| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mar-a-Lago
|
Employment |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mar-a-Lago
|
Employment insurance |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Shooting of D.S. | Unknown location with 'many... | View |
This document is page 25 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Mr. Rohrbach argues to the Court regarding the reliability of forms filled out by Mr. Roberts, an employee of Mar-a-Lago, concerning his dependents and insurance coverage. The argument centers on whether Mr. Roberts had a business duty to be truthful to his employer, distinguishing the situation from the precedent set in United States v. Lieberman, though the Court remains skeptical.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a legal debate between attorneys Rohrbach and Sternheim before a judge regarding the admissibility of an insurance form containing a statement by a 'Mr. Roberts'. The discussion centers on whether the act of providing insurance and paying medical bills through Mar-a-Lago constitutes a course of conduct, and whether a witness can be questioned about practices that occurred before their time of involvement.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorneys Rohrbach (Gov) and Sternheim (Defense) argue before the Judge regarding the admissibility of insurance forms and medical billing records related to Mar-a-Lago. The debate centers on whether a form filled out by 'Mr. Roberts' constitutes hearsay and if a witness, Ms. Gill, can testify to practices that occurred before her employment began.
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) in the case USA v. Maxwell. The Court and attorneys discuss the admissibility of Mar-a-Lago personnel records (Exhibits 823 and 824) intended to prove that Virginia Roberts was the daughter and dependent of an employee, Mr. Roberts. The debate centers on whether the employee-filled forms constitute hearsay or admissible business records verified by the employer.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Mar-a-Lago | Mr. Roberts | $0.00 | Provision of benefits to the daughter as a depe... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity