AJN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was submitted as evidence, labeled 'Government Exhibit 237', in the criminal case... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as Government Exhibit 903-R in the court case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal case | This document is Exhibit 932 for the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A photograph was entered into evidence as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 51-C' for the case 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, designated Government Exhibit 224-R, in the criminal cas... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence (Exhibit 904-R) in the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, designated as Government Exhibit 211, in the legal case ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A notebook was entered as evidence, designated as Government Exhibit 601 in case 52 20 Cr. 330 (A... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002235.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Document 106) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 30, 2020. It outlines the legal standards for pretrial detention and bail under the Eighth Amendment and the Bail Reform Act. It notes that the defendant (Maxwell) did not appeal the initial detention order and remains incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center.
DOJ-OGR-00002234(1).jpg
This document is page 2 of a Court Opinion and Order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail, citing flight risk, substantial resources, foreign citizenship in a non-extradition country, and lack of candor regarding finances. It outlines the background of the case, including the June 2020 indictment for facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors and the Defendant's subsequent arrest in New Hampshire.
DOJ-OGR-00002226(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit B', filed as part of a legal proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) on December 23, 2020. It is the first page of a four-page document and includes a Bates number from the Department of Justice (DOJ-OGR-00002226).
DOJ-OGR-00002222.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit A' as part of a legal filing. It was filed on December 23, 2020, in case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN and is marked as page 1 of 4. The page also includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) Bates number.
DOJ-OGR-00002215(1).jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 103) from December 23, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that Maxwell and her spouse only discussed divorce prior to her arrest to protect him from 'terrible consequences,' not because the relationship was failing, and asserts that the spouse is willing to co-sign her bond. It also defends Maxwell's financial disclosures, stating she has pledged all her and her spouse's assets and that the government has not successfully challenged the accuracy of her financial report.
DOJ-OGR-00002207(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a 'Reply Memorandum' filed on December 23, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The filing is in support of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. It lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002190(1).jpg
This document is page 29 of a legal filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (identified by case number). The text presents the prosecution's argument against granting bail, citing the defendant's wealth, foreign ties, and skill at hiding as flight risks. It argues that a 'privately funded jail' and GPS monitoring are insufficient to ensure appearance in court, citing legal precedents (Banki, Zarger, Benatar) to support the claim that electronic monitoring merely reduces a head start rather than preventing flight.
DOJ-OGR-00002171.jpg
This page is from a legal filing dated December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), though the defendant is not explicitly named in the body text. The text outlines legal arguments regarding pre-trial detention, citing the Bail Reform Act and specific statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 2422, 2423) related to sex offenses involving minors, which create a presumption of detention. It discusses the legal standards for reopening a detention hearing and the burden of proof regarding flight risk, citing precedents from the Second Circuit and S.D.N.Y.
DOJ-OGR-00002171(1).jpg
This page is from a legal filing dated December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), though the defendant is not explicitly named in the body text. The text outlines legal arguments regarding pre-trial detention, citing the Bail Reform Act and specific statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 2422, 2423) related to sex offenses involving minors, which create a presumption of detention. It discusses the legal standards for reopening a detention hearing and the burden of proof regarding flight risk, citing precedents from the Second Circuit and S.D.N.Y.
DOJ-OGR-00002165.jpg
This document is the first page of the Government's memorandum opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, filed on December 18, 2020, in the SDNY. The Government argues that Maxwell remains a serious flight risk due to her extensive financial resources and foreign ties, citing the Court's previous denial of bail on July 14, 2020. The prosecution asserts that the new defense motion merely repackages old arguments and offers financial details the Court previously deemed irrelevant to the flight risk determination.
DOJ-OGR-00002163.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal memorandum filed by the government on December 18, 2020, in case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The memorandum is in opposition to the defendant's renewed motion for release. The contents outline the government's arguments, including the background of the case, applicable law, and a discussion of the offense, evidence, the defendant's characteristics, and conditions of confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00002148.jpg
This document is a cover page for 'Exhibit A' from a legal filing. It is identified as page 24 of 30 of Document 97-22 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 14, 2020. The page is also marked with the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00002148.
DOJ-OGR-00002121.jpg
This document is Page 26 of a legal filing (Document 97-21) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. It contains a table summarizing procedural timelines and statutory rules under the UK's Extradition Act 2003, specifically detailing scenarios where a person consents to extradition versus those requiring a hearing. The document outlines the roles of the Secretary of State and the Extradition Judge in extending deadlines and ordering removal.
DOJ-OGR-00002119.jpg
This document is a single page from a legal filing, specifically the cover page for 'Annex D'. It is page 24 of Document 97-21, filed on December 14, 2020, in case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The page is also marked with a Department of Justice (DOJ) Bates number.
DOJ-OGR-00002106.jpg
This page is part of a legal filing (Document 97-21) filed on December 14, 2020, analyzing the likelihood of Ghislaine Maxwell successfully contesting extradition under UK law. The text argues that Maxwell cannot rely on 'passage of time' or 'forum' bars to prevent extradition, citing that while some conduct occurred in London, the majority of harm occurred in the US. It heavily references the Extradition Act 2003 and various legal precedents (Tollman, Gomes, Kakis).
DOJ-OGR-00002089.jpg
This document is a cover or separator page from a legal filing dated December 14, 2020, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal case). The page is titled 'Waiver of Extradition: United Kingdom' and bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002089.
DOJ-OGR-00002088.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit T', filed on December 14, 2020, as part of legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It is marked with a Department of Justice document number (DOJ-OGR-00002088). The page itself contains no substantive information beyond identifying the exhibit.
DOJ-OGR-00002044.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit H', which is part of Document 97-8 filed on December 14, 2020, in the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The Bates number DOJ-OGR-00002044 suggests it is a document produced by the Department of Justice.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity