AJN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was submitted as evidence, labeled 'Government Exhibit 237', in the criminal case... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as Government Exhibit 903-R in the court case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal case | This document is Exhibit 932 for the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A photograph was entered into evidence as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 51-C' for the case 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, designated Government Exhibit 224-R, in the criminal cas... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence (Exhibit 904-R) in the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, designated as Government Exhibit 211, in the legal case ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A notebook was entered as evidence, designated as Government Exhibit 601 in case 52 20 Cr. 330 (A... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002378.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit B', filed on February 4, 2021, as part of the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The footer includes a Bates number, DOJ-OGR-00002378, indicating it is a document produced by the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00002378(1).jpg
This document is a cover sheet labeled 'EXHIBIT B' for a court filing submitted on February 4, 2021. It serves as page 1 of 23 for Document 134-2 in the criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002378.
DOJ-OGR-00002353(2).jpg
This document is Page 6 of a legal filing (Motion to Suppress) from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). Maxwell's defense argues that Counts Five and Six (perjury charges) should be dismissed because they rely on evidence obtained through an unlawful grand jury subpoena that violated a Protective Order in the civil case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. The document asserts the government proceeded 'ex parte' to avoid contestation.
DOJ-OGR-00002352(3).jpg
This document is the 'Table of Exhibits' page (page 5 of 23) from a legal filing (Document 134) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists nine exhibits (A through I), including a Civil Protective Order, a Giuffre Protective Order Proposal, and two transcripts from 2019. Exhibits C, F, G, H, and I are heavily redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002352(2).jpg
This document is a Table of Exhibits from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists several exhibits, including a Civil Protective Order, a 'Giuffre Protective Order Proposal,' and transcripts from March and April 2019, with other exhibits being fully redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002352(1).jpg
This document is page 5 of 23 from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 4, 2021. It serves as a Table of Exhibits listing items A through I. While Exhibits A, B, D, and E refer to protective orders (specifically mentioning Giuffre) and 2019 transcripts, Exhibits C, F, G, H, and I are heavily redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002346.jpg
This is a Notice of Motion filed on February 4, 2021 (dated January 25, 2021) in the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense is moving to suppress evidence obtained from a specific government subpoena (the target of which is redacted) and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing Due Process violations. The defense also requested oral arguments for this motion.
DOJ-OGR-00002346(1).jpg
This is a Notice of Motion (Pretrial Motion #3) filed on February 4, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the SDNY. Maxwell's defense is moving to suppress evidence obtained via a government subpoena to a redacted entity and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment based on the Due Process Clause.
DOJ-OGR-00002323.jpg
This document is page 3 (Table of Authorities) of a legal filing (Document 126) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists legal precedents (cases) and statutes cited in the brief, including Supreme Court cases like Duren v. Missouri and Second Circuit cases like United States v. Jackman. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002323.
DOJ-OGR-00002323(1).jpg
This document is page 'ii' (labeled Page 3 of 13 in the PDF) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (Cases) and Statutes cited elsewhere in the filing. The citations heavily reference cases involving jury selection and fair representation (e.g., Duren v. Missouri, Taylor v. Louisiana), suggesting the main document likely involves a motion regarding jury composition or selection.
DOJ-OGR-00002322.jpg
This document is page 'i' (the Table of Contents) of a legal filing submitted on January 25, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines the structure of the document, which includes a Preliminary Statement, a Statement of Facts covering procedural history and the District's Jury Plan, and an Argument section.
DOJ-OGR-00002312(1).jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing, specifically Document 124 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It outlines the structure of the parent document, which includes sections for introduction, argument, conclusion, and a certificate of service. A Bates number at the bottom (DOJ-OGR-00002312) suggests it is part of a production from the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00002311(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, supports a motion to dismiss four counts of the superseding indictment against her, arguing a lack of specificity. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002309.jpg
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her counsel, is formally requesting the dismissal of Counts One through Four of the Superseding Indictment, citing a 'Lack of Specificity.' The defense also requests an oral argument regarding this motion (Pretrial Motion #12).
DOJ-OGR-00002309(1).jpg
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her counsel, is formally requesting the dismissal of Counts One through Four of the Superseding Indictment, citing a 'Lack of Specificity.' The defense also requests an oral argument regarding this motion (Pretrial Motion #12).
DOJ-OGR-00002300(1).jpg
This is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The page lists the defendant's legal representation from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00002298.jpg
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In this filing (Pretrial Motion #8), Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell requests the dismissal of either Count One or Count Three of the Superseding Indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous.
DOJ-OGR-00002298(1).jpg
This document is a Notice of Motion (Pretrial Motion #8) filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. In this filing, defendant Ghislaine Maxwell requests the dismissal of either Count One or Count Three of the Superseding Indictment, arguing that they are multiplicitous. The defense also requests oral argument on the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00002287(1).jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 120) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 25, 2021. The text presents legal arguments regarding the 'Severance of Offenses' under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 14, citing various precedents to argue that counts should be severed if joinder prejudices the defendant. It discusses the legal standards for 'misjoinder' and 'substantial prejudice' required to grant a motion to sever.
DOJ-OGR-00002286(1).jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 120) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 25, 2021. The text presents legal arguments and case citations regarding the severance of charges and 'joinder,' specifically arguing that perjury counts should not be joined with substantive crimes if they are not sufficiently connected physically, temporally, or transactionally. The document cites precedents such as *United States v. Rivera*, *Randazzo*, and *Potamitis* to support the argument that unrelated offenses should be tried separately.
DOJ-OGR-00002282.jpg
This document is page 4 (marked as 'iii') of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated January 25, 2021. It is a Table of Authorities listing relevant Statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 1623, 2422, 2423(a)) and Rules (Fed. R. Crim. P. 8(a), 14(a), and Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7) cited in the main document. The page bears the Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002282.
DOJ-OGR-00002282(1).jpg
This document is a Table of Authorities page (page iii) from a legal filing submitted on January 25, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It lists relevant statutes including 18 U.S.C. § 1623 (perjury), § 2422 (coercion/enticement), and § 2423(a) (transportation of minors), as well as Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding joinder and severance of charges.
DOJ-OGR-00002281.jpg
This document is page 'ii' (3 of 19) of a legal filing from January 25, 2021, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a 'Table of Authorities' section listing various legal precedents (cases) cited in the main document, including United States v. Halper and United States v. Burke. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00002281'.
DOJ-OGR-00002279(1).jpg
This document is the title page of a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a severance and separate trial regarding Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment. The document lists the legal defense teams representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002266.jpg
This document is a court exhibit filed on January 13, 2021, in the case US v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It consists of a printout from the Bureau of Prisons website displaying COVID-19 inmate testing statistics, showing 95,830 completed tests and 38,569 positive tests at that time. The document bears a 'DOJ-OGR' Bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity