DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000012.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (dated Sept 17, 2024) arguing that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was legally limited only to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and not binding on other federal districts. It cites the US Attorney's Manual and the specific text of the NPA authorized by R. Alexander Acosta to support the claim that the agreement contained limiting language regarding its scope. The text emphasizes that the negotiation history does not support an inference that the agreement was intended to apply nationwide.
DOJ-OGR-00000010.jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024, discussing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal. The court affirms that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) does not prevent the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting Maxwell. The text references a $750,000 fine imposed on Maxwell and cites legal precedent establishing that plea agreements generally only bind the specific district office where they are entered.
DOJ-OGR-00030408.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile comments section (URL: myspace.com/iloveanirishboi) dated March 26, 2006. It contains four messages from users 'L0vEabLe d0rKk' (who identifies herself as Mary) and 'shake your ziggy zong', discussing a potential departure and urging the recipient to negotiate with their parents to stay longer. The document includes a DOJ Bates stamp and metadata indicating a Public Records Request from 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00030405.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page (URL: iloveanirishboi) dated 4/4/2006, containing comments from March 27, 2006. The profile owner's identity is redacted, but they report an income of '$250,000 and Higher'. Comments from users 'Daddy's LiL' Girl', 'nikxx', and 'mary' discuss social plans, including taking pictures, a trip to Atlanta, and an invitation to Wellington (a location often associated with equestrian activities and the Epstein case context) to get back into dancing.
DOJ-OGR-00030403.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page dated April 4, 2006, featuring comments from March 28-29, 2006. The comments indicate the profile owner, likely named Saige, is a student who has recently traveled to or is moving to Florida. Friends express sadness at their departure and ask specific questions about where in Florida they are moving.
DOJ-OGR-00030402.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page for user 'iloveanirishboi' (friendID=65739759), dated April 4, 2006. It contains personal interests, photo captions mentioning 'ZaCk' and '1-214', and comments from friends 'lynds' and 'Wonderful-Winslow' expressing affection and discussing a location named 'Cherokee'. The document is part of a DOJ FOIA release with Bates number DOJ-OGR-00030402, and significant personal identifying information has been redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00030377.jpg
This document is page 24 of 114 from a DOJ Public Records Request (17-295) containing the text of Florida state statutes regarding sexual offender registration. The text details specific requirements for offenders to report changes in residence, employment, email/IM handles, and enrollment in higher education to the Sheriff's office and the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. It specifically outlines protocols for offenders living in vehicles or vessels and mandates reporting within 48 hours of status changes.
DOJ-OGR-00030371.jpg
This document is a legal sentencing computation form dated July 26, 2017, from a Florida court case. It details the calculation of a defendant's sentence points, which total 56.7, leading to a calculated lowest permissible prison sentence of 21.5 months. The form includes sections for various offenses, enhancements, and the final sentence imposed, and bears a Department of Justice document identifier.
DOJ-OGR-00030368.jpg
This document is a Florida Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet for Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated June 30, 2008, prepared by 'Belohlavek' of the State Attorney's Office in Palm Beach County. It details two specific offenses: a primary offense of 'Procuring Person Under 18 for Prostitution' (F.S. 794.03) and an additional offense of 'Felony Solicitation of Prostitution' (F.S. 796.07(2)(f)), resulting in a subtotal of 57.7 sentencing points. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp and indicates it was part of a 2017 public records request.
DOJ-OGR-00030357.jpg
This document is page 4 of 114 from a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) dated July 26, 2017. It contains the text of Florida Statute 948.101 dealing with 'Terms and conditions of community control.' It outlines the legal requirements for offenders placed on community control, including confinement to residence, electronic monitoring, employment release conditions, and supervision by the Department of Corrections. While specific names like Epstein are not in the text, this statute provides the legal framework relevant to his work release and community control status in Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00030355.jpg
This is a legal close-out sheet for case number 08-9381, detailing the final disposition for defendant Jeffrey Epstein on June 30, 2008. The document indicates Epstein entered a negotiated plea, resulting in a sentence of 6 months in county jail followed by 12 months of community control. It also notes that he was designated a sexual offender as part of the case's resolution.
DOJ-OGR-00021107.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, arguing for a 'categorical approach' to interpreting statutes of limitation, specifically §3283. It cites several Supreme Court precedents, most notably U.S. v. Noveck (1926), to support the argument that an extended statute of limitations for fraud-related offenses only applies when fraud is an essential element of the crime itself, not when it is merely alleged as 'mere surplusage' in an indictment for a different crime like perjury or tax evasion.
DOJ-OGR-00021093.jpg
This page from a legal brief (Case 22-1426) argues points regarding the scope of plea agreements and Double Jeopardy. It analyzes the 'Abbamonte-Alessi rule' and the 'Annabi' precedent to determine if a plea agreement binding 'the Government' applies to other United States Attorney Offices (USAOs). The text argues that for charges to be distinct enough to bypass the rule, they must cover a new time period, noting that in the Annabi case, the conspiracy period was two years longer.
DOJ-OGR-00021088.jpg
This page from a legal document argues that the Court's precedents do not require applying the 'Annabi' canon to agreements formed outside its Circuit. It cites several cases to support the position that federal plea agreements should be analyzed under general choice-of-law principles for contracts, highlighting a magistrate judge's questioning of the current practice.
DOJ-OGR-00021083.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated February 28, 2023, presents a series of case law citations to support the legal argument that a plea agreement made by an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) binds the entire United States government. The cited cases establish that the U.S. government is considered a single entity across all districts, and therefore, an agreement made by one of its attorneys in one location (e.g., West Virginia) is enforceable against federal prosecutors in another (e.g., South Dakota).
DOJ-OGR-00021076.jpg
This page from a 2023 court filing analyzes the text of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It details that the FBI investigated Epstein for offenses committed between 2001 and 2007, and that the NPA was intended to 'globally' resolve his liability. The text explains that federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida was deferred in favor of state prosecution by Florida, provided Epstein abided by the terms.
DOJ-OGR-00021059.jpg
This document is page 12 of 113 from a legal filing (Case 22-1426, Document 59), dated February 28, 2023. It contains a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (U.S. v. [Defendant]) cited in the main brief, along with their corresponding page numbers. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00021059).
DOJ-OGR-00021058.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal filing from Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. It is a table of authorities listing numerous U.S. court cases, dating from 1926 to 2022, which are cited within the main document. Each citation includes the case name, legal reporter information, and the page numbers where the case is referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00021053.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing dated February 28, 2023. It lists various legal precedents (case law) cited in the main brief, including 'Doe v. Indyke et al.,' which directly references Darren Indyke, a known associate and executor for Jeffrey Epstein. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00021052.jpg
This document is page 'iv' of a 113-page legal filing, specifically Document 59 in Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. The page is a table of contents outlining legal arguments concerning standard of review, procedural errors, and the District Court's application of a sentencing adjustment under USSG § 3B1.1.
DOJ-OGR-00021050.jpg
This document is a Table of Contents page (page ii) from a legal appeal filed on February 28, 2023. It outlines arguments regarding the Statute of Limitations (Point II) and allegations that Juror No. 50 made false statements during voir dire, denying Ms. Maxwell a fair trial (Point III). The document specifically references the Mann Act, Section 3283, and the McDonough Test regarding juror bias.
DOJ-OGR-00021049.jpg
This document is the Table of Contents (page i) for an appellate brief filed on February 28, 2023, in Case 22-1426. It outlines legal arguments asserting that the 'Appellant' (contextually Ghislaine Maxwell) should have all counts dismissed based on the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), claiming status as a third-party beneficiary and arguing that the USAO-SDNY is bound by the 'potential co-conspirators' provision.
DOJ-OGR-00021043.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely a sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell) where the judge is ruling on sentencing guidelines. The judge overrules an objection, finding by a preponderance of evidence that the defendant supervised Sarah Kellen, who is identified as a 'knowing participant in the criminal conspiracy.' The ruling cites testimony from Larry Visoski, David Rodgers, and Carolyn, as well as flight records and a household manual, to establish the defendant's leadership role as 'Epstein's number two.'
DOJ-OGR-00021038.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely United States v. Maxwell given the context and case number 22-1426) filed on February 28, 2023. The text details a judge's analysis of sentencing guidelines (2003 vs 2004) and determines the timeline of a sexual abuse conspiracy, specifically noting that the conspiracy involving a victim named Carolyn ended in early 2005 when she turned 18. The judge explicitly states that they found Carolyn to be a credible witness.
DOJ-OGR-00021035.jpg
A page from a court transcript (likely the sentencing hearing in US v. Maxwell, filed in the 2023 appeal) debating sentencing enhancements. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues that testimony from pilots proves Maxwell had supervisory authority over Sarah Kellen within the conspiracy. Defense attorney Everdell rebuts that Maxwell's presence while Kellen scheduled 'massage appointments' does not constitute supervision. The defense also mentions a 'five-point enhancement for repeated and dangerous sex offenders.'
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity