MR. GOLDBERGER
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Correspondents |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Allies |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Unknown |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Allied counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Adversarial in proceeding |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Mr. Rothstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A heated argument occurs during a legal deposition among the attorneys present. The dispute cente... | Deposition Room (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition involving a contentious argument between attorneys over questioning procedure ... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where attorneys are engaged in a heated procedural dispute. Mr. Tein attempts ... | Undisclosed deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal proceeding, likely a deposition, where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness defended by Mr. ... | A room with a table. | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where attorneys are in disagreement over the line of questioning for a female ... | Deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal proceeding, likely a deposition, where counsel are arguing about the line of questioning.... | Unknown deposition/hearing ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is being conducted where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Undetermined (deposition se... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is conducted where a witness is questioned by Mr. Tein. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of a sworn statement. | An unspecified location, no... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of an unnamed witness regarding their interaction with Mr. Epstein. The questioning co... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/interview of a witness. The transcript records a portion of this event, including a pe... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious deposition takes place where participants argue over procedure and conduct. Mr. Tei... | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or interview where a witness is questioned about a past interaction with Mr. Epstein. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious legal deposition where attorneys argue over conduct and procedure, leading to a bre... | A room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where attorneys are arguing over procedural rules regarding objections. Mr. Te... | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is being conducted, as evidenced by the Q&A format, speaker roles, and mention of 'd... | Undisclosed | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal proceeding, likely a deposition or hearing, where attorneys are questioning a witness. | A room with a table, likely... | View |
| 2004-09-29 | N/A | A legal deposition took place, during which attorneys MR. LEOPOLD and MR. GOLDBERGER had a disput... | Unspecified deposition room | View |
| 2004-09-29 | N/A | A deposition is taking place, during which an argument occurs between the attorneys over procedur... | Undisclosed deposition loca... | View |
| 2004-09-29 | N/A | A contentious deposition where attorneys argue over procedure and conduct. Mr. Tein notes that Mr... | Unnamed deposition location | View |
| 2004-09-29 | N/A | A deposition is taking place, which started late (after 2 p.m. instead of the scheduled 9 a.m.). ... | Undisclosed deposition loca... | View |
| 2004-09-29 | N/A | A legal proceeding (likely a deposition or hearing) where the transcribed dialogue takes place. | A room with a table | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017521.jpg
This document is a four-page condensed transcript (pages 122-125) from a deposition of Mr. Rothstein. Attorney Jack Scarola questions Rothstein to confirm that attorney Brad Edwards had no involvement in illegal activities at the RRA firm or the handling of Epstein cases, which Rothstein confirms. Rothstein acknowledges that lying would violate his agreement with the U.S. government and result in him 'dying in prison.' The transcript concludes with procedural discussions regarding the timeline for reviewing transcripts and a pending motion for summary judgment for Brad Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017502.jpg
This is a deposition transcript of a witness named Scott (likely Scott Rothstein of RRA) being questioned by Ms. Haddad. The witness admits that his law firm's operations in 2009 were funded principally by a Ponzi scheme and theft, rather than legitimate revenue. He explicitly confesses to illicit activities involving law enforcement, politicians, judges, and organized crime. The questioning focuses heavily on the firm's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, revealing there was a specific 'Epstein conference room' at the firm and a firm-wide meeting regarding Epstein in July 2009, alongside a large volume of emails concerning Epstein litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012125.jpg
This document is a transcript of a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts (labeled as 'V'), conducted by an interviewer labeled 'JS', regarding the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein'. Roberts details being contacted by associates of Jeffrey Epstein (possibly Bill Riley or Mr. Goldberger) and Epstein himself, who allegedly pressured her to stay quiet about sexual abuse allegations in exchange for being 'looked after'. Roberts recounts refusing the offer, citing her desire to protect her family and avoid involvement, while noting Epstein's lack of remorse and his attempts to discredit other accusers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021777.jpg
This document is a text of a Palm Beach Post editorial from February 13, 2008, criticizing State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It argues that the prosecution was too lenient, influenced by Epstein's defense team (including Alan Dershowitz), and failed to pursue stronger charges despite significant evidence collected by police.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012474.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Tein, discusses their extensive contact with the Palm Beach Police Department regarding Epstein. The witness states they spoke with police 'more than I like can count' over a four-year period, with the last contact being about a year to a year and a half prior, and confirms remembering Detective Michelle Pagan but not Detective Recarey.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012473.jpg
This document is a transcript from a deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning focuses on a scheduling conflict where the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, was unable to start the deposition that morning due to a court appearance. The witness is also asked if they have listened to a prior tape-recorded statement they gave to the police.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012447.jpg
This document is a transcript of a contentious legal proceeding, likely a deposition. It captures a heated exchange between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, who appear to be opposing attorneys, regarding the questioning of an unnamed female witness. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's conduct, accusing him of berating the witness, leading to a personal argument where names are mistaken and prior court encounters are mentioned.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446.jpg
This document is page 51 of a legal transcript, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Tein regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to a question, stating it has been asked multiple times and is harassing the witness, while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein defend their line of questioning.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443.jpg
This document is a two-page excerpt from a deposition transcript, identified by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443'. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about a photograph (marked 18-001) showing the witness and a redacted friend, connecting the friend's presence to the day the witness was served a subpoena. The transcript also records a tense procedural discussion between the attorneys, Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger, regarding the marking of evidence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012442.jpg
This document is page 47 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by Mr. Tein. The witness denies asking co-workers to lie and refutes an accusation about getting a friend to switch name tags, claiming the situation was a coincidence. The transcript includes objections from an attorney, Mr. Leopold, and a discussion about marking photographic exhibits for the deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012437.jpg
This document is page 49 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a meeting with 'Mr. Herman'. The witness confirms the meeting occurred at her aunt's house, where a lawsuit was discussed, but claims her aunt's only involvement was opening the door. The witness's attorneys, Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Leopold, are also present, with Mr. Leopold objecting to a question about 'privileged matters'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012419.jpg
This document is a two-page transcript from a contentious legal deposition, likely related to a U.S. House Oversight Committee investigation. It captures a heated argument between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over deposition procedure and professional conduct, with a third attorney, Mr. Goldberger, attempting to mediate.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012409.jpg
This document is page 14 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstructing the deposition and being severely late. The argument revolves around taking a five-minute break, and Mr. Leopold requests assurance that the audio record will be preserved.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012408.jpg
This document is page 13 of a deposition transcript, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012408'. It captures a heated argument between several individuals, likely attorneys, named Mr. Tein, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Leopold. The conflict involves accusations of obstruction and inappropriate aggression, leading to a threat to cancel the deposition before the participants agree to take a break.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012407.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript from a legal proceeding, possibly related to a U.S. House Oversight investigation. A witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a press conference held by their father, stepmother, and a Mr. Herman regarding the witness's lawsuit. The deposition becomes contentious as the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects and threatens to leave, prompting a procedural argument with another attorney, Mr. Goldberger.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012404.jpg
This document is page 9 of a deposition transcript, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012404'. It captures a procedural argument between attorneys, where Mr. Tein repeatedly instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections.' Mr. Leopold defends his actions as necessary to protect his client from improperly formulated questions, while another attorney, Mr. Goldberger, suggests a simpler method of objection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012274.jpg
This document is page 19 of a sworn statement transcript from Onsor & Associates. It captures the conclusion of the testimony, where the questioner confirms the witness was not coerced and told the truth. The statement, attended by Mr. Goldberger and Ms. Sanchez, concluded at 12:15 p.m.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012267.jpg
This document is page 12 of a deposition transcript from Onsor & Associates. In this excerpt, an unidentified witness denies ever feeling uncomfortable with Mr. Epstein, being afraid to refuse him, or being touched inappropriately during their single encounter. The witness states that Mr. Epstein never touched their private parts, grabbed them, or touched them physically in any way.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction. Mr. Leopold in turn accuses Mr. Tein of being aggressive and threatens to cancel the deposition, ultimately deciding to take a break.
No Subject
A heated argument occurs during a deposition. Mr. Tein accuses someone of obstruction. Mr. Leopold accuses Mr. Tein of being aggressive and threatens to cancel the deposition. The court reporter interjects to manage the dialogue, and Mr. Leopold calls for a break.
No Subject
A heated exchange between attorneys during a deposition regarding the questioning of a female witness. Mr. Leopold objects to repetitive questions and accuses the questioner of harassment.
No Subject
A heated discussion between counsel regarding the repetitive and allegedly harassing nature of questions posed to a female witness.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction. Mr. Leopold in turn accuses Mr. Tein of being aggressive and threatens to cancel the deposition, ultimately deciding to take a break.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction. Mr. Leopold in turn accuses Mr. Tein of being aggressive and threatens to cancel the deposition, ultimately deciding to take a break.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction. Mr. Leopold in turn accuses Mr. Tein of being aggressive and threatens to cancel the deposition, ultimately deciding to take a break.
Barcoded documents, color copies, and affidavits
A discussion during a legal proceeding about the barcoding of documents, confirmation that the State Attorneys Office will not charge for color copies, and a speaker's intent to get affidavits from Mr. Pincus and Judge Stern about the hearing.
Procedure for handling photo exhibits
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition regarding the proper procedure for copying photos, marking them as exhibits, and managing interruptions and the tone of the conversation.
No Subject
A heated argument during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning of an unnamed female. The exchange becomes personal, with insults and Mr. Leopold misidentifying Mr. Tein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity