Mr. Alessi
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Alessi's wife
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner (Q)
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Roberts
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Palm Beach house
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Jane
|
Driver passenger |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
the defense
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Unspecified past interaction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994-01-01 | N/A | Construction begins on the residence; architects finish drawings. | El Brillo Way residence | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Mr. Alessi first met Ghislaine Maxwell. | The house (implied) | View |
| 0009-07-01 | N/A | Date Mr. Alessi signed the declaration in question (year implied as 2020 based on context). | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018063.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Alessi by Ms. Comey. The questioning focuses on authenticating 'Government Exhibit 52,' a directory containing the date range 2004-2005, which Alessi identifies as a later version of a directory he saw while working for Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor also attempts to ask Alessi if Sarah Kellen's name appears in the exhibit, though the Court interrupts to sustain an objection regarding authentication foundation.
DOJ-OGR-00018051.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Ms. Comey, regarding the identification of Government Exhibit 52A as a copy of a page from Government Exhibit 52. The exchange includes a legal objection for 'lack of foundation' by another attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and a discussion with the judge to clarify the nature of the exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00018009.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, who is being asked to identify portions of a multi-page list he recognizes. After an objection for a leading question is sustained by the court, Mr. Alessi confirms that he recognizes the entire contents of pages 1, 2, and 3 of the document in question.
DOJ-OGR-00018008.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Alessi identifies a 58-page exhibit as a booklet of instructions he was required to follow to maintain 'the house' during his employment with Mr. Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017995.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of Mr. Alessi by Ms. Comey. The testimony focuses on identifying the layout of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach property, specifically describing the 'cabana' or 'pool house' where Epstein's desk, a couch, and stereo equipment were located. Government's Exhibit 299 (GX-299), a depiction of the property layout, was admitted into evidence without objection from the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00017983.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi. Alessi testifies that Ms. Maxwell was present with Mr. Epstein at his Palm Beach residence "95 percent of the times." The witness then identifies Government Exhibit 298 as an accurate depiction of the first floor of the residence, which is subsequently admitted into evidence by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00017979.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of witness Alessi) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case US v. Maxwell. The witness, Mr. Alessi, testifies that he met Ghislaine Maxwell around 1991 while working for Jeffrey Epstein and interacted with her on a daily basis until he left in 2002. During the proceeding, Alessi identifies Maxwell in the courtroom, noting she is wearing a black sweater.
DOJ-OGR-00017973.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of Mr. Alessi) filed on August 10, 2022. Mr. Alessi testifies about his work history, stating he moved to Florida in early 1994, worked as a maintenance man for a wealthy family in Palm Beach, was briefly self-employed, and then began working for Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014759.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022, in which the judge overrules objections from the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The court finds by a preponderance of evidence that the defendant personally recruited Virginia (Giuffre) while she was a minor to provide sexualized massages to Epstein, was aware of the sexual nature of these acts, and used monetary incentives to encourage Virginia to recruit another minor, Carolyn. The judge cites testimony from witnesses Annie, Jane, Kate, and Mr. Alessi, as well as flight records.
DOJ-OGR-00008309.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 9, 2021. It discusses the legal admissibility of a telephone directory (Exhibit GX 606) found at the Palm Beach residence, arguing it is not hearsay because it is offered to prove a link between Maxwell and the listed contacts rather than the truth of the contact details. The text cites witness Mr. Alessi's testimony confirming Maxwell regularly used this directory.
DOJ-OGR-00008308.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court order filed on December 9, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court overrules the Defense's objections to the admission of a 'directory' (contact book) on both authentication and hearsay grounds. The Judge cites Second Circuit precedents (Al-Moayad, Londono) to establish that address books can be admitted for the non-hearsay purpose of linking the possessor of the document to the names listed within, rather than proving the accuracy of the contact details.
DOJ-OGR-00008307.jpg
This document is page 5 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated December 9, 2021, regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The text discusses the legal admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52), identified as a household directory from the Palm Beach property. The court argues that witness Mr. Alessi sufficiently authenticated the book based on his familiarity with it, despite Defense objections regarding the chain of custody and physical alterations (Post-it notes, pencil markings).
DOJ-OGR-00008306.jpg
This legal document is a memorandum of law, likely from the prosecution, arguing for the admission of an exhibit (GX 52) into evidence. It counters a defense objection that the witness, Mr. Alessi, cannot authenticate the exhibit because he has no personal knowledge of its creation. The memorandum cites several legal precedents to support the argument that a document can be authenticated under Rule 901(b)(4) based on its distinctive characteristics or a witness's general familiarity, even without direct observation of its creation.
DOJ-OGR-00008305.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 9, 2021, details the testimony of a witness, Mr. Alessi, regarding telephone directories belonging to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. Mr. Alessi describes the directories' physical characteristics, their contents (including contacts for friends, family, business, and massage therapists in Palm Beach), and how they were regularly updated. His testimony, which confirms the directories' appearance and purpose, is presented as being corroborated by other evidence, such as a 'Household Manual' (Government Exhibit 606).
DOJ-OGR-00008270.jpg
This legal document is a filing arguing against the government's attempt to admit 'Exhibit 52' as evidence in a trial involving Ms. Maxwell. The author contends that the government has failed to authenticate the exhibit, has abandoned its original premise that it was Ms. Maxwell's book, and that admitting it at this late stage would be unfair. The argument is bolstered by the government's decision not to call a key witness, 'Employee-1', who was supposed to link the exhibit to Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00008267.jpg
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing against the government's attempt to use her April 2016 deposition testimony. The core argument is that "Deposition Exhibit 13" is an unauthenticated photocopy and is fundamentally different from "Exhibit 52." This claim is supported by testimony from Mr. Alessi, who noted a significant physical discrepancy between Exhibit 52 and books he saw while employed by Mr. Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019000.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony covers standard procedures involving an employee named Mr. Alessi in Palm Beach and specifically details a flight (Flight 979) on May 9, 1997. The flight traveled from Teterboro, NJ, to Santa Fe, NM, carrying Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and a passenger identified as 'Jane' to Epstein's Zorro Ranch.
DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge, defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca, and government attorney Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on the procedural issue of raising a new argument that was not addressed during a witness's examination, specifically in relation to the testimony of Mr. Alessi. The judge explains their position while affirming they will keep an open mind to future arguments from both sides before the court goes into recess.
DOJ-OGR-00018990.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between an attorney, Ms. Comey, and the judge regarding whether the defense had an adequate opportunity to cross-examine a witness named Mr. Alessi. The judge also mentions a planned briefing on "Government Exhibit 52" as indicated by a Mr. Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00018942.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features an argument by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding the admissibility of evidence under the business records exception (Rule 803.6), specifically challenging the consistency of record-keeping in a 'book' and 'Western Union money transfer records' after an individual named Mr. Alessi left in 2002. The defense argues that the records do not meet the standard of a regular business practice.
DOJ-OGR-00018885.jpg
This document is page 23 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The dialogue involves a debate between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach) and defense (Ms. Sternheim) regarding the admissibility of 'record 824' and the implications of testimony provided by Juan Alessi concerning the year 2001. The proceedings are paused by the Judge to wait for a juror experiencing train issues.
DOJ-OGR-00018591.jpg
This court transcript details a legal argument about the admissibility of evidence in a case against the defendant, Epstein. The speaker argues that a topless photograph of a victim, taken at a tropical location consistent with flight records, is relevant to prove their relationship was sexual in nature. This evidence is intended to counter the defense's potential argument that the victim was merely a professional masseuse providing a treatment to the defendant at Mar-a-Lago.
DOJ-OGR-00018589.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures legal arguments regarding a piece of evidence in a conspiracy trial. The prosecution asserts that a topless photograph of a victim, along with flight logs showing she traveled with Maxwell and Epstein at age 17, proves she was a minor victim of the conspiracy. The defense, represented by Ms. Menninger, counters that photo metadata and testimony from Mr. Alessi establish the victim was not a minor at the relevant times, arguing the prosecution's claim is contrary to its own evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00030566.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, detailing an interview with Mr. John Alessi. Alessi recounts a phone call he made to Jeffrey Epstein, during which Epstein confirmed he was the subject of an investigation and had hired his own private investigator. The conversation underscores the ongoing and confidential nature of the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00021557.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023, in which a judge is ruling on objections to a report (likely a Presentence Investigation Report). The judge overrules the defendant's objections, citing credible testimony from witnesses Annie, Jane, Kate, and Mr. Alessi to establish that the defendant personally recruited Virginia (a minor) for sexualized massages with Epstein. The ruling also affirms that the defendant used monetary incentives to have Virginia recruit 14-year-old Carolyn, who subsequently witnessed sexual acts at Epstein's residence.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | MR. EPSTEIN | Mr. Alessi | $6,300.00 | Theft of cash (band of hundred dollar bills) fr... | View |
| 2009-09-08 | Received | Unknown (Victim) | Mr. Alessi | $6,300.00 | Total amount stolen by Alessi across two incide... | View |
| 2009-09-08 | Received | Unknown (Victim) | Mr. Alessi | $1,500.00 | Partial amount of the theft (one of two times). | View |
Work instructions
Witness questioned on whether Maxwell's instructions originated from Epstein.
Maxwell's visit to Mar-a-Lago
Prior testimony confirming Maxwell went to Mar-a-Lago for treatment and Alessi waited outside for an hour.
Separation Agreement / NDA
Agreement requiring Alessi not to talk to anybody about Epstein's or Maxwell's lives.
Household Rules
Testified that he was supposed to be 'blind, deaf, and dumb'.
Removal of pictures
Mr. Epstein would instruct Mr. Alessi to remove pictures of Ms. Maxwell from the house before other women arrived. Mr. Alessi refers to this as a 'mandate'.
Cross-examination
Questioning regarding the age of masseuses and whether the witness met a person named Carolyn.
Property Layout
Direct examination regarding the physical layout of Epstein's Palm Beach property.
Adherence to household manual
Questioning regarding whether Alessi followed a specific manual and knowledge of 'the countess'.
Declaration
A declaration document sent to Alessi for signature.
Identification of underage females
Questioning regarding the identity of two females seen at Epstein's Palm Beach house.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity