DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00033140.jpg
This document is a concordance (index) page from a legal transcript produced by Consor & Associates. It lists words starting with 'S' through 'T'—including 'Tein', 'Ted', 'testimony', and 'Swiss'—along with the specific page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The document bears a Department of Justice Office of Government Relations (DOJ-OGR) stamp and a Public Records Request number.
DOJ-OGR-00033137.jpg
This document is page 149 of a transcript index from a legal proceeding, prepared by Censor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists keywords from 'proper' to 'remember' and their corresponding page and line number locations within the full transcript. The document is part of a public records request response from the DOJ, as indicated by the footer identifier.
DOJ-OGR-00033132.jpg
This document is page 144 of an index for a legal transcript, created by Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists keywords from 'instruct' to 'lawsuit' and proper nouns like Jason, KATHRYN, and Lavelle, along with the page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The footer contains a public records request number and a DOJ document identifier.
DOJ-OGR-00033131.jpg
This document is page 143 of a concordance index from a legal transcript, prepared by the firm Censor & Associates. The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'good' to 'institution' and provides the page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The document references several individuals, including Hayley, Herman, Hawthorne, and GROVE, and is marked with a Department of Justice (DOJ) control number.
DOJ-OGR-00033129.jpg
This document is an index page (Page 141, Bates DOJ-OGR-00033129) from a legal transcript produced by Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists alphabetical keywords from 'Duval' to 'final' with their corresponding page and line numbers in the main transcript. Significant entries include 'Epstein' (heavily referenced), 'FBI' (indicating federal investigation discussions), 'Figueroa', 'e-mail', and 'fifty-million-d...' (suggesting a large financial sum or settlement was discussed).
DOJ-OGR-00033127.jpg
This document is a concordance (word index) page from a legal deposition or transcript produced by Consor & Associates. It lists words alphabetically from 'cases' to 'Country' alongside their page and line numbers in the source transcript. Key terms include 'Connolly' (referenced multiple times), 'civil', 'complaint', 'coaching', and 'CF09454AXX' (likely a case number). The document is part of a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) processed by the DOJ.
DOJ-OGR-00033126.jpg
This document is page 138 of an index for a legal or official transcript, produced by the firm Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'Assessment' to 'case', along with the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The footer contains the transcription company's address in West Palm Beach, FL, and a Department of Justice (DOJ) document control number.
DOJ-OGR-00033125.jpg
This document is Page 137 (also labeled Page 2812) of a legal transcript index produced by Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It provides an alphabetical list of keywords starting with 'A' (e.g., 'affidavit', 'agent', 'Albritton', 'Antico', 'arrested') alongside the specific page and line numbers where these terms appear in the main transcript. The document contains redactions obscuring names or terms between 'alcohol' and 'allegations'.
DOJ-OGR-00033119.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript (Page 131) produced by Consor & Associates. It captures a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold regarding scheduling and professional courtesy, specifically concerning someone named Jack canceling vacation plans. The argument escalates until Mr. Tein calls Mr. Leopold selfish and abruptly terminates the deposition, with Mr. Goldberger instructing to go off the record.
DOJ-OGR-00033108.jpg
This page of a deposition transcript records the questioning of an unnamed witness regarding their distrust of their stepmother. The witness confirms they have a pending lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein but clarifies they have not received money yet. The interrogator questions the witness about whether their stepmother ever disclosed being arrested for fraud or fired from Hawthorne Aviation; the witness answers 'No' and 'Never' to these inquiries.
DOJ-OGR-00033105.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript marked 'Page 117' and 'Page 2792'. It captures a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold regarding procedural rules and objections. Mr. Tein aggressively questions a witness, asserting that the witness's parents, who filed a police report, are 'liars,' prompting Mr. Leopold to instruct the witness not to answer and to state for the record that the question was inappropriate and misleading.
DOJ-OGR-00031117.jpg
This document is a page from a transcript of an interview with a female witness whose name is redacted. She recounts an incident where she was instructed to give a massage to a man (referred to as 'he'), during which he masturbated ('whacked off') and made comments about her body. The witness describes receiving money immediately after, leaving with another woman named Haley who knew what was happening, and subsequently going shopping at Marshall's.
DOJ-OGR-00031112.jpg
This document is page 6 of a 43-page interview transcript dated July 26, 2017. An interviewer, identified as 'MP', questions an individual about an event where two people went upstairs. The interviewee recalls an older man named Jeff and a tall, blonde woman, whom they speculate was Jeff's assistant, going upstairs for about five minutes after a brief introduction in the kitchen.
DOJ-OGR-00031110.jpg
This document is a page from an interview transcript where an unidentified witness discusses rumors spread about them at school. The witness claims a former friend, Sheena Nueva, spread rumors originating from an ex-boyfriend, Zack, alleging the witness was paid $300 for sexual acts with an 'old man.' The conversation also briefly mentions a shopping trip to Marshall's.
DOJ-OGR-00025365.jpg
This document is a Bureau of Prisons medical record for Jeffrey Epstein dated July 23, 2019. It details a medical encounter following an 'unspecified injury' where providers sought to 'Rule Out (R/O) self inflicted injuries.' As a result of the assessment, the plan included placing Epstein on suicide watch and scheduling follow-ups with psychology services.
DOJ-OGR-00025361.jpg
This document is a Bureau of Prisons clinical record (Page 2 of 2) for inmate Jeffrey Epstein dated July 30, 2019. It lists his registration number, DOB, and facility (NYM), identifying a psychological provider (PsyD) whose name is redacted. The main body of this specific page is blank, containing only header and footer metadata indicating the report was generated and completed at 12:33 PM.
DOJ-OGR-00020142.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court argues against granting bail, citing Maxwell's lack of employment ties to the US, significant ties abroad, and a pattern of providing erroneous financial information to Pretrial Services, specifically underreporting her assets in July 2020 by omitting her spouse's assets and trust accounts.
DOJ-OGR-00020136.jpg
This legal document is a court's analysis regarding a defendant's renewed motion for bail. The defendant argues the government's case is weak, lacking documentary evidence and relying almost entirely on the testimony of three unidentified accusers. The court, however, disagrees with the defendant's assessment and reaffirms its previous decision to deny bail, finding no conditions can reasonably assure the defendant's appearance at future proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00008819.jpg
This document is the second and final page (signature page) of a court filing (Document 577) from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It was signed by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan on January 14, 2022, in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00008807.jpg
This document is a Court Order filed on January 5, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes a briefing schedule for the Defense's motion for a new trial and addresses the appointment of counsel for a juror regarding potential inquiries into juror conduct. The document also notes that the court will not adjourn post-trial briefing on other issues.
DOJ-OGR-00008804.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 5, 2022, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca argues against the government's request for a hearing concerning a juror who revealed post-trial that they were a victim of sexual assault. He contends the request is premature and that, based on publicly available information and legal precedent, the court should order a new trial without an evidentiary hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00008786.jpg
This document is page 80 of a court filing (Document 565) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. It contains the concluding remarks and jury instructions for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically instructing jurors on the standard of proof (reasonable doubt), the necessity of ignoring sympathy, and the conduct expected during deliberations. The text emphasizes that the burden of proof lies with the Government.
DOJ-OGR-00008782.jpg
This document is Page 76 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) dated December 19, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 56, which explains the definition of 'Redaction' to the jury and instructs them to disregard the reasons for any redactions in evidentiary items.
DOJ-OGR-00008778.jpg
This document is page 72 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) dated December 19, 2021, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It contains Jury Instruction No. 52, titled 'Use of Evidence from Searches,' where the judge instructs the jury that evidence seized by law enforcement was properly admitted and lawful. The jury is directed to disregard any personal opinions regarding the search methods and to give the evidence full consideration in determining the Defendant's guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00008763.jpg
This document is a page from the jury instructions (Instruction No. 40) for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 19, 2021. It defines the legal concept of 'Venue' within the Southern District of New York and lists the specific counties included in that jurisdiction. The instruction clarifies that the Government must prove venue by a 'preponderance of the evidence' rather than 'beyond a reasonable doubt,' stating that Maxwell must be acquitted of any specific offense if venue is not established for it.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity