DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020037.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal filing (Defense Bail Submission) dated December 8, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. It cites a 'Macalvins report' to refute government claims that Maxwell's finances are opaque, stating that she and her spouse have disclosed all assets, which total approximately $22.5 million—the exact amount proposed for the bond. A footnote contains redactions regarding the name of a specific bank involved in her finances.
DOJ-OGR-00020022.jpg
This document outlines a proposed $28.5 million bail package for Ghislaine Maxwell filed on December 14, 2020. The package includes a $22.5 million personal recognizance bond co-signed by Maxwell and her spouse, secured by all their U.S. assets, and $5 million in additional bonds co-signed by friends and family (whose names are redacted). It also details a unique $1 million bond posted by a private security company intended to monitor her home confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00020015.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail and lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00020007.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court is addressing defense arguments for release, comparing her situation to United States v. Friedman, but distinguishing it because Maxwell allegedly did not provide her whereabouts to the government despite staying in contact. The judge argues that Maxwell may not have realized the severity of the charges or the likelihood of prosecution until her actual indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00019989.jpg
A transcript page from a court hearing dated April 1, 2021, likely involving Ghislaine Maxwell (represented by Mr. Cohen). The defense argues that the client's arrest, detention, and the COVID-19 crisis have made it difficult to provide financial information requested by Pretrial Services, specifically regarding a real estate transaction. The text also notes the government requested until November to complete discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00017437.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Mr. Everdell questions Visoski about flight logs (document 3527-07) to establish when Sarah Kellen began flying on Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft. Visoski confirms that Kellen was flying on Epstein's planes in the early 2000s and the questioning pivots to her role as Epstein's personal assistant.
DOJ-OGR-00017420.jpg
A court transcript excerpt from the cross-examination of a pilot named Visoski (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Visoski confirms he was hired in 1991 and flew approximately 1,000 flights for Epstein until 2005, utilizing both Gulfstream and Boeing aircraft. He acknowledges that Epstein frequently had other passengers, many of whom were female, and that he would often see or greet them at the plane's entrance.
DOJ-OGR-00017417.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a pilot named Visoski. The testimony confirms that Visoski worked as a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein for nearly 30 years (1991-2019), initially as co-captain under his friend David Rogers, before swapping roles to become chief pilot around 2000. The page concludes with attorney Mr. Everdell requesting to display Government's Exhibit 311.
DOJ-OGR-00017416.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the beginning of the cross-examination of Mr. Visoski by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. The text establishes that Visoski testified on direct examination that he began working as a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein around 1991.
DOJ-OGR-00017414.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Visoski (likely a pilot). Visoski describes meeting a woman referred to as 'Jane' when Jeffrey Epstein brought her to the cockpit during a flight departing from West Palm Beach Airport, noting her 'piercing powder blue eyes.' Visoski also confirms remembering a passenger named Virginia Roberts flying on Epstein's plane.
DOJ-OGR-00017413.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. Witness Visoski is questioned by Ms. Comey about a 'female singer' identified on a document, whom the court refers to by the pseudonym 'Jane.' Visoski confirms this person was a passenger on Jeffrey Epstein's plane and recalls meeting her in the mid-to-late 1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00017406.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a pilot named Visoski. Visoski details the protocols for creating passenger manifests for flights piloted for Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2004, explaining that the captain was responsible for recording flight times and passenger names immediately after landing. He testifies that he did not keep copies of these records but physically delivered them to a main office in New York approximately every 30 days.
DOJ-OGR-00017405.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a pilot named Visoski. Visoski testifies that he and another pilot, David Rogers, maintained two specific records for Mr. Epstein: flight logs and passenger manifests. He clarifies that flight logs track technical aircraft data (hours, landings, engine cycles) and do not contain passenger information.
DOJ-OGR-00017402.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Visoski. The witness provides a detailed walkthrough of the interior of Jeffrey Epstein's private aircraft, describing it as resembling a 'recreational vehicle.' Specific features mentioned include a 'round room' with a circular couch and a 'red room' that served as Mr. Epstein's office.
DOJ-OGR-00017383.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring direct testimony from a witness named Visoski. The witness provides a detailed walkthrough of the interior layout of Jeffrey Epstein's home, describing a massive living room (200x50 ft), a library where Epstein spent most of his time, a dining room converted into a home theater, a kitchen, and a downstairs area featuring a gym and indoor swimming pool. The witness notes they personally installed the stereo system in the living room.
DOJ-OGR-00017381.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) recording the direct examination of Mr. Visoski by Ms. Comey. Visoski testifies about Jeffrey Epstein's ranch, confirming it was approximately 10,000 acres. He details his presence at the ranch's main house for purposes of discussing aircraft maintenance/purchases, managing luggage, and installing high-end audio equipment for Epstein, whom he describes as an audiophile.
DOJ-OGR-00017380.jpg
This document is page 18 of 247 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (The Ghislaine Maxwell trial). A witness identified as 'Visoski' is providing direct testimony describing the physical layout of a property, noting a runway, a main entrance marked with a 'Z', and a main house situated on a cliff overlooking a ravine.
DOJ-OGR-00017379.jpg
This document is page 145 of a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Visoski. The witness describes the physical layout of a large ranch property, detailing specific structures including a firehouse, greenhouse, stables for 10-15 horses, a private runway with a hangar housing a twin-engine Cessna, a 'lodge' (triple-wide trailer with a faux facade), and a log cabin on a cliff.
DOJ-OGR-00017361.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts the moment the judge thanks and discharges the jury following the verdict. Defense counsel Ms. Sternheim requests the court wait on the presentence report and explicitly asks for a court order to ensure Ms. Maxwell receives a COVID-19 booster shot.
DOJ-OGR-00005823.jpg
This document is page 40 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) from October 29, 2021, arguing for the admissibility of testimony from 'Employee-1'. The text details that Employee-1 will testify that in October 2005, Epstein and a supervisor ordered the removal of computers and contact books from the house. The government argues this testimony proves the defendant's role in the conspiracy, knowledge of the abuse of underage girls, and authenticates exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00005642.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Document 386) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on October 29, 2021. It argues against the admissibility of testimony from an expert witness named Rocchio, specifically challenging her opinions on victim credibility and long-term psychological consequences of abuse as irrelevant, prejudicial, and violating Federal Rules of Evidence 401, 402, 403, and 704.
DOJ-OGR-00005635.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from October 29, 2021, argues against the admissibility of expert opinions from a treatment provider named Rocchio. The filing contends that Rocchio's opinions on grooming are based solely on personal experience, lack a reliable methodology, and are not supported by scientific literature. It cites various legal precedents and an academic article to assert that her testimony fails to meet the standards for expert witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00005631.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) arguing to preclude Dr. Rocchio from testifying as a government expert witness. It details the government's intent to have Rocchio testify generally about the psychology of sexual abuse, grooming, delayed disclosure, and trauma, while noting she has not evaluated any specific victims in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00005629.jpg
This document is a Table of Exhibits from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated October 29, 2021. It lists two exhibits related to the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa M. Rocchio: a notice dated April 23, 2021, and her Curriculum Vitae.
DOJ-OGR-00005620.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 11 of 12) of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the Government failed to comply with Rule 404(b) notice deadlines (originally May 28, extended to October 11), depriving Maxwell of the chance to litigate properly, and they request the Court exclude this belated evidence. The document lists the contact information for defense attorneys from three different law firms.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity