| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
29
Very Strong
|
36 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Corresponded |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
David Pegg
|
Corresponded |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Business associate |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Pegg
|
Correspondent |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert D. Balin
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ICI
|
Professional licensing |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marc Allan Fernich
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Represented by |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted AUSA]
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
CIA
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-03 | N/A | Confirmation of legal stance regarding unsealing appellate briefs | Boston, MA (Weinberg's office) | View |
| 2016-03-01 | N/A | Strategic discussion via email about creating a 'counter narrative' for Jeffrey Epstein in respon... | N/A | View |
| 2015-04-24 | N/A | Date of this letter warning ABC against airing the interview. | Boston/New York | View |
| 2015-01-30 | N/A | The Guardian newspaper, via journalist David Pegg, sent a media inquiry to Jeffrey Epstein's lawy... | N/A (email correspondence) | View |
| 2015-01-30 | N/A | The Guardian journalist David Pegg sends a media inquiry to Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Martin G. W... | London | View |
| 2015-01-29 | N/A | The Guardian newspaper, through journalist David Pegg, attempts to contact Jeffrey Epstein and hi... | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | The Guardian newspaper, via journalist David Pegg, initiated a media enquiry for an article conce... | N/A | View |
| 2010-04-16 | N/A | Fax transmission of FOIA request to FBI ICRC. | Winchester, VA (Recipient) | View |
| 2010-01-06 | N/A | Submission of FOIA and Privacy Act Request by Epstein's legal counsel to the FBI | Boston, MA (Sender) to Winc... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Epstein's plea deal negotiation and subsequent jail time/probation. | Florida | View |
| 1972-04-24 | N/A | Martin G. Weinberg was admitted to practice as an Attorney. | Boston, Massachusetts | View |
A legal letter from attorney Martin G. Weinberg, representing Jeffrey Epstein, to John Zucker at ABC's Office of Legal Counsel. Weinberg attempts to dissuade ABC from airing a 'Good Morning America' interview with 'Jane Doe 3,' claiming her accusations are uncorroborated, recycled from 2011 UK tabloids, and were previously dismissed by a federal judge. The letter also notes that an FBI agent declared Jane Doe 3 refused to cooperate with the FBI regarding Epstein in 2007.
This document is an email chain from October 2016 involving Jeffrey Epstein and his legal team (Martin Weinberg, Darren Indyke, and Kathy Ruemmler). Epstein shares a link to a LawNewz article regarding a federal judge ordering a hearing in a rape lawsuit against Donald Trump. Martin Weinberg responds with a redacted privileged email containing an attachment with legal revisions ('Revisions to Opp') edited by both himself (MGW) and Indyke (DKI).
This document is an FBI Privacy Waiver and Certification of Identity form signed by Jeffrey E. Epstein on January 5, 2010. In the document, Epstein lists his personal details, including his SSN and Palm Beach address, and authorizes the FBI to release all information relating to him to his attorney, Martin G. Weinberg of Boston. The document was faxed by the FBI ICRC in Winchester, VA on April 16, 2010.
This document is page 3 of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request sent by attorney Martin G. Weinberg to the FBI on April 16, 2010. The letter requests all records regarding the monitoring, surveillance, or investigation of Epstein, specifically asking for searches in the Central Records System and Electronic Surveillance indices. The requester preauthorizes up to $1,000 in processing fees and demands justification for any withheld information.
This document is a formal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act request dated January 6, 2010, sent by attorney Martin G. Weinberg on behalf of his client, Jeffrey Edward Epstein, to the FBI. The letter requests all records related to Epstein created between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2009. The document provides specific personal details about Epstein to facilitate the search, including his date of birth, place of birth, Palm Beach address, and Social Security Number.
This document is an email chain from March 18, 2016, where journalist Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein on a public relations strategy to counter an upcoming book by an author named Patterson. Wolff suggests Epstein should publicly become an 'anti-Trump voice' to gain 'political cover' and deflect attention, proposing an op-ed and a TV interview with Charlie Rose. Epstein forwarded this advice to his legal team, including Martin Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, and Darren Indyke, prompting a reply from Weinberg marking the communication as 'ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE'.
This document is an email chain from January 30, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein forwards a media inquiry from The Guardian to his lawyer, Martin G. Weinberg. The inquiry, sent by journalist David Pegg, concerns an upcoming article and sets a response deadline, noting that Epstein had not responded to prior contact attempts. The content of the emails between Epstein and his lawyer is redacted and marked as 'Privileged'.
This document is an email chain from January 30, 2015, initiated by David Pegg, a journalist from The Guardian, to Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Martin G. Weinberg. Pegg is seeking comment from Epstein for an upcoming article and sets a response deadline of February 2, 2015. The subsequent emails between Weinberg and Epstein are included but their content is redacted under attorney-client privilege.
This document is an email chain from January 30, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Martin G. Weinberg, forwards a media enquiry to 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The enquiry is from David Pegg, a journalist at The Guardian, who is seeking comment from Epstein for an upcoming article. Pegg sets a response deadline of February 2, 2015, and notes that previous attempts to contact Epstein directly have been unsuccessful.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-04-16 | Paid | Martin G. Weinberg | FBI | $1,000.00 | Preauthorization for spending on FOIA search/pr... | View |
Requesting intervention to expedite production of a 12,000 page file and requesting a conference regarding FBI's FOIA responsibilities.
Voicemail left in the morning regarding civil forfeiture.
Informing recipient that a Petition to Probate the Epstein Estate and Will was filed in the Virgin Islands the previous day.
Denial of request to share information/video footage; request for any useful information for ongoing investigation.
Request from Epstein's prior defense attorneys to view video footage of his jail cell and hallway at MCC from midnight to 7 AM on Aug 10, 2019.
Inquiry about availability at 9:30 AM tomorrow to discuss potential civil forfeiture issues.
Initial inquiry: 'Alex, Mike and I are authorized to continue the discussion of potential civil forfeiture issues with you. Are you available at 930 tomorrow morning?'
Confirmation that the time works and request for a dial-in number.
Requesting availability for a call at 9:30 tomorrow to discuss 'potential civil forfeiture issues'. States he and Mike are authorized to continue discussion.
Confirming time works and asking for a dial-in.
Requesting taint team for seized Virgin Islands computers; asking about dismissal of charges (nolle prosequi); requesting call with death investigators.
Requesting confirmation of preservation requests, requesting DNA testing on ligatures/bed stripping found in MCC cell, requesting taint review for seized emails, and inquiring about dismissal of indictment.
Detailed request for preservation of all evidence regarding Epstein's death and July 23 incident.
Formal request for preservation of all evidence regarding Epstein's death and previous suicide attempt on behalf of his family.
Weinberg asks for response to letters from July 26 and Aug 1 seeking preservation/production. Specifically requests advising AUSAs in ND Ga and others to preserve records pending discovery requests due Sept 13.
Response denying broad discovery requests while affirming obligations under Rule 16 and Brady.
Formal notice that Martin G. Weinberg is joining as additional counsel for Jeffrey Epstein.
Acknowledging receipt of email and requesting that 'all three of us' be included on future emails regarding the case.
Resending an attachment regarding US v Epstein because the original recipient was out of office.
Confirming initial discovery production will happen no later than Tuesday in native electronic format (PDFs, JPEGs).
Weinberg requests the prosecution break out search warrants, affidavits, and returns from the main discovery production and email them to him and Reid Weingarten immediately.
Sending a more formal preservation/production request for NPA-related materials.
Sending a formal preservation/production request for NPA-related materials.
Acknowledging receipt of email regarding preservation/production; promising a responsive letter by Monday; asking for timing and format of discovery so Steptoe IT can prepare.
Stating intent to sign the Protective Order on behalf of the Epstein defense team and inquiring about the first wave of discovery.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity