| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed author
|
Correspondent |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr Leslie Wexner
|
Financial |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed author
|
Correspondents |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Correspondents |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
The Clintons
|
Donor |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Close association |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Kevin Spacey
|
Close association |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Close association |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Kevin Spacey
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
The Clintons (Bill and Hilary)
|
Philanthropic donor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Clintons
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JACK A. GOLDBERGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Guy P. Fronstin, Esq.
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E.
|
Friend |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The proposal suggests considering 'some kind of annual event which brings together your business ... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed call between the production team and the recipient. | Phone/Remote | View |
| 2016-10-09 | N/A | Dinner meeting | Unknown | View |
| 2016-01-22 | N/A | Email exchange between Jeffrey E. and an unnamed person regarding a disturbing conversation Jeffr... | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-12 | N/A | Deadline for the recipient to respond to The Guardian's request for comment. | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-12 | N/A | Deadline (18:00) for the recipient to respond to The Guardian's request for comment before public... | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | The recipient pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution and procuring minors for prostitutio... | N/A | View |
An email from Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com) dated October 9, 2016. Epstein comments on the 2016 election, specifically Donald Trump's tactic of highlighting Bill Clinton's accusers to counter Hillary Clinton's narrative on victims. Epstein reminds the recipient that he had predicted or explained this scenario to them previously during a dinner.
An email correspondence from 'Bob' (likely biologist Robert Trivers) to an associate of the 'ELF' (likely Epstein's foundation). The email discusses a potential funding proposal, the author's failure to get hired at Texas A&M due to controversy surrounding his research on honor killings and beauty metrics, and includes a graphic sexual anecdote about a woman he met in New Orleans regarding transsexual fantasies.
This document is an email from journalist Tim Malloy to an unnamed individual with a background in PR and show business who was an acquaintance of Jeffrey Epstein. Malloy is soliciting the recipient's participation or insight for an upcoming Netflix documentary series (produced by Lisa Bryant and Joe Berlinger, with James Patterson consulting). The email includes a legal disclaimer referencing 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and a specific contact email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
This document is a formal request for comment from journalists (including Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia Hughes) to a prominent physics professor (identifiable as Lawrence Krauss by the biographical details) regarding an upcoming story on sexual misconduct allegations. The text details specific incidents of alleged assault and harassment occurring between 2006 and 2007 at the Center for Inquiry in D.C. and Case Western Reserve University. The document is stamped with a House Oversight footer, indicating it is part of an investigation, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's connections to academia.
This document is a letter from David Pegg of The Guardian newspaper to an unnamed individual, strongly implied to be Jeffrey Epstein, dated just before January 12, 2015. The letter lists several points for comment before an article's publication, including the recipient's 2008 conviction for procuring minors, associations with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Kevin Spacey, and financial links to Leslie Wexner. It sets a firm deadline for a response and specifies what constitutes a substantive reply.
This document is a personal correspondence, likely an email, from an unidentified author to a recipient. The author engages in a philosophical and provocative discussion on topics such as overpopulation, climate change, and fascism, referencing personal experiences like visiting Buchenwald and literary works. The author also recounts attending a 'Forbidden Research conference' and reflects on the recipient's 'political incorrectness'.
This document, an email identified as being from Jeffrey Epstein via the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026414' document number, contains speculative and controversial theories on race, gender, and intelligence. The author discusses altering brain development to 'make blacks smarter', stereotypes various ethnic and gender groups based on perceived cognitive and motivational differences, and critiques linguist Noam Chomsky's theories on language.
A typed document contains commentary on a range of controversial topics, including overpopulation, climate change, fascism, and political correctness. The author discusses the potential 'benefits' of climate change, analyzes fascism through the lens of fiction like "The Man in the High Castle," and critiques the lack of genuine contrarian thought at a "Forbidden Research" conference.
This document, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, is a written text from an unnamed author to an unnamed recipient. The author lays out a series of racist, sexist, and pseudo-scientific theories about differences in intelligence and cognition among races (Black, European, Chinese, Jewish) and genders. The text disputes established science, dismisses social factors for developmental differences, and challenges linguist Noam Chomsky's theories on language acquisition.
This undated document is a personal letter or note from an unidentified author to a recipient (likely Jeffrey Epstein) discussing philosophical topics such as overpopulation, climate change, and fascism. The author, who identifies as East German, analyzes the recipient's 'political incorrectness' and recounts discussions from a 'Forbidden Research conference' about politics and diversity. A significant portion is dedicated to a critical analysis of the communication skills and methods of 'Joi' (likely Joi Ito), alleging he sanitizes topics and has others write his material.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Unnamed recipient | Clintons' philant... | $0.00 | The document states that the recipient has made... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Unnamed recipient | Clintons' philant... | $0.00 | The document states that the recipient has made... | View |
The author responds to the recipient's ideas about 'layers' of development and speculates on racial and gender differences in intelligence, cognition, and motivation. The author proposes theories about Black people's motor vs. cognitive development, gender differences in motivation for STEM fields, and intellectual traits of Chinese and Jewish people. The author also challenges Chomsky's theory of language acquisition and relates different musical styles (African, Western, Chinese) to cognitive structures.
Malloy requests the recipient's participation/insight for a Netflix documentary on Epstein, citing their PR reputation and acquaintance with Epstein.
The document discusses phone calls made to a house, where callers left messages identifying themselves. This information was memorialized by a witness.
O'Connor lists cases (Church of the Holy Trinity vs. United States; Zorach vs. Clauson; McGowan vs. Maryland) containing statements to the effect that the US is a Christian nation.
The author discusses pseudoscientific theories about intelligence, genetics, race, and gender. The author speculates about making 'blacks smarter' through genetic manipulation, discusses supposed developmental differences in Black children, gender differences in motivation for STEM fields, and perceived cultural traits of Chinese and Jewish people. The author also disputes Chomsky's theory of language acquisition.
The author responds to the recipient's ideas about 'layers' in the brain and speculates on using genetic or other methods to alter brain development times to 'make blacks smarter'. The author discusses theories on racial and gender differences in intelligence, motivation, and evolutionary adaptation, stereotypes various groups (Black people, Europeans, women, men, Chinese, Jews), and refutes Noam Chomsky's linguistic theories.
The entire document is a communication from an unnamed author to an unnamed recipient, discussing topics like overpopulation, fascism, political correctness, and events at a conference. The author is responding to the recipient's 'political incorrectness'.
The author discusses various controversial topics, including climate change as a means of overpopulation control and the 'efficiency' of fascism. The author also analyzes the recipient's 'political incorrectness' and the communication style of a person named 'Joi'.
The author discusses various philosophical and controversial topics, including overpopulation, fascism, and political discourse, referencing literature and personal experiences. The author is responding to the recipient's 'political incorrectness'.
The author discusses various philosophical and controversial topics, including overpopulation, fascism, and political discourse, referencing literature and personal experiences. The author is responding to the recipient's 'political incorrectness'.
The author responds to the recipient's ideas about 'layers' of development and speculates on racial and gender differences in intelligence, cognition, and motivation. The author proposes theories about Black people's motor vs. cognitive development, gender differences in motivation for STEM fields, and intellectual traits of Chinese and Jewish people. The author also challenges Chomsky's theory of language acquisition and relates different musical styles (African, Western, Chinese) to cognitive structures.
Fuller discusses the negative impact of online information regarding the recipient on MC2's branding. He urges the recipient to get the information removed and suggests seeking therapy for depression.
A letter requesting the recipient to review their files for two specific items: an interview with Christina Venero and unredacted pages of a Police Incident Report.
An email chain initiated by Jeffrey E. stating 'talking to macgiver, disturbs me, and that takes a lot'. An unnamed person replies, 'What part do you find disturbing? Do you think he is losing it?'.
An email chain initiated by Jeffrey E. stating 'talking to macgiver, disturbs me, and that takes a lot'. An unnamed person replies, 'What part do you find disturbing? Do you think he is losing it?'.
An email chain initiated by Jeffrey E. stating 'talking to macgiver, disturbs me, and that takes a lot'. An unnamed person replies, 'What part do you find disturbing? Do you think he is losing it?'.
A letter from David Pegg of The Guardian to an unnamed person, requesting comment on their alleged links to Leslie Wexner, close association with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Kevin Spacey, and substantial contributions to Clinton philanthropic causes. A deadline for response is set for 18:00 on Monday, January 12th, 2015.
An analysis of market conditions, focusing on the impact of a US SPR release on oil markets and European geopolitics. The email proposes several specific WTI crude oil options trading strategies for 5-day and 35-day expiries. Tazia is CC'd to potentially assist with pricing and liquidity.
An analysis of market conditions, focusing on the impact of a US SPR release on oil markets and European geopolitics. The email proposes several specific WTI crude oil options trading strategies for 5-day and 35-day expiries. Tazia is CC'd to potentially assist with pricing and liquidity.
Attorney Guy P. Fronstin sends a fax confirming an acceptance and requests the recipient to cancel a Grand Jury presentation scheduled for the next day to proceed with filing, processing, and a plea resolution.
A female voice identified as [REDACTED] requested a call back regarding police questioning.
A letter from David Pegg of The Guardian to an unnamed recipient, giving them an opportunity to comment on several points before a story is published. The points include links to Leslie Wexner, associations with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Kevin Spacey, and contributions to Clinton-related charities. A response deadline of 18:00 on Monday, January 12th, 2015 is given.
A letter from David Pegg of The Guardian to an unnamed recipient, giving them an opportunity to comment on several points before a story is published. The points include links to Leslie Wexner, associations with Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Kevin Spacey, and contributions to Clinton-related charities. A response deadline of 18:00 on Monday, January 12th, 2015 is given.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity