TED
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
INS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Analyst subject company |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Debbie Nichols
|
Professional contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Congress
|
Legislative judicial interaction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Control ownership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Control ownership |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal action (subpoena) | Subpoenas were issued to multiple entities connected to J. Epstein and Jeffrey Epstein, including... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00004738.jpg
This is page 2 of a court order filed on June 4, 2021, in the case United States v. Maxwell. The court is addressing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to subpoena the entire journal of 'Minor Victim-2.' The court rejects Maxwell's arguments, characterizing the request as a 'fishing expedition' and noting that impeachment material is generally not obtainable via Rule 17(c) subpoena prior to trial. The document also notes that 'BSF' (likely legal counsel for the victim) has stated the unproduced portions of the journal do not mention Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00004667.jpg
This document is a page from a grand jury testimony transcript filed on May 25, 2021. A witness details a series of subpoenas issued to various organizations, including American Express and several companies linked to J. Epstein and Jeffrey Epstein, such as the Virgin Island Foundation, Inc. and J. Epstein and Company. The witness describes the responses, noting that while some entities provided documents like credit card information, J. Epstein and Company sent a "letter of no response" and others gave a verbal confirmation of having no records.
DOJ-OGR-00005854.jpg
This document is page 71 of a court filing (Document 397) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. It is a legal argument by the prosecution opposing a defense motion to suppress an identification made by Minor Victim-4. The text argues that the victim's identification is reliable because she had multiple personal interactions with the defendant between 2001 and 2004, and concludes by asking the court to deny the defense's motion.
DOJ-OGR-00020081.jpg
This document is page 18 of a government filing (Document 102) from June 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text argues against bail by highlighting flight risks, specifically noting that France does not extradite its own citizens (citing the 'Peterson' case) and arguing that any 'anticipatory waiver' of extradition the defendant might sign regarding the United Kingdom is legally unenforceable under UK law (referencing the Extradition Act of 2003 and U.S. v. Stanton). The prosecution asserts that such waivers are meaningless until a defendant is physically present before a British judge.
DOJ-OGR-00020070.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal brief filed by the Department of Justice, seemingly in relation to a detention hearing. The text argues that defendants charged with sex trafficking of minors (18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 or 2423) face a presumption of detention because no conditions can assure their appearance or community safety. It cites various legal precedents (English, Mercedes, Petrov) to support the Government's position that the burden is on the defendant to rebut this presumption, and discusses the standards for reopening a detention hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00005417.jpg
This document is page 24 of a legal filing (Document 380) from October 29, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). The text is a legal argument citing multiple precedents (Boyle, Rodriguez, Hill, Watts, Carneglia) to support the exclusion of evidence related to the government's charging decisions. The argument asserts that such evidence is hearsay, irrelevant, and potentially confusing to jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00005410.jpg
This document is page 17 of 54 from a court filing (Document 380) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. It argues for the sealing of exhibits containing the names or last names of specific minor victims (Minor Victim-1, 3, 4, 6) and Witness-1 to prevent harassment and protect privacy, citing various legal precedents. A footnote also argues that courtroom sketch artists should be precluded from drawing the faces of victims.
DOJ-OGR-00002686.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal filing (Document 146) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case, dated February 4, 2021. The defense argues that allegations regarding 'Accuser-3' are time-barred because the statute of limitations expired before the 2003 amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283, and retroactive application would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. Furthermore, the defense contends that allegations involving Accuser-3 are irrelevant to the conspiracy charges, which should only pertain to Accuser-1 and Accuser-2.
DOJ-OGR-00017500.jpg
This court transcript page features the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski (likely a pilot) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's activities around 2004. The testimony confirms that by 2004, Maxwell was traveling less frequently on Jeffrey Epstein's planes and was 'moving on' from him. The witness discusses Maxwell's developing relationship with Gateway Incorporated co-founder Ted Waitt, noting that she spent significant time helping him complete a boat, including decorating it and adding a helipad.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019852.jpg
The document recounts a series of high-profile Hollywood events and parties leading up to the Oscars, detailing interactions with celebrities like Barry Jenkins and Damien Chazelle. It also describes a political rally organized by the United Talent Agency protesting a travel ban, featuring speeches from prominent industry figures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019712.jpg
This document is page 224 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, given the file code 'Epst' and ISBN), marked as a House Oversight exhibit. It details historical KGB infiltration of the NSA during the Cold War, focusing on the 'MICE' recruitment acronym and specific spies including Dunlap (a driver for NSA generals), Robert Lipka, Ronald Pelton, and David Sheldon Boone. It discusses how Dunlap used his 'no inspection' status to smuggle documents and mentions financial payments for espionage, specifically $60,000 paid to Boone.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019656.jpg
This document is page 168 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets'. While the file name includes an Epstein reference ('Epst_...'), the text details Edward Snowden's asylum in Russia, his relationship with his lawyer Kucherena, his cooperation with the FSB, and his appearance on a telethon with Vladimir Putin. It argues that Snowden received sanctuary and perks in exchange for cooperation and intelligence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019597.jpg
This document is page 109 from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the footer), which is part of a House Oversight Committee file. The text details Edward Snowden's time in Russia, his asylum, the risks taken by his associates like Sarah Harrison and Julian Assange, and his subsequent media appearances and financial earnings ($20,000 from TED). It critiques Snowden's transition from a technician to a media figure and his rhetoric regarding facing prison versus escaping to Russia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019511.jpg
This document appears to be page 23 of a book (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, indicated by the filename prefix 'Epst') included in a House Oversight Committee production. The text details Edward Snowden's time in Geneva (2007-2009) working as a junior-level Telecommunications Support Officer (TSO) for the CIA under State Department cover. It discusses his lifestyle, his relationship with intern Mavanee Anderson, his girlfriend Lindsay Mills, and contrasts his actual role with his later claims of being a 'senior adviser.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019300.jpg
This document is a promotional or informational flyer for an initiative called 'WE Talks' (Women Empowerment: Women to Women Talks). It outlines a mission to support women's professional growth through seminars described as akin to 'TED Talks for Women.' The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019300, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019260.jpg
This document discusses the legislative strategies used by authoritarian regimes, particularly Russia, to suppress civil society and political opposition. It details the implementation of the 2012 "foreign agents" law and the 2015 "undesirables" law, which target NGOs receiving foreign funding and foreign organizations deemed threats, respectively, effectively criminalizing dissent and isolating domestic activists.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019242.jpg
This document appears to be page 8 of a report titled 'Breaking Down Democracy,' stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. It analyzes the strategies of modern authoritarian regimes (specifically China, Russia, and Turkey) including historical revisionism, redefining democratic terms, and removing term limits. It also discusses international collaboration among these regimes to subvert human rights standards and protect mutual interests, contrasting this with the democratic optimism of the late 20th century.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019241.jpg
This document appears to be page 7 of a Freedom House report discussing the rise and tactics of modern authoritarianism, specifically focusing on internet censorship ('The Great Firewall'), the suppression of civil society, and concepts like 'Majoritarianism' and 'Sovereignty.' While the content is a geopolitical analysis referencing leaders like Putin, Erdoğan, and Orbán, the document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019241,' indicating it was part of a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation (likely related to the Epstein probe, given the prompt context, though Epstein is not mentioned in the text of this specific page).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019068.jpg
This document is page 3 of an FBI FD-302 interview report dated December 13, 2006. The interviewee is a former chef for Jeffrey Epstein who worked at the NYC and Palm Beach residences. The report details the interviewee's knowledge of Epstein's properties (including the USVI island and the NYC home described as a former school), staff (including a Russian worker and an assistant), and observations regarding teenage girls, though the interviewee denies witnessing inappropriate behavior.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031934.jpg
This document appears to be page 22 of a geopolitical analysis or intelligence briefing regarding the Syrian Civil War. It discusses the risks of the Assad regime using chemical weapons against the uprising, the limitations of U.S. deterrents (citing commitments in Libya), the technical difficulties of an Israeli preemptive strike, and the need for the Obama administration to plan for a post-Assad scenario involving a coalition with Turkey. The document is stamped with a House Oversight footer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031921.jpg
This document appears to be page 9 of a geopolitical intelligence report (likely Stratfor, commonly found in these files) analyzing the strategic situation in Israel and Gaza around August 2011. It discusses the political fallout of the Eilat road attacks, speculating that Hamas likely knew of the attacks despite denials, comparing the tactic to Fatah's use of Black September in the 70s. The analysis suggests Hamas aims to provoke an Israeli response to gain sympathy in Egypt and Europe.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031836.jpg
This document appears to be page 3 of a political analysis or article (possibly from the Weekly Standard or shared as a briefing) discussing the breakdown of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations around 2011. It details the implications of the Hamas-Fatah reconciliation agreement, arguing it destroys the peace process, and suggests the White House might pivot to Syria for diplomatic progress, citing historical precedents involving Netanyahu and Ehud Barak.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031587.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical policy paper or briefing included in a House Oversight production (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031587). It analyzes Chinese foreign policy, specifically the CCP's suspicion of Western interventionism through the UN, citing examples from the Iraq War (2003) and the Libyan crisis. It outlines the historical 'Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence' established by Zhou Enlai and discusses China's pragmatic approach to the Syrian crisis.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031586.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a political analysis article written by Adrien Morin on May 18, 2014. It discusses the Syrian civil war, the diplomatic standoff at the UN caused by Russian and Chinese vetoes, and Western concerns regarding Chinese foreign policy and 'realpolitik.' The document includes a House Oversight footer (031586), suggesting it was part of a production of documents to Congress.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026087.jpg
An email thread from May 14, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein and a redacted individual. The conversation revolves around advice on how to communicate with an unnamed third party ('him'), with the redacted person suggesting 'the war in Yemen' as a topic after Epstein asks if the subject is economic, military, or tech. Epstein mentions there is 'much to do around the trump trip' and agrees to ask about the Yemen topic. The email includes a pasted news snippet about Yemeni Foreign Minister Al Meahlafi seeking support in Brussels.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity