| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition is taking place where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with their at... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious deposition takes place where participants argue over procedure and conduct. Mr. Tei... | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious legal deposition where attorneys argue over conduct and procedure, leading to a bre... | A room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is being conducted where Mr. Tein is questioning an unnamed deponent who is represen... | Unknown | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court proceeding | The start of a remote court proceeding for an arraignment, initial scheduling conference, and bai... | Remote | View |
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing the beginning of a remote legal proceeding. The judge (THE COURT) confirms the presence of counsel (MS. MOE), a court reporter, and a Pretrial Services Officer (Leah Harmon). The judge states the purpose of the hearing—an arraignment, scheduling conference, and bail hearing—and explains it is being conducted remotely under the authority of the CARES Act due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
This document is page 12 of a deposition transcript involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they are aware that a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filed a lawsuit on their behalf. Mr. Leopold objects based on attorney-client privilege, specifically referencing conversations between himself and the witness, as well as an 'attorney from Miami'.
This document is page 25 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about their contact with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the questioning style, noting the presence of a child, while Mr. Tein asks if the witness was persuaded to engage in sexual activity with Epstein for money and about specific methods of communication, which the witness denies.
This document is page 13 of a deposition transcript, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012408'. It captures a heated argument between several individuals, likely attorneys, named Mr. Tein, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Leopold. The conflict involves accusations of obstruction and inappropriate aggression, leading to a threat to cancel the deposition before the participants agree to take a break.
This document is page 10 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a redacted deponent, represented by attorney Mr. Leopold, about their awareness of a lawsuit filed on their behalf by lawyer Jeffrey Herman. Mr. Leopold objects to the question, citing attorney-client privilege, leading to a dispute over the validity of the privilege claim.
A written declaration by the plaintiff, submitted as Exhibit A in the case.
A written declaration by a witness, submitted as Exhibit B in the case.
Stated victims relied on US Attorney's Office representatives to their detriment and would have objected to the plea agreement if they knew the facts.
Exhibit 2: Jane Doe Number 3 and Jane Doe Number 4's motion pursuant to rule 21 for joinder in action.
Edwards provided sworn testimony and an affidavit asserting he was not involved in the Ponzi scheme.
Testified about White bingeing on Twinkies while depressed.
Request to access sealed briefs from 2011.
Asserted the Post failed to notify Florida prosecutors.
Response to the Post's motion.
Original motion filed by the Post seeking to unseal briefs.
Motion arguing Roberts made false statements.
Answer to a complaint where Maxwell denied allegations.
Answer to a complaint where Maxwell denied allegations.
States Dershowitz has not provided documents despite 45 days passing.
Stated Epstein ordered her to have sex with Dershowitz six times.
Stated Epstein ordered her to have sex with Dershowitz six times.
Filing of allegations by Giuffre against Epstein, Dershowitz, and others.
Accused Reinhart of violating DOJ policies by switching sides.
Added defendant Mohammed Bin Abdullah Al-Jomaith.
Added defendant Mohammed Bin Abdullah Al-Jomaith.
Argued no conspiracy to violate victims' rights; noted Epstein opposed provisions like sex offender registration.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity