This legal document, part of Case 22-1426, argues that the duties of U.S. Attorneys are statutorily confined to their specific districts. It cites the case of Annabi to support the claim that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting an individual named Maxwell. The document includes footnotes referencing U.S. Code to detail the powers and limitations of U.S. Attorneys, including the exception that the Attorney General can authorize them to act outside their districts.
This legal document argues that the government is precluded from charging the Appellant under Count Six due to a prior Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The argument is based on legal precedent against prosecuting the same crime in a new district and asserts that the charge, involving the trafficking of a witness named Carolyn, falls within the time period covered by the NPA. The document also references a court's finding that the NPA covers Maxwell's involvement in offenses committed by Epstein.
This document is a page from a legal filing that discusses the legal precedent set in the Annabi case concerning the scope of plea agreements. It explains the "Annabi rule," which holds that a plea agreement only binds the U.S. Attorney's office in the district where it was made, unless explicitly stated otherwise. The document also highlights that this rule has been sharply criticized by other courts, such as in U.S. v. Gebbie, for lacking a sound analytical basis.
This document is a court docket sheet from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 2022. It details an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the unsealing and docketing of previously undocketed motions and letters from November and December 2021 related to juror strikes, jury questionnaires, and subpoenas. The order addresses privacy concerns under Fed. R. Evid. 412 and mandates the parties to confer on redactions for specific documents involving a witness identified as 'Jane' and an 'Administrator Feldman'.
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for Case 22-1426, involving the USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details a series of legal filings, primarily letters and motions, entered on July 12, 2022, from both the prosecution (USA) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings, dated from late 2021, cover various pre-trial issues such as witness testimony, expert disclosures, and jury instructions, and the log also notes the deletion of a sealed document that was filed in error.
A page from a court docket report for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from June 25-26, 2022. The entries include motions regarding victim impact statements, letters from defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim and the USA, and judicial orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan concerning sentencing procedures and the defendant's access to legal materials at the MDC.
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from June 22 to June 24, 2022. It details the procedural skirmishes leading up to sentencing, specifically regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the admissibility of victim impact statements. The judge orders the inclusion of statements from seven individuals, explicitly naming Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre, while denying defense requests for redactions.
This document is a page from a court docket log for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 19, 2021, to December 22, 2021. It details various motions, orders regarding public access to trial exhibits and closing arguments, and minute entries for the jury trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan.
This document is a docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing events from December 15 to December 17, 2021. It records minute entries for the jury trial held on December 16, 2021, listing all present attorneys for the defense and prosecution. The document also details various court orders regarding the admissibility of witness testimony (specifically mentioning Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton) and procedural disputes over prior inconsistent statements.
This document is a court docket from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from late November 2021. The entries primarily concern procedural matters ahead of trial, including court orders for the production of documents from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, motions regarding expert testimony, and letters from both the prosecution (USA) and Maxwell's defense team about trial procedures and jury instructions. The presiding judge is Alison J. Nathan.
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 22, 2021. It lists several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including directives regarding the sealing and redaction of opinions, the denial of motions to quash a subpoena related to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, and memorandum opinions precluding the expert testimony of Bennett Gershman and Dr. Ryan Hall.
This document is a court docket log from the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 19, 2021. It details orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a motion in limine to exclude evidence from 'Accuser-3' (Witness-3), ultimately ruling that testimony regarding Maxwell introducing the witness to Epstein and facilitating sexualized massages is admissible as evidence of Mann Act counts. It also mentions a letter from the prosecution team and procedural orders regarding the sealing and redaction of documents.
This document is a court docket report (SDNY) covering November 15-17, 2021, detailing pretrial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the filing of transcripts for prior conferences, a memo endorsement ordering the government to use FedEx for disclosures due to mail delays at the MDC, and minute entries for a pretrial conference, voir dire, and the beginning of jury selection. The document lists the full legal teams for both the defense and the prosecution present during these proceedings.
This document is a court docket report (Case 22-1426, SDNY) from November 2021 details legal proceedings in the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. It lists various filings including orders on redactions to protect victim privacy, motions in limine regarding 'Accuser-3' and co-conspirator statements, and a dispute over an unauthenticated hearsay document (Exhibit 52). The docket reflects active pre-trial litigation between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach) and defense counsel (Pagliuca, Everdell) regarding the admissibility of evidence and pseudonym logistics.
This document is a court docket sheet from the SDNY regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell appeared via telephone and sets forth a comprehensive order regarding jury selection protocols, including the use of questionnaires, anonymized juror numbers, and schedules for voir dire in November 2021. The Judge explicitly denied a request to seal the proposed jury questionnaires, citing the First Amendment right to public access despite the case's significant media attention.
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings and orders between late August and early October 2021. It details scheduling for jury selection and pretrial conferences, handles redaction requests regarding third-party identities, and includes a significant order requiring the government to disclose the identities of unnamed co-conspirators. The document also outlines the trial schedule, anticipating opening statements to begin on November 29, 2021.
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering June 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's bail appeal by the Second Circuit, her complaints regarding sleep deprivation at the MDC, and the denial of her motions to suppress evidence. It also orders the unsealing of documents related to the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell.
This document is a page from a court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from May 3, 2021, to May 6, 2021. It includes judicial orders regarding a trial continuance until fall 2021 and the acceptance of hard drives by the MDC for the defendant's use, as well as various letters filed by both the defense and the prosecution regarding discovery and witness disclosures.
This document is a court docket log (SDNY CM/ECF) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between April 22 and April 23, 2021. It details procedural exchanges regarding electronic devices in the courtroom (denied), suppression motions, adjournment requests, and proposed redactions to protect third-party privacy (granted). The document lists key legal teams for both the defense (Boies Schiller Flexner) and the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach), and includes Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings on these procedural matters.
This document is a court docket summary from the Southern District of New York regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the court's rulings on numerous pretrial motions filed by Maxwell, denying most of them, including motions to dismiss based on Epstein's non-prosecution agreement and statute of limitations. The court did, however, grant Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges for a separate trial and ordered both parties to negotiate and submit schedules for remaining pretrial matters by April 21, 2021.
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 16, 2021. It lists filings including the Government's opposition to various defense motions to dismiss and suppress evidence, an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the unsealing of reply briefs, and a defense reply memorandum. The document also references the underlying indictment charging Maxwell with facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors between 1994 and 1997.
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from March 1 to March 23, 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's third motion for bail, various letters exchanged regarding pretrial motions and redactions, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sealing of exhibits. It specifically mentions the related civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell (15-cv-7433) in the context of unsealing transcript portions.
This document is a page from the court docket (SDNY CM/ECF) for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 4, 2021, and March 1, 2021. It records defense motions for a Bill of Particulars and a Third Motion for Bond, as well as multiple sealed documents and correspondence regarding MDC confinement conditions. The document also includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling responses for the bond motion and granting an extension for defense replies.
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) detailing a series of motions and supporting memorandums filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on February 4, 2021. The filings, entered by her attorneys Jeffrey Pagliuca and Mark Cohen, seek to dismiss various counts of the superseding indictment, suppress evidence, and strike surplusage from the indictment. The legal grounds for these motions include due process violations, pre-indictment delay, breach of a non-prosecution agreement, and claims that charges are time-barred.
This document is a page from a federal court docket (SDNY) regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 14 to December 18, 2020. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders approving redactions for both defense and government filings related to Maxwell's renewed bail application, citing privacy interests and legal precedents like Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. It also records the filing of a Memorandum of Law with numerous exhibits by the defense and the appearance of attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the prosecution.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity