DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000903.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 30, 2021, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-770). Lara Pomerantz of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is entering the case as additional counsel, joining co-counsel Won S. Shin, on behalf of the United States (Appellee). The document certifies her admission to the court and provides her contact information.
DOJ-OGR-00000902.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 30, 2021, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-770). Maurene Comey of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is entering her appearance as additional counsel for the United States (Appellee), serving as co-counsel alongside Won S. Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00000898.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 (related to Ghislaine Maxwell) covering filings between February 4, 2021, and February 16, 2021. It details numerous defense motions filed by Maxwell's legal team (Cohen, Pagliuca) to dismiss charges, suppress evidence, and strike surplusage, alongside multiple sealed documents. The log also records correspondence to Judge Nathan regarding conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000895.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 and early 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's bail application due to flight risk, citing specific charges including conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts and perjury. The docket tracks correspondence between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Everdell), sealed documents, and Maxwell's subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal after a request for an extension of time was denied.
DOJ-OGR-00000893.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), listing entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020. It records the filing of transcripts from a July 2020 conference, an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions for Maxwell's sealed bail application based on privacy interests and judicial efficiency, and the submission of Maxwell's renewed bail motion with numerous exhibits. Additionally, it notes the appearance of attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the government and the government's subsequent opposition to the bail application.
DOJ-OGR-00000891.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and a denied request for an in camera conference regarding a renewed bail motion. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders balancing privacy interests with public access, ultimately allowing tailored redactions to defense letters but denying the request to keep proceedings entirely sealed or in camera.
DOJ-OGR-00000890.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court docket in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various filings including letters regarding discovery deadlines, affidavits, mandates from the USCA dismissing an appeal, and several memo endorsements and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding discovery schedules and conditions of confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00000888.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) listing filings and orders between August 18, 2020, and September 8, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records legal maneuvers including attorney appearances, sealed documents, letter motions regarding redactions and protective orders, and a Memorandum Opinion denying defense requests for victim identities and changes to confinement conditions. The page concludes with a notice of appeal filed by Maxwell regarding a previous memorandum and opinion.
DOJ-OGR-00000886.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings and orders from late July 2020. It includes entries regarding motions for a protective order, responses from both the defense and prosecution, and a Memorandum Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan resolving disputes over the protective order's language concerning victim identification and the use of discovery materials.
DOJ-OGR-00000883.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket containing orders and notices related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details COVID-19 protocols for courthouse entry, remote proceeding logistics, victim notification rights, and Speedy Trial Act exclusions. It also lists a memo endorsement scheduling briefing deadlines and notices of attorney appearances for Maxwell's defense team.
DOJ-OGR-00000869.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the Defendant's third request for release on bail, concluding that she remains a significant flight risk and that no conditions can reasonably assure her appearance. The judge cites the nature of the charges involving a minor victim as a strong factor favoring continued detention.
DOJ-OGR-00000865.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a Court Order filed on December 28, 2020 (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), denying the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) third motion for release on bail. The Court rejects new proposals, including renouncing French and British citizenship and placing assets in a monitored account, reaffirming that she remains a flight risk with substantial resources and foreign ties. It references previous denials from July and December 2020 and notes her continued incarceration at the Metropolitan Detention Center.
DOJ-OGR-00000856.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the filing of opposition and reply memoranda regarding Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, as well as Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders approving redactions to protect third-party privacy and ultimately denying the motion for release on bail on December 28, 2020. The text heavily cites legal precedents regarding judicial transparency versus privacy interests (Lugosch, Amodeo).
DOJ-OGR-00000850.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770) covering proceedings in August and September 2020. It details several legal motions, including the defense's failed attempts to compel the disclosure of victim identities, modify protective orders to use discovery in civil cases, and move Maxwell to the general prison population. The log concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal regarding the denial of the protective order modification.
DOJ-OGR-00000840.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The appeal challenges a court order from March 22, 2021, which denied her 'Third Motion for Release on Bail'. The document identifies Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, and the prosecuting Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00000839.jpg
This document is a procedural instruction page attached to a court filing (Document 1-1) for Case 21-770, dated March 24, 2021. It outlines administrative requirements for attorneys and pro se parties regarding updating contact information via PACER/CM/ECF and explains the rules for case captions and appellate designations under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP). The document bears a DOJ-OGR bates stamp, indicating it was likely processed as part of a FOIA request.
DOJ-OGR-00000832.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on August 5, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Docket No. 19-2221). Attorney Martin G. Weinberg of Boston, MA, certifies his appearance as additional counsel for the Defendant-Appellant, Jeffrey Epstein, joining existing counsel Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00000821.jpg
This document is a page from a legal case file (Case 19-2221) detailing the attorneys involved and the charges against the defendant. It lists pending counts for sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of children, identifies Reid Weingarten as the defense attorney, and lists Alex Rossmiller and Alison Gainfort Moe as prosecutors for the United States.
DOJ-OGR-00000812.jpg
This document is page 29 of a court order filed on July 18, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The Court denies the adequacy of Epstein's proposed bail package, citing a lack of audited financial statements and criticizing the defense for providing only a cursory one-page asset summary totaling over $559 million. The Court characterizes the defense's conditional offer to provide better financials only if bail is granted as 'disingenuous' for a man of Epstein's wealth and financial experience.
DOJ-OGR-00000811.jpg
This document is a page from a court order denying bail for Jeffrey Epstein. The court determines that the defendant poses a significant flight risk due to his wealth, overseas ties (specifically in Paris), and the severity of the potential sentence (45 years). The court cites precedent such as United States v. Abdullahu to support the decision that no conditions can reasonably assure his appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00000780.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from July 2019 for the case against Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of New York. It details the initial legal proceedings, including the unsealing of the indictment, Epstein's arrest on July 6th, his initial appearance and arraignment on July 8th where he pleaded not guilty, and the scheduling of detention and bail hearings. The document identifies the key legal personnel involved, including the prosecution team (Alison Moe, Maurene Ryan Comey, Alex Rossmiller), the defense team (Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, Marc Fernich), and the presiding judges (Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman and Judge Richard M. Berman).
DOJ-OGR-00000779.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing for Case 19-2221, dated July 23, 2019. It lists defense counsel Reid Weingarten and pending felony charges related to sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of children or by force. It also identifies the Plaintiff (USA) and their representation by Alex Rossmiller and Alison Gainfort Moe of the U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY.
DOJ-OGR-00000762.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Government to Judges Berman and Engelmayer, filed on August 5, 2025. The Government responds to a court order demanding information about the potential unsealing of grand jury materials from the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The Government acknowledges the public's strong right of access to trial exhibits, noting that exhibits from the Maxwell trial were already made public, but requests an extension until August 8, 2025, to provide its final position on unsealing the grand jury exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00000759.jpg
This document is a letter filed on August 4, 2025, from an anonymous victim in the U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein case to Judge Richard Berman. The author criticizes the DOJ's handling of the 'Epstein Files,' accuses the government of using victims as political pawns, and demands full transparency regarding the wealthy 'friends' associated with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000757.jpg
An anonymous victim of Epstein writes a memo to Judge Richard M. Berman, expressing profound distrust in the DOJ and FBI, whom the author believes are protecting powerful individuals involved with Epstein. The author questions the official cause of Epstein's death and argues that the public release of the 'Epstein Files' is harming victims. The memo concludes with a formal request for a third-party review of all documents to ensure that no victims' identities are revealed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity