DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00025380.jpg
This document is an internal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) email chain dated August 12, 2019, two days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. Sonya Thompson forwards a request to Michael Carvajal and Ray Ormond with the subject line "Need you to reconstruct 292 data for Inmate Epstein, 76318-054." The email includes a humorous automated signature reference to Skynet and Google.
DOJ-OGR-00025379.jpg
This document is a separator or placeholder page identifying a mail attachment. The attachment is a Microsoft Word document with the filename 'Epstein Reconstruction 76318-054 draft7 OGC Comments.docx', indicating a draft document related to an Epstein reconstruction that contains comments from the Office of General Counsel (OGC).
DOJ-OGR-00025378.jpg
This document is an email chain from September 10, 2019, discussing the draft and review of a document titled 'Epstein Reconstruction 76318-054'. Kenneth Hyle provides legal/general counsel edits to Hugh Hurwitz, who is coordinating the finalization of the report to be sent to the DOJ via an intermediary named Kathy. The document appears to be an internal Bureau of Prisons review concerning Jeffrey Epstein's custody or death.
DOJ-OGR-00025354.jpg
This document is a placeholder or separator page indicating the existence of a mail attachment. The attachment is a PDF file named 'Epstein 76318-054 IR328255.pdf'. The page bears Department of Justice Bates stamps.
DOJ-OGR-00025353.jpg
This document is an internal email from a Unit Manager at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York dated July 30, 2019. It transmits a Discipline Hearing Officer (DHO) packet regarding inmate Jeffrey Epstein (Register No. 76318-054) to Shirley V. Skipper-Scott and other redacted recipients. The email references an attached Incident Report (IR328255) and notes that a hard copy will be placed in the DHO mailbox.
DOJ-OGR-00025352.jpg
This document is a printed email chain from July 30, 2019, involving Bureau of Prisons (BOP) staff. Rosa Proto originally distributed a 'DHO Packet' (Discipline Hearing Officer) regarding inmate Jeffrey Epstein (ID 76318-054), which was subsequently forwarded by Shirley V. Skipper-Scott to Lamine N'Diaye. The document indicates administrative or disciplinary proceedings were being processed regarding Epstein shortly before his death.
DOJ-OGR-00025338.jpg
An internal email chain dated August 11-12, 2019, following Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody. Staff members discuss the urgent reconstruction of Epstein's "292 data" (likely activity logs) for the weeks leading up to his death, noting he was moved in and out of the Special Housing Unit (SHU) three times between July 7 and August 10. The final email forwards the reconstructed reports to Sonya Thompson.
DOJ-OGR-00025320.jpg
This email, dated July 8, 2019, details Jeffrey Epstein's initial intake at MCC New York following his arrival on July 6, 2019. It outlines his placement in the Special Housing Unit (SHU), his arraignment, and strict protocols regarding psychological observation and suicide watch pending an assessment. The email also notes significant media presence outside the facility.
DOJ-OGR-00025244.jpg
This document is an email chain from September 10, 2019, concerning the review and finalization of a document titled 'Epstein Reconstruction 76318-054 draft7'. Kenneth Hyle sends suggested edits to Hugh Hurwitz, who in turn had asked 'Ken' (likely Hyle) to review the document so it could be passed to 'Kathy' for submission to the Department of Justice (DOJ). The chain shows a collaborative effort to finalize an official report on Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00020373.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 21-58) discusses the court's affirmation of Judge Nathan's decision to deny Ghislaine Maxwell bail. The text argues that MDC's nighttime security protocols do not interfere with Maxwell's trial preparation and notes procedural errors in Maxwell's filing of a 'renewed motion' rather than a new appeal or proper motion in District Court. It cites Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure regarding the untimeliness of the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00020371.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Case 21-58, Document 92) dated May 27, 2021. It outlines the 'Applicable Law' regarding pretrial detention, specifically citing 18 U.S.C. § 3142. The text argues that for offenses involving minor victims (18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 or 2423), there is a statutory presumption that no conditions will assure the defendant's appearance, placing a burden of production on the defendant to prove they are not a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00020370.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 21-58) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's motion should be denied. It details Judge Nathan's previous findings that MDC's security protocols—specifically regarding night monitoring and eye coverings—do not interfere with Maxwell's trial preparation. The document affirms that previous denials of bail and release have been upheld.
DOJ-OGR-00020369.jpg
This document is page 11 of a court filing dated May 27, 2021, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). It details the Government's response regarding Maxwell's request for an eye mask and a dispute over nighttime flashlight checks. Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's request to modify the monitoring schedule on May 14, 2021, noting that Maxwell's claims were unsupported by an affidavit and that flashlight checks are standard procedure for all inmates.
DOJ-OGR-00020368.jpg
This document page, part of a legal filing from May 2021, details the Government's response to Judge Nathan regarding 'flashlight surveillance' of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. It explains that while general population inmates are checked hourly and SHU inmates every 30 minutes, Maxwell is checked every 15 minutes due to an 'enhanced security schedule' and 'heightened safety and security concerns,' despite not being on suicide watch.
DOJ-OGR-00020362.jpg
This legal document, dated May 27, 2021, is a court filing outlining the allegations against Maxwell. It details her alleged role as a co-conspirator with Jeffrey Epstein in the sexual abuse of minors between 1994 and 1997, including identifying, enticing, and grooming victims. The document also references a Superseding Indictment that expanded the charges and the conspiracy timeline to 2004, and notes that Maxwell lied under oath in a civil deposition to conceal her crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00020361.jpg
This document is page 3 of a Government legal filing dated May 27, 2021, opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed attempts for bail. It outlines the procedural history, noting that Judge Nathan previously denied bail twice and that the appellate court affirmed these denials on April 27, 2021. The document states that Maxwell's trial is scheduled to begin on November 29, 2021, and begins a Statement of Facts regarding her indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00020328.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Case 21-58) dated May 17, 2021, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bond due to 'horrific conditions' at the MDC. The text details specific grievances, including sleep deprivation by guards every 15 minutes, contaminated brown water, sewage smells in her unit, and the video/audio recording of privileged meetings with her attorneys. The filing asserts that these conditions make it impossible for her to prepare for trial and that she is not being treated like similarly situated pre-trial detainees.
DOJ-OGR-00020322.jpg
This is a 'Notice of Case Manager Change' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 27, 2021, regarding the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Case 21-58cr). The document lists Debra Ann Livingston as Chief Judge and Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe as Clerk of Court, and references the lower court proceedings in the SDNY under Judge Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020317.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the detention conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC East Building. The text details unsanitary conditions involving mold and vermin, inadequate facilities for legal counsel meetings (described as a 'fishbowl' and 'death trap'), and Maxwell's deteriorating health due to lack of fresh air and sunlight over eight months. It also notes that a request for a legal call regarding pretrial motions was denied.
DOJ-OGR-00005903.jpg
This document, an excerpt from a larger text filed in a legal case, analyzes the psychological processes of child sexual offenders. It discusses the concept of "self-grooming," where offenders justify their actions to themselves, and explores the cognitive distortions and "implicit theories" they use to rationalize their behavior. The text also notes that offenders have a special ability to identify vulnerable children, such as those with poor parental relationships or who have been previously victimized.
DOJ-OGR-00005899.jpg
This document is page 32 of 43 from Exhibit 397-1 filed on October 29, 2021, in the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The content is an excerpt from an academic paper authored by S. Craven et al., discussing the definitions and psychology of 'sexual grooming.' It critiques definitions that rely too heavily on the clinical diagnosis of 'paedophile,' arguing that such definitions reinforce stereotypes (e.g., 'dirty old men') and fail to account for offenders known to the victim.
DOJ-OGR-00005879.jpg
This document is page 12 of 43 from a court filing (Document 397-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains excerpts from academic literature discussing the psychology and methodology of 'Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse,' specifically citing studies on boundary violations, sexual desensitization, and environmental manipulation. The text outlines statistical findings regarding how abusers gradually increase physical contact, violate privacy (e.g., entering bathrooms), and manipulate families to gain access to victims.
DOJ-OGR-00005872.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing an academic table titled "General Definitions of Grooming." The table lists various authors and their respective definitions of the term "grooming" in the context of child sexual abuse, spanning publications from 1982 to 2010.
DOJ-OGR-00005837.jpg
This document is a page from a Government filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on October 29, 2021. It argues for the admissibility of the terms 'minor' and 'sexual abuse' regarding Minor Victim-3, noting she was 17 when sexual contact with Epstein began. The prosecution asserts that the defendant knew of Epstein's preference for underage girls and rejects the defense's request for jury instructions regarding United Kingdom law.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity