Trove
Sign In Sign Up

[REDACTED]

Person
Mentions
6261
Relationships
8
Events
11
Documents
2346
Also known as:
[REDACTED] (female) DET [REDACTED] [REDACTED] (payer) Ms. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] (Detective) Brett [REDACTED] [Redacted] (Captain Secretary, USP Leavenworth) [Redacted] (Captain, MCC NY) Him / [Redacted] [Redacted] (Ms.) Mr. [Redacted] (Attorney) [Redacted] (NYPD) [Redacted] (USANYS), [Redacted] (MCC) [Redacted], [Redacted] Traveler [REDACTED] Approver [REDACTED] Maurene [Redacted] (USANYS) [REDACTED] - US
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
8 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Unnamed Witness
Acquaintance
8 Strong
1
View
person Jim Eisenberg
Client
7
1
View
person Speaker 'A'
Co conspirators coordinators
6
1
View
person Unknown
Acquaintance
5
1
View
person Redacted Woman
Client
1
1
View
person Caller/Victim
Client
1
1
View
person Assistant U.S. Attorney
Professional correspondence
1
1
View
person [REDACTED]
Professional supervisory
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A A redacted individual accompanied the interviewee to the encounters 'twice'. Unspecified View
N/A N/A The process of arranging for girls to visit Jeffrey. When Jeffrey was in town, a redacted person ... N/A View
N/A N/A The interviewee provided massages and was paid $200 each time. The client would sometimes masturb... An unspecified location ref... View
N/A N/A A briefing conversation where a redacted female associate of Epstein's advised the interviewee ab... Not specified View
2007-04-24 N/A A taped interview was conducted with a redacted individual. The interview was held pursuant to a ... Not specified View
2007-04-24 N/A A taped interview was conducted by the FBI with an individual represented by counsel, pursuant to... Undisclosed View
2007-04-24 N/A A taped interview was conducted with an individual (name redacted) by the FBI and an Assistant U.... Undisclosed View
2006-08-28 N/A Acquisition of 22 items of property as evidence in the Jeffrey Epstein case. 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... View
2006-08-28 N/A Acquisition of 19 items of property/evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... View
2006-08-28 N/A Acquisition of 24 categories of property/evidence by law enforcement. 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... View
2006-08-28 N/A Acquisition of property/evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... View

EFTA00029844.pdf

Defense counsel Laura Menninger objects to government redactions in the case US v. Maxwell. Menninger argues that 'Accuser-2's' diary entries are not confidential as they were shared on a NY Times podcast and do not implicate Maxwell. The letter also argues against redacting information about another accuser (name redacted) who has publicized her allegations via Netflix and podcasts, referencing the 'Kramer notes', and discusses sealing issues related to Maxwell's deposition in a separate civil case ruled on by Judge Preska.

Legal correspondence / motion response
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029734.pdf

This document is an email thread from August 2019, shortly before Jeffrey Epstein's death, regarding the case 'US v Epstein'. Attorney Martin G. Weinberg writes to a redacted party requesting a response to letters seeking the preservation of records, specifically mentioning Assistant US Attorneys in the Northern District of Georgia. The redacted respondent replies on August 9, 2019, stating a comprehensive response will be sent shortly.

Email thread
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029723.pdf

This document is an email chain from August 2019 between Parvin Moyne of Akin Gump (representing Deutsche Bank) and redacted officials (likely SDNY prosecutors). The correspondence concerns the scheduling of an 'attorney proffer' regarding Jeffrey Epstein's relationship with the bank. Moyne proposes a presentation by Akin Gump and 'DB Legal' to overview Epstein's accounts, transactions, and findings from their internal investigation to assist the government in reviewing subpoena returns.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029714.pdf

An email dated August 14, 2019 (four days after Jeffrey Epstein's death), transmitting a revised 'JE status memo' intended for an individual named Geoff. The correspondence discusses incorporating comments into the final document.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029711.pdf

An email chain from August 8-9, 2019 (the days immediately preceding Jeffrey Epstein's death) involving an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY and the FBI. The correspondence concerns scheduling a 'proffer' (interview/cooperation session) with a redacted female individual and coordinating with her attorney for the following week. The subject line is 'Florida'.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029699.pdf

An email dated June 22, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to a redacted recipient. The email attaches a court subpoena directed at Lockheed Martin and references a phone call that took place the previous day. The sender offers to assist in triaging records if they are found to be voluminous.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029680.pdf

This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York sent on February 21, 2020. The sender attaches a 'civil_complaint.pdf' and asks the recipient to identify the victim/accuser involved, noting that the allegations originate from 1999.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029675.pdf

This document is an email chain from February 2020 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and Jill Greenfield, a UK partner at Fieldfisher LLP. The correspondence concerns the SDNY's request to interview Greenfield's client, who is believed to be a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and a former employee of Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails discuss interview logistics, including anonymity, the voluntary nature of the discussion, the composition of the interview team (prosecutors and FBI agents), and the creation of FBI Form 302 reports.

Email chain / correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029658.pdf

This document is a calendar entry for a 'Call/Meeting on Epstein' scheduled for December 7, 2018. The meeting was organized by and attended by individuals associated with the USANYS (United States Attorney's Office, NY), including a contractor, though their specific identities are redacted.

Calendar entry / electronic event record
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029657.pdf

This document is an email header from December 7, 2018, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email, sent to other USANYS staff including a contractor, has the subject line 'Call/Meeting on Epstein', indicating internal coordination or investigation discussions regarding Jeffrey Epstein prior to his 2019 arrest. The names of the sender and recipients are redacted.

Email header
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029652.pdf

This document is a digital calendar record for a meeting titled 'Meet re Epstein forfeiture' scheduled for December 9, 2019. The record indicates the event was accepted and classified as 'X-PERSONAL'. The attendee's identity and the specific office location have been redacted.

Calendar entry / electronic event record
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029648.pdf

This document is a digital calendar record for an event on December 4, 2019, described as an 'Accepted: [Redacted] proffer (re abuse)'. The meeting was scheduled to take place at the offices of the law firm Winston & Strawn at 200 Park Ave. The attendee's name is redacted, but the context suggests a legal proffer session regarding abuse allegations, occurring months after Jeffrey Epstein's death.

Digital calendar entry / schedule record
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029617.pdf

An email chain from July 2021 between the Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the SDNY (US Attorney's Office) and attorney Stacey Richman. The SDNY official requests a call regarding Mark Epstein. Stacey attempts to have Mark Epstein join the call, noting he hopes for information regarding his brother Jeffrey Epstein's death ('demise'). The SDNY official explicitly declines Mark's presence, stating that is not the purpose of the call and insisting on speaking with Stacey alone first.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029614.pdf

This document is an email dated September 22, 2021, discussing a court reporter who recalls being involved in Jeffrey Epstein's litigation. The email notes that she may have recorded one or two depositions of Epstein and is checking her files for the original transcript to authenticate it.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029601.pdf

This document is the Curriculum Vitae (CV) of a redacted FBI Expert Witness and Computer Forensic Examiner based in the New York Field Office. The subject has been with the FBI since 2005, following careers in programming and environmental health. The CV details extensive training in digital forensics (cell phones, Windows, Mac, Linux), certifications (EnCase, Cellebrite), and a significant history of instructing and speaking at international conferences and training sessions (including in Ghana and Egypt) regarding cyber security and digital investigations up to July 2021.

Curriculum vitae (cv) / fbi expert witness report
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029596.pdf

This document is a Fact Witness Travel Request form dated August 31, 2021, submitted by an AUSA to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It requests travel arrangements for a redacted witness to travel to the Southern District of New York for trial or grand jury preparation scheduled for September 17, 2021. The witness is expected to arrive on September 16 and depart on September 17 or 18.

Fact witness travel request (domestic)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029588.pdf

This is a court subpoena issued on August 28, 2021, by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. It commands a redacted individual to appear in person on November 29, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. to testify in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The document is signed by US Attorney Audrey Strauss and a court official.

Court subpoena
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029580.pdf

This document is a Certificate of Authenticity from Amazon's Law Enforcement Response Team, dated November 10, 2021. It certifies that documents produced for External Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) are authentic business records kept in the ordinary course of business. The declaration is signed under penalty of perjury by a redacted Amazon employee in Seattle, Washington.

Certificate of authenticity / legal declaration / email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029532.pdf

Digital calendar entry for a 'Pre-Meeting' scheduled for June 28, 2021, regarding 'US v Noel/Epstein FOIA'. The meeting was organized by and attended by staff from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject likely refers to Freedom of Information Act requests related to the prosecution of Tova Noel (one of the guards on duty when Epstein died) and the broader Epstein case.

Calendar event / meeting invite
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029530.pdf

This document is a calendar entry for a meeting scheduled on June 28, 2021, titled 'Pre-Meeting US v Noel/Epstein FOIA'. The meeting was accepted by an attendee from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), whose name is redacted. The document relates to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) proceedings concerning a case involving Noel and Epstein.

Calendar entry / meeting schedule
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029529.pdf

This document is an email notification dated June 27, 2021, indicating the acceptance of a calendar meeting titled 'Pre-Meeting US v Noel/Epstein FOIA'. The recipient is affiliated with the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject matter likely pertains to Freedom of Information Act requests related to the prosecution of prison guard Tova Noel in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death.

Email / calendar acceptance notification
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029520.pdf

This document is an internal email dated June 28, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in White Plains, NY, to other USANYS staff. The email concerns the processing of a FOIA request related to Jeffrey Epstein and attaches the OCME (Office of Chief Medical Examiner) Report of Autopsy, noting that boxes on the document indicate intended redactions.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029506.pdf

This document is a digital calendar entry for an event titled 'Accepted' scheduled for June 11, 2019. The location/subject is described as 'Brass meet re Epstein', classified as 'X-PERSONAL'. The organizer's identity is redacted, and the entry was created on June 10, 2019.

Calendar entry / digital record
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029496.pdf

This document is an email exchange from January 29, 2015. Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com) sent a link to a TruNews article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein Allegedly Targeted Well Known Actress' to a redacted recipient. The recipient replied approximately two hours later expressing shock and disbelief, writing 'Oh no no no! Un F ing believable!!'. The email contains a standard legal disclaimer attributing the property to 'JEE'.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029482.pdf

This document is an automated email notification from CWT Sato Travel to a redacted Department of Justice employee. The email, dated May 3, 2020, reminds the recipient that their travel voucher for Trip ID 11164814 is late. The trip details reveal the traveler went to Santa Monica from December 15-18, 2019, for the purpose of a 'Witness interview' related to the 'Epstein Investigation' (Case R20NYS13444).

Email notification / travel voucher request
2025-12-25
Analysis Source
Total Received
$19,463,379.94
39 transactions
Total Paid
$4,983,625.00
16 transactions
Net Flow
$14,479,754.94
55 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Paid [REDACTED] College/Writer $0.00 Potential payment for college tuition. View
N/A Paid [REDACTED] Writer $0.00 Purchase of a travel ticket ('bought me a ticke... View
N/A Received Mr Epstein or his... [REDACTED] $0.00 Extra payment for sexual encounters. View
N/A Received Implied Ms Maxwel... [REDACTED] $200.00 Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... View
N/A Received [REDACTED WITNESS] [REDACTED] $0.00 Witness stated he would like to reimburse [reda... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein o... [REDACTED] $0.00 Extra payment for sexual encounters. View
N/A Received [REDACTED] [REDACTED] $100.00 Payment for going with her to Jeff's house and ... View
N/A Received Implied Ms Maxwel... [REDACTED] $200.00 Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... View
N/A Received [REDACTED] [REDACTED] $0.00 The text mentions 'offering [REDACTED]', implyi... View
N/A Received Mr Epstein or his... [REDACTED] $0.00 Extra payment for sexual encounters. View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $0.00 Epstein paid for her to [redacted]. View
N/A Received Implied Ms Maxwel... [REDACTED] $200.00 Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... View
N/A Received Epstein [REDACTED] $300.00 Payment for massage services View
N/A Received Epstein's organiz... [REDACTED] $200.00 Christmas gift via Western Union View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein/E... [REDACTED] $200.00 Payment for sex (low end of range). View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein/E... [REDACTED] $5,000.00 Payment for sex (high end of range). View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $200.00 Cash payments given after massages, initially f... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $0.00 Subject stated they 'was paid well and they bot... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein/E... [REDACTED] $200.00 Payment for sex (range start) View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein/E... [REDACTED] $5,000.00 Payment for sex (range end, depending on travel... View
N/A Received Baby's father / O... [REDACTED] $300.00 Alleged payment mentioned in school rumors for ... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $0.00 Epstein provided [Redacted] to travel to Epstei... View
N/A Received Mr Epstein or his... [REDACTED] $0.00 Extra payment for sexual encounters. View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $0.00 Received monies for the same thing (amount unsp... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $300.00 Payment after the massage incident View
As Sender
4807
As Recipient
4978
Total
9785

Time sensitive review of pending productions

From: [Redacted] (USANYS) [C...
To: [REDACTED]

Urgent request to review productions (TW 3500, NTW 3500, Rule 16) to be loaded on a drive for FedEx to GM by 3:20pm. Includes internal network file paths.

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

RE: Time sensitive review of pending productions

From: [REDACTED]
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) [C...

Stating productions reviewed but index needs review due to time sensitive call. Timestamp 3:10 PM.

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

RE: Time sensitive review of pending productions

From: [REDACTED]
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) [C...

Confirming things are sorted out. Timestamp 3:18 PM.

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

RE: Time sensitive review of pending productions

From: [Redacted] (USANYS) [C...
To: [REDACTED]

Sending attachment with password for MDC/Maxwell file. Timestamp 20:59:27 +0000.

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

RE: ISO response to defense calling many, many agents

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Providing attachments (MIL briefing, Reply Brief, Pretrial conference transcript) regarding precluding defense from attacking the investigation. Notes AJN's ruling is on pages 15-30.

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

RE: ISO response to defense calling many, many agents

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Amazing, thanks!

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

Re: ISO response to defense calling many, many agents

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

States they have been dealing with this issue in the Maxwell case and have a decent ruling from Judge Nathan. Offers to send briefing.

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

ISO response to defense calling many, many agents

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Requesting briefing material in response to defense efforts to call numerous agents to trial to impeach the investigation. Mentions a Touhy letter.

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

RE: [Redacted]

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Various administrative exchanges regarding adding attachments and marking documents as confidential vs. public.

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

FW: expert witness

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Forwarding previous email and asking if they have an email address for a specific individual.

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

RE: expert witness

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Confirmation of a UC Davis email address for the subject.

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

FW: expert witness

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Inquiry asking if they have an email address for a specific individual, referencing an original email.

Email
2021-11-24
Communication Source

Fwd: [EXTERNAL] Good morning

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Forwarding the inquiry from Aaron Katersky.

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

[EXTERNAL] Good morning

From: Aaron Katersky
To: [REDACTED]

Inquiry regarding a preview piece for the trial, specifically noting that Maxwell's most prominent accuser and another individual are not on the witness list.

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

[EXTERNAL] [Redacted]

From: Joe Nascimento
To: [REDACTED]

Alerting recipient about a subpoena served to [Redacted] regarding a lawsuit against their ex-husband involving sex discrimination and Epstein connections.

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

Accepted: 227815.002 USA V GHISLAINE MAXWELL 20 CR 330 (AJN)

From: [REDACTED]
To: testimony [Redacted]

Notification of acceptance for item 227815.002 related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

Ghislaine Maxwell's accuser 'was paid to set up Tom Parke...

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Shared link to a Daily Mail article regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's accuser and Tom Parker Bowles.

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

RE: [EXTERNAL] Good morning

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

no comment

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

Fwd: [EXTERNAL] Good morning

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Forwarding Katersky's inquiry.

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

[EXTERNAL] Good morning

From: Katersky, Aaron
To: [REDACTED]

Inquiry about Maxwell's prominent accuser not being part of the case and not being a witness.

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

227815.002 USA V GHISLAINE MAXWELL 20 CR 330 (AJN)

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Invitation for an 'att prep call' (attorney preparation call) via Microsoft Teams.

Email/calendar invite
2021-11-23
Communication Source

FW: US V Maxwell

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Transcript from today's conference is attached.

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

FW: US V Maxwell

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Forwarded email with redacted body

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

FW: US V Maxwell

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Forwarding email with attachment LBNAMAXT.PDF

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

[EXTERNAL] US V Maxwell

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Original email in chain

Email
2021-11-23
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search