DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008760.jpg
This document is a jury instruction (Instruction No. 38) from a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 19, 2021. It explains the legal principle of co-conspirator liability, instructing the jury that all members of a conspiracy are responsible for the reasonably foreseeable acts and statements of any other member made in furtherance of that conspiracy. The instruction specifies the conditions under which a co-conspirator's actions can be used as evidence against the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00008754.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing, likely jury instructions, from a criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. It outlines the legal standards for proving her involvement in a conspiracy, stating that the Government must establish her knowing participation but does not need to prove she knew all details, knew all other members, or was involved from the beginning. The text clarifies that even a limited role or a single act could be sufficient for a guilty verdict if she was aware of the conspiracy's criminal aims.
DOJ-OGR-00008752.jpg
This document is page 46 of a court filing (Document 565) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 19, 2021. The text contains jury instructions explaining the burden of proof for Count Five of the indictment regarding conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors. It clarifies that the objective is proved if the jury finds Maxwell agreed with at least one other person to commit the elements of the offense.
DOJ-OGR-00008750.jpg
This document is page 44 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 19, 2021. The text outlines legal instructions regarding the determination of a conspiracy, emphasizing that circumstantial evidence ('disconnected acts and conduct') can be as conclusive as direct proof. It specifies that the Government must prove a mutual understanding existed to violate the law as charged in Counts One, Three, and Five of the Indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00008746.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing, likely jury instructions, dated December 19, 2021. It outlines the legal criteria for finding the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, guilty as an 'aider and abettor' in a criminal venture. The text specifies that guilt depends on whether she knowingly associated with the venture and acted to make it succeed; otherwise, she must be found not guilty under this theory.
DOJ-OGR-00008742.jpg
This document is page 36 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 19, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 28 regarding Count Six: Sex Trafficking of an Individual Under the Age of 18. The text defines the 'Third Element' of the charge, specifying that consent is not a defense if the victim 'Carolyn' was underage, and defining what constitutes a 'commercial sex act.'
DOJ-OGR-00008733.jpg
This document is page 27 (numbered 26 internally) of jury instructions filed on December 19, 2021, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It outlines the three legal elements required to prove 'Count Four: Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity.' The instruction specifies that this count relates solely to a victim identified as 'Jane' during the time period of 1994 to 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00008727.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court filing (Document 565) from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 19, 2021. It details Jury Instruction No. 14 regarding 'Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity,' outlining the three legal elements the Government must prove. It specifies that this count relates specifically to a victim identified as 'Jane' during the period of 1994 to 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00008713.jpg
This document is a legal instruction, specifically "Instruction No. 2: Role of the Jury," from a trial filed on December 19, 2021. The judge outlines the jury's responsibilities as the exclusive finders of fact, who must weigh evidence, determine witness credibility, and make decisions based solely on the evidence presented. The instruction explicitly distinguishes what constitutes evidence (witness answers, exhibits, stipulations) from what does not (lawyers' statements, questions, and the judge's own comments or rulings).
DOJ-OGR-00008708.jpg
This document is the title page for the 'Jury Charge' (instructions provided to the jury) in the criminal case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It was filed on December 19, 2021, in the Southern District of New York under case number S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00008704.jpg
This document is a draft verdict sheet from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the first three counts regarding conspiracy and enticement of minors for illegal sexual activity, providing spaces for the jury to mark 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty'.
DOJ-OGR-00008699.jpg
This document is page 161 of a court filing (Document 563) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 59, which outlines the procedures for the start of deliberations, including the election of a foreperson, the method for communicating with the judge via written notes passed to Marshals, and strict rules regarding the privacy and weight of juror notes.
DOJ-OGR-00008695.jpg
This document is a page from the jury instructions (Instruction No. 55) filed on December 18, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The instruction advises the jury that it is standard practice for witnesses to meet with lawyers (both Government and Defense) to prepare before testifying and that such preparation is not improper, though the jury may weigh it when assessing credibility. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00008695.
DOJ-OGR-00008691.jpg
This document is page 153 of a court filing (Document 563) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated December 18, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 51, which instructs the jury that the Government is not legally required to use any specific investigative techniques to prove its case and that the jury must decide based on the evidence presented.
DOJ-OGR-00008686.jpg
This document is Page 148 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 46, which guides the jury on how to evaluate testimony provided by law enforcement and government employees, specifically noting that their employment status does not automatically grant their testimony greater weight than that of ordinary witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00008685.jpg
This document is page 147 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) dated December 18, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 45 regarding the credibility of witnesses and impeachment by prior inconsistent statements, instructing jurors on how to weigh testimony when a witness contradicts previous statements.
DOJ-OGR-00008683.jpg
This document is page 145 (marked internal page 62) of a court filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains jury instructions regarding the evaluation of witness testimony, specifically addressing how to weigh the testimony of a witness with a prior felony conviction and the use of pseudonyms/first names to protect witness privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00008678.jpg
This document is a page from the jury instructions (Instruction No. 41) filed on December 18, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The instruction clarifies the 'Time of Offense,' stating that the Government does not need to prove the alleged conduct occurred on exact dates, only that it occurred 'on or about' the dates or within the time periods alleged in the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00008672.jpg
This document is page 51 (electronic page 134) of jury instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text instructs the jury that to convict Maxwell on Counts One and Three, they must find that an overt act of conspiracy involved a witness other than 'Kate,' meaning Kate's testimony alone is insufficient for these specific counts.
DOJ-OGR-00008670.jpg
This document is a page from jury instructions (Instruction No. 36) filed on December 18, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the 'Third Element' of conspiracy, requiring an 'overt act,' and lists specific alleged acts including group sexual encounters involving Maxwell, Epstein, and a minor named Jane (1994-1997), an unsolicited massage given by Maxwell to Annie in New Mexico (1996), and travel invitations to a minor named Carolyn (2001-2002).
DOJ-OGR-00008668.jpg
This legal document, likely a page of jury instructions from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, outlines the legal standards for finding Ms. Maxwell guilty of participating in a conspiracy. It clarifies that the government does not need to prove she knew all the details or participants of the conspiracy, nor that she was involved from its inception. The document states that she can be held responsible for all acts of the conspiracy during its existence if she knowingly joined at any point, and that even a single act or a limited role could be sufficient to establish her membership.
DOJ-OGR-00005868.jpg
This document is the cover page for Exhibit A, part of Document 397-1, filed on October 29, 2021, in the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The page itself contains no substantive information beyond its identification as an exhibit and a Department of Justice (DOJ) Bates number.
DOJ-OGR-00005853.jpg
This document is page 70 of a legal filing (Document 397) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on October 29, 2021. The text argues against a motion to suppress evidence, specifically regarding a 'confirmatory identification' made by 'Minor Victim-4.' The prosecution argues the identification is admissible because the victim knew the defendant by name from previous interactions, citing various legal precedents regarding independent reliability of witness identification.
DOJ-OGR-00002724.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for 'Exhibit E' filed on February 4, 2021, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains a header with filing details and a footer with a Department of Justice Bates number (DOJ-OGR-00002724).
DOJ-OGR-00002706.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, is an argument from the defense demanding the immediate production of unredacted reports from the government. The defense contends these reports, held by the FBI, contain exculpatory 'Brady material' and that the government cannot fulfill its disclosure obligations by providing redacted versions. The argument is supported by citations to legal precedents, including Kyles v. Whitley, and a prior ruling from the court on the timing of such disclosures.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity