DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00032829.jpg
This document is a printout of a Myspace page dated November 14, 2005 (accessed), containing comments from February 2005. It displays a redacted user photo and two comments: one from a user named 'sam' asking 'are you too cool for two eyes? hmmmm missy?' and another from a user with the handle 'Just remember Ninjas make terrible pancakes' saying 'lol.' The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00032829) and indicates it is part of a Public Records Request.
DOJ-OGR-00032827.jpg
This document is a printout of a Myspace webpage dated November 14, 2005, processed by the DOJ on July 26, 2017. It features a redacted photo captioned 'Watching the sprinting valet boys with my wife' and includes comments from April 24, 2005. One significant comment is from 'Virginia' (likely Virginia Giuffre) complimenting someone named 'Ash' ('beautiful pic ash--you look... amazing.').
DOJ-OGR-00032815.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace comments page (Page 4 of 15) dating from February 21-22, 2005. It features comments from four users, including 'Virginia' (likely Virginia Roberts Giuffre) and 'Leah Jean', directed at a specific profile owner (FriendID 172831). The comments are generally social in nature, with Leah Jean mentioning a conversation with 'Matt' and complimenting the recipient's accent.
DOJ-OGR-00032800.jpg
This document is a printout of a Myspace comment section from April 2005, produced as part of a DOJ public records request. It contains messages from a user named 'Kayla' (UnderCoverLover) discussing books, eating disorders, and asking for a phone call, as well as two messages from user 'preston77' mentioning attempts to call the profile owner. The document includes a footer URL referencing a specific friendID (172831).
DOJ-OGR-00025454.jpg
On August 15, 2019, Hugh Hurwitz sent an email to Kenneth Hyle sharing a HuffPost article about Jeffrey Epstein's death and its reflection on the Federal Prison System. Hurwitz acknowledges the source's perspective but warns that the story could lead to increased focus and scrutiny from the Department of Justice (DOJ) on their internal OIA process.
DOJ-OGR-00025438.jpg
This document is an email chain from December 27-30, 2019, regarding a "Psych Reconst Response" for inmate Epstein (#76318-054). An Assistant Director from the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) sends a document to the Warden of the NYM facility. The Warden then forwards this to several staff members, including Charisma Edge and Shirley V. Skipper-Scott, and instructs a redacted individual to schedule a meeting for the following week to discuss the matter, to which the individual agrees.
DOJ-OGR-00014490.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that the government failed to provide corroborating witnesses (specifically relatives of accusers Jane, Kate, and Carolyn) or phone records to back up the victims' stories. Additionally, the defense highlights the testimony of pilot Larry Visoski, who stated he never saw women under the age of 20 on the planes, using this to cast doubt on the prosecution's case.
DOJ-OGR-00014470.jpg
This document is page 70 of a court transcript (summation) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Moe argues against the testimony of defense memory expert Loftus, contrasting the implanting of false memories about getting lost in a mall with the impossibility of implanting false memories about invasive physical trauma like enemas or sexual abuse. Moe emphasizes that Loftus admitted on cross-examination that core traumatic memories are stronger than other types of memory.
DOJ-OGR-00014466.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case USA v. Maxwell. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that the case centers on manipulation, money, and memory, highlighting how Maxwell groomed victims for Epstein. The text contrasts the small payments made to victim Carolyn (approx. $100) against the $30 million Maxwell received from Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014465.jpg
This document is page 65 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the summation by prosecutor Ms. Moe. She argues that the government has met its burden of proof regarding the six crimes charged against Ghislaine Maxwell. Ms. Moe specifically refutes the defense's narrative that Maxwell is being blamed for a man's actions, asserting instead that Maxwell made her own choices and committed crimes 'hand-in-hand' with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014460.jpg
This document is a page from the summation transcript in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell is guilty of Count Four and Count Six (sex trafficking of a minor). The text details Maxwell's interactions with victims named Kate, Jane, and specifically Carolyn, a 14-year-old middle school dropout whom Maxwell recruited for massage appointments with Epstein knowing she was a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00014457.jpg
This document is a page from the summation (closing arguments) delivered by prosecutor Ms. Moe in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor argues that Maxwell enticed a minor victim referred to as 'Jane' to travel to New York via plane, using money, gifts, and school payments provided by Epstein as inducement. The text outlines the legal elements of the crime, asserting that Maxwell intended for Jane to engage in criminal sexual activity with Epstein, who was provided access to the underage girl for molestation rather than mentorship.
DOJ-OGR-00014444.jpg
This document is a page from a court summation (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) detailing the testimony of a victim named Carolyn and her boyfriend, Sean. The prosecutor outlines how Carolyn, at age 14 in 2001, was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell to perform sexualized massages at Jeffrey Epstein's house. The text highlights grooming behaviors, including Maxwell asking the minor about sex toys and family trauma, and attempting to invite the girl to travel with them.
DOJ-OGR-00014439.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell filed on August 10, 2022. The text details an account involving a victim named Annie, stating that Maxwell and Epstein attempted to abuse her ('cuddle') in New Mexico, but she hid in a bathroom, causing Maxwell to lose interest. The prosecutor notes that Epstein subsequently paid for Annie to take a summer trip to Thailand, a fact corroborated by her mother and high school boyfriend, David Mulligan, despite the defense's attempt to use spotty border patrol records to dispute it.
DOJ-OGR-00014432.jpg
This document is a page from the closing summations of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), delivered by prosecutor Ms. Moe. She argues that the testimony of a victim identified as 'Jane' is credible despite her being a 'kid' at the time of the abuse. The text highlights that Jane recalled specific first names of individuals present during 'group sexualized encounters': Emmy, Kelly, Sophie, Eva, and Michelle.
DOJ-OGR-00014431.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the summation by Ms. Moe (likely the prosecution). The text focuses on the testimony of Dr. Rocchio, an expert in the psychology of sexual trauma, explaining why victims (specifically Jane) delay disclosure or only provide partial details initially. Ms. Moe argues that Jane's behavior is consistent with 'textbook' child sexual abuse and highlights that Jane's testimony is corroborated by three other witnesses: Annie, Carolyn, and Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00014429.jpg
This document is a page from a court summation by Ms. Moe, discussing testimony related to a victim referred to as "Jane." The prosecutor highlights corroborating testimony from a witness named Matt, who confirmed that Jane had told him years prior about her abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and a woman identified as Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00014428.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation delivered by Ms. Moe (prosecution) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The speaker details two specific flights in May 1997 and April 1998 where a minor victim, 'Jane,' traveled with Epstein and Maxwell to New Mexico and New York. The speaker also rebuts the defense's argument that the 'Jane' listed in the flight logs was actually an adult personal assistant with the same first name, citing pilot and DMV testimony as proof.
DOJ-OGR-00014415.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the closing summation by prosecutor Ms. Moe. The text focuses on a restrictive household manual that warned employees to 'see nothing, hear nothing,' which the prosecution argues was designed to cover up the 'horrifying crimes' committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor also highlights a repeating pattern or 'playbook' Maxwell used to exploit multiple victims, specifically naming Jane, Annie, Carolyn, and Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00014407.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text captures the beginning of the closing arguments phase, where the Judge outlines the schedule: Ms. Moe will present for the government, followed by a lunch break, and then Ms. Menninger will present for the defense. The page concludes with the Judge introducing Ms. Moe to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00005287.jpg
This document is page 11 of 40 from a jury questionnaire filed on October 22, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page contains questions 15, 16, and 17 (renumbered from 14, 15, and 16) asking prospective jurors about their biases regarding law enforcement searches/evidence, their experience with expert witnesses, and their ability to adhere to strict media blackout instructions during the trial. The document includes handwritten edits renumbering the questions.
DOJ-OGR-00005284.jpg
This document is page 7 (filed as page 8 of 40) of a blank juror questionnaire for Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains questions 5 through 8a regarding the potential juror's availability, English proficiency, medical condition, and medication use, with visible manual re-numbering of the questions.
DOJ-OGR-00005262.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing dated October 18, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues they have received voluminous discovery materials (over 14,000 pages) from the government very recently (Oct 11-12), leaving insufficient time to review them before filing motions in limine. The document details the logistics of the hard drive deliveries to counsel in New York and Colorado, and to Ms. Maxwell at the MDC, while noting that some materials provided to Maxwell were incomplete.
DOJ-OGR-00005261.jpg
This document is a legal filing detailing a defense team's motions in limine to exclude specific evidence, testimony, and terminology (including references to Jeffrey Epstein and characterizing accusers as "victims") in a criminal case. It also outlines procedures for temporary sealing of confidential discovery materials and reserves the right to file additional motions.
DOJ-OGR-00005258.jpg
This document is a signature page (Page 3 of 4) from a court filing (Document 357) dated October 18, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists the defense legal team submitting the document, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity