Bennet J. Moskowitz
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Legal representative |
47
Very Strong
|
47 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Client |
26
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Client |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
AMI
|
Employment |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Indyke
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
defendants
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
AMI
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nine East 71st Street Corporation
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mariann Meier Wang
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Indyke (Defendants)
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Villacastin
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-06 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Co-Executors' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-08-26 | N/A | Request to withdraw document ECF No. 40 | Court Docket (ECF) | View |
| 2021-08-13 | N/A | Filing of Declaration of Bennet J. Moskowitz in support of Co-Executors' Statement | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-08-13 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Bennet J. Moskowitz | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-06-30 | N/A | Filing of letter informing Court of desire to lift stay | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-12-01 | N/A | Joint Status Report submitted to the Court. | New York | View |
| 2020-12-01 | N/A | Filing of Joint Status Report | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Submission of Status Report | New York | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Submission of Joint Status Report via ECF | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-10-07 | N/A | Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice signed by parties. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-10-01 | N/A | Submission of Joint Status Report requesting a stay of the case. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-08-14 | N/A | Filing of joint status report requesting stay of discovery. | New York | View |
| 2020-08-14 | N/A | Filing of Status Report requesting continuation of stay | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-08-14 | N/A | Joint submission of status report and request for extension. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-08-14 | N/A | Joint submission of status report requesting extension | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-07-09 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Change of Address by Bennet J. Moskowitz | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-06-19 | N/A | Joint Stipulation submitted by parties | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action filed | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Filing of Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed and signed by counsel for both pa... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-04-30 | N/A | Filing of Document 40 in Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Filing of Document 60 in Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN-DCF | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Filing of letter to Judge Freeman regarding supplemental authority. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-27 | N/A | Meet and confer telephone call regarding discovery deficiencies | Telephone | View |
074.pdf
A legal status report filed on December 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz regarding the case 'VE v. Darren Indyke and Richard D. Kahn'. The document informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that the plaintiff (VE) has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and has received an award offer which she is considering. The parties request that the court case remain stayed while this settlement process concludes.
073.pdf
This document is a status report letter filed on November 2, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Pepper on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and the Plaintiff 'VE'. It informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program which is currently under review. Consequently, both parties jointly request that the ongoing litigation (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625-AJN-DF) remain stayed to preserve resources and judicial economy.
072.pdf
A legal status report filed on October 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Epstein Estate executors (Indyke and Kahn) and the Plaintiff 'VE'. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program which is under review, and consequently requests that the civil case remain stayed.
068.pdf
This is a Notice of Change of Address filed on July 8, 2020, in the Southern District of New York for case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN (VE v. Indyke et al.). Attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz notifies the court that his firm, Troutman Sanders LLP, has changed its name to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP. The physical address and contact numbers remain unchanged.
066.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Order Staying Action from June 2020 in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff 'VE' and the defendants (Epstein's estate executors Indyke and Kahn, and associated entities) agreed to pause the litigation to allow the plaintiff to participate in the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program,' a non-adversarial alternative. Judge Debra Freeman signed the order, staying the case and requiring a status report by August 14, 2020.
065.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order filed on June 12, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625). The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', and the defendants (Executors of the Epstein Estate and associated entities) agreed to stay the lawsuit to allow the plaintiff to participate in the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program', a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. The document is signed by attorneys Brad Edwards (for the plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (for the defendants).
060.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. The letter serves to supplement a pending motion to dismiss by submitting a recent Opinion & Order from Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in a related case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which dismissed punitive damages claims against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein's executors. The defense argues this precedent supports dismissing punitive damages in the current action.
059.pdf
A legal letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman requesting a 30-day extension on various discovery and filing deadlines for multiple civil cases (including VE, Katlyn Doe, Priscilla Doe, etc.) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The request was granted and 'So Ordered' by Judge Freeman on the same day, April 14, 2020.
058.pdf
This document is a letter dated April 14, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman. It requests a 30-day extension for various legal deadlines in several cases filed by 'Doe' plaintiffs (VE, Katlyn, Priscilla, Lisa, Anastasia) against the Defendants, citing the ongoing pandemic as the reason. The request notes that it is made with the Plaintiffs' consent.
054.pdf
This document is a Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of VE v. Indyke et al. It outlines the agreed-upon timeline for the exchange of evidence, including initial disclosures, medical records, and expert reports. The filing identifies the key subjects of discovery as Epstein's alleged torts against the plaintiff, the liability of the corporate defendants, and the plaintiff's damages.
050.pdf
This document is a letter filed on January 2, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter pertains to the case 'VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al.' and requests oral argument on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Moskowitz represents the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) and associated entities.
047.pdf
This document is a letter dated December 26, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It requests a one-week extension (until January 2, 2020) for the defendants, including the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) and related corporate entities, to file a reply supporting their Motion to Dismiss in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street. The plaintiff consented to this extension request.
038.pdf
This document is a Memorandum of Law filed on November 29, 2019, by the defendants (Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities) in the case VE v. Indyke et al. The defendants move to dismiss several counts of the plaintiff's complaint, arguing that the battery claim is time-barred and not revived by the Child Victims Act because it is distinct from claims under NY Penal Law § 130. Furthermore, they argue that negligence claims against the corporate defendants (Nine East, FTC, and NES) are based on vague, conclusory allegations that fail to establish a duty of care, breach, or proximate cause, and that punitive damages are legally barred against an estate.
037.pdf
This document is a legal declaration filed on November 29, 2019, by Bennet J. Moskowitz, an attorney for the defendants in the case of VE v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Moskowitz declares his representation of the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate and associated corporate entities. The declaration serves to submit a copy of the Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint as an exhibit to support the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
030.pdf
This document is a Memorandum of Law filed on November 15, 2019, in the US District Court (SDNY) by the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) and associated entities. The defendants state they do not object to the Plaintiff 'VE' proceeding anonymously but request the court enter a specific 'Proposed Order' to ensure they can adequately defend themselves and conduct discovery while maintaining her confidentiality from the general public. The filing argues that while anonymity is acceptable, it must not prejudice the defense's ability to investigate the allegations.
029.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a two-week extension for the Epstein Estate executors and associated entities to respond to a complaint in the case 'VE v. Nine East 71st Street'. The Judge granted the request on November 14, 2019, extending the deadline to November 29, 2019, but handwritten notes explicitly state 'No further extensions'.
027.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 12, 2019, requesting a two-week extension for the Defendants (Executors of Epstein's Estate and related entities) to respond to the Plaintiff's complaint in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. The letter notes that Plaintiff's counsel refused to consent to the extension.
025.pdf
This document is a letter dated October 29, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter represents the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) and associated corporate entities in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. It serves to clarify the record regarding an ex parte order issued in a related case (Katlyn Doe) and requests an extension until November 15, 2019, to respond to the Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Anonymously.
023.pdf
This document is a civil summons filed on September 26, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN. The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing several entities including Nine East 71st Street Corporation and Financial Trust Company, Inc., as well as Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The document requires the defendants to serve an answer to the complaint within 21 days to the plaintiff's attorney, J. Stanley Pottinger.
022.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on September 25, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing several entities including Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., NES, LLC, and the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn). The summons instructs the defendants to respond to the complaint within 21 days.
021.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated September 18, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It concerns the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The letter confirms an agreement between the parties to accept service of the complaint and extends the defendants' deadline to respond until November 15, 2019; the request was 'So Ordered' by the judge on September 19, 2019.
063.pdf
A Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on October 15, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff Teresa Helm agrees to dismiss her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate with prejudice after accepting an offer from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The document serves to formally close the case.
059.pdf
This document is a joint status report filed on August 14, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The attorneys for both parties inform Judge Debra Freeman that the plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and is awaiting a determination. Consequently, both parties request a 45-day extension to the current stay of discovery to preserve resources while the compensation claim is processed.
053.pdf
A Notice of Change of Address filed on July 9, 2020, in the case of Annie Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Case 19-CV-10475). Attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz notifies the court that his law firm's name has changed from Troutman Sanders LLP to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, though the physical address and contact numbers remain the same.
051.pdf
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order filed on June 12, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, regarding the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The parties agreed to stay (pause) the legal proceedings for 60 days to allow the Plaintiff, Teresa Helm, to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative to litigation. If the claims are resolved through the program, the plaintiff agrees to discontinue the lawsuit with prejudice.
Extension of deadlines in Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and...
Request to extend various discovery and filing deadlines by 30 days due to the pandemic.
Re: Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, Juliette Bryant cases
Request to extend discovery deadlines by 30 days due to the ongoing pandemic.
Jane Doe 1000, 1:19-cv-10577-LJL-DCF; Teresa Helm, 1:19-c...
Request for 30-day extension of deadlines due to ongoing pandemic
Request for extension of deadlines due to pandemic
Request to extend deadlines for motions, status reports, fact discovery, and expert reports by 30 days due to COVID-19 pandemic.
Request for extension of deadlines in multiple civil case...
Request to extend discovery and reporting deadlines by 30 days due to the ongoing pandemic.
Extension of deadlines in Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and Teal...
Requesting a 30-day extension for various discovery and filing deadlines due to the ongoing pandemic, with Plaintiffs' consent.
Extension of deadlines in Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and Teal...
Request to extend discovery and pleading deadlines by 30 days due to the pandemic.
Re: Maria Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn,...
Requesting a four-day extension to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint due to COVID-19 difficulties.
Teala Davies v. Indyke et al. 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF)
Request for approval of briefing schedule for Motion to Dismiss
Re: Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.....
Request for a one business day extension of the briefing schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss due to attorney illness.
Re: Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn...
Request for extension of briefing schedule deadlines due to attorney illness.
Anastasia Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn... ...
Request for a two-day extension of time (until Feb 19, 2020) for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, noted as having Plaintiff's consent.
Anastasia Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn...
Request for a two-day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
Response to Preservation Notice
Confirming clients are abiding by discovery obligations but objecting to the list of subject matters.
Document Preservation Notice
Notice to preserve all documents relevant to the dispute, specifically listing email accounts and subject matters.
Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn...
Request for a pre-motion conference to dismiss the complaint based on statute of limitations and invalidity of punitive damages claims.
Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn... 1:...
Request for pre-motion conference to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint as time-barred and to strike punitive damages.
Juliette Bryant v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.....
Request to set forth bases for anticipated motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint as time-barred and to dismiss punitive damages demand.
Anastasia Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as ...
Request for court approval regarding service acceptance and extension of time to respond to complaint.
Anastasia Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as ...
Request for court approval of an agreement regarding service of complaint and extension of time to respond.
Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn...
Request to refer action to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman for General Pretrial.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Request for oral argument on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN) ...
Request for a one-week extension of Defendants' time to file their reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint.
Jane Doe 17 v. Darren K. Indyke... 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF
Request for extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint
Teala Davies v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn... 1...
Request for extension of time to answer the complaint until January 20, 2020.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity