DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000710.jpg
This document is page 72 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, following Jeffrey Epstein's death. An attorney representing victims addresses the court, acknowledging the likely motion to dismiss the criminal case but passionately arguing that the record should remain open. The speaker emphasizes the systemic betrayal of the victims and requests that those not present be allowed to submit victim impact statements so their voices are officially recorded.
DOJ-OGR-00000705.jpg
This document is page 67 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on September 3, 2019. It contains the concluding sentence of a statement made by 'Jane Doe 7,' expressing hope for healing and gratitude toward investigators and public servants working on the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000703.jpg
This document is a victim impact statement from 'Jane Doe 7' filed on September 3, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The victim describes being unknowingly recruited by an agent and subsequently sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein at his New York City mansion. She details the severe psychological aftermath, including becoming a recluse, suffering from shame and guilt, and struggling with suicidal thoughts.
DOJ-OGR-00000701.jpg
This document is page 63 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on September 3, 2019. It contains a victim impact statement delivered in court following the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker describes the lasting trauma of Epstein's abuse, expresses anger at the prison system for allowing Epstein to commit suicide (thereby denying victims their day in court), and concludes by reclaiming their identity as a survivor rather than a victim.
DOJ-OGR-00000696.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, following the death of Jeffrey Epstein. Annie Farmer addresses the court, speaking on behalf of her sister, Maria Farmer, who reported Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell for assault in 1996. Annie Farmer expresses disappointment regarding Epstein's death in government custody and urges the court to ensure that his accomplices are held accountable.
DOJ-OGR-00000683.jpg
This document is page 45 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a victim impact statement from an unidentified woman describing the profound negative effects of Epstein's abuse on her career, relationships, and mental health, and expressing frustration that his death allowed him to escape justice. The speaker also mentions having written a 350-page book about her experiences.
DOJ-OGR-00000678.jpg
This document is page 40 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It contains a victim impact statement from an unnamed former model who describes being sexually assaulted by Epstein, receiving money immediately after the act, and subsequently suffering from depression and leaving the modeling industry. The transcript concludes with Mr. Edwards introducing another victim, Jane Doe No. 4, who begins her statement.
DOJ-OGR-00000672.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). An attorney representing victims addresses the court, thanking the Judge and the U.S. Attorney's office for their treatment of the victims. The attorney introduces Courtney Wild, a client who sought help in 2008, to speak to the court; Ms. Wild then spells her name for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00000668.jpg
This document is page 30 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). Attorney Mr. Edwards addresses the court regarding his clients (victims) who wish to speak, establishing protocols for those who wish to remain anonymous ('Jane Doe'). Edwards also acknowledges presentations made by attorneys Weingarten and Weinberg, expressing professional respect for Weinberg despite the adversarial nature of the case, and references the 'tragic ending' (Epstein's death) in relation to potential civil rights violations.
DOJ-OGR-00000652.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten addresses the court regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that prison employees falsified information and ignored orders never to leave Epstein alone. Weingarten states that despite the medical examiner's conclusion of suicide by hanging, the defense has received medical evidence suggesting the injuries were more consistent with assault.
DOJ-OGR-00000648.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. Prosecutor Ms. Comey addresses the court to support the dismissal of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death, citing Second Circuit law requiring abatement. Crucially, she states that this dismissal does not stop the government's ongoing investigation into potential coconspirators or future prosecutions of new defendants.
DOJ-OGR-00000640.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court transcript from a case filed on September 3, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It records the opening of the proceeding where the Judge asks for introductions. Government attorneys Maureen Comey and Alison Moe introduce themselves, noting the presence of FBI Special Agent Amanda Young and NYPD Detective Paul Byrne, while defense attorneys Reid Weingarten, Martin Weinberg, and Michael Miller (of Steptoe & Johnson) introduce themselves.
DOJ-OGR-00000631.jpg
This document is a Mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on August 21, 2019. It orders the withdrawal of Jeffrey Epstein's appeal (Docket No. 19-2221) following a stipulation filed by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) 42. The document is signed by the Clerk of Court, Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00000619.jpg
This document is page 8 of a court transcript filed on August 6, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues for a 13-month timeline to prepare for trial, citing the need to litigate a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), unseal files for potential witnesses, and difficulties working with Epstein under current jail conditions. The Court responds by setting a monitoring period and excluding time through June 8.
DOJ-OGR-00000617.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (the federal case against Jeffrey Epstein), filed on August 6, 2019. The transcript records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court') and defense attorney Mr. Weinberg regarding the scheduling of the trial. They agree to target September 2020 for the trial date, as Mr. Weinberg argues that 13 months is necessary to prepare for a case of this 'magnitude and scope.'
DOJ-OGR-00000616.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing on August 6, 2019, where Epstein's lawyer, Mr. Weinberg, requests a trial date of Labor Day 2020. Weinberg cites the need to review over a million pages of discovery and address complex constitutional issues related to Epstein's previous Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and double jeopardy protections. The text also notes Epstein's incarceration at the MCC and the defense's intent to file early motions to dismiss based on the NPA.
DOJ-OGR-00000577.jpg
This is page 67 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings involve a discussion regarding victims wishing to be heard, with Mr. Boies present to represent them. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg clarifies that Epstein does not concede the government's evidence and intends to mount a defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000574.jpg
This document is page 64 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, related to Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A prosecutor is arguing before the judge ('Your Honor') regarding the legal presumption (likely for detention) and rebutting defense arguments that a lack of recent convictions or charges (specifically regarding obstruction or witness tampering) should work in the defendant's favor. The speaker emphasizes that Congress intended for sex crimes against children to carry lifelong liability.
DOJ-OGR-00000571.jpg
This is page 61 of a court transcript from the Jeffrey Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490-RMB), filed on July 24, 2019. Prosecutor Rossmiller argues before the Court that pre-trial detention does not prevent a defendant from preparing a robust defense, citing the 'Zarrab' case as a precedent where a detained defendant had ample access to counsel and document review. The prosecution expresses willingness to consider factors like space and document review capabilities for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00000568.jpg
This is page 58 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The page captures a debate between the Judge (The Court) and defense attorney Mr. Weinberg regarding the fairness of bail conditions and access to counsel. Weinberg argues that the unique complexity of the case (facing a well-resourced prosecution and 'a million pages of discovery') justifies different treatment than typical defendants at Rikers Island, while the Court counters by highlighting the serious nature of crimes faced by indigent defendants.
DOJ-OGR-00000563.jpg
This document is page 53 of a court transcript filed on July 24, 2019, concerning the detention hearing of Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). A defense attorney argues to the Judge that specific financial details ('values and accounts') and evidence of seizures should remain confidential to ensure Epstein's right to a fair and impartial jury in Manhattan, citing the enormous publicity surrounding the case. The speaker mentions opposing counsel Mr. Rossmiller at the end of the page.
DOJ-OGR-00000562.jpg
This document is page 52 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Attorney Mr. Weinberg argues with the Court about the confidentiality of the defendant's financial information, specifically in the context of a bail determination. Notably, Weinberg explicitly states that the defendant (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) does not possess a billion dollars while discussing hypothetical bail amounts of $20 million.
DOJ-OGR-00000561.jpg
This document is page 51 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490 (USA v. Jeffrey Epstein), filed on July 24, 2019. A member of the defense counsel is addressing the Judge regarding bail conditions, stating the defendant is willing to accept any monetary conditions, home detention, and monitoring to guarantee his appearance. The speaker also addresses the issue of sealing financial information, conceding that if monetary bail conditions are set, the associated financial information becomes a judicial document to which the public is entitled.
DOJ-OGR-00000550.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 24, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker (likely the presiding judge) reinforces the presumption of Epstein's innocence during bail discussions. The speaker also quotes a previous statement by Judge Pickholz, who expressed surprise at the prosecutor's office's actions regarding Epstein's sex offender classification, specifically debating the reduction from Level 3 to Level 1.
DOJ-OGR-00000542.jpg
Transcript from a July 24, 2019 court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) where Epstein's defense argues for his release. The defense claims Epstein 'disciplined himself' and cites a 14-year gap in allegations (referencing 2002 and 2005) as proof he is no longer a danger. The Judge ('The Court') challenges this position, quoting the defense's previous letter which stated any danger had 'abated' or 'evaporated.'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity