AJN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was submitted as evidence, labeled 'Government Exhibit 237', in the criminal case... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as Government Exhibit 903-R in the court case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal case | This document is Exhibit 932 for the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A photograph was entered into evidence as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 51-C' for the case 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, designated Government Exhibit 224-R, in the criminal cas... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence (Exhibit 904-R) in the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, designated as Government Exhibit 211, in the legal case ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A notebook was entered as evidence, designated as Government Exhibit 601 in case 52 20 Cr. 330 (A... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016856.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, likely named Dubin. The witness is questioned about their observations of the relationship between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, stating that they lived in the same house but finding the term 'relationship' hard to define. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, repeatedly objects to the questioning, with the court overruling one objection and sustaining another.
DOJ-OGR-00016749.jpg
This document is page 20 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. The content captures a procedural discussion where the Judge ('The Court') outlines the legal requirements for introducing extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement to impeach a witness, citing United States v. Gulani. Ms. Menninger briefly responds to a question about a pseudonym.
DOJ-OGR-00010536.jpg
This document is the cover page for "The Government's Sentencing Memorandum" in the criminal case of the United States of America versus Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on June 22, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, it lists the legal counsel for the government, including U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and several Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00009191.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 24, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial" and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms. The case number is identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00009122.jpg
This document is the Preliminary Statement from a legal memorandum filed by the US Government on February 24, 2022, opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The Government argues that Maxwell has not met the heavy burden required to prove that a juror deliberately lied during voir dire or that the juror would have been struck for cause, citing legal precedents such as McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood. The filing requests that the Court deny the defendant's motion based on the present record.
DOJ-OGR-00009108.jpg
This document is the title page of an Amicus Curiae Brief filed on February 24, 2022, by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-CR-330) in the Southern District of New York. The filing attorneys listed are Abbe David Lowell and Christopher D. Man of Winston & Strawn LLP, and Joel B. Rudin of the Law Offices of Joel B. Rudin, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00009002.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically 'Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 24, 2022. It identifies the case as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell and lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00008980.jpg
This document is the cover page for a Memorandum of Law filed on February 24, 2022, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It was filed by attorney Todd Spodek on behalf of 'Juror 50', who is seeking to intervene in the case to release a sealed jury questionnaire and transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00008925.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is an omnibus memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her post-trial motions. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00019878.jpg
This document is page 'iii' (Table of Authorities) from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists legal precedents cited within the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and 'United States v. Salerno' (1987), along with a citation to 18 U.S.C. § 3142 regarding bail/detention. The page bears a Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00019878.
DOJ-OGR-00019865.jpg
This document is the first page of the Government's Memorandum in Support of Detention for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. The prosecution argues that Maxwell poses an extreme flight risk due to her wealth, three passports, foreign citizenship, and lack of ties to the US, and requests she be detained pending trial for her alleged role in partnering with Jeffrey Epstein to exploit minors.
DOJ-OGR-00019864.jpg
This document is the cover page for the Government's Memorandum in Support of Detention in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330 AJN), filed in the Southern District of New York. It lists Audrey Strauss as the Acting U.S. Attorney and identifies Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey as Assistant U.S. Attorneys handling the case. The header indicates the document was originally filed on July 2, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00019717.jpg
This document is a service list page from a court filing dated January 12, 2021, associated with Case 21-58 and referencing criminal case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists four Assistant U.S. Attorneys (Moe, Rossmiller, Comey, and Rohrbach) who received electronic notification of the filing via their Department of Justice email addresses. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00019717.
DOJ-OGR-00010447.jpg
This document is the title page of the Sentencing Memorandum filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 15, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It lists the legal counsel representing Maxwell, including attorneys from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser LLP, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp number DOJ-OGR-00010447.
DOJ-OGR-00010418.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It lists Maxwell's defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser, the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman. The filing supports Maxwell's objections to the Presentence Investigation Report.
DOJ-OGR-00010291.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on March 15, 2022, it is the government's memorandum opposing the defendant's motion for a new trial. The prosecution team is headed by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00009870.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal motion filed on March 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial" for the case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00009801.jpg
This document is the preliminary statement of a memorandum filed by the United States Government on March 11, 2022, opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The Government argues that Maxwell has failed to meet the heavy burden required to prove juror misconduct during voir dire. The text cites legal precedents to support the finality of trials and argues the motion should be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00009799.jpg
This document is the cover page for the United States Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial. It was filed on March 11, 2022, in the Southern District of New York under case number S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The filing lists United States Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach as counsel for the government.
DOJ-OGR-00009770.jpg
This document is page 13 of a completed juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on March 24, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The juror answered 'No' to questions regarding whether they or their family have been subjects of grand jury investigations, victims of crimes, or parties to legal disputes involving US government agencies like the FBI or NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00009632.jpg
This document is a court order filed on March 7, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details an application by US Attorney Damian Williams to compel a redacted male witness to testify at a hearing scheduled for March 8, 2022, despite the witness refusing to do so based on his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The document cites Title 18, United States Code, Sections 6002 and 6003 regarding immunity and compulsion of testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00009627.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the Southern District of New York, signed by US Attorney Damian Williams on March 7, 2022. It requests the Court to issue an order compelling a redacted individual to testify at a March 8, 2022 hearing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The request is made pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 6002 and 6003, which typically relate to granting immunity to witnesses to compel testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00009563.jpg
This document is the cover page for the Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's Omnibus Post-Trial Motions, filed on February 25, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It lists Damian Williams as the U.S. Attorney and Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach as Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00002962.jpg
This document is a preliminary statement from the U.S. Government in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on April 16, 2021. The Government submits this memorandum to oppose twelve pre-trial motions filed by the defendant on January 25, 2021. The statement outlines the Government's arguments for denying the motions, asserting that they lack support in fact or law and addressing specific points such as the irrelevance of Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement and the timeliness of the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00002714.jpg
This document is page 21 of a defense motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense attorneys (Cohen & Gresser LLP) are requesting the Court order the government to disclose 'bad acts' evidence (Rule 404(b)) by March 12, 2021, a request the government previously denied. The document concludes the legal brief and is signed by Mark S. Cohen.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity