| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Redacted (External/Colleague)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted (AUSA)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Participants]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | USANYS official called the tipster to verify the subject of the information. | Phone Call | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Epstein FOIA Moot | Unknown | View |
| 2019-04-29 | N/A | Meeting regarding the Epstein case (referred to as 'meeting with [Redacted] on Monday'). | Unknown | View |
An email chain from August 13, 2019 (shortly after Epstein's death) between the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), the FBI, and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence forwards Epstein's official Bureau of Prisons (BOP) photograph and 'TruView' commissary records. The internal email notes that Epstein's account showed only three transactions where he received money from three different individuals.
This document is an email record dated January 9, 2021, between personnel at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject matter concerns a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request related to Jeffrey Epstein, specifically referencing 'Atty Visit Logs' (Attorney Visit Logs) and 'Count Slips'. The specific identities of the communicants are redacted.
This document is an email chain dated April 13, 2021, between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence focuses on scheduling a meeting regarding 'Epstein FOIA Next Steps' for the 'Noel Team', with participants discussing conflicts such as proffers and evening plans to find a suitable time slot.
This document is an email chain dated October 22, 2021, originating from Jacklyn Thrapp, a reporter for The National Enquirer. Thrapp contacts officials at USANYS (US Attorney's Office) to verify a rumor that a specific, redacted individual will not be called to the stand during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The email was then forwarded internally by USANYS staff.
This document is an email header dated December 15, 2020, with the subject 'FW: following up'. It was sent to a recipient at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and blind-copied to an internal journaling address (USAHUB-USAJournal111). The sender and specific recipient names are redacted.
This document is an email chain between the law firm Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) spanning January to April 2020. The law firm submitted a 'Touhy letter' requesting documents from the DOJ regarding pending litigation against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The USANYS eventually produced a set of documents and a response letter on April 21, 2020, followed by the scheduling of a phone call to discuss the production.
This document is an email thread from April 21, 2021, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject involves a 'Tartaglione Taint Team Question,' referring to Nicholas Tartaglione (Epstein's cellmate), and includes an attachment referencing a court filing (ECF 119) in the case US v. Tartaglione. The specific content of the discussion is redacted.
An internal email dated October 25, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email concerns a '3500 cover letter' (referring to Jencks Act disclosures) and includes an attachment named '2021.10.25_Maxwell_Cover_Letter_v1.docx', indicating preparation for discovery production in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
An email chain from November 29, 2021, between employees of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns updating the 'Ghislaine Maxwell victim page' on the DOJ website with new information regarding trial attendance, specifically noting that the trial (jury selection) began that day. The update outlines strict COVID-19 protocols for the courthouse and clarifies that victim access is coordinated by specific Victim-Witness Coordinators.
This document is an email metadata record from November 3, 2020, concerning the 'Epstein priv review' (privilege review). It indicates that a specific item or batch labeled '1B72' has been released. The email was circulated internally within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and included contractors. The specific sender and recipients are redacted.
An email chain from July 14, 2020, between an FBI Special Agent from the Violent Crimes Task Force and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The FBI agent forwards information regarding where the 'phone number and last call made by Epstein' was documented in the case file. The USANYS staff member then instructs a contractor to organize these files on the 'MCC shared drive' to review FBI '302' reports for discovery decisions.
This document is an email metadata log dated December 17, 2020, regarding a 'Question re SDFL Epstein file'. It shows correspondence involving representatives from the US Attorney's Offices in the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) and the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The specific content of the email is not visible, only the headers and an indication of an embedded message file.
An email chain from August 30, 2019, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The thread discusses a tip from an AUSA in Boston regarding a potential Epstein victim who was a model in NYC approximately 20 years prior. The victim alleged she was taken to Epstein's townhouse where 'something happened,' and subsequently contacted attorney David Boise (Boies), but felt harassed by his firm's persistent calls, leading her to seek help from federal prosecutors instead.
This document is an internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated August 8, 2019. It circulates a media inquiry from Insider reporter Keenan Trotter regarding Jeffrey Epstein's potential ties to foreign governments, specifically mentioning an expired Austrian passport and travels to the Middle East. A USANYS official responds to the forwarded chain stating, 'Thanks, I'll handle it.'
An email chain between USANYS (Southern District of New York) staff dated May 6, 2020, discussing a press inquiry from ABC News. ABC reported a tip that 'something is imminent' regarding Epstein coconspirators. A USANYS staff member responds 'Negative' to the inquiry about whether anything was happening at that time.
This document is an email metadata record dated February 18, 2021. The subject line 'RE: Question re SDFL Epstein file' indicates internal government correspondence, likely involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), concerning files related to the Epstein case in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). The sender and recipients are heavily redacted.
An email dated August 31, 2020, between US Attorney's Office (USANYS) personnel with the subject 'FinCEN/Bank Letters'. The email contains numerous attachments referencing the 'FinCEN Files' investigation, involving letters and requests for comment from investigative journalists (ICIJ, BuzzFeed, BBC) to major financial institutions like Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, and Barclays regarding suspicious activity reports.
An email chain from August 2, 2019, between Defense Counsel (Garden City, NY) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The discussion concerns the filing of motions related to cell tower data and statements to police. The Defense seeks to file under seal to protect 'cooperating witnesses' and statements, while the Government argues that statements to law enforcement are not 'sensitive' under the protective order. The Government also reprimands the Defense for previously filing sensitive exhibits publicly in error. Additionally, the Defense notes logistical issues with having the defendant sign an affidavit at the MCC without their own team acting as witnesses.
This document is an email chain from January 2020 coordinating official foreign travel for an Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) from the Southern District of New York (USANYS) to Sweden. The correspondence discusses travel dates (revised to Feb 4-6, 2020), visa requirements, Office of International Affairs (OIA) approval, and passport applications, referencing a flight booking with code HEZZTD.
This document is an email chain from July 14, 2020, between the FBI and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). It discusses the transfer of the FBI case file regarding Jeffrey Epstein's death, specifically highlighting documentation of the 'last call' made by Epstein. The USANYS staff discusses organizing these files (specifically FBI 302 interview reports) on an 'MCC shared drive' to make discovery decisions.
An email chain from December 1, 2020, between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The topic is drafting a letter regarding 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell) and a defense request concerning the MDC Warden. The prosecutors discuss editing the draft to explicitly quote 'Bobbi' (likely defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim) rather than characterizing her views.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated April 10-13, 2020. It details the submission of a prosecution memo regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation and mentions that the team is working on a draft indictment. The correspondence involves scheduling a conference call with 'team and chiefs' to discuss the memo.
An email chain from July 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The correspondence concerns coordinating document discovery for the recently charged Ghislaine Maxwell case, specifically revisiting materials related to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The emails mention that the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) conducted a significant document collection the previous year.
This document is an internal US Attorney's Office (SDNY) email chain dated October 30, 2020, discussing the status of e-discovery data processing by contractor PAE for the 'US v. Epstein' case. It details the shipment of a hard drive containing productions SDNYPROD008 through SDNYPROD014 and notes that approximately 1.2 million additional records are currently being imaged, with concerns that the full production may not meet a November 9 deadline.
Forwarded message containing attachment <Ray Statement.ebd.docx>
Drafting language regarding witness concerns following comments about Prince Andrew. Notes that one witness has met several times, while two others who worked for Maxwell/Epstein have not been interviewed but are willing.
Listing attorneys asking about confidentiality since public comments about Prince Andrew. Requesting email regarding Maxwell depositions.
Email header only. Contains attachment: Safe_Horizon_As_a_result_of_this_new_law.docx
Receipt confirmed.
Shared links to NY Post and NY Daily News articles regarding an Epstein guard's lawyer having a shouting match with a judge.
Wait, he hadn’t booked anything yet?? Ok, that is WAY less sympathetic. I assumed that everything was booked!
Serving subpoena regarding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Circulation of a news article regarding the conflict between Prince Andrew and the FBI regarding cooperation in the Epstein case.
Forwarding a task list.
Asking if the order was picked up and requesting a paralegal be sent if not.
List of tasks, mostly redacted. Item 3 is 'Epstein trust documents'.
Reporting a call from Judge Nathan's clerk that the order is signed and ready for pickup.
Confirming the addition of 'revocations' to the document and planning to circulate it by 3:00 PM.
Requesting travel arrangements for a witness flying from Florida on Feb 6th for grand jury prep on Feb 7th in the Epstein case.
Asking if the recipient is signed off and if the document can be sent to 'Part I' today or tomorrow.
Asking if the recipient is signed off so the order can be sent to 'Part I' today or tomorrow.
I'll let [Redacted] do his input first, then look at what he's done
Discussing updates to a sharing order application regarding additional trust and will documents received from estate attorneys.
Asking about the intent to share specific documents (likely revocations), noting they don't seem substantive.
Instruction to add items in the right place and send the order. Sender notes they are not a T&E (Trust & Estate) lawyer.
Confirming the document accurately describes materials received but notes it doesn't appear to include revocations.
Initial email stating the sharing order application has been updated to include additional trust and will documents received from estate attorneys over the last two weeks.
Asking to add the note about revocations and send the order. Jokes about not being a T&E (Trust & Estate) lawyer.
Confirming the description is accurate but noting it doesn't appear to include 'revocations' and suggesting that word be added.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity