AJN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was submitted as evidence, labeled 'Government Exhibit 237', in the criminal case... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as Government Exhibit 903-R in the court case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal case | This document is Exhibit 932 for the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A photograph was entered into evidence as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 51-C' for the case 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, designated Government Exhibit 224-R, in the criminal cas... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence (Exhibit 904-R) in the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, designated as Government Exhibit 211, in the legal case ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A notebook was entered as evidence, designated as Government Exhibit 601 in case 52 20 Cr. 330 (A... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002038.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit F' in the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It was filed on December 14, 2020, and is marked as page 1 of 3. The document itself contains no substantive information beyond its identification as an exhibit and its case filing details.
DOJ-OGR-00002018.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit A' of Document 97-1, filed on December 14, 2020, in the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The page is marked with a Department of Justice production number (DOJ-OGR-00002018), indicating it is part of a larger submission in a legal proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00001977.jpg
This document is page 'iv' (page 5 of the PDF) from a legal filing dated December 14, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It serves as a Table of Authorities, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (relating to release or detention of a defendant pending trial) and Rule 5(F) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The page bears a Department of Justice discovery stamp (DOJ-OGR-00001977).
DOJ-OGR-00001941.jpg
This document is page 64 of a court transcript from a bail proceeding filed on December 10, 2020 (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues that the government is using tactics to circumvent the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by indicting conduct that is 25 years old. He cites the 'Annabi case' regarding the reach of plea agreements binding U.S. Attorney offices.
DOJ-OGR-00021544.jpg
This document is a court order filed on February 25, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Maxwell), ordering a public hearing to address potential juror misconduct. The court orders Juror 50 to appear on March 8, 2022, to testify under oath regarding answers given to Questions 25 and 48 on the jury questionnaire. The Judge also rules that Juror 50's privacy interests are outweighed by the presumption of public access given his public comments.
DOJ-OGR-00021533.jpg
This document is page 9 of a court order (Document 620) filed on February 25, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court rules that while a hearing is warranted regarding Juror 50's potential failure to disclose a history of sexual abuse, the Defendant has not justified an inquiry into Juror 50's social media usage. The Judge notes that Juror 50's minimal Twitter usage and explanation for deleting apps during jury selection do not implicate the 'McDonough' standard for juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00021530.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court order (Document 620) filed on February 25, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text discusses the legal standards required to hold a 'McDonough hearing' regarding juror nondisclosure, citing Second Circuit precedents that set a high bar for post-verdict inquiries to prevent juror harassment and 'fishing expeditions.' The court notes that the Defendant (Maxwell) argues against this standard but fails to provide an alternative.
DOJ-OGR-00021497.jpg
This document is a cover page labeled 'Exhibit 2' for a 'Draft Non-Prosecution Agreement' dated September 6, 2007. It contains legal case citations related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) and a later appellate or related case (Case 22-1426), along with a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00021455.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal filing, specifically an exhibit (SA-279) filed in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330) and later in an appellate case (22-1426). The text outlines specific Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC), focusing on candor in dealing with others and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, likely used to argue that attorneys involved in the underlying case (potentially the Epstein plea deal) violated ethical standards regarding honesty and misrepresentation.
DOJ-OGR-00021388.jpg
This is a page from a legal filing, identified by two different case numbers: Case 22-1426 (dated 06/29/2023) and Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (filed 04/16/21). The page itself is intentionally left blank, serving as a placeholder within the larger document. A Bates number at the bottom, DOJ-OGR-00021388, indicates it was processed by the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00021157.jpg
This document is Page 5 of a Criminal Judgment against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S2 20 CR 330), filed on June 29, 2022. It outlines the 'Standard Conditions of Supervision' for her supervised release, including requirements to report to a probation officer, maintain employment, restrictions on travel and weapons possession, and prohibitions against interacting with known criminals or acting as a confidential informant. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp indicating it is part of a larger production.
DOJ-OGR-00021156.jpg
This document is page 4 of 8 from a judgment in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S2 20 CR 330 AJN), filed on June 29, 2022. It specifies the terms of her supervised release, which includes 3 years for counts 3 and 4, and a concurrent 5 years for count 6. The document also lists mandatory conditions, such as making restitution, cooperating with DNA collection, and complying with sex offender registration requirements.
DOJ-OGR-00021154.jpg
This document is page 2 of a criminal judgment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2022. It lists additional counts of conviction, specifically Count 4 (Transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, ending in 1997) and Count 6 (Sex trafficking of a minor, ending in 2004). The document is marked as part of an appellate record from February 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00019592.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing from September 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061) before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to dismiss her appeal, submitted by her attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. The appeal originates from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00019586.jpg
This is a court filing from September 24, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061). Ghislaine Maxwell, through her attorneys Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., submits an unopposed motion to file three specific documents under seal: her unredacted opening brief, Appendix Volume 2, and an unredacted response to a government opposition motion. The document originates from an appeal of the case in the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00019508.jpg
This document is page 7 (labeled page 6 internally) of a court filing from July 2, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines the protocols for handling 'Confidential Information' during discovery, specifically defining what constitutes confidential material and establishing protections for the personal identification of victims and witnesses. It also sets the procedure for Defense Counsel to challenge confidential designations.
DOJ-OGR-00019472.jpg
This document is the first page of a Superseding Indictment (S1 20 Cr. 330) filed in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. Count One charges her with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts. The overview alleges that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell assisted Jeffrey Epstein in recruiting, grooming, and abusing girls as young as 14, knowing they were underage.
DOJ-OGR-00019400.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief filed on September 24, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061). It appeals a decision from the Southern District of New York (Case 20-CR-330) involving the United States of America. The document lists her legal representation as Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the Denver-based firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00019289.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell on September 10, 2020, requesting the consolidation of two appeals. The first is from her criminal case (United States v. Maxwell) and the second is from a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell). Maxwell argues the cases are intertwined because new information from the criminal case is relevant to the court's decision to unseal deposition material in the civil case.
DOJ-OGR-00019247.jpg
This document is a screenshot of a UPS tracking page, filed as Exhibit 15-2 in Case 1:20-cv-03380-AJN on September 4, 2020. It displays the tracking interface for a 'UPS Next Day Air' shipment, though the specific status is collapsed. The URL at the bottom reveals the specific tracking number 1ZF4661F0194176904.
DOJ-OGR-00019244.jpg
This document is a UPS Next Day Air shipping label for a package sent by Renee McReynolds of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P. in Denver, CO. The package, filed on September 4, 2020, was addressed to the Clerk of Court at the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in New York City. The shipment's reference line indicates it pertains to the legal case 'Maxwell 20 cr. 330 (AJN)'.
DOJ-OGR-00019239.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed by Ghislaine Maxwell on September 3, 2020 (received September 4, 2020) in the Southern District of New York. Maxwell is appealing a September 2, 2020 court order that denied her motion to modify a protective order. The filing cites legal precedents (Pichler v. UNITE, Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., and Brown v. Maxwell) to establish jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity