SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00013584.jpg
This document is page 43 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell is cross-examining a witness named Ms. Chapell regarding her verification of 'Jeffrey Epstein invoices.' The attorney introduces Defendant's Exhibit TC-1, which the witness identifies as invoices belonging to Epstein that were provided to her by the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00013583.jpg
This document is page 42 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell. The testimony focuses on the witness verifying 'several hundred' invoices provided by the defense against archived business records stored in boxes in a warehouse. The witness confirms that these records pertained to two specific accounts owned by Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00013582.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on her preparation for testimony, confirming she had phone calls with the government and that they sent her three old FedEx invoices to verify. The invoices are related to packages potentially sent by G. Maxwell to individuals named Carolyn or Cardine.
DOJ-OGR-00013581.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell. The testimony focuses on FedEx shipping invoices from December 2002, confirming that G. Maxwell sent packages to Laura Casey Wasserman and Danny Hillis, explicitly noting that these recipients were not named Carolyn or Cardine.
DOJ-OGR-00013580.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell. The questioning focuses on an invoice detailing package shipments from 2002, establishing that J. Epstein sent a package to a recipient referred to as "Jane" on December 12, 2002. The testimony explicitly clarifies that the sender was not Ghislaine Maxwell, and also mentions a separate FedEx shipment from December 9, 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00013579.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell. The testimony focuses on a FedEx shipment from December 12, 2002, sent by 'J. Epstein' to a recipient named 'Cardine' in West Palm Beach, Florida. The questioning attorney specifically seeks to establish that the sender was Jeffrey Epstein, not Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00013578.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell, by an attorney, Mr. Everdell, regarding an invoice. The questioning establishes that packages were sent by G. Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein to Isabel Maxwell and Ron Burckle, and specifically confirms that no package was sent to a person named Carolyn according to the invoice.
DOJ-OGR-00013577.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on an invoice (page 8) detailing FedEx shipments from 2002, establishing that 'G. Maxwell' sent packages to 'Lisa Anasrons' on December 9th, and to 'Isabel Maxwell' and 'Ron Burckle' on December 10th.
DOJ-OGR-00013575.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Ms. Chapell regarding a 2002 invoice (Exhibit 801-R) associated with Jeffrey Epstein's account at 457 Madison Avenue. The testimony specifically confirms a FedEx shipment picked up on December 3, 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00013574.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Chapell) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on a shipping invoice from 'October' where Ghislaine Maxwell is listed as the sender and Casey Wasserman is the recipient, with Jeffrey Epstein and the address 457 Madison Avenue also listed on the document. The defense specifically establishes that this invoice does not contain any transaction involving a recipient named 'Carolyn'.
DOJ-OGR-00013573.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell. The questioning focuses on an invoice and two shipments that occurred on October 7, 2002, one of which was sent by Cecilia Steen. The questioner also makes a point to establish that Cecilia Steen and Ghislaine Maxwell are not the same person.
DOJ-OGR-00013572.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Chapell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a FedEx package sent from 457 Madison Avenue listing 'Cecilia Steen' and 'Jeffrey E. Epstein' as the senders. The package was addressed to a recipient named 'Caroline' (last name withheld) in West Palm Beach, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00013571.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed August 10, 2022) documenting the cross-examination of Ms. Chapell by attorney Mr. Everdell. They are reviewing Government's Exhibit 803-R, a FedEx invoice dated October 14, 2002, associated with Jeffrey Epstein's account at 457 Madison Avenue, New York. The testimony confirms a specific shipment occurred on October 7, 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00013570.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell by attorney Mr. Everdell regarding FedEx invoices (Exhibits 801, 802, and 803) from late 2002 associated with Jeffrey Epstein's account. The discussion focuses on orienting the jury to specific pages of Government Exhibit 803.
DOJ-OGR-00013569.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell, by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The testimony concerns a package sent on October 7, 2002, which listed the names Cecilia Steen and Jeffrey E. Epstein, had a shipping address of 457 Madison Avenue, New York, and was sent to a recipient named Caroline in West Palm Beach, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00013568.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. The testimony focuses on Government Exhibit 802, establishing that a package was sent by J. Epstein from 457 Madison Avenue, New York, on December 12, 2002. The recipient was an individual with the first name Cardine, located in West Palm Beach, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00013567.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, regarding a package shipped on December 3, 2002. The testimony establishes the sender's address as 457 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, and the recipient as a person named Carolyn in West Palm Beach, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00013566.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. The testimony focuses on an invoice, identified as Government Exhibit 801, where Ms. Chapell confirms that Jeffrey E. Epstein is the account holder. She further testifies that S. Kellen was the sender of a related package, with Epstein's name also appearing on it.
DOJ-OGR-00013564.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where government exhibits are being entered into evidence. Attorney Mr. Rohrbach questions a witness, Ms. Chapell, who identifies Government Exhibit 802 as an invoice connected to Jeffrey E. Epstein's account. The government then requests that this exhibit be placed under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00013562.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) featuring the direct examination of Ms. Chapell, a Senior Paralegal at Federal Express Corporation. Questioned by Mr. Rohrbach, she confirms her role involves responding to subpoenas and producing records. She testifies to her familiarity with FedEx's billing invoices, explaining they are generated through 'scanning events' and the revenue service department.
DOJ-OGR-00013561.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the court proceedings as they resume, with the judge bringing in the jury and then allowing the government's attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, to call his next witness, Tracy Chapell, for direct examination.
DOJ-OGR-00013559.jpg
A transcript page from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge discusses a potential stipulation regarding testimony from Mr. Glassman about advice he gave to 'Jane' concerning cooperation with the government, aiming to avoid attorney-client privilege issues. The court also addresses administrative matters regarding letters submitted the previous night.
DOJ-OGR-00013558.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022. The judge and attorneys for the government and defense discuss the scheduling of future trial events, such as the charge conference and closing arguments, which depends on when the defense will rest its case. A defense attorney, Ms. Comey, also brings up an unresolved issue regarding a subpoena issued to a Mr. Glassman.
DOJ-OGR-00013556.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 757, filed 2022-08-10). The discussion primarily revolves around the nature of closing arguments, the proper method for presenting evidence (specifically regarding a witness's personal experience), and an 'Exhibit 52 issue.' The Court, Ms. Moe, Mr. Pagliuca (representing the defense), and Ms. Comey participate in the dialogue, clarifying procedural matters related to the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00013555.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural argument between legal counsel and the judge. The discussion centers on the appropriate method for presenting exhibits to a jury, specifically concerning a witness, Mr. Buscemi, whose testimony would be limited to simply identifying the items. An attorney, Ms. Moe, defends her proposed streamlined approach against objections that it is improper and prevents substantive cross-examination.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity