New Mexico
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00017171.jpg
This document is a summation by Ms. Menninger in a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Menninger argues for reasonable doubt regarding Carolyn's involvement in Count Six, suggesting Carolyn added Ghislaine Maxwell to her story after financial difficulties. The summation also addresses the government's conspiracy theory involving Epstein and Maxwell arranging for underage females to travel to New York for sex acts, clarifying that Carolyn did not travel to New York and Annie Farmer's travel was independent of Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00017168.jpg
This document is a page from a legal summation in a court case, filed on August 10, 2022. The speaker argues that memory is a constructive and fallible process, using Annie Farmer's incorrect recollection of an April 1996 date as an example. The speaker also defends the credibility of an expert, Dr. Loftus, by stating she has consulted for the Department of Justice, FBI, and Secret Service, countering the implication that she is solely a defense witness.
DOJ-OGR-00017126.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney. Menninger argues against the credibility of a witness named 'Jane' by suggesting her memory of abuse in New Mexico was implanted by the government's repeated questioning. The attorney emphasizes that Jane does not recall Ghislaine being present with Jeffrey Epstein during any of the alleged abuse, which is a central point for the case.
DOJ-OGR-00017122.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding, likely a summation, dated August 10, 2022. The speaker, 'I', questions the credibility of 'Jane' regarding alleged sexual abuse, lawsuits, and travel dates, noting inconsistencies in her accounts and her mother's absence from testifying. The document also mentions Jane receiving 'wads of cash' from Jeffrey Epstein and details several of Jane's trips, including one from New Jersey to New Mexico in May '97 and to Europe in January '98.
DOJ-OGR-00016444.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a direct examination where an unnamed witness describes picking up a person named Annie from the airport in Arizona after her trip to New Mexico. The witness states Annie was quiet and withdrawn, and that Ghislaine had bought her a new pair of boots. The testimony also covers a trip Annie took in the summer of 1996 to Thailand and Vietnam, which was allegedly paid for by a 'Foundation'.
DOJ-OGR-00013286.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion about jury instructions concerning an alleged victim named Kate. The judge clarifies their view on the instruction, avoiding complexities of New Mexico law. An attorney for the government, Ms. Sternheim, then informs the court that their next witness will be Janine Gill, an employee of the Trump organization since 2007, and that they will introduce two government exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00031290.jpg
This document is a printed page from the Albuquerque Tribune Online, dated March 7, 2006 (with a URL suggesting data from December 2002). It lists sixteen separate donations, each in the amount of $5,000, from various individuals and corporations including Phillips Petroleum, Albertsons, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. The document bears a DOJ stamp (DOJ-OGR-00031290) and appears to be part of a larger discovery or FOIA release (Public Records Request No.: 17-295) likely related to political fundraising in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00031284.jpg
This document is a page from the Albuquerque Tribune Online, dated March 7, 2006, listing financial contributions from various individuals and organizations. The contributions, likely political donations, range from $10,000 to $13,000 and originate from entities primarily located in New Mexico, with others from Texas, California, and Kansas. The recipient of these funds is not specified in the document.
DOJ-OGR-00031281.jpg
This document appears to be a printed page from the Albuquerque Tribune Online, dated July 26, 2006, listing high-value financial contributions (ranging from $25,000 to $29,100). The list includes individuals, PACs, law firms, and corporations from various states including New Mexico, New Jersey, Texas, and Tennessee. The document is part of a Department of Justice Public Records Request (17-295) release.
DOJ-OGR-00031243.jpg
This document is a printout from the Albuquerque Tribune Online, dated via URL to December 7, 2002, listing financial contributors to an unspecified entity (likely a political campaign given the context of 'donate' and 'political committee' descriptions). The page lists 16 separate entities and individuals, each contributing exactly $10,000. The document bears a Department of Justice (DOJ) stamp (DOJ-OGR-00031243) and a Public Records Request number, indicating it was released as part of a federal investigation or FOIA request.
DOJ-OGR-00022381.jpg
This document is a heavily redacted contact list, page 96, from a larger collection identified as DOJ-OGR-00022381. It lists several individuals, including Jeffrey Epstein (listed twice), Bill Richardson, and others, along with the Santa Fe Institute. All personal contact information associated with the entries has been blacked out, with a note indicating the redactions were for personal contact information.
DOJ-OGR-00017317.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript, dated August 10, 2022, pertaining to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details a discussion between MR. EVERDELL and MS. MOE, addressing 'Your Honor,' regarding a defendant's alleged role in transporting 'Jane' to and from New Mexico. The central issue is whether these flights were intended for illegal sexual activity and if the defendant's actions constitute aiding and abetting, with the jury currently deliberating on these points for a potential conviction on Count Four.
DOJ-OGR-00013819.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Swain. Swain testifies about picking up a person named Annie from the airport after a trip to New Mexico, noting Annie was quiet, withdrawn, and had a new pair of boots bought for her by someone named Ghislaine. The witness also states that Annie traveled to Thailand and Vietnam in the summer of 1996 to work at an orphanage and school.
DOJ-OGR-00013719.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning establishes that Farmer did not communicate with either Jeffrey Epstein or Ms. Maxwell before a trip she took from Arizona to New Mexico. It is also established that Epstein did not inform Farmer that Maxwell would be present in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00013285.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, where the Court discusses a proposed limiting instruction for the jury. The instruction clarifies that testimony from a witness about alleged sexual conduct with Mr. Epstein in New Mexico is not considered 'illegal sexual activity' as charged by the government in the indictment. The Court also references a prior November 23rd conference where the defense agreed with the instruction, and notes complications related to New Mexico law.
DOJ-OGR-00010664.jpg
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, counsel for Annie Farmer, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 22, 2022. It provides Annie Farmer's victim impact statement regarding the crimes committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, and requests permission for Ms. Farmer to make an oral statement at Maxwell's sentencing. The statement details the profound and ongoing psychological and emotional impact of the abuse on Annie Farmer.
DOJ-OGR-00009611.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the sufficiency of evidence to uphold a defendant's conviction on multiple counts. It details the defendant's role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation, specifically by making travel arrangements for a victim named Jane and recruiting another victim, Virginia. The document cites trial testimony and legal precedents to assert that a rational jury could and did find the defendant guilty.
DOJ-OGR-00009579.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.
DOJ-OGR-00014704.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger. They are discussing the legal standard required for a jury to find a defendant guilty of aiding in the transportation of a person named 'Jane' to New Mexico. The central issue is whether the flight must have had a 'significant or motivating purpose' related to illegal sexual activity.
DOJ-OGR-00011751.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Visoski. Visoski testifies about their employment with "Mr. Epstein," listing numerous residences they visited, including properties in Manhattan, Palm Beach, New Mexico, Paris, and two islands in St. Thomas. The witness recalls their first visit to the Palm Beach residence was in 1991 and states they visited that location frequently to handle luggage.
DOJ-OGR-00017378.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Attorney Ms. Comey questions a witness, Mr. Visoski, about a ranch property in Stanley, New Mexico, owned by Mr. Epstein. Mr. Visoski describes the layout of the property, including an entrance area called 'Ranch Central' with staff housing and an office, and a separate five-bedroom, motel-style building used for guests, pilots, and a chef.
DOJ-OGR-00014492.jpg
This document is a partial legal summation from August 10, 2022, discussing evidence presented or promised in a case, likely related to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. It highlights discrepancies between promised evidence (like nude photographs and schoolgirl outfits) and what was actually seen, and notes that law enforcement witnesses failed to deliver on promises and case agents were not called to testify. The document also references FedEx records indicating Ghislaine Maxwell did not send anything to an underage girl.
DOJ-OGR-00017556.jpg
This document is a single page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Jane, who confirms she was in an assigned guest bedroom and spent most of her time alone there while in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00017482.jpg
This document is a partial transcript of a cross-examination from August 10, 2022, in a legal case. The questioning of Mr. Visoski focuses on Jeffrey Epstein's alleged generosity to Visoski's daughters, Epstein's back problems, and his frequent receipt of massages. It details that massages were arranged by a ranch manager at Epstein's New Mexico ranch and provided by masseuses from a Santa Fe salon called Ten Thousand Waves.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021706.jpg
A printed Daily Mail article recounting Virginia's trip to London in March 2001 with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details Virginia being prepared by Ghislaine to meet Prince Andrew, including a shopping trip for expensive clothes, followed by a meeting at Ghislaine's house and a night out at Tramp nightclub. It mentions a specific payment of $15,000 to Virginia from Epstein and confirms flight logs matching the itinerary.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity