This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). Rodgers admits that his previous statement to the government—that he first met 'Jane' around 2000—was based on memory without researching his logbooks and was 'a couple of years off.' The attorney points out that flight logs from 1996, 1997, and 1998 show a passenger with Jane's first name, establishing an earlier connection than Rodgers initially recalled.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' past interviews with the FBI in 2006 and with prosecutors in 2020 regarding flights he piloted for Epstein. The interrogator specifically asks about an entry in Rodgers' flight log for a person named 'Jane' and whether she was discussed in the initial FBI interview.
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on establishing that the witness's memory of meeting 'Jane' on Epstein's plane on November 11, 1996, is derived solely from reviewing flight logs rather than independent recollection. The flight log entry for that date reportedly lists only a first name, which matches 'Jane's' true first name.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. The judge calls for a mid-afternoon break during the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. After a recess, Mr. Everdell informs the court that he is not yet halfway through his questioning, indicating the examination will continue for some time.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning establishes that Rodgers' testimony about the number and timing of flights, including those to Interlochen, is not based on independent memory but on a 'refreshed recollection' from reviewing flight records and logbooks.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on establishing that Rodgers flew an unnamed male to Interlochen, Michigan, on seven separate occasions between 1991 and 1997. The trips were typically in August for the purpose of watching end-of-the-year performances.
This document is page 194 from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. The testimony initially covers legal liability regarding aircraft ownership, during which prosecutor Ms. Comey successfully objects multiple times. The questioning then shifts to specific flights and the witness's familiarity with Interlochen, described as a summer arts camp for musicians and singers.
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony establishes that helicopters were owned by 'Air Ghislaine, Inc.' and purchased by Jeffrey Epstein from Sikorsky. The questioning attorney attempts to establish that Epstein controlled the companies owning the aircraft, and questions the witness's employment history prior to working for Epstein.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that Jeffrey Epstein controlled the companies that owned his aircraft: JEGE, Incorporated owned the Boeing 727, and Hyperion Air owned the Gulfstream. The witness also estimates that Epstein purchased a Bell helicopter in November 2002.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers. The witness confirms that he did not share his personal pilot logbooks with Ghislaine Maxwell and that she would not have known who was flying on the planes unless she was on the flight herself. The questioning then shifts to the ownership structure (LLCs) of Epstein's Gulfstream and Boeing aircraft between 1994 and 2004.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers confirms sending flight manifests, which were separate from the flight logbook and also held by Larry Visoski, to Epstein's New York office on a monthly basis. The witness explicitly denies sending these same manifests to Ghislaine.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. Rodgers confirms the procedures for logging passengers on a plane associated with Epstein, stating that frequent passengers like Sarah Kellen were abbreviated by initials, while new passengers' full names were used. He also affirms that Epstein's friends, acquaintances, and family would fly on the plane with him, sometimes just for a 'lift'.
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' practices for recording passengers in flight logbooks for 'Epstein's planes'. Rodgers confirms that for frequent, recognized passengers, they would often use initials instead of full names to save space, citing 'SK' as an example of such an entry.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' personal practice as a pilot of transcribing passenger names from manifests into a personal logbook. It also explores how Rodgers would record passengers whose names were unknown, using placeholders like "one passenger" or "one PAX," and sometimes noting their gender.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the pilot's practice of maintaining passenger manifests and logbooks (specifically Government's Exhibit 662), distinguishing between FAA requirements versus personal practice, particularly regarding international flights and customs clearance.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) regarding flight protocols. Rodgers testifies that he was not always told the names of all passengers, did not always meet them, and that airline regulations did not require him to gather passenger names.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Rodgers in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The testimony covers Rodgers' inability to recall Sarah Kellen's phone number despite seeing it in a binder, and shifts to discuss the logistical requirements for scheduling flights for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically the need for destination and departure time.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on transportation arrangements, confirming the witness handled their own, and their communications in the 2000s, specifically confirming they used cell phones to discuss flights and spoke with an individual named Sarah Kellen frequently enough to have her number saved.
This document is a page from a court transcript involving the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on flight scheduling protocols in the early 2000s, establishing that Sarah Kellen primarily coordinated flights with the chief pilot, Larry, rather than Rodgers. Rodgers confirms that he first met Sarah Kellen in September 2001, which coincides with her first appearance on his flight logs.
This court transcript excerpt details the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding flight scheduling procedures. The witness confirms that in the 1990s, they would coordinate with Ghislaine if she was flying, or otherwise with one of Epstein's secretaries. The witness then identifies Lesley Groff as Epstein's secretary in the 2000s with whom they would have coordinated.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers testifies about the process of scheduling flights during the 1990s, stating that while they occasionally spoke directly with Mr. Epstein or Ghislaine, the primary point of contact was typically Epstein's secretary in New York.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, who was a pilot for Epstein. Rodgers testifies to never observing any evidence of sexual activity on the flights, such as discarded clothes, sex toys, or condoms, and states they have no reason to believe Epstein engaged in sexual activity with underage girls or women on the flights they piloted. The questioning then begins to explore the flight scheduling process, mentioning that Rodgers and a Larry Visoski would be alerted before a flight.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a pilot named Rodgers (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on the layout of Gulfstream and Boeing aircraft, specifically regarding pilot access to restrooms and coffee, and whether the pilot ever observed sexual activity in the passenger cabin (which the witness denies). The questioning also touches on pilot responsibilities for cleaning the cabin after flights.
This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers in the case involving Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The questioning focuses on the lack of rules regarding the pilot's interaction with passengers and other staff, as well as the logistics of leaving the cockpit to use the restroom on a Gulfstream jet during long flights to Europe.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of pilot David Rodgers (filed Aug 10, 2022). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell questions Rodgers about flight protocols on Epstein's Gulfstream and Boeing aircraft, specifically confirming that while cockpit doors were closed, Epstein never explicitly instructed Rodgers that he could not leave the cockpit or mingle with passengers.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity