DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00005389.jpg
This document is a letter dated October 27, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that the defense is filing a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (regarding sexual behavior evidence) under seal. It also outlines the defense's plan to serve redacted copies of this motion to the counsel of the specific alleged victims whose behavior is discussed in the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00005386.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated October 27, 2021, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text argues that the government is prioritizing witness convenience over the prudence of seating a fair and impartial jury, characterizing the government's actions as seeking an 'undue and unreasonable advantage.'
DOJ-OGR-00005377.jpg
This document is a letter motion filed on October 25, 2021, by defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests a one-week extension (to November 3, 2021) to file the joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet, citing conflicting deadlines including Rule 412 briefing. The government has consented to this extension request.
DOJ-OGR-00005373.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions and jury instructions. It specifically highlights disputes between the Government and the Defense regarding whether potential jurors should be asked live questions about their knowledge of or dealings with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The text includes standard admonitions to jurors not to discuss the case and to report any outside communication attempts.
DOJ-OGR-00005359.jpg
This document is an introduction to a legal filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated October 22, 2021. It outlines a request by the parties for the Court to include specific questions during the examination of prospective jurors (voir dire). The text emphasizes standard legal principles, specifically the presumption of innocence for Ms. Maxwell and the government's burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00005356.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court filing (Document 367) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 22, 2021. It appears to be a blank page from a juror questionnaire or note-taking form, containing a field for 'Juror ID' and ruled lines for writing.
DOJ-OGR-00005354.jpg
This document is Page 32 of 35 from Document 367, filed on October 22, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a blank continuation sheet for a Juror Questionnaire, allowing a juror to provide overflow answers by referencing the relevant question number. The page contains lines for writing but no handwritten text.
DOJ-OGR-00005352.jpg
This document is page 30 of a juror questionnaire for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It contains questions assessing a prospective juror's impartiality, privacy concerns regarding their answers, and willingness to adhere to court instructions regarding outside information and case discussion.
DOJ-OGR-00005346.jpg
This document is page 24 of a juror questionnaire for a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains questions designed to screen potential jurors for biases or personal experiences related to sexual abuse, sex trafficking, and sex crimes involving minors. A comment on the document indicates that the U.S. Government proposed some of the specific wording used in the questions.
DOJ-OGR-00005343.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court filing (Document 367) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains a draft juror questionnaire focusing on potential jurors' opinions on sex trafficking laws and personal history with sexual abuse. The document highlights a legal dispute where the Government objects to specific questions proposed by the Defense (highlighted in green text) regarding the jurors' personal victimization history, arguing they are inappropriate, while the Defense argues these questions are necessary to identify bias against Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005340.jpg
This document is page 18 of a draft juror questionnaire filed on October 22, 2021, for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains questions 13 and 14, which ask potential jurors about their exposure to media regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ms. Maxwell, and whether they can remain impartial. The document highlights a dispute between the prosecution and defense, visible in sidebar comments, where the Government objects to defense-proposed questions (in green text) regarding jurors' specific reactions to media coverage.
DOJ-OGR-00005322.jpg
This document is the final page (page 6 of 6) of a court filing (Document 366) from October 22, 2021, associated with case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell case). The text contains closing remarks from the presiding judge thanking the recipients (likely prospective jurors) for following instructions and supporting the American institution of trial by jury. It bears the Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00005322.
DOJ-OGR-00005321.jpg
This document is page 5 of 6 from a court transcript filed on October 22, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains instructions from the judge to prospective jurors regarding the logistics of jury selection during the COVID-19 pandemic, including masking and social distancing requirements. The text details how jurors should complete their questionnaires, protocols for restroom breaks, and emphasizes the civic importance of jury service.
DOJ-OGR-00005320.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on October 22, 2021, containing instructions to the jury pool. The text outlines strict prohibitions against jurors discussing the case on social media or conducting independent research via Google or news outlets. It also details privacy and safety measures due to the 'high-profile' nature of the case and COVID-19, including the use of juror numbers instead of names and the provision of daily transportation for jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00005315.jpg
This document is page 39 of 40 from a court filing (Document 365) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains a list of voir dire questions (numbered 21-33) for prospective jurors, focusing on crime victim history, basic demographics, employment history, and media consumption habits (social media, news, podcasts).
DOJ-OGR-00005310.jpg
This document is page 34 of a 40-page legal filing, specifically Document 365 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The page itself is largely a placeholder, containing only the heading 'Introduction' and the text '[PLACEHOLDER FOR INTRODUCTORY REMARKS]'. A Department of Justice (DOJ) identifier is present in the footer.
DOJ-OGR-00005307.jpg
This is page 31 of a 40-page legal document (Document 365) filed on October 22, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The page is a blank, lined form with a space for a Juror ID, likely intended for notes or as part of a questionnaire. The document has a Bates number of DOJ-OGR-00005307.
DOJ-OGR-00005306.jpg
This document is a blank page containing ruled lines, likely intended for juror notes. It is page 30 of 40 from Document 365 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 22, 2021. The page includes a header for 'Juror ID' and a footer with the page number '-29-' and a DOJ Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00005303.jpg
This document is page 27 of a court filing (Document 365) from October 22, 2021, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains a 'Closing Question' (renumbered from 50 to 51) for a jury questionnaire, asking jurors if they require confidentiality for any of their previous answers to protect their privacy or avoid embarrassment.
DOJ-OGR-00005302.jpg
This document is a blank juror questionnaire from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. The questions are designed to screen potential jurors for bias by asking about their personal experiences, or those of their friends and family, with accusations of sexual harassment, abuse, or assault. The form is unanswered.
DOJ-OGR-00005300.jpg
This document is page 24 of a juror questionnaire from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. The questions are designed to identify potential biases a juror might have regarding laws and organizations related to sex trafficking, sex crimes, and sexual harassment. It also probes the juror's ability to fairly assess the credibility of law enforcement witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00005292.jpg
This document is page 16 of a juror questionnaire from a federal criminal case, filed on October 22, 2021. It poses questions to a potential juror to determine if they have any personal or professional associations with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The questionnaire also seeks to understand if any such relationships would impact their ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00005288.jpg
This document is page 12 of a juror questionnaire for a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It queries potential jurors on their history with the legal system, including prior jury service, participation in court cases as a witness or defendant, and any involvement they or their close relations have had with governmental or law enforcement investigations.
DOJ-OGR-00005279.jpg
This document is page 3 of a 40-page court filing, Document 365 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The page serves as a placeholder, instructing the insertion of a juror information sheet from the Jury Department and includes a space for a Juror ID. A document control number, likely from the Department of Justice (DOJ), is present in the footer.
DOJ-OGR-00005251.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a legal filing from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330), filed on October 18, 2021. The text outlines legal arguments regarding jury selection (*voir dire*), citing Second Circuit precedents to argue that the court, rather than attorneys, should conduct the questioning of potential jurors to ensure impartiality and efficiency. The filing asserts that the defendant (Maxwell) has provided no persuasive reason to deviate from this customary practice.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity