kong to Moscow in June 2013. It details his strategic planning, including job changes, financial preparation, and communications with Laura Poitras and Julian Assange. The text analyzes his lack of visa applications to other regions and suggests his movement to Russia was a calculated decision involving coordination with Russian officials. Note: This document focuses entirely on Edward Snowden and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
This document page, part of a House Oversight record, details an interview with Russian lawyer Anatoly Kucherena regarding his representation of Edward Snowden. It describes their first meeting on July 12, 2013, at Sheremetyevo Airport, where Kucherena advised Snowden to withdraw asylum petitions to other countries to secure sanctuary in Russia. The text also covers a subsequent meeting with human rights organizations where Snowden formally requested asylum in Russia.
This document (page 196) appears to be an investigative narrative detailing the 39-day period Edward Snowden spent in the Moscow airport transit zone in 2013. It discusses his living conditions with Sarah Harrison, the costs of the capsule hotel, and the possibility that he was actually housed in VIP quarters used by Russian security services (FSB/KGB). The text outlines the media frenzy and futile search for Snowden by reporters who bought tickets and bribed staff to find him.
This document appears to be a page from a book or investigative report (Chapter 25: Vanishing Act) included in House Oversight Committee files. It details the author's 2015 trip to Moscow to investigate Edward Snowden's 2013 arrival and subsequent stay in the airport transit zone. The text challenges Snowden's narrative, citing reports from *Izvestia* that suggest his arrival was a coordinated operation with Russian intelligence services, rather than him simply being trapped due to a revoked passport.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity