DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001609.jpg
A court document filed on July 10, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, wherein Ghislaine Maxwell waives her right to be physically present at her arraignment, bail hearing, and conference. The document is signed on her behalf by her attorney, Christian R. Everdell, and specifically cites the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason for waiving physical presence at the bail hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00001605.jpg
This document is page 25 of a bail application filed on July 10, 2020, for Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that Maxwell is concealing the identities of potential bond co-signers to protect their safety and privacy. The filing cites legal precedents involving high-profile defendants like Bernie Madoff and Marc Dreier to argue that Maxwell should be granted release subject to conditions, including the potential use of private security guards.
DOJ-OGR-00001604.jpg
This document is page 24 of a legal filing (Document 18) from July 10, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail due to COVID-19 risks and the adequacy of the proposed bail package. The defense proposes a $5 million bond co-signed by six individuals (siblings, relatives, friends) and secured by $3.75 million in UK property, along with home detention, GPS monitoring, and travel restrictions to NY districts. A footnote cites *United States v. Boustani* to argue that private security guards are appropriate given Maxwell's circumstances.
DOJ-OGR-00001600.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Document 18) dated July 10, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues against the government's assertion that Maxwell is a flight risk, citing her isolation as a protective measure rather than an attempt to flee, and noting that wealth and foreign citizenship alone are insufficient grounds for detention without proof of 'inclination' to flee. It also argues that COVID-19 travel restrictions make flight unlikely and mentions in a footnote that individuals in the media (specifically in the UK) are falsely claiming to have ties to her.
DOJ-OGR-00001584.jpg
This document is page 4 (labeled 'iii') of a legal filing, specifically a Table of Authorities listing case law citations. It was filed on July 10, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell). The page lists various legal precedents cited in the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and 'United States v. Kashoggi', referencing rulings from the S.D.N.Y., 2nd Circuit, and other jurisdictions regarding bail or detention issues (inferred from the statute 18 U.S.C. § 3142).
DOJ-OGR-00001583.jpg
This document is a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on July 10, 2020. It lists numerous U.S. court cases that are cited as legal precedent within the main document, providing the case names, citations, and the page numbers where they are referenced. The cases listed involve the United States as a party against various individuals and span from 1978 to 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001568.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 8, 2020. It formally lists and provides photographic exhibits of two properties owned by Epstein: an estate in Palm Beach, Florida, and a ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00001563.jpg
This document is page 1 of a Superseding Indictment filed on July 8, 2020, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines Count One, charging her with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts between 1994 and 1997. The text alleges Maxwell recruited and groomed victims as young as 14 for Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001533.jpg
This is the signature page (page 2 of 4) of a court order filed on July 6, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Judge Alison J. Nathan orders the submission of a letter proposing a date for proceedings and a revised schedule for the Defendant's bail application. The document bears a DOJ production stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00001531.jpg
This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, dated July 2, 2020. It records a sealed docket entry for the "Arrest (Removal) of Ghislaine Maxwell" in case number 1:20-mj-00132-AJ. The notice explicitly states that because the case is sealed, no electronic public or participant notices were distributed.
DOJ-OGR-00001517.jpg
This document is page 17 of 18 from an indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 6, 2020. It outlines Count Six (Perjury) against Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging she knowingly made false material declarations during a deposition on July 22, 2016, related to civil case 15 Civ. 7344. The specific false testimony cited involves her denial of knowledge regarding sex toys or devices at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house.
DOJ-OGR-00001501.jpg
An official Arrest Warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell on June 29, 2020. The warrant, signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith, lists five specific charges based on an indictment, including conspiracy to entice minors, enticement of a minor, conspiracy to transport minors, transportation of a minor, and perjury. The document lists AUSA Alison Moe as the contact.
DOJ-OGR-00001463.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 23 of 24) of a legal filing submitted on May 27, 2021, in Case 21-770. The document, signed by Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey on behalf of the Southern District of New York prosecution team (including Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach), argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's motion should be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00001462.jpg
This document is page 22 of a legal filing dated May 27, 2021, arguing against Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release. The text asserts that Judge Nathan did not abuse her discretion in detaining Maxwell as a flight risk and highlights Maxwell's extensive access to discovery materials via computers (13 hours/day) and legal counsel via video calls (25 hours/week) at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00001460.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 21-770) argues that Judge Nathan acted within her discretion regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement at the MDC. It asserts that Maxwell failed to provide evidence that MDC protocols interfered with her trial preparation. The document dismisses Maxwell's complaints about conditions—specifically regarding undrinkable water, inadequate food, audio recording of legal visits, and sewage overflows—as bare assertions without evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00001455.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal filing (likely a government opposition brief) from May 27, 2021, regarding case 21-770. It argues that there are no grounds to overturn Judge Nathan's denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail, noting that MDC security protocols do not interfere with her trial preparation. It also argues that Maxwell's 'renewed motion' is procedurally improper and untimely under appellate rules.
DOJ-OGR-00001451.jpg
This page from a 2021 legal filing discusses Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. It details her complaints regarding sleep disruption due to flashlight checks and the lack of an eye mask, noting that the MDC does not issue eye masks but allows other items to be used. The document records that Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's request to modify the monitoring schedule on May 14, 2021, stating her claims were unsupported by an affidavit.
DOJ-OGR-00001449.jpg
This document is page 9 of a court filing from May 27, 2021, related to Case 21-770 regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the procedural history of Maxwell's failed appeals for bail/pretrial release and the court's affirmation of Judge Nathan's decisions on April 27, 2021. The text specifically highlights Maxwell's complaints regarding her conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically '15-minute light surveillance,' and notes that the appellate court directed such specific relief requests back to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001445.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 21-770, dated May 27, 2021) outlines the Government's argument for the detention of Ghislaine Maxwell. It references three denied bail applications and details a specific hearing on July 14, 2020, where Judge Nathan ruled Maxwell a flight risk based on strong evidence and the nature of the offenses. The document highlights that the indictment is supported by three victim-witnesses, corroborated by flight records and diaries.
DOJ-OGR-00001444.jpg
This legal document, page 4 of a court filing from May 27, 2021, outlines allegations against Maxwell for her role as a co-conspirator with Jeffrey Epstein in the sexual abuse of minors between 1994 and 1997. It details her alleged actions of identifying, enticing, and grooming victims, and notes that a Superseding Indictment expanded the charges against her, including sex trafficking conspiracy, extended the timeline of the conspiracy to 2004, and identified a fourth victim.
DOJ-OGR-00001433.jpg
This document is page 4 of 4 of a court filing, identified as Document 256-2 in case 20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on April 29, 2021. Labeled 'EXHIBIT B', it consists of a photograph of an unnamed woman with a bruise under her eye. The document is also marked with a Department of Justice (DOJ) control number.
DOJ-OGR-00001427.jpg
This is a court order filed on May 14, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document addresses complaints from Maxwell's defense counsel regarding sleep deprivation caused by guards shining flashlights into her cell every 15 minutes. The Government responded that these checks are routine safety measures, though Maxwell receives more frequent checks due to being housed alone and the nature of her charges.
DOJ-OGR-00001421.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's Appendix to her Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release filed on May 17, 2021, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It lists the case numbers (21-770 & 21-58) and identifies her legal counsel, Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00001421.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity