Inspector General
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Federal Bureau of Prisons
|
Oversight |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | N/A | Issuance and internal circulation of a subpoena related to the MCC (Metropolitan Correctional Cen... | New York | View |
026.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court conference held on January 30, 2020, regarding the case United States v. Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, the guards charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death. The proceedings focus on setting a trial date; the defense requests a delay until October due to discovery volume and personal conflicts, while the prosecution argues for a June trial, emphasizing the case is limited to a specific '14-hour period.' The judge ultimately sets the trial for June 22, 2020, following a contentious exchange with defense attorney Jason Foy regarding family vacation schedules and professional obligations.
EFTA00036688.pdf
This document is a chain of emails exchanged on August 10, 2019, the date of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondence discusses a 'Draft Notification' and specifically notes that the text should reflect that the Attorney General has requested the DOJ Office of Inspector General to investigate the matter alongside the FBI. The participants' identities are redacted.
EFTA00036602.pdf
This document is an internal government email chain dated August 10, 2019 (the date of Jeffrey Epstein's death). The correspondence concerns a 'Draft Notification' regarding the event. The most significant content is an instruction to ensure the notification states that, in addition to the FBI's investigation, the Attorney General has requested the DOJ Office of Inspector General to investigate the matter.
EFTA00035791.pdf
This document is a transcript and summary of a Fox News segment by Tucker Carlson from January 25, 2023. Carlson criticizes the lack of accountability regarding Jeffrey Epstein's death, highlighting that former AG Bill Barr promised an investigation that never materialized and that the only guards charged had their cases dropped. The segment also details a call to a DOJ case officer named Lyeson Daniel who refused to confirm his employment, and questions the official narrative regarding the suicide ruling.
EFTA00033663.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the MCC Supervisory Staff Attorney and Martin G. Weinberg, the attorney for Jeffrey Epstein's family. The primary content is an August 11, 2019, request from Weinberg to the MCC demanding the preservation of all evidence (videos, logs, notes, medical records, etc.) related to Epstein's detention, attempted suicide on July 23, and death on August 10. The chain also includes the initial August 10 notification from the MCC to Weinberg confirming Epstein's death.
EFTA00023996.pdf
This document is a Litigation Hold Notice issued by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York following the death of Jeffrey Epstein. It mandates the preservation of all evidence, records, and communications related to Epstein's incarceration at the MCC from July 6, 2019, through his death on August 10, 2019, including specific details regarding a suicide attempt on July 23 and the events of the night of his death. The notice explicitly lists types of evidence to be preserved, such as video surveillance, employee logs, medical records, and physical evidence from his cell.
EFTA00022623.pdf
This document contains notes from a February 2021 conference call between prosecutors (SDNY) and defense attorneys (Jason Foy, Eric Sarraga) representing one of the correctional officers charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death. The discussion focuses on a potential Deferred Prosecution (DP) agreement, with the defense arguing that the defendant had no criminal intent, was not 'up to no good,' and that the unique pressure of the Epstein case ('things are always different') is driving the prosecution. The notes mention the co-defendant 'Montell' and discuss trial adjournments and mitigating factors.
EFTA00017811.pdf
A formal discovery request letter from Montell Figgins, attorney for Michael Thomas (one of the guards on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died), addressed to an Assistant US Attorney in the SDNY. The letter requests all materials (reports, photos, videos) created or possessed by the United States Inspector General regarding the incident. The letter cites Rule 16(a)(1)(C) and U.S. v. Bryan as legal basis for the request.
DOJ-OGR-00028808.jpg
This document is a U.S. government API/HIT data record, a type of flight log, dated March 13, 2011. It details an inbound general aviation flight for Jeffrey E. Epstein on aircraft N212JE, arriving at West Palm Beach (PBI). The departure location is listed as unknown.
DOJ-OGR-00028485.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice API (Advance Passenger Information) hit data record dated January 14, 2011. It details an outbound flight for Jeffrey E. Epstein on a general aviation aircraft with tail number N909JE. The flight departed from Ataturk Airport (IST) in Istanbul, with the arrival location listed as unknown (XXX).
DOJ-OGR-00022088.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a government filing arguing against a defendant's (Thomas) motion for discovery. The government contends that searching for certain records from the BOP, CIA, and Vice President's office would be an undue burden and that a draft Inspector General report is not subject to disclosure because it is not material to the defense and is protected by deliberative process privilege. The government states the report is not yet complete and the prosecution team has no involvement in its creation.
DOJ-OGR-00022073.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against a motion filed by an individual named Thomas on April 9, 2020. Thomas is seeking to compel the Government to produce a wide range of documents related to the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death, including the Inspector General's report, Bureau of Prisons (BOP) records, and disciplinary files for MCC employees. The Government asserts that Thomas is not entitled to these materials and that his motion should be denied by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00022072.jpg
This document is page 5 of a court filing (Document 35) from April 24, 2020, in the case against prison guards Noel and Thomas (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). It details legal maneuvering regarding discovery, specifically focusing on requests for MCC video surveillance footage and reports from the Inspector General. The text notes that Thomas considered filing a motion to dismiss based on 'selective prosecution' but failed to do so by the deadline.
DOJ-OGR-00022064.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 35) in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on April 24, 2020. It outlines the government's legal arguments against providing additional discovery materials to a defendant named Thomas. The arguments assert that the government has met its obligations, the requested materials are not relevant, and they are not required to collect materials from agencies outside the prosecution team.
DOJ-OGR-00022057.jpg
A printout of a Government Executive article dated November 19, 2019, filed as a court document. The article details testimony by BOP Director Hawk Sawyer regarding staffing shortages ('augmentation') and the fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein suicide, including the indictment of two guards for falsifying records. Sawyer agrees with Senator Ted Cruz that the event was a 'black eye' for the agency but defends the majority of the staff.
DOJ-OGR-00022046.jpg
This document is a formal discovery request dated January 29, 2020, from Montell Figgins (attorney for Michael Thomas) to AUSA Rebekah Donaleski regarding the case 'United States v. Michael Thomas' (incorrectly listed as State of NY in the Re: line, but with federal docket 1:19-cr-00830). The letter requests all materials (reports, photos, videos) possessed by the United States Inspector General pursuant to Rule 16(a)(1)(C). It cites U.S. v. Bryan as legal precedent for the entitlement to these documents.
DOJ-OGR-00022042.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for a broad interpretation of the prosecution's 'Brady obligations.' It asserts that the government must disclose not only admissible favorable evidence but any information that could lead to such evidence, resolving any doubts in favor of disclosure to the defense. The document cites several legal precedents, including Safavian and Paxson, to support the claim that the pretrial standard is simply whether evidence is favorable, not whether it would change the trial's outcome.
DOJ-OGR-00022035.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) dated April 9, 2020, related to defendant Michael Thomas (one of the guards charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death). The text argues that Michael Thomas is entitled to the complete Inspector General's Report under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)E, citing various legal precedents (Armstrong, Rigas, McGuinness, Giffen) to define 'material' evidence necessary for defense preparation.
DOJ-OGR-00022009.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on February 10, 2020, for case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. A defense attorney states their intention to file a motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds of selective prosecution. The attorney also requests discovery materials from an Inspector General's report concerning the same incident, anticipating that this will cause a trial delay, to which the court replies that the issue has already been addressed.
DOJ-OGR-00021997.jpg
This document is a legal letter filed on January 27, 2020, by Montell Figgins, the attorney for Michael Thomas (a prison guard charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death). Figgins states his intent to file a motion for dismissal based on selective prosecution and argues that the defense needs more time and access to Inspector General reports to prepare for trial, noting the government took over 90 days to investigate the incident. The letter is copied to prosecutors and counsel for the co-defendant, Noel.
DOJ-OGR-00021984.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on December 19, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Figgins argues to the judge that an ongoing Inspector General's report investigating the Bureau of Prisons' supervision and policies is crucial for the defense. Figgins requests clarity on the status and release date of this report, citing media reports about testimony from the head of the BOP and statements by the U.S. Attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00025174.jpg
This document is a comprehensive legal preservation and production request sent by attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein's family (based out of Boston) to federal authorities including the MCC, FBI, and USAO. It demands the preservation of all physical, electronic, and video evidence regarding Epstein's detention, the July 23rd suicide attempt, and his death on August 10, 2019, specifically targeting logs, cell videos, and staff identities from the 9th floor SHU unit.
DOJ-OGR-00025486.jpg
This document excerpt details events surrounding Epstein's death on August 9th and 10th. It notes that Epstein was returned to his cell on August 9th without a required cellmate despite being on PSYCH Alert. On August 10th, a Correction Officer performed a routine check, but not all required checks were completed. Later that morning, staff found Epstein unresponsive, initiated CPR, and he was transported to a hospital by EMS where he was pronounced dead at 7:36 a.m.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020589.jpg
This document appears to be a bibliography or endnotes page (labeled 130) from a House Oversight Committee report. The citations (numbered 14 through 30) reference academic papers, government reports, and news articles concerning technology transfer to China, reverse engineering, US export controls (deemed exports), and the monitoring of foreign students via SEVIS. The latest date referenced in the citations is September 2018.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017990.jpg
This document is a printout of a Law & Crime article filed as a court exhibit in April 2019. It details Alan Dershowitz's aggressive denial of sexual misconduct allegations made by Virginia Roberts, characterizing them as an extortion plot effectively shielded by litigation privileges. The text also covers Dershowitz's defense of the controversial non-prosecution agreement (plea deal) secured for Jeffrey Epstein by then-U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, with Dershowitz stating he is 'proud' of the deal as a legal achievement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity