SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00013618.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of witness Ms. Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz regarding her travel to New York. Ms. Farmer testifies that she flew commercially and alone to New York, did not pay for her own ticket, and begins to mention meeting Epstein before being interrupted by a hearsay objection from Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00013617.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of witness Annie Farmer by Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies that her sister, Maria, told her about a trip to New York where Jeffrey Epstein was interested in helping Annie with her education and was purchasing her travel ticket. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects on hearsay grounds, but the objection is overruled by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00013616.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness identified as A. Farmer. The witness testifies about visiting her sister, Maria, in New York in December 1995 while Maria was working for Jeffrey Epstein. The witness states she could not afford the travel herself and that Jeffrey Epstein purchased the plane ticket for her.
DOJ-OGR-00013615.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness identified as A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness describes their family's difficult financial situation during their teenage years, noting their parents were divorced and their mother, a sales rep for Owen Company, supported the family with little help. The witness also provides details about their older sister, Maria Farmer, who lived in Manhattan and worked as a painter after completing graduate school.
DOJ-OGR-00013614.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a witness named Annie Farmer identifies the defendant, Maxwell, in the courtroom and testifies that Maxwell gave her a massage when she was 16 years old. At that time, Farmer was living in Arizona with her mother and sister, Ashley.
DOJ-OGR-00013613.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness identified as 'A. Farmer' (Annie Farmer), conducted by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony covers the witness's background, including her birth in Missouri, upbringing in Arizona, and education at the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Texas at Austin, culminating in her current profession as a psychologist.
DOJ-OGR-00013612.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of witness A. Farmer (age 42) by Ms. Pomerantz. The text includes judicial instructions regarding the relevance of testimony concerning 'illegal sexual activity' relative to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell, and the introduction of Government Exhibit 13, which is noted as being under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00013608.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the direct examination of Supervisory Investigator Brown by attorney Mr. Rohrbach regarding Government Exhibits 21 and 22. The court admits Exhibit 21 under seal to protect witness identities, and Brown testifies that Exhibit 22 is a DMV image capture of the same person, stored in a photosystem database.
DOJ-OGR-00013607.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Brown. The witness identifies Government Exhibit 21 as a fair and accurate report from the New York State DMV's 'compass database,' which they state is used to store records of ID cards and driver's licenses in the ordinary course of business. An attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, is noted as offering the exhibit on behalf of the government.
DOJ-OGR-00013606.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Brown, who works as a supervisor/investigator. Brown describes the process for obtaining an identification card from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), including the required application steps, personal information, and the types of original documents (e.g., social security card, passport) that must be presented for verification.
DOJ-OGR-00013605.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the beginning of testimony in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The government's attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, calls William Brown to the stand as a witness. After being sworn in, Mr. Brown states his name and testifies that he works for the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Division of Field Investigations.
DOJ-OGR-00013604.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a courtroom exchange where Prosecutor Ms. Moe asks jurors to review Government Exhibit 52G (sealed), specifically trying to point them to entries regarding 'massage, Florida.' Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to this direction, and the objection is sustained by the Court, allowing jurors to review the document without specific direction.
DOJ-OGR-00013603.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a proceeding where several government exhibits are admitted into evidence. The judge gives a limiting instruction to the jury, stating the exhibits should only be used to consider a potential link between a "Ms. Maxwell" and other information, not for the truth of the matter asserted. At the request of Ms. Moe and with no objection from Mr. Pagliuca, the court agrees to seal the exhibits to protect witness identities.
DOJ-OGR-00013601.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the judge and two counsels, Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger, clarifying that only specific parts ('subletters') of an evidence item ('52') are being moved into the record. After a brief recess, the judge confirms with counsel that they are ready to proceed and instructs that the jury be brought in.
DOJ-OGR-00013600.jpg
A page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed August 10, 2022. The prosecutor (Ms. Moe) argues that specific evidence is relevant to prove a female subject was an adult in the 2000s and therefore could not have been an 'underage girl' personal assistant at that time, rebutting a defense photograph. The Court agrees the rebuttal is relevant and allows it, before moving to a sidebar to discuss jury instructions.
DOJ-OGR-00013598.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between Ms. Moe and the Court about a rebuttal witness. Ms. Moe argues that an exhibit, containing a picture and date of birth, was disclosed to the defense as soon as it was received and that the information is already known to the defendant. The Court considers the procedural aspects of calling the person as a rebuttal witness.
DOJ-OGR-00013596.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The proceedings involve discussions between the Judge and attorneys (Ms. Moe, Ms. Menninger, Mr. Pagliuca) regarding limiting instructions for a witness named Ms. Farmer, modeled after a previous witness named Kate. Additionally, attorney Mr. Pagliuca discloses a new witness, William Brown, a DMV record custodian relevant to identity verification.
DOJ-OGR-00013595.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT), Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Moe regarding the procedural handling of an exhibit numbered '52'. The attorneys raise concerns about the exhibit's partial admission, relevance, and the jury's ability to evaluate its authenticity and weight without access to the full physical object.
DOJ-OGR-00013594.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the judge. Mr. Pagliuca clarifies his objection concerning an exhibit, explaining that while he agrees to photocopies being shown to the jury as requested by the government, he insists the complete, original exhibit be entered into the official record for any future appellate proceedings. The core issue is the distinction between the evidence presented to the jury and the evidence preserved for the formal court record.
DOJ-OGR-00013593.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a procedural discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and two counsels, Ms. Moe and Mr. Pagliuca, regarding the correct method for offering 'Government Exhibit 52' and its excerpts into evidence. The counsels clarify whether the entire document should be offered foundationally with excerpts for the jury, ultimately agreeing on the process.
DOJ-OGR-00013590.jpg
This document is the final page (49 of 49) of a court transcript index filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the examination of witness Tracy Chapell by attorneys Mr. Rohrbach (Direct) and Mr. Everdell (Cross). It also indexes Government Exhibits 801-803 and Defendant Exhibit TC-1.
DOJ-OGR-00013589.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It records the end of a day's session where counsel for both sides, Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell, confirm they have no further business, leading the Court to adjourn the proceedings until 8:45 a.m. on December 10, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00013588.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the adjournment of a trial. The judge informs the jury that an attorney involved in the case has fallen ill, possibly with COVID, necessitating a break in the proceedings. The court is recessed for the day with the intention of resuming the following morning.
DOJ-OGR-00013587.jpg
A court transcript page filed on August 10, 2022, documenting a procedural pause in a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Comey request a private discussion in the robing room with the defense's consent, leading the judge to excuse the jury. The transcript notes that the subsequent pages (2020-2024) regarding this discussion are sealed.
DOJ-OGR-00013586.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell successfully offers 'Defense Exhibit TC-1', related to FedEx business invoices, into evidence under a temporary seal. After the exhibit is admitted and made available to the jury, Mr. Everdell concludes his questioning, and the witness is excused by the court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity